Download:
pdf |
pdfOMB No. 3117-0016/USITC No. 19-2-4146; Expiration Date: 6/30/2020
(No response is required if currently valid OMB control number is not displayed)
U.S. IMPORTERS’ QUESTIONNAIRE
Silicon Metal from Russia
This questionnaire must be received by the Commission by January 21, 2020
See last page for filing instructions.
The information called for in this questionnaire is for use by the United States International Trade Commission in
connection with its review of the antidumping duty order concerning Silicon metal from Russia (inv. No. 731-TA-991 (Third
Review)). The information requested in the questionnaire is requested under the authority of the Tariff Act of 1930, title
VII. This report is mandatory and failure to reply as directed can result in a subpoena or other order to compel the
submission of records or information in your firm’s possession (19 U.S.C. § 1333(a)).
Name of firm
Address
________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
City
Website
State
Zip Code
_________________
____________________________________________________________________
Has your firm imported silicon metal (as defined on the next page) from any country at any time
since January 1, 2014?
NO
(Sign the certification below and promptly return only this page of the questionnaire to the
YES
(Complete all parts of the questionnaire, and return the entire questionnaire to the Commission)
Commission)
Return questionnaire via the Commission Drop Box by clicking on the following link:
https://dropbox.usitc.gov/oinv/. (PIN: SMFR)
CERTIFICATION
I certify that the information herein supplied in response to this questionnaire is complete and correct to the best of my knowledge
and belief and understand that the information submitted is subject to audit and verification by the Commission. By means of this
certification I also grant consent for the Commission, and its employees and contract personnel, to use the information provided in
this questionnaire and throughout this proceeding in any other import-injury investigations or reviews conducted by the Commission
on the same or similar merchandise.
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that information submitted in response to this request for information and throughout this
proceeding or other proceedings may be disclosed to and used: (i) by the Commission, its employees and Offices, and contract
personnel (a) for developing or maintaining the records of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in internal investigations, audits,
reviews, and evaluations relating to the programs, personnel, and operations of the Commission including under 5 U.S.C. Appendix
3; or (ii) by U.S. government employees and contract personnel, solely for cybersecurity purposes. I understand that all contract
personnel will sign appropriate nondisclosure agreements.
Name of Authorized Official
Title of Authorized Official
Date
Signature
Phone
Email address
Contains Business Proprietary Information
U.S. Importers’ Questionnaire – Silicon Metal from Russia (Third Review)
Page 2
PART I.—GENERAL INFORMATION
Background.--On March 26, 2003, the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) issued an antidumping
duty order on imports of silicon metal from Russia. On June 3, 2019, the Commission instituted a review
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1675(c)) (the Act) to determine whether
revocation of the order would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to the
domestic industry within a reasonably foreseeable time. If both the Commission and Commerce make
an affirmative determination, the order will remain in place. If either the Commission or Commerce
makes a negative determination, Commerce will revoke the order. Questionnaires and other
information pertinent to this proceeding are available at
https://www.usitc.gov/investigations/701731/2019/silicon_metal_russia/full_review.htm
Silicon metal.--Silicon metal, which generally contains at least 96.00 percent but less than 99.99 percent
silicon by weight. The merchandise covered by this proceeding also includes silicon metal from Russia
containing between 89.00 and 96.00 percent silicon by weight, but containing more aluminum than
silicon metal which contains at least 96.00 percent but less than 99.99 percent silicon by weight. Silicon
metal is currently imported under statistical reporting numbers 2804.69.1000, 2804.69.5000 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The HTSUS provisions are for convenience and
customs purposes; the written description of the scope is dispositive.
Reporting of information.--If information is not readily available from your records in exactly the form
requested, furnish carefully prepared estimates. If your firm is completing more than one questionnaire
in connection with this proceeding (i.e., a producer, importer, and/or purchaser questionnaire), you
need not respond to duplicated questions in the questionnaires.
Confidentiality.--The commercial and financial data furnished in response to this questionnaire that
reveal the individual operations of your firm will be treated as confidential by the Commission to the
extent that such data are not otherwise available to the public and will not be disclosed except as may
be required by law (see 19 U.S.C. § 1677f). Such confidential information will not be published in a
manner that will reveal the individual operations of your firm; however, general characterizations of
numerical business proprietary information (such as discussion of trends) will be treated as confidential
business information only at the request of the submitter for good cause shown.
Verification.--The information submitted in this questionnaire is subject to audit and verification by the
Commission. To facilitate possible verification of data, please keep all of your files, worksheets, and
supporting documents used in the preparation of the questionnaire response. Please also retain a copy
of the final document that you submit.
Release of information.--The information provided by your firm in response to this questionnaire, as
well as any other business proprietary information submitted by your firm to the Commission in
connection with this proceeding, may become subject to, and released under, the administrative
protective order provisions of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1677f) and section 207.7 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR § 207.7). This means that certain lawyers and
other authorized individuals may temporarily be given access to the information for use in connection
with this proceeding or other import-injury proceedings conducted by the Commission on the same or
similar merchandise; those individuals would be subject to severe penalties if the information were
divulged to unauthorized individuals.
