Download:
pdf |
pdfOMB No. 3117‐0016/USITC No. 18‐3‐3954; Expiration Date: 6/30/2020
(No response is required if currently valid OMB control number is not displayed)
U.S. PURCHASERS’ QUESTIONNAIRE
UTILITY SCALE WIND TOWERS FROM CHINA AND VIETNAM
This questionnaire must be received by the Commission by October 31, 2018
See last page for filing instructions.
The information called for in this questionnaire is for use by the United States International Trade Commission in
connection with its review of the countervailing and antidumping duty orders concerning utility scale wind towers
(“wind towers”) from China and Vietnam (Inv. Nos. 701‐TA‐486 and 731‐TA‐1195‐1196 (Review)). The information
requested in the questionnaire is requested under the authority of the Tariff Act of 1930, title VII. This report is
mandatory and failure to reply as directed can result in a subpoena or other order to compel the submission of records
or information in your possession (19 U.S.C. § 1333(a)). Further information on this questionnaire can be obtained from
Cindy Cohen (202‐205‐3230, cindy.cohen@usitc.gov).
Name of firm
Address
City
State
Zip Code
Website
Has your firm purchased wind towers (as defined on the next page) from any source (domestic or foreign) at any
time since January 1, 2012?
NO
(Sign the certification below and promptly return only this page of the questionnaire to the Commission)
YES
(Complete all parts of the questionnaire, and return the entire questionnaire to the Commission)
Return questionnaire via the Commission Drop Box by clicking on the following link:
https://dropbox.usitc.gov/oinv/. (PIN: WIND)
CERTIFICATION
I certify that the information herein supplied in response to this questionnaire is complete and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief and understand that the information submitted is subject to audit and verification by the Commission. By
means of this certification I also grant consent for the Commission, and its employees and contract personnel, to use the
information provided in this questionnaire and throughout this proceeding in any other import‐injury proceedings or reviews
conducted by the Commission on the same or similar merchandise.
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that information submitted in response to this request for information and throughout this
proceeding or other proceedings may be disclosed to and used: (i) by the Commission, its employees and Offices, and contract
personnel (a) for developing or maintaining the records of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in internal investigations, audits,
reviews, and evaluations relating to the programs, personnel, and operations of the Commission including under 5 U.S.C.
Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. government employees and contract personnel, solely for cybersecurity purposes. I understand that all
contract personnel will sign appropriate nondisclosure agreements.
Name of Authorized Official Title of Authorized Official
Signature
Phone
Date
Email address
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Wind towers (R1)
Page 2
PART I.—GENERAL INFORMATION
Background.‐‐On February 15, 2013, the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) issued countervailing
and antidumping duty orders on imports of wind towers from China and Vietnam. On January 2, 2018,
the Commission instituted a review pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. §
1675(c)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation of the orders would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of material injury to the domestic industry within a reasonably foreseeable time. If both
the Commission and Commerce make an affirmative determination, the orders will remain in place. If
either the Commission or Commerce makes a negative determination, Commerce will revoke the orders.
Questionnaires and other information pertinent to this proceeding are available at
https://www.usitc.gov/investigations/701731/2018/utility_scale_wind_towers_china_and_vietnam/full
_review.htm.
Wind towers covered by these investigations are certain wind towers, whether or not tapered, and
sections thereof. Certain wind towers are designed to support the nacelle and rotor blades in a wind
turbine with a minimum rated electrical power generation capacity in excess of 100 kilowatts and with a
minimum height of 50 meters measured from the base of the tower to the bottom of the nacelle (i.e.,
where the top of the tower and nacelle are joined) when fully assembled.
A wind tower section consists of, at a minimum, multiple steel plates rolled into cylindrical or conical
shapes and welded together (or otherwise attached) to form a steel shell, regardless of coating, end‐
finish, painting, treatment, or method of manufacture, and with or without flanges, doors, or internal or
external components (e.g., flooring/decking, ladders, lifts, electrical buss boxes, electrical cabling,
conduit, cable harness for nacelle generator, interior lighting, tool and storage lockers) attached to the
wind tower section. Several wind tower sections are normally required to form a completed wind tower.
