OMB files this
comment in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.11( c ). This OMB action is
not an approval to conduct or sponsor an information collection
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This action has no
effect on any current approvals. If OMB has assigned this ICR a new
OMB Control Number, the OMB Control Number will not appear in the
active inventory. For future submissions of this information
collection, reference the OMB Control Number provided.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
36 Months From Approved
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
The Toxic Substances Control Act
(TSCA), as amended by the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for
the 21st Century Act, required EPA to designate chemical substances
on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory as either “active” or
“inactive” in U.S. commerce. To accomplish that, EPA finalized a
rule, the TSCA Inventory Notification (Active-Inactive)
Requirements Rule (“Active-Inactive Rule”) requiring industry
reporting of chemicals manufactured (including imported) or
processed in the U.S. over the past 10 years, ending on June 21,
2016. 82 FR 37520 (8/11/17). Included in the Active-Inactive Rule
were provisions for the submission of confidential business
information (CBI). Submitters were required to substantiate all CBI
claims made in that data collection, except for chemical substance
identity. If the chemical was reported pursuant a retrospective
reporting requirement, submitters had an option to voluntarily
substantiate the CBI claim; if the chemical was reported pursuant a
prospective reporting requirement, the submitters had to
substantiate the CBI claim at the time of filing. EPA is now
supplementing and revising certain aspects of that proposal in
response to a recent federal court decision remanding the
Active-Inactive Rule, which implicates changes to requirements for
Form A under the proposed Review Plan Rule and changes to
requirements for Form B under the Active-Inactive Rule. EPA is
addressing substantiation requirements pertaining to reverse
engineering. The SNPRM proposes two additional questions that
manufacturers and processors would be required to answer to
substantiate CBI claims for specific chemical identifies asserted
in an NOA Form A and an NOA Form B and proposes procedures for
supplementing previously-submitted substantiations with responses
to those questions.
US Code:
15
USC 2607 Name of Law: Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
This is a new data collection
activity resulting from the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for
the 21st Century Act, which requires additional responsibilities of
EPA in maintaining the TSCA Inventory, and imposes reporting
requirements on regulated entities wishing to maintain claims of
confidentiality for chemical substance identity. Specific to this
SNRPM, EPA is addressing substantiation requirements pertaining to
reverse engineering in response to a recent court ruling remanding
the Active-Inactive Rule by adding two additional substantiation
questions. As such, the change being implemented in this ICR period
is the addition of new burden and cost for activities associated
with the two new questions, as presented in Table 2. The total
burden to industry for this ICR period is 1,123 hours, all
occurring during a 90-day reporting period after the rule is
enacted.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.