Contains Business Proprietary Information
U.S. Importers’ Questionnaire – Silicon Metal from Russia (Third Review)
Page 3
Valid number error messages.--If you are completing this form in a country that uses periods (“.”) to
delineate multiples of 1000 (e.g., one million would appear as $1.000.000 rather than $1,000,000), you
may be unable to enter in numbers greater than 999 in numeric form fields. The solution to this data
entry issue is to temporarily change your operating system’s number formatting to be consistent with
the U.S. number formatting system while you complete this form. Detailed instructions on how to
resolve this issue is provided at the end of this questionnaire and is available upon request from Nitin
Joshi (202-708-1669, nitin.joshi@usitc.gov).
D-GRIDS tool.--The Commission has a tool that firms can use to move data from their own MS Excel
compilation files into self-contained data tables within this MS Word questionnaire, thereby reducing
the amount of cell-by-cell data entry that would be required to complete this form. This tool is a macroenabled MS Excel file available for download from the Commission's generic questionnaires webpage
(https://www.usitc.gov/trade_remedy/question.htm) called the "D-GRIDs tool." Use of this tool to help
your firm complete this questionnaire is optional. Firms opting to use the D-GRIDs tool to populate their
data into this questionnaire will need the D-GRIDs specification sheet PDF file specific to this proceeding
(available on the case page which is linked under the "Background" above) which includes the necessary
references relating to this questionnaire, as well as the macro-enable MS Excel D-GRIDs tool itself from
the generic questionnaires page. More detailed instructions on how to use the D-GRIDs tool are
available within the D-GRIDs tool itself.
I-1.
OMB statistics.--Please report below the actual number of hours required and the cost to your
firm of completing this questionnaire.
Hours
Dollars
The questions in this questionnaire have been reviewed with market participants to ensure that
issues of concern are adequately addressed and that data requests are sufficient, meaningful, and
as limited as possible. Public reporting burden for this questionnaire is estimated to average 40
hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering data, and completing
and reviewing the questionnaire.
We welcome comments regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate, suggestions for reducing
the burden, and any suggestions for improving this questionnaire. Please attach such comments
to your response or send to the Office of Investigations, USITC, 500 E St. SW, Washington, DC
20436.
Contains Business Proprietary Information
U.S. Importers’ Questionnaire – Silicon Metal from Russia (Third Review)
I-2a.
Page 4
Establishments covered.--Provide the name and address of establishment(s) covered by this
questionnaire.
“Establishment”--Each facility of a firm involved in the importation of silicon metal, including
auxiliary facilities operated in conjunction with (whether or not physically separate from) such
facilities.
I-2b.
Stock symbol information.-- If your firm or parent firm is publicly traded, please specify the
stock exchange and trading symbol:
.
I-2c.
External counsel.-- If your firm or parent firm is represented by external counsel in relation to
this proceeding, please specify the name of the law firm and the lead attorney(s).
Law firm:
Lead attorney(s):
I-3.
Ownership.--Is your firm owned, in whole or in part, by any other firm?
No
Firm name
Yes--List the following information, relating to the ultimate parent/owner.
Country
Extent of
ownership
(percent)
Contains Business Proprietary Information
U.S. Importers’ Questionnaire – Silicon Metal from Russia (Third Review)
I-4.
Related importers/exporters.--Does your firm have any related firms, either domestic or
foreign, that are engaged in importing silicon metal into the United States or that are engaged in
exporting silicon metal to the United States?
No
Yes--List the following information.
Firm name
I-5.
Country
Affiliation
Related producers.--Does your firm have any related firms, either domestic or foreign, that are
engaged in the production of silicon metal?
No
Yes--List the following information.
Firm name
I-6.
Page 5
Country
Affiliation
Importing operations.--Please indicate the nature of your firm’s importing operations on silicon
metal. More than one answer may be applicable.
Importer of record
Takes title to the
imported product(s)
Consignee of the
imported products(s)
Customs broker or
freight forwarder
Contains Business Proprietary Information
U.S. Importers’ Questionnaire – Silicon Metal from Russia (Third Review)
I-7.
Consignees.--If your firm is an importer of record of silicon metal but is not the consignee,
please list the consignees below (firm name, address, telephone number, and individual to
contact).
Firm name
I-8.
Page 6
Contact person and
phone number
Address
FTZ, TIB, or bonded warehouses.--Please indicate whether your firm enters silicon metal into, or
withdraws such merchandise from, foreign trade zones or bonded warehouses. Also indicate
whether your firm imports silicon metal under the TIB (temporary importation under bond)
program.