Wind towers and sections thereof are included within the scope whether or not they are joined with
nonsubject merchandise, such as nacelles or rotor blades, and whether or not they have internal or
external components attached to the subject merchandise.
Specifically excluded from the scope are nacelles and rotor blades, regardless of whether they are
attached to the wind tower. Also excluded are any internal or external components which are not
attached to the wind towers or sections thereof.
Wind towers are currently imported under statistical reporting numbers 7308.20.00201 or
8502.31.00002 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Prior to 2011, subject
merchandise was classified in the HTSUS under statistical reporting number 7308.20.0000 and may
continue to be to some degree. The HTSUS provisions are for convenience and customs purposes; the
written description of the scope is dispositive.
Unit.—A unit, unless otherwise stated, is a complete wind tower (whether or not comprised of multiple
sections) or wind tower equivalent (e.g., one section of a wind tower comprised of four sections would
be equal to ¼ or 0.25 wind towers).
1
Wind towers are classified under HTSUS 7308.20.0020 when imported as a tower or tower section(s) alone.
Wind towers may also be classified under HTSUS 8502.31.0000 when imported as part of a wind turbine (i.e.,
accompanying nacelles and/or rotor blades).
2
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Wind towers (R1)
Page 3
Purchaser.‐‐Any firm engaged, either directly or through a parent company or subsidiary, in purchasing
wind towers from another firm that produces, imports, or otherwise distributes wind towers.
Reporting of information.‐‐ If information is not readily available from your records, provide carefully
prepared estimates. If your firm is completing more than one questionnaire in connection with this
proceeding (i.e., a producer, importer, and/or purchaser questionnaire), you need not respond to
duplicated questions.
Confidentiality.‐‐The commercial and financial data furnished in response to this questionnaire that
reveal the individual operations of your firm will be treated as confidential by the Commission to the
extent that such data are not otherwise available to the public and will not be disclosed except as may
be required by law (see 19 U.S.C. § 1677f). Such confidential information will not be published in a
manner that will reveal the individual operations of your firm; however, general characterizations of
numerical business proprietary information (such as discussion of trends) will be treated as confidential
business information only at the request of the submitter for good cause shown.
Verification.‐‐The information submitted in this questionnaire is subject to audit and verification by the
Commission. To facilitate possible verification of data, please keep all of your files, worksheets, and
supporting documents used in the preparation of the questionnaire response. Please also retain a copy
of the final document that you submit.
Release of information.‐‐The information provided by your firm in response to this questionnaire, as
well as any other business proprietary information submitted by your firm to the Commission in
connection with this proceeding, may become subject to, and released under, the administrative
protective order provisions of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1677f) and section 207.7 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR § 207.7). This means that certain lawyers and
other authorized individuals may temporarily be given access to the information for use in connection
with this proceeding or other import‐injury proceedings conducted by the Commission on the same or
similar merchandise; those individuals would be subject to severe penalties if the information were
divulged to unauthorized individuals.
I‐1.
Establishments covered.‐‐Provide the name and address of establishment(s) covered by this
questionnaire, if different from that listed on the cover page. Firms operating more than one
establishment should combine the data for all establishments into a single response.
“Establishment”‐‐Each facility of a firm involved in the purchase of wind towers, including
auxiliary facilities operated in conjunction with (whether or not physically separate from) such
facilities.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Wind towers (R1)
I‐2.
Ownership.‐‐Is your firm owned, in whole or in part, by any other firm?
No
Yes‐‐List the following information.
Extent of ownership
Firm name
Address
(percent)
I‐3.
I‐4.
I‐5.
Page 4
Related importers/exporters.‐‐Does your firm have any related firms, either domestic or
foreign, that import wind towers into the United States or that export wind towers to the United
States?
No
Yes‐‐List the following information.
Firm name
Country
Affiliation
Related producers.‐‐Does your firm have any related firms, either domestic or foreign, that
produce wind towers?
No
Yes‐‐List the following information.
Firm name and country
Country
Affiliation
Business plan.‐‐Does your company or any related firm have a business plan or any internal
documents that describe, discuss, or analyze expected market conditions for wind towers?
