|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benchmarks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evidence of state health officer and other senior state health department management involvement in the tobacco control program |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
Response |
|
|
|
|
|
Describe the involvement of the state health officer and other senior health department management in the tobacco control program. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evidence of executed sustainability plan and activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
Response |
|
|
|
|
|
Briefly describe the process used to develop sustainability plan, including how stakeholders were involved. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Was the Program Sustainability Assessment Tool completed when developing the plan? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Were at least 50% of stakeholders from outside the state and local health departments? Please explain. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evidence that training and technical assistance needs have been assessed and provided by the program to state and local health department staff, coalition members, and partners statewide |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
Response |
|
|
|
|
|
Have training & TA needs of partners (state and local health department staff, coalition member, and other partners statewide) been assessed in the last year? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Were identified training & TA needs delivered, and if so, how? Please explain. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evidence of use of funding to support environmental, policy, and systems interventions and strategies that are evidence-based and reach populations disproportionately affected by tobacco use, exposure to SHS and tobacco-related diseases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
Response |
|
|
|
|
|
How have environmental, policy, and systems interventions reached populations disproportionately affected by tobacco use, exposure to SHS, and tobacco related diseases? (Include data, if available.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evidence of increased community networks and community-based organizations and individuals who have been affected by tobacco use to educate the community’s decision makers and leaders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
Response |
|
|
|
|
|
Has there been an increase in community networks, CBOs, and/or individuals who have been affected by tobacco use educating community decision makers and leaders? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please explain. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evidence of identifying and training tobacco control spokespersons for each Designated Market Area (DMA) |
|
|
(Please see the User Guide Appendix for number and type of DMAs by state) |
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
Response |
|
|
|
|
|
How many DMAs have at least one trained tobacco control spokesperson? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
How many trained tobacco control spokesperson(s) are there in total in your state? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evidence of monitoring the percentage of public housing authorities with 100% smoke-free indoor air policies |
|
|
Describe the total number of Public Housing Authorities (PHAs) in your state, and those that have comprehensive smoke free policies*. Describe the number of units and residents in each. Do not include subsized or other public housing that are not under the authority of a PHA. *A comprehensive smoke free policy prohibits smoking in all indoor areas of all residential buildings under the jurisdiction of the PHA, including individual living units, hallways, and balconies.
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
PHAs with comprehensive smoke free policies* |
All PHAs in state |
|
|
|
|
Number of PHAs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of residents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evidence of monitoring the percentage of public mental health and substance abuse facilities with tobacco–free policies for their campuses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
State legislation banning tobacco use? |
Percentage covered, if No |
|
|
|
|
Mental health outpatient facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mental health residential facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substance abuse outpatient facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substance abuse residential facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regarding program efforts to expand access to evidence-based tobacco cessation treatment, remove barriers, and promote utilization of covered treatment benefits, please respond to the following CDC evaluation questions. |
|
|
Description |
Did program efforts target these areas? |
Did these efforts target Medicaid recipients? |
Was this part of any effort with the CDC 6|18 Team? |
Describe progress (As appropriate, distinguish between Medicaid and commercial insurance) |
|
|
Expanding access to evidence-based cessation treatment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Removing barriers to covered cessation treatments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Promoting utilization of covered cessation treatments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Measures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Best Practice Area |
|
|
|
Mass-Reach Health Communication Interventions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of monthly speaking opportunities by trained tobacco control spokespersons to educate decision-makers, stakeholders, and the public |
|
|
*Someone who is knowledgeable about the issues and can speak to the public, media, and interested groups to educate about science, programs and policies to help curb tobacco use. These people could be contractors, local advocates, coalition members |
|
|
Description |
Response |
|
|
How many times did a trained tobacco control spokesperson speak to educate decision-makers, stakeholders, and the public (including media) from [Date] to [Date]? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of paid and earned media efforts targeting populations or areas with high concentrations of smoking prevalence, secondhand smoke exposure, and chronic disease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Did any media efforts target population(s) or area(s) disproportionately impacted by tobacco use? |
Indicate which populations or areas were targeted, using drop down: |
|
|
African American |
|
|
|