“Foreign trade zone” is a designated location in the United States where firms utilize special
procedures that allow delayed or reduced customs duty payments on foreign merchandise, as
well as other savings. A foreign trade zone must be designated as such pursuant to the rules
and procedures set forth in the Foreign-Trade Zones Act.
“Bonded warehouse” is a secured facility supervised by U.S. customs, where dutiable landed
imports are stored pending their re-export, or release after payment of import duties, taxes, and
other charges. A bonded warehouse must be designed as such pursuant to the rules and
procedures set forth in 19 U.S.C. § 1555.
“Temporary Importation under Bond (“TIB”) program” is a procedure whereby, imported
merchandise may be entered under certain conditions for a limited time into the United States
free of duty. Under the program, an importer posts a bond for twice the amount of duty, taxes,
etc. that would otherwise be owed on the importation and agrees to export or destroy the
merchandise within a specified time or pay liquidated damages. This program is restricted to
certain categories of merchandise listed in subheadings 9813.00.05 through 9813.00.75 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS).
Item
Foreign trade zones
Bonded warehouses
Temporary importation under bond
No
Yes
Contains Business Proprietary Information
U.S. Importers’ Questionnaire – Silicon Metal from Russia (Third Review)
I-9.
Business plan.--In Parts II and III of this questionnaire we request a copy of your company’s
business plan. Does your company or any related firm have a business plan or any internal
documents that describe, discuss, or analyze expected market conditions for silicon metal?
No
I-10.
Page 7
Yes
If yes, please provide the requested documents. If you are not providing the
requested documents, please explain why not.
Other trade actions.--To your knowledge, have the products subject to this proceeding been the
subject of any other import relief proceedings in the United States or in any other countries?
No
Yes
If yes, please specify.
Contains Business Proprietary Information
U.S. Importers’ Questionnaire – Silicon Metal from Russia (Third Review)
Page 8
PART II.--TRADE AND RELATED INFORMATION
Further information on this part of the questionnaire can be obtained from Nitin Joshi (202-708-1669,
nitin.joshi@usitc.gov). Supply all data requested on a calendar-year basis.
II-1.
Contact information.--Please identify the responsible individual and the manner by which
Commission staff may contact that individual regarding the confidential information submitted
in part II.
Name
Title
Email
Telephone
II-2a.
Changes in operations.--Please indicate whether your firm has experienced any of the following
changes in relation to the importation of silicon metal since January 1, 2014.
Check as many as appropriate.
Office/warehouse openings
Office/warehouse closings
Relocations
Expansions
Acquisitions
Consolidations
Prolonged shutdowns or
importation curtailments
Revised labor agreements
Other (e.g., technology)
If checked, please describe; leave blank if not applicable.
Contains Business Proprietary Information
U.S. Importers’ Questionnaire – Silicon Metal from Russia (Third Review)
II -2b
Anticipated changes in operations.—Does your firm anticipate any changes in in the character
of its operations or organization relating to the importation of silicon metal in the future?
No
II-3.
Page 9
Yes
If yes, supply details as to the time, nature, and significance of
such changes and provide underlying assumptions, along with
relevant portions of business plans or other supporting
documentations that address this issue.
Arranged imports.--Has your firm imported or arranged for the importation of silicon metal for
delivery after September 30, 2019?
“Arranged imports” are imports for which your firm has placed an order with a foreign supplier
for subject merchandise, but delivery of those imports is not scheduled to occur until after the
date listed above.
No
Yes–Fill out the table below.
Quantity (in short tons contained silicon)
Period/Source
Oct-Dec 2019
Jan-Mar 2020
Apr-Jun 2020
Jul-Sept 2020
Russia
All other sources
II-4.
Reasons for importing if producer.--If your firm also produces silicon metal in the United States,
please indicate the reasons for importing this product. If your firm’s reasons differ by source,
please elaborate.
Contains Business Proprietary Information
U.S. Importers’ Questionnaire – Silicon Metal from Russia (Third Review)
Page 10
Definitions
“Imports” –Those products identified for Customs purposes as imports for consumption for
which your firm was the importer of record (i.e., was responsible for paying any import duty).
“Admissions into FTZs” -- Note that any firm that “admits” silicon metal into a Free Trade Zone
(FTZ), processes those imports of silicon metal into a downstream product, and then classifies
those goods as the downstream product for purposes of clearance through Customs (i.e.,
“imports for consumption”), should report its “admissions” into its FTZ as imports in this
questionnaire, and its use of those admissions/imports as “internal consumption”.
“Import quantities” –Quantities reported should be net of returns.
“Import values”—Values reported should be landed, duty-paid values at the U.S. port of entry,
including ocean freight and insurance costs, brokerage charges, and import duties (i.e., all
charges except inland freight in the United States).
“U.S. commercial shipments”— Shipments made within the United States as a result of an arm’s
length commercial transaction in the ordinary course of business. Report net values (i.e., gross
sales values less all discounts, allowances, rebates, prepaid freight, and the value of returned
goods) in U.S. dollars, f.o.b. your point of shipment.