No
If yes, please provide these documents. If you are not providing the
Yes requested documents, please explain why not.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Wind towers (R1)
Page 5
PART II.‐‐PURCHASES
Contact information.‐‐ Please identify the responsible individual and the manner by which Commission
staff may contact that individual regarding the confidential information submitted in this questionnaire.
Name
Title
Email
Telephone
II‐1. Purchases.‐‐Report the quantity of your firm’s purchases of wind towers in 2017 that were
produced in each of the specified countries. (Do not include imports for which your firm was the
importer of record; such imports should be reported in your U.S. importers’ questionnaire.)
A unit, unless otherwise stated, is a complete wind tower (whether or not comprised of multiple
sections) or wind tower equivalent (e.g., one section of a wind tower comprised of four sections
would be equal to ¼ or 0.25 wind towers).
Wind towers produced in:
2017
Quantity
(in units)
United States
China
Vietnam
All other countries1
Sources unknown
Total
0
1
Please identify these countries:
II‐2.
II‐3.
Imports.‐‐Since January 1, 2012, has your firm imported wind towers?
No
Yes
If yes‐‐ COMPLETE AND RETURN A U.S. IMPORTERS’ QUESTIONNAIRE
Purchase types.‐‐Since January 1, 2012, has your firm changed the size, type, or other features
desired of the wind towers you purchased?
No
Yes
If yes, identify the countries and explain.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Wind towers (R1)
II‐4.
Page 6
Purchases before and after order.‐‐
(a)
(b)
Did your firm purchase wind towers from China and/or Vietnam before 2012?
No‐‐skip to (d)
Yes—complete (b), (c), and (d)
If yes, has your pattern of purchasing wind towers from China changed since 2012?
No, our pattern of purchasing is essentially unchanged.
Yes, we discontinued purchases from China because of the order.
Yes, we reduced purchases from China because of the order.
Yes, but we changed the pattern of purchases from China for reasons other
than the order (please explain below).
(c)
If yes, has your pattern of purchasing wind towers from Vietnam changed since 2012?
No, our pattern of purchasing is essentially unchanged.
Yes, we discontinued purchases from Vietnam because of the order.
Yes, we reduced purchases from Vietnam because of the order.
Yes, but we changed the pattern of purchases from Vietnam reasons other than
the order (please explain below).
(d)
Has your pattern of purchasing wind towers from nonsubject foreign sources (i.e.,
countries other than China and Vietnam) changed since 2012?
We did not purchase from nonsubject foreign sources before or after the order.
No, our pattern of purchasing is essentially unchanged.
Yes, we increased purchases from nonsubject foreign sources because of the
order.
Yes, but we changed our pattern of purchases from nonsubject foreign sources
for reasons other than the order (please explain below).
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Wind towers (R1)
II‐5.
Page 7
Changes in purchasing patterns.‐‐Please indicate how the shares of your firm’s purchases of
wind towers from different sources have changed since January 1, 2012.
Source of Did not
purchases purchase Decreased Increased Constant Fluctuated
II‐6.
Explanation for trend
United
States
China
Vietnam
All other
countries
Sources
unknown
Country knowledge.‐‐ Please indicate the countries of origin with which your firm has
experience or information in the wind towers market.
United
States
II‐7.
China
Vietnam
Other
countries
Other countries (specify)
Supplier identification.‐‐ Please list your firm’s FIVE largest suppliers for wind towers since
January 1, 2012. Also, provide the share of the quantity of your firm’s total purchases of wind
towers that each of these suppliers accounted for in 2017.
No.
Supplier’s name
City and state
Share of quantity of
2017 purchases
1
%
2
%
3
%
4
%
5
%
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Wind towers (R1)
Page 8
PART III.‐‐ MARKET CHARACTERISTICS AND PURCHASING PRACTICES
III‐1. Firm type.‐‐Which of the following best describes your firm as a purchaser of wind towers
(check all that apply)?
OEM
Distributor
Other
Describe other
If your firm is a distributor of wind towers, please answer questions III‐2 and III‐3.
