OMB files this
comment in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.11( c ). This OMB action is
not an approval to conduct or sponsor an information collection
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This action has no
effect on any current approvals. If OMB has assigned this ICR a new
OMB Control Number, the OMB Control Number will not appear in the
active inventory. For future submissions of this information
collection, reference the OMB Control Number provided. In
accordance with 5 CFR 1320, OMB is withholding approval of this
information collection. Prior to the publication of the final rule,
the agency must provide to OMB a summary of all comments pertaining
to the information collection burden imposed by this rule and any
changes made in response to these comments.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
36 Months From Approved
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PHMSA proposes to amend 49 CFR §
192.634 and 49 CFR § 195.418 to require pipeline operators who
elect to use alternative equivalent technology onshore rupture
mitigation activities to notify, in accordance with § 192.949, the
Office of Pipeline Safety at least 90 days in advance of use. This
notification requirement is mandatory. An operator choosing this
option must send a technical and safety evaluation, including
design, construction, and operating procedures for the alternative
equivalent technology to the Associate Administrator of Pipeline
Safety with the notification. PHMSA would then have 90 days to
object to the alternative equivalent technology via letter from the
Associate Administrator of Pipeline Safety; otherwise, the
alternative equivalent technology would be acceptable for
use.
US Code:
49
USC 60102 Name of Law: Pipeline Safety Laws
The NPRM Pipeline Safety:
Amendments to Parts 192 and 195 to Require Valve Installation and
Minimum Rupture Detection Standards proposes a new paragraph (d) in
both 49 CFR § 192.634 and 49 CFR § 195.418 requiring operators who
elect to use alternative equivalent technology to notify, in
accordance with § 192.949, the Office of Pipeline Safety at least
90 days in advance of use. An operator choosing this option must
include a technical and safety evaluation, including design,
construction, and operating procedures for the alternative
equivalent technology to the Associate Administrator of Pipeline
Safety with the notification. PHMSA would then have 90 days to
object to the alternative equivalent technology via letter from the
Associate Administrator of Pipeline Safety; otherwise, the
alternative equivalent technology would be acceptable for use.
PHMSA estimates this notification requirement will result in 2
responses annually and has allotted each respondent 40 hours per
response to conduct this task.
No
No
No
No
No
No
Uncollected
Angela Dow 202 366-1246
angela.dow@dot.gov
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
Alternative Equivalent Technology for Onshore Rupture Mitigation Notifications.docx
Alternative Equivalent Technology for Onshore Rupture Mitigation Notifications