“Internal consumption” –Product consumed internally by your firm. Such transactions are
valued at fair market value.
“Transfers to related firms” –Shipments made to related firms. Such transactions are valued at
fair market value.
“Related firm” –A firm that your firm solely or jointly owned, managed, or otherwise controlled;
a firm that solely or jointly owned, managed, or otherwise controlled your firm; and/or a firm
that was solely or jointly owned, managed, or otherwise controlled by a firm that also solely or
jointly owned, managed, or otherwise controlled your firm.
“Export shipments”— Shipments to destinations outside the United States, including shipments
to related firms.
“Inventories” --Finished goods inventory, not raw materials or work in progress.
Note: As requested in Part I of this questionnaire, please keep all supporting documents/records
used in the preparation of the trade data, as Commission staff may contact your firm regarding
questions on the trade data. The Commission may also request that your company submit copies
of the supporting documents/records (such as production and sales schedules, inventory records,
etc.) used to compile these data.
Contains Business Proprietary Information
U.S. Importers’ Questionnaire – Silicon Metal from Russia (Third Review)
II-5a.
Page 11
Imports: Russia.--Report your firm’s imports and your firm’s shipments and inventories of silicon
metal imported from Russia during the specified periods.
RUSSIA
Quantity (in short tons contained silicon), value (in $1,000)
Calendar year
Item
2016
2017
January-September
2018
2018
2019
Beginning-of-period inventories
(quantity) (A)
Imports / FTZ admissions:1
Quantity (B)
Value (C)
U.S. shipments:
Commercial shipments:
Quantity (D)
Value (E)
Internal consumption:2
Quantity (F)
Value2 (G)
Transfers to related firms:2
Quantity (H)
Value2 (I)
Export shipments:3
Quantity (J)
Value (K)
End-of-period inventories
(quantity) (L)
1
Please identify the foreign producers, if known:
.
Sales to related firms (including internal consumption) must be valued at fair market value. In the event that your firm uses
a different basis for valuing these sales within your company, please specify that basis (e.g., cost, cost plus, etc.) and provide
value data using that basis for each period identified above:
.
3
Identify your firm’s principal export markets:
.
2
Contains Business Proprietary Information
U.S. Importers’ Questionnaire – Silicon Metal from Russia (Third Review)
II-5a.
Page 12
Imports: Russia.–Continued
RECONCILIATION OF SHIPMENTS, IMPORTS, AND INVENTORIES.--Generally, the data reported for the
end-of-period inventories (i.e., line L) should be equal to the beginning-of-period inventories (i.e., line
A), plus imports (i.e., line B), less total shipments (i.e., lines D, F, H, and J). Please ensure that any
differences are not due to data entry errors in completing this form, but rather actually reflect your
firm’s records; and also provide any likely explanations for any differences (e.g., theft, loss, damage,
record systems issues, etc.) if they exist.
Calendar year
Reconciliation
2016
A+B–D–F–H–J-L=
should equal zero ("0") or
provide an explanation.1
1
January-September
2017
0
2018
0
2018
0
2019
0
0
Explanation if the calculated fields above are returning values other than zero (i.e., “0”) but are nonetheless accurate:
.
II-5b.
Channels of distribution: RUSSIA-- Report your firm’s U.S. shipments (i.e. inclusive of
commercial U.S. shipments, internal consumption, and transfers to related firms) of imports
from all other sources by channel of distribution.
Quantity (in short tons contained silicon)
Calendar year
Item
2016
2017
January-September
2018
2018
2019
U.S. shipments
to Distributors: (M)
To Polysilicon and chemical
producers:(N)
To Primary aluminum producers:
(O)
To Secondary aluminum
producers:(P)
To All other end users1: (Q)
1
Identify other end users
.
RECONCILIATION OF CHANNELS.--Please ensure that the quantities reported for channels of distribution
(i.e., lines M, N, O, P, and Q) in each time period equal the quantity reported for U.S. shipments (i.e., line
D, F, and H) in each time period. If the calculated fields below return values other than zero (i.e., “0”),
the data reported must be revised prior to submission to the Commission.
Calendar years
Reconciliation
M + N + O + P + Q – D – F - H = zero
("0"), if not revise.
2016
2017
0
January-September
2018
0
2018
0
2019
0
0
Contains Business Proprietary Information
U.S. Importers’ Questionnaire – Silicon Metal from Russia (Third Review)
II-6a.
Page 13
Imports: All other sources.--Report your firm’s imports and your firm’s shipments and
inventories of silicon metal imported from all other sources during the specified periods.
ALL OTHER SOURCES
(list sources:
)
Quantity (in short tons contained silicon), value (in $1,000)
Calendar year
Item
2016
2017
January-September
2018
2018
2019
Beginning-of-period inventories
(quantity) (A)
Imports / FTZ admissions:1
Quantity (B)
Value (C)
U.S. shipments:
Commercial shipments:
Quantity (D)
Value (E)
Internal consumption:2
Quantity (F)
Value2 (G)
Transfers to related firms:2
Quantity (H)
Value2 (I)
Export shipments:3
Quantity (J)
Value (K)
End-of-period inventories
(quantity) (L)
1
Please identify the foreign producers, if known:
.