III‐2. Competition for sales.‐‐Do you compete for sales to your customers with the manufacturers or
importers from which you purchase wind towers?
No
Yes If yes, please describe.
III‐3.
Types of customers.‐‐What are the major types of consumers to which you sell wind towers?
If your firm is an end user of wind towers, please answer questions III‐4 and III‐5.
III‐4. End uses.—Have there been any changes in the end uses of wind towers since January 1, 2012?
Do you anticipate any future changes?
Changes in end uses No
Yes
Changes since
January 1, 2012
Anticipated changes
Explain
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Wind towers (R1)
III‐5.
Page 9
Demand for end use products.‐‐
(a)
Has the demand for your firm’s final products incorporating wind towers changed since
January 1, 2012?
Increased
No change
(b)
III‐6.
Decreased
Fluctuated
Has this had any effect on your firm’s demand for wind towers?
No
Yes
Explain
Substitutes.— Have there been any changes in the number or types of products that can be
substituted for wind towers since January 1, 2012? Do you anticipate any future changes?
Changes in substitutes No Yes
Changes since January
1, 2012
Anticipated changes
Explain
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Wind towers (R1)
III‐7.
Page 10
Demand trends.‐‐ Indicate how demand within the United States and outside of the United
States (if known) for wind towers has changed since January 1, 2012, and how you anticipate
demand will change in the future. Explain any trends and describe the principal factors (for
example, federal or state government policies and natural gas prices) that have affected, and
that you anticipate will affect, these changes in demand.
Fluctuate
with no
Overall
No
Overall
increase change decrease clear trend
Market
Explanation and factors
Demand since January 1, 2012
Within the
United States
Outside the
United States
Anticipated future demand
III‐8.
III‐9.
Within the
United States
Outside the
United States
Market studies.‐‐Please provide as a separate attachment to this request any studies, surveys,
etc. that you are aware of that quantify and/or otherwise discuss wind towers supply (including
production capacity and capacity utilization) and demand in (1) the United States, (2) each of
the other major producing/consuming countries, including China and Vietnam, and (3) the world
as a whole. Of particular interest is such data from 2012 to the present and forecasts for the
future. Examples may include AWEA market reports, DOE documents, etc.
Country preferences.‐‐Do you or your customers ever specifically order wind towers from one
country in particular over other possible sources of supply?
No
Yes
If yes, identify the countries and explain.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Wind towers (R1)
Page 11
III‐10. Importance of purchasing domestic product.‐‐Please fill out the table below, estimating the
percentage of your firm’s total 2017 purchases of wind towers that required wind towers
produced in the United States.
Estimated percentage of
your firm’s total 2017
purchases of wind
towers
Purchases that did not require domestic product
%
Purchases that were required by law or regulation to be domestic
product (e.g., government purchases under “Buy American” provisions)
%
Purchases that were not required by law or regulation, but were
required by your customers to be domestic product
%
Purchases that were required to be domestic product for other reasons
(explain: )
%
Total (should sum to 100.0%)
0.0 %
III‐11. Conditions of competition.‐‐
(a) Is the wind tower market subject to business cycles (other than general economy‐wide
conditions) and/or other conditions of competition distinctive to wind towers?
Check all that apply.
Please describe.
No
Skip to question III‐12.
Yes‐Business cycles (e.g.
seasonal business)
Yes‐Other distinctive
conditions of competition
(b) If yes, have there been any changes in the business cycles or conditions of competition for
wind towers since January 1, 2012?
No
Yes
If yes, describe.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Wind towers (R1)
Page 12
III‐12. Decisions based on producer and country‐of‐origin.‐‐How often does your firm, and if you
know, do your customers, make purchasing decisions involving wind towers based on its
producer or country of origin?
Always Usually Sometimes Never
If at least sometimes, explain.
Decision based on producer
Your firm
Your customers
Decision based on country of origin
Your firm
Your customers
III‐13. Availability of supply.‐‐Has the availability of wind towers in the U.S. market changed since
January 1, 2012? Do you anticipate any future changes?