Asian American, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander |
|
|
|
Native American, Native Alaskan |
|
|
|
Hispanic / Latino |
|
|
|
Behavioral Health or Substance Abuse |
|
|
|
LGBT |
|
|
|
Rural |
|
|
|
Urban |
|
|
|
Low SES |
|
|
|
Pregnant Women |
|
|
|
Veteran/Military |
|
|
|
Other (please explain) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Select the paid media channel(s) used for these targeted efforts, if applicable. |
Indicate which paid channels were used, using drop down: |
|
|
TV |
|
|
|
Radio |
|
|
|
Internet (paid, not free posts) |
|
|
|
Magazines |
|
|
|
Newspapers |
|
|
|
Billboards |
|
|
|
Other (please explain) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Which earned media efforts have targeted disparately affected populations or areas (by program or designated spokesperson)? |
Indicate which earned media channels were used, using drop down: |
|
|
Letters to the Editors/Editorials |
|
|
|
Press Releases |
|
|
|
Interviews |
|
|
|
Other (please explain) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Types of social media activities used to complement traditional paid and earned media efforts (e.g., social media campaign, posting content) and the reach of social media activities by social media site used (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, YouTube) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicate if the following social media activities that have been used to complement traditional paid and earned media efforts. If yes, describe reach, using quantitative data on number of posts, tweets, retweets, like/follows, or audience information, when available. |
|
|
Social media activities |
Indicate which social media activities were used using the drop-down: |
|
|
Facebook Posts |
|
|
|
Describe Reach using quantitative data on number of posts, tweets, retweets, likes/follows, if available: |
|
|
|
Provide additional details on audience, topic/message or information shared, if available : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tweets/Retweets |
|
|
|
Describe Reach using quantitative data on number of posts, tweets, retweets, likes/follows, if available: |
|
|
|
Provide additional details on audience, topic/message or information shared, if available : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YouTube videos |
|
|
|
Describe Reach using quantitative data on number of posts, tweets, retweets, likes/follows, if available: |
|
|
|
Provide additional details on audience, topic/message or information shared, if available : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blogs |
|
|
|
Describe Reach using quantitative data on number of posts, tweets, retweets, likes/follows, if available: |
|
|
|
Provide additional details on audience, topic/message or information shared, if available : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buttons or other materials posted on website |
|
|
|
Describe Reach using quantitative data on number of posts, tweets, retweets, likes/follows, if available: |
|
|
|
Provide additional details on audience, topic/message or information shared, if available : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other: specify below |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provide additional details on audience, topic/message or information shared, if available : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Best Practice Area |
|
|
|
Surveillance and Evaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number and type of tobacco-related surveys implemented during the funding year (e.g., ATS, YTS), and type of tobacco-related modules implemented (e.g., BRFSS, YRBSS) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
What surveys providing data on tobacco use indicators were implemented in [Year] ? Check all that apply, including those where the program contributed funding to enhance data collection. |
Indicate which surveys were implemented by using the drop down: |
|
|
Adult Tobacco Survey |
|
|
|
Youth Tobacco Survey |
|
|
|
Youth Risk Behavior Survey |
|
|
|
Other tobacco-related state surveys, Explain: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number and type of tobacco-related surveys implemented during the funding year (e.g., ATS, YTS), and type of tobacco-related modules implemented (e.g., BRFSS, YRBSS) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
Response |
|
|
Describe any modules (e.g., Secondhand Smoke, Diabetes, mental Health) that were implemented or used, or additional methods (e.g., innovative sampling) that were used to enhance surveillance efforts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number and type of tobacco-related indicators developed and implemented in state surveillance systems during the funding year (e.g., ATS, YTS, BRFSS, YRBSS) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Are recent state tobacco use adult prevalence rates available for the following populations? |
Select the Appropriate Response (Yes/No/NA) for Each Category: |
|
|
African American |
|
|
|
American Indian/Alaska Native |
|
|
|
Asian American/Pacific Islander |
|
|
|
Behavioral Health/Substance Abuse |
|
|
|
Hispanic/Latino |
|
|
|
LGBT |
|
|
|
Low SES |
|
|
|
Rural/Urban |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Best Practice Area |
|
|
|
Infrastructure, Administration, and Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of funding (state, CDC, and other) used to meet CDC-recommended funding levels outlined in Best Practices - 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
Response |
|
|
As of [DATE], how much funding was allocated to the state Tobacco Control Program (including all sources, state, CDC, and other)? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number and type of staff positions maintained throughout the entire funding year to support the tobacco control program (e.g., program director, policy coordinator, communications specialist, cessation coordinator, surveillance and evaluation staff, fiscal management systems staff, and administrative staff) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
Response |
|
|
How many months has a tobacco program manager/director been in place? (Round up if partial month) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicate how many full-time staff members there are per category: |
Enter the number of staff members, using decimals if needed: |
|
|
Note: If staff fulfill more than one major role, you may include them in more than one categories, unless their title specifies one area, such as "Cessation specialist" |
|
|
Administrative |
|
|
|
Cessation |
|
|
|
Communications |
|
|
|
Disparities |
|
|
|
Fiscal management |
|
|
|
Policy |
|
|
|
Prevention |
|
|
|
Surveillance and Evaluation |
|
|