Sales to related firms (including internal consumption) must be valued at fair market value. In the event that your firm uses
a different basis for valuing these sales within your company, please specify that basis (e.g., cost, cost plus, etc.) and provide
value data using that basis for each period identified above:
.
3
Identify your firm’s principal export markets:
.
2
Contains Business Proprietary Information
U.S. Importers’ Questionnaire – Silicon Metal from Russia (Third Review)
II-6a.
Page 14
Imports: All other sources.–Continued
RECONCILIATION OF SHIPMENTS, IMPORTS, AND INVENTORIES.--Generally, the data reported for the
end-of-period inventories (i.e., line L) should be equal to the beginning-of-period inventories (i.e., line
A), plus imports (i.e., line B), less total shipments (i.e., lines D, F, H, and J). Please ensure that any
differences are not due to data entry errors in completing this form, but rather actually reflect your
firm’s records; and also provide any likely explanations for any differences (e.g., theft, loss, damage,
record systems issues, etc.) if they exist.
Calendar year
Reconciliation
2016
A+B–D–F–H–J-L=
should equal zero ("0") or
provide an explanation.1
1
January-September
2017
0
2018
0
2018
0
2019
0
0
Explanation if the calculated fields above are returning values other than zero (i.e., “0”) but are nonetheless accurate:
.
II-6b.
Channels of distribution: All other sources--Report your firm’s U.S. shipments (i.e. inclusive of
commercial U.S. shipments, internal consumption, and transfers to related firms) of imports
from all other sources by channel of distribution.
Quantity (in short tons contained silicon)
Calendar year
Item
2016
2017
January-September
2018
2018
2019
U.S. shipments to
Distributors: (M)
Polysilicon and chemical
producers:(N)
Primary aluminum producers: (O)
Secondary aluminum
producers:(P)
All other end users1: (Q)
1
Identify other end users
.
RECONCILIATION OF CHANNELS.--Please ensure that the quantities reported for channels of distribution
(i.e., lines M, N, O, P, and Q) in each time period equal the quantity reported for U.S. shipments (i.e., line
D, F, and H) in each time period. If the calculated fields below return values other than zero (i.e., “0”),
the data reported must be revised prior to submission to the Commission.
Calendar years
Reconciliation
M + N + O + P + Q – D – F - H = zero
("0"), if not revise.
2016
2017
0
January-September
2018
0
2018
0
2019
0
0
Contains Business Proprietary Information
U.S. Importers’ Questionnaire – Silicon Metal from Russia (Third Review)
Page 15
II-7.
Effect of order.--Describe the significance of the existing antidumping duty order covering
imports of silicon metal from Russia in terms of its effect on your firm’s imports, U.S. shipments
of imports, and inventories. You may wish to compare your firm’s operations before and after
the imposition of the order.
II-8.
Likely impact of revocation. --Would your firm anticipate any changes in the character of its
operations or organization, including its imports, U.S. shipments of imports, or inventories of
silicon metal in the future, if the antidumping duty order on silicon metal from Russia were to be
revoked?
No
Yes
If yes, supply details as to the time, nature, and significance of
such changes and provide underlying assumptions, along with
relevant portions of business plans or other supporting
documentations that address this issue.
II-9.
Transfers to related firms.--If your firm reported transfers to related firms in any of the data
tables in part II, please identify the firm(s) and indicate the nature of the relationship between
your firm and the related firms (e.g., joint venture, wholly owned subsidiary) and whether the
transfers were priced at market value or by a non-market formula.
II-10.
Other explanations.--If your firm would like to further explain a response to a question in Part II
for which a narrative box was not provided, please note the question number and the
explanation in the space provided below. Please also use this space to highlight any issues your
firm had in providing the data in this section, including but not limited to technical issues with
the MS Word questionnaire.
Contains Business Proprietary Information
U.S. Importers’ Questionnaire – Silicon Metal from Russia (Third Review)
Page 16
PART III.--PRICING AND MARKET FACTORS
Further information on this part of the questionnaire can be obtained from Pamela Davis (202-2052218, Pamela.Davis@usitc.gov).
III-1.
Contact information.--Please identify the responsible individual and the manner by which
Commission staff may contact that individual regarding the confidential information submitted
in part III.
Name
Title
Email
Telephone
PRICE DATA
III-2.
This question requests quarterly quantity and value data for your firm’s commercial shipments
to unrelated U.S. customers of the following products your firm imported from Russia :
Product 1.-- Sold to primary aluminum producers; silicon metal less than 99.99% pure that
contains a minimum of 98.5% silicon, a maximum of 1.00% iron, a maximum of
0.07% calcium, and no restriction of the aluminum content; lumps. Do not include
fines or dust in the quantity and value data reported for this product.