Please explain, noting the countries and reasons
Availability in the U.S. market No Yes for the changes.
Changes since January 1, 2012:
U.S.‐produced product
Imports from China and Vietnam
Imports from all other countries
U.S.‐produced product
Imports from China and Vietnam
Imports from all other countries
Anticipated changes:
III‐14. Availability of specific product types.‐‐Are certain grades/types/sizes/heights of wind towers
only available from certain country sources?
No
Yes
If yes, please identify the countries and the grade/type/size/height.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Wind towers (R1)
Page 13
III‐15. Supply constraints.‐‐Has any firm refused, declined, or been unable to supply your firm with
wind towers since January 1, 2012 (examples include placing customers on allocation or
“controlled order entry,” declining to accept new customers or renew existing customers,
delivering less than the quantity promised, being unable to meet timely shipment commitments,
inability to meet certain specifications, etc.)?
No
Yes
If yes, please describe.
III‐16. Purchasing frequency.‐‐
(a)
How frequently do you make purchases of wind towers (check one)?
Daily Weekly
(b)
Monthly
Quarterly Annually
Other If other, specify
Do you expect this purchasing frequency to change in the next two years?
No
Yes If yes, explain.
III‐17. Number of suppliers contacted.‐‐How many suppliers do you generally contact before making a
purchase? Between and firms.
III‐18. Supplier negotiations.‐‐Do your firm’s purchases of wind towers usually involve negotiations
between supplier and purchaser?
No
If yes, explain the factors you generally negotiate and note whether your
Yes firm quotes competing prices during negotiations.
III‐19. Change in suppliers.‐‐ Has your firm changed suppliers since January 1, 2012?
No
If yes, please list the supplier(s), whether the firm was added or dropped,
Yes and the reasons for the change.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Wind towers (R1)
Page 14
III‐20. New suppliers.‐‐
(a)
Are you aware of any new suppliers, either foreign or domestic, that have entered the
market since January 1, 2012?
No
Yes If yes, please identify the firms.
(b)
Do you expect new wind towers suppliers to enter the U.S. market in the next two
years?
No
Yes If yes, please explain.
III‐21. Supplier qualification.—
(a)
Do you require your suppliers to be or to become certified or qualified to sell wind
towers to your firm? If yes, provide the following information.
The number of days to qualify a new supplier.
A general description of the certification or qualification process. Also, a brief
description of the factors that you consider when qualifying a new supplier (e.g.,
quality of product, reliability of supplier, etc.).
No
Number
Yes of days Process and factors
(b)
List all suppliers qualified to sell wind towers to your firm, by country of origin.
Source
Names of qualified suppliers
U.S. producers
China
Vietnam
Other countries
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Wind towers (R1)
Page 15
III‐22. Failure to certify.‐‐Since January 1, 2012, have any domestic or foreign producers failed in their
attempts to certify or qualify their wind towers with your firm or have any producers lost their
approved status?
No
Yes
If yes, please identify these firms, the countries where they are located, and
the reasons why they failed the certification/qualification.
III‐23. Major purchasing factors.‐‐ Please list, in order of their importance, the three major factors
your firm considers in deciding from whom to purchase wind towers (examples include
availability, extension of credit, contracts, price, quality, range of supplier’s product line,
traditional supplier, etc.).
1.
2.
3.
Please list any other factors that are very important in your purchase decisions:
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Wind towers (R1)
Page 16
III‐24. Purchasing factors.‐‐Please rate the importance of the following factors in your firm’s
purchasing decisions for wind towers.
Factor
Very
important
Somewhat
important
Not
important
Availability
Available capacity
Delivery terms
Delivery time
Discounts offered
Liftetime cost
Minimum quantity requirements
Packaging
Payment terms
Price
Product consistency
Product range
Quality meets industry standards
Quality exceeds industry standards
Reliability of supply
Technical support/service
Transportation costs to the U.S.
U.S. transportation costs
III‐25. Quality characteristics.‐‐What characteristics does your firm consider when determining the
quality of wind towers?
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Wind towers (R1)
Page 17
III‐26. Minimum quality.‐‐How often do wind towers from the following countries meet minimum
quality specifications for your uses or your customers’ uses?
Rarely or
Don’t
Source
Always
Usually
Sometimes
never
know
United States
China
Vietnam
Other:
III‐27. Frequency of decisions based on price.‐‐How often does your firm purchase the wind towers
that are offered at the lowest f.o.b. price and at the lowest delivered price?
Item
Always
Usually
Sometimes
Never
Lowest f.o.b. price
Lowest delivered price
III‐28. Frequency of decisions based on transportation cost.‐‐How often does your firm make
purchasing decisions involving wind towers based on the transportation cost to the wind turbine
site?
Always
Usually
Sometimes
Never
III‐29. Price leaders.‐‐A price leader is defined as (1) one or more firms that initiate a price change,
either upward or downward, that is followed by other firms, or (2) one or more firms that have a
significant impact on prices. A price leader is not necessarily the lowest‐priced supplier.
Please list the names of any firms you considered price leaders in the wind towers market since
January 1, 2012.
Firm(s)
Describe how the firm(s) exhibited price leadership
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Wind towers (R1)
Page 18
III‐30. Changes in U.S. industry.‐‐
(a)
Please identify and discuss any improvements/changes in the U.S. wind tower industry
since January 1, 2012 and explain the factors, including the order(s) under review, that
were responsible for each improvement/change.
(b)
Please discuss any improvements/changes that you anticipate in the future in the U.S.
wind tower industry. Identify the anticipated time period and causes for these
improvements/changes.
III‐31. Effect of revocation of orders.‐‐ What do you think will be the effects on your firm and on the
U.S. market of any revocation of the countervailing duty and antidumping duty orders on
imports of wind towers from China and Vietnam?
III‐32. Long‐term arrangements.—Please list any long‐term contracts or supply agreements that your
firm has with suppliers of wind towers. Briefly describe these agreements, including the name of
the supplier, dates, any minimum purchase quantities, and any dedicated capacity maintained
by the supplier.
Supplier name
Dates
covered
Minimum
purchase
quantities
(units)
Dedicated
capacity
(units)
Brief description
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Wind towers (R1)
Page 19
III‐33. Impact of the section 301 investigation.— This question concerns the section 301 investigation
and tariffs on wind towers that have been proposed and implemented by the United States in
response to Chinese trade practices.
(a) Did the announcement in March, 2018 and subsequent implementation of tariff remedies in
the section 301 investigation impact, or do you anticipate that it will impact, your firm's
wind tower business and/or the U.S. wind tower market as a whole?
Yes—Please fill out table below and
answer part (b)
No
Don’t know
Item
Response
1
Impact on your firm
1
Impact on overall U.S. market
1
Please identify the magnitude and timing of any effects, and compare your firm's
operations/overall market before and after the announcement of the section 301 measures.
(b) Assessment of specific impacts of the section 301 investigation.‐‐Please indicate the impact
of the announcement and subsequent implementation of remedies in the section 301
investigation and tariff actions regarding wind towers.
Item
Fluctuate
with no
No
clear
Increase change Decrease
trend
Explanation and factors
Overall demand for
wind towers in the
U.S. market
Prices for wind towers
in the U.S. market
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Wind towers (R1)
Page 20
PART IV.‐‐ PRODUCT COMPARISIONS
IV‐1. Interchangeability.‐‐Are wind towers produced in the United States and in other countries
interchangeable (i.e., can they physically be used in the same applications)?
Please indicate A, F, S, N, or 0 in the table below:
A = the products from a specified country‐pair are always interchangeable
F = the products are frequently interchangeable
S = the products are sometimes interchangeable
N = the products are never interchangeable
0 = no familiarity with products from a specified country‐pair
Country‐pair
China
Vietnam
Other countries
United States
China
Vietnam
For any country‐pair producing wind towers which is sometimes or never interchangeable,
please identify the country‐pair and explain the factors that limit or preclude interchangeable
use:
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Wind towers (R1)
IV‐2.
Page 21
Factors other than price.‐‐Are differences other than price (e.g., quality, availability,
transportation network, product range, technical support, etc.) between wind towers produced
in the United States and in other countries a significant factor in your firm’s purchases of the
products?