Product 2.-- Sold to secondary aluminum producers; silicon metal less than 99.99% pure that
contains a minimum of 97.0% silicon, a maximum of 2.00% iron, a maximum of 0.4%
calcium, and no restriction of the aluminum content; lumps. Do not include fines or
dust in the quantity and value data reported for this product.
Product 3.-- Sold to chemical and polysilicon manufacturers; silicon metal less than 99.99% pure
that contains a minimum of 98.0% silicon, a maximum of 1.50% iron, a maximum of
0.2% calcium, and a maximum of 0.4% aluminum; lumps and/or powder. Do not
include fines or dust in the quantity and value data reported for this product.
Please note that values should be f.o.b., U.S. point of shipment and should not include U.S.-inland
transportation costs. Values should reflect the final net amount paid to your firm (i.e., should be net
of all deductions for discounts or rebates).
(a) During January 2016September 2019, did your firm import from Russia and sell to
unrelated U.S. customers any of the above listed products (or any products that were
competitive with these products)?
Yes.--Please complete the following pricing data table as appropriate.
No.--Skip to question III-3.
Contains Business Proprietary Information
U.S. Importers’ Questionnaire – Silicon Metal from Russia (Third Review)
Page 17
III-2b. Price data (Russia).--Report below the quarterly price data1 for pricing products2 imported from
Russia and sold by your firm.
Russia
Report data in short tons of contained silicon and actual dollars (not 1,000s).
(Quantity in short tons of contained silicon, value in dollars)
Product 1
Product 2
Quantity
Value
Quantity
Value
Product 3
Period of shipment
Quantity
Value
2016:
January-March
April-June
July-September
October-December
2017:
January-March
April-June
July-September
October-December
2018:
January-March
April-June
July-September
October-December
2019:
January-March
April-June
July-September
1 Net values (i.e., gross sales values less all discounts, allowances, rebates, prepaid freight, and the value of returned
goods), f.o.b. your firm’s U.S. point of shipment.
2 Pricing product definitions are provided on the first page of Part III.
Note.--If your firm’s product does not exactly meet the product specifications but is competitive with the specified product,
provide a description of the product. Also, please explain any anomalies in your firm’s reported pricing data.
Product 1:
Product 2:
Product 3:
Contains Business Proprietary Information
U.S. Importers’ Questionnaire – Silicon Metal from Russia (Third Review)
III-2c.
Page 18
Price data checklist.--Please check that the pricing data in question III-2(b) has been correctly
reported.
Are the price data reported above:
√ if Yes
In actual dollars (not $1,000) and short tons of contained silicon?
F.o.b. U.S. point of shipment (i.e., does not include U.S. transport costs)?
Net of all discounts and rebates?
Have returns credited to the quarter in which the sale occurred?
Less than reported commercial shipments in part II in each year?
III-2d. Pricing data methodology.--Please describe the method and the kinds of documents/records
that were used to compile your price data.
Note: As requested in Part I of this questionnaire, please keep all supporting documents/records
used in the preparation of the price data, as Commission staff may contact your firm regarding
questions on the price data. The Commission may also request that your company submit copies
of the supporting documents/records (such as sales journal, invoices, etc.) used to compile these
data.
Contains Business Proprietary Information
U.S. Importers’ Questionnaire – Silicon Metal from Russia (Third Review)
III-3.
Price setting.--How does your firm determine the prices that it charges for sales of silicon metal
(check all that apply)? If your firm issues price lists, please submit sample pages of a recent list.
Transaction
by
transaction
III-4.
Contracts
Set
price
lists
Other
If other, describe
Discount policy.--Please indicate and describe your firm’s discount policies (check all that apply).
Quantity
discounts
III-5.
Page 19
Annual
total
volume
discounts
No
discount
policy
Other
Describe
Pricing terms.--On what basis are your firm’s prices of imported silicon metal from Russia
usually quoted? (check one)
Delivered
F.o.b.
If f.o.b., specify point
Contains Business Proprietary Information
U.S. Importers’ Questionnaire – Silicon Metal from Russia (Third Review)
III-6.
Contract versus spot.--Approximately what share of your firm’s sales of silicon metal imported
from Russia in 2018 was on a (1) short-term contract basis, (2) annual contract basis, (3) longterm contract basis, and (4) spot sales basis?
Type of sale
Long-term
Annual
contracts
contracts
(multiple
(multiple
deliveries for
deliveries for 12
more than 12
months)
months)
Short-term
contracts
(multiple
deliveries for
less than 12
months)
Share of your
2018 sales
III-7.
%
%
Spot sales
(for a single
delivery)
%
%
Total
(should
sum to
100.0%)
0.0
Contract provisions.--Please fill out the table regarding your firm’s typical sales contracts for
silicon metal imported from Russia (or check “not applicable” if your firm does not sell on a
short-term, annual and/or long-term contract basis).