Please indicate A, F, S, N, or 0 in the table below:
A = such differences are always significant
F = such differences are frequently significant
S = such differences are sometimes significant
N = such differences are never significant
0 = no familiarity with products from a specified country‐pair
Country‐pair
China
Vietnam
Other countries
United States
China
Vietnam
For any country‐pair for which factors other than price always or frequently are a significant
factor in your firm’s purchases of wind towers, identify the country‐pair and report the
advantages or disadvantages imparted by such factors:
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Wind towers (R1)
IV‐3.
Page 22
Factor country comparisons.‐‐For the factors listed below, please rate how wind towers
produced in each country you identified in your response to question II‐4 compare with wind
towers produced in each of the other countries you identified.
Superior
Comparable
Inferior
Superior
Comparable
Inferior
Superior
Comparable
Inferior
If you are unfamiliar with the product from a particular country, please leave the boxes for those
country comparisons blank.
Product from
Product from
United States
United States
Product from
compared to
compared to
China compared to
product from
product from
product from
China
Vietnam
Vietnam
Availability
Available capacity
Delivery terms
Delivery time
Discounts offered
Extension of credit
Lifetime cost
Minimum quantity requirements
Packaging
Price1
Product consistency
Product range
Quality meets industry standards
Quality exceeds industry standards
Reliability of supply
Technical support/service
Transportation costs to the U.S.1
U.S. transportation costs1
Factor
1
A rating of superior on price/transportation costs indicates that the first country generally has lower prices/
transportation costs than the second country.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Wind towers (R1)
Page 23
Superior
Comparable
Inferior
Superior
Comparable
Inferior
Superior
Comparable
Inferior
IV‐3. Continued.
If you are unfamiliar with the product from a particular country, please leave the boxes for those
country comparisons blank.
Product from
United States
Product from
Product from
China compared to Vietnam compared
compared to
product from
product from
to product from
Nonsubject
Nonsubject
Nonsubject
countries
countries
countries
Availability
Available capacity
Delivery terms
Delivery time
Discounts offered
Extension of credit
Lifetime cost
Minimum quantity requirements
Packaging
Price1
Product consistency
Product range
Quality meets industry standards
Quality exceeds industry standards
Reliability of supply
Technical support/service
Transportation costs to the U.S.1
Factor
1
U.S. transportation costs
1
A rating of superior on price/transportation costs indicates that the first country generally has lower prices/
transportation costs than the second country.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Wind towers (R1)
IV‐4.
Page 24
Change in price.‐‐
(a)
Since January 1, 2012, has there been a change in the price of wind towers?
Yes (also respond to
No (If “No” for all countries,
Source
question part (b))
skip to next question)
United States
China
Vietnam
(b)
If your firm responded “yes” to any of the above countries, please describe how the
price of U.S.‐produced wind towers has changed relative to the price of imported wind
towers from China and Vietnam.
Price of U.S.‐produced
Price of U.S.‐produced
wind towers is now
wind towers is now
Prices changed by
relatively lower
relatively higher
Country
the same percent
China
Vietnam
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Wind towers (R1)
Page 25
PART V.‐‐PRICES‐‐
V‐1. Project information—
(a) Please fill out the following table with respect to your firm’s projects involving wind towers
since January 1, 2012.
Projects
Item
(count)
Total number of projects involving purchases of wind towers
Number of projects involving bids/purchases from U.S. producers
Number of projects involving bids/purchases from suppliers of wind towers from
China
Number of projects involving bids/purchases of wind towers from Vietnam
Number of projects involving bids by suppliers of wind towers from other countries
(b) Did any of these projects involve bids and/or purchases by both domestic producers of wind
towers and suppliers of wind towers from China or Vietnam?
No—Skip to question
VI‐1.
Yes—fill out the table below and
also answer question V‐2.
Total number of projects involving bids/purchases from both domestic producers
and suppliers of wind towers from China or Vietnam
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Wind towers (R1)
V‐2.