Typical sales
contract provisions
Item
Average contract
duration
No. of
days
Price renegotiation
(during contract
period)
Yes
Fixed quantity
and/or price
No
Quantity
Indexed to raw
material costs1
Price
Both
Yes
No
Not applicable
1
Page 20
Please identify the indexes used:
Short-term contracts
(multiple deliveries
for less than 12
months)
Annual contracts
(multiple
deliveries for 12
months)
365
Long-term contracts
(multiple deliveries
for more than 12
months)
%
Contains Business Proprietary Information
U.S. Importers’ Questionnaire – Silicon Metal from Russia (Third Review)
III-8.
Lead times.--What is your firm’s share of sales of silicon metal imported from Russia from
inventory and produced to order and what is the typical lead time between a customer’s order
and the date of delivery for your firm’s sales of silicon metal?
Source
Share of 2018
sales
From inventory
%
From foreign manufacturers’ inventory
%
Produced to order
%
Total (should sum to 100.0%)
III-9.
Page 21
0.0
Lead time (average
number of days)
%
Shipping information.-(a)
What is the approximate percentage of the cost of silicon metal imported from Russia
that is accounted for by U.S. inland transportation costs?
%
(b)
Who generally arranges the transportation to your firm’s customers’ locations?
Your firm
Purchaser (check one)
(c)
When your firm sells silicon metal imported from Russia, from where is it shipped?
Point of importation
Storage facility (check one)
(d)
Indicate the approximate percentage of your sales of silicon metal imported from Russia
that are delivered the following distances from your firm’s U.S. point of shipment.
Distance from your firm’s U.S. point of shipment
Share
Within 100 miles
%
101 to 1,000 miles
%
Over 1,000 miles
%
Total (should sum to 100.0%)
0.0
%
Contains Business Proprietary Information
U.S. Importers’ Questionnaire – Silicon Metal from Russia (Third Review)
Page 22
III-10. Geographical shipments.--In which U.S. geographic market area(s) has your firm sold silicon
metal imported from subject countries since January 1, 2014 (check all that apply)?
Geographic area
Russia
Northeast.–CT, ME, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, and VT.
Midwest.–IL, IN, IA, KS, MI, MN, MO, NE, ND, OH, SD, and WI.
Southeast.–AL, DE, DC, FL, GA, KY, MD, MS, NC, SC, TN, VA, and
WV.
Central Southwest.–AR, LA, OK, and TX.
Mountains.–AZ, CO, ID, MT, NV, NM, UT, and WY.
Pacific Coast.–CA, OR, and WA.
Other.–All other markets in the United States not previously listed,
including AK, HI, PR, and VI.
III-11. End uses.—
(a) List the end uses of the silicon metal that your firm imports from Russia. For each end-use
product, what percentage of the total cost is accounted for by silicon metal and other
inputs?
Share of total cost of end-use product
accounted for by
End-use product
Silicon metal
Other inputs
Total
(should sum to 100.0%
across)
%
%
0.0 %
%
%
0.0 %
%
%
0.0 %
(b) Have there been any changes in the end uses of silicon metal since January 1, 2014? Do you
anticipate any future changes?
Changes in end uses
Changes since
January 1, 2014
Anticipated changes
No
Yes
Explain
Contains Business Proprietary Information
U.S. Importers’ Questionnaire – Silicon Metal from Russia (Third Review)
Page 23
III-12. Substitutes.--Have there been any changes in the number or types of products that can be
substituted for silicon metal since January 1, 2014? Do you anticipate any future changes?
Changes in
substitutes
No
Yes
Explain
Changes since
January 1, 2014
Anticipated changes
III-13. Availability of supply.--Has the availability of silicon metal in the U.S. market changed since
January 1, 2014? Do you anticipate any future changes?
Availability in the U.S.
market
Please explain, noting the countries and reasons for
No Yes the changes.
Changes since January 1, 2014:
U.S.-produced product
Imports from Russia
Imports from all other
countries
Anticipated changes:
U.S.-produced product
Imports from Russia
Imports from all other
countries
Contains Business Proprietary Information
U.S. Importers’ Questionnaire – Silicon Metal from Russia (Third Review)
Page 24
III-14. Demand trends.--Indicate how demand within the United States and outside of the United
States (if known) for silicon metal has changed since January 1, 2014, and how you anticipate
demand will change in the future. Explain any trends and describe the principal factors that have
affected, and that you anticipate will affect, these changes in demand.
Market
Overall
increase
No
change
Overall
decrease
Fluctuate
with no
clear trend
Demand since January 1, 2014
Within the United
StatesOverall demand
Polysilicon /
chemical user
demand
Aluminum sector
Other sectors
Outside the United
States
Anticipated future demand
Within the United
StatesOverall demand
Polysilicon /
chemical user
demand
Aluminum sector
Other sectors
Outside the United
States
Explanation and factors
Contains Business Proprietary Information
U.S. Importers’ Questionnaire – Silicon Metal from Russia (Third Review)
Page 25
III-15. Product changes.--Have there been any significant changes in the product range, product mix,
or marketing of silicon metal since January 1, 2014? Do you anticipate any future changes?