Page 26
Bid/Purchase Data.— Please fill out the table below for all of your firm’s projects since January 1, 2012 for which your firm received at least
one bid (or purchase) from a supplier of domestic wind towers and at least one bid (or purchase) from a supplier of wind towers produced
in China or Vietnam.
Please list all bids/purchases for each project. The costs reported below should include amounts for any services, such as installation,
training, or warranty.
Year
Project
Supplier name
name/location
Supplier type
(producer/
importer/
foreign
producer)
Country
produced
Height of
Size of
tower
tower
(meters) (megawatts)
Total f.o.b.
cost
(dollars)
Total
Number of wind
delivered cost
towers
(dollars)
purchased
Reason bid accepted or rejected
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Wind towers (R1)
V‐2.
Year
Page 27
Bid/Purchase Data (continued).
Project
Supplier name
name/location
Supplier type
(producer/
importer/
foreign
producer)
Country
produced
Height of
Size of
tower
tower
(meters) (megawatts)
Total f.o.b.
cost
(dollars)
Total
Number of wind
delivered cost
towers
(dollars)
purchased
Reason bid accepted or rejected
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Wind towers (R1)
Page 28
PART VI.—ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
VI‐1. Other explanations.‐‐If your firm would like to further explain a response to any question for
which a narrative response box was not provided, please note the question number and the
explanation in the space provided below.
VI‐2.
OMB statistics.‐‐Please report the actual number of hours required and the cost to your firm of
completing this questionnaire.
Hours
Dollars
The questions in this questionnaire have been reviewed with market participants to ensure that
issues of concern are adequately addressed and that data requests are sufficient, meaningful,
and as limited as possible. Public reporting burden for this questionnaire is estimated to average
40 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering data, and
completing and reviewing the questionnaire.
We welcome comments regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate, suggestions for
reducing the burden, and any suggestions for improving this questionnaire. Please attach such
comments to your response or send to the Office of Investigations, USITC, 500 E St. SW,
Washington, DC 20436.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Wind towers (R1)
Page 29
HOW TO FILE YOUR QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONSE
This questionnaire is available as a “fillable” form in MS Word format on the
Commission’s website at: LINK
Please do not attempt to modify the format or permissions of the questionnaire
document. Please submit the completed questionnaire using one of the methods noted
below. If your firm is unable to complete the MS Word questionnaire or cannot use one
of the electronic methods of submission, please contact the Commission for further
instructions.
• Upload via Secure Drop Box.—Upload the MS Word questionnaire along with a scanned copy of the
signed certification page (page 1) through the Commission’s secure upload facility:
Web address: https://dropbox.usitc.gov/oinv/
Pin: WIND
• E‐mail.—E‐mail the MS Word questionnaire to cindy.cohen@usitc.gov; include a scanned copy of the
signed certification page (page 1). Submitters are strongly encouraged to encrypt nonpublic documents
that are electronically transmitted to the Commission to protect your sensitive information from
unauthorized disclosure. The USITC secure drop‐box system and the Electronic Document Information
System (EDIS) use Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) 140‐2 cryptographic algorithms to
encrypt data in transit. Submitting your nonpublic documents by a means that does not use these
encryption algorithms (such as by email) may subject your firm’s nonpublic information to unauthorized
disclosure during transmission. If you choose a non‐encrypted method of electronic transmission, the
Commission warns you that the risk of such possible unauthorized disclosure is assumed by you and not
by the Commission.
If your firm does not purchase this product, please fill out page 1, print, sign, and submit a scanned
copy to the Commission.
Parties to this proceeding.—If your firm is a party to this proceeding, it is required to serve a copy of the
completed questionnaire on parties to the proceeding that are subject to administrative protective
order (see 19 CFR § 207.7). A list of such parties may be obtained from the Commission’s Secretary (202‐
205‐1803). A certificate of service must accompany the completed questionnaire you submit (see 19 CFR
§ 207.7). Service of the questionnaire must be made in paper form.
File Type | application/pdf |
File Title | Microsoft Word - Purchaser questionnaire |
Author | keysha.martinez |
File Modified | 2018-09-18 |
File Created | 2018-09-18 |