Changes in product
range, product mix,
or marketing
No
Yes
Explain
Changes since
January 1, 2014
Anticipated changes
III-16. Conditions of competition.-(a) Is the silicon metal market subject to business cycles (other than general economy-wide
conditions) and/or other conditions of competition distinctive to silicon metal?
Check all that apply.
Please describe.
No
Skip to question III-17.
Yes-Business cycles (e.g.
seasonal business)
Yes-Other distinctive
conditions of competition
(b) If yes, have there been any changes in the business cycles or conditions of competition for
silicon metal since January 1, 2014?
No
Yes
If yes, describe.
III-17. Supply constraints.--Has your firm refused, declined, or been unable to supply silicon metal
since January 1, 2014 (examples include placing customers on allocation or “controlled order
entry,” declining to accept new customers or renew existing customers, delivering less than the
quantity promised, being unable to meet timely shipment commitments, etc.)?
No
Yes
If yes, please describe.
Contains Business Proprietary Information
U.S. Importers’ Questionnaire – Silicon Metal from Russia (Third Review)
Page 26
III-18. Impact of the section 232 tariffs.-- Did the imposition of tariffs on imported steel/aluminum
products under section 232 have an impact on the silicon metal market in the United States?
Yes— Please indicate the
impact in the table below.
No
Don’t know
Explain, noting how the
Fluctuate
Overall
No
Overall
with no
increase change decrease clear trend
Factor
imposition of tariffs under
section 232 affected each
factor of the silicon metal
market in the United States.
Prices for silicon metal
Overall U.S. demand
for silicon metal
III-19. Raw materials.-- Indicate how silicon metal raw material prices have changed since January 1,
2014, and how you expect they will change in the future.
Raw
materials
prices
Fluctuate
with no
Explain, noting how raw material
Overall
No
Overall
clear
price changes have affected your
increase change decrease trend
firm’s selling prices for silicon metal.
Changes since
January 1,
2014
Anticipated
changes
III-20. Price comparisons.--Please compare market prices of silicon metal in U.S. and non-U.S. markets
if known. Provide information as to time periods and regions for any price comparisons.
III-21. Market studies.--Please provide as a separate attachment to this request any studies, surveys,
etc. that you are aware of that quantify and/or otherwise discuss silicon metal supply (including
production capacity and capacity utilization) and demand in (1) the United States, (2) each of
the other major producing/consuming countries, including Russia, and (3) the world as a whole.
Of particular interest is such data from 2016 to the present and forecasts for the future.
Contains Business Proprietary Information
U.S. Importers’ Questionnaire – Silicon Metal from Russia (Third Review)
Page 27
III-22. Interchangeability.-- Is silicon metal produced in the United States and in other countries
interchangeable (i.e., can they physically be used in the same applications)?
Please indicate A, F, S, N, or 0 in the table below:
A = the products from a specified country-pair are always interchangeable
F = the products are frequently interchangeable
S = the products are sometimes interchangeable
N = the products are never interchangeable
0 = no familiarity with products from a specified country-pair
Country-pair
Russia
Other countries
United States
Russia
For any country-pair producing silicon metal that is sometimes or never interchangeable,
identify the country-pair and explain the factors that limit or preclude interchangeable use:
III-23. Factors other than price.--Are differences other than price (e.g., quality, availability,
transportation network, product range, technical support, etc.) between silicon metal produced
in the United States and in other countries a significant factor in your firm’s sales of the
products?
Please indicate A, F, S, N, or 0 in the table below:
A = such differences are always significant
F = such differences are frequently significant
S = such differences are sometimes significant
N = such differences are never significant
0 = no familiarity with products from a specified country-pair
Country-pair
Russia
Other countries
United States
Russia
For any country-pair for which factors other than price always or frequently are a significant
factor in your firm’s sales of silicon metal, identify the country-pair and report the
advantages or disadvantages imparted by such factors:
Contains Business Proprietary Information
U.S. Importers’ Questionnaire – Silicon Metal from Russia (Third Review)
Page 28
III-24. Other explanations.--If your firm would like to further explain a response to a question in Part III
for which a narrative box was not provided, please note the question number and the
explanation in the space provided below. Please also use this space to highlight any issues your
firm had in providing the data in this section, including but not limited to technical issues with
the MS Word questionnaire.
Contains Business Proprietary Information
U.S. Importers’ Questionnaire – Silicon Metal from Russia (Third Review)
Page 29
Correcting Valid number error messages.--If you are completing a Commission
questionnaire in a country that uses periods (“.”) to delineate multiples of 1000 (e.g., one million would
appear as $1.000.000 instead of as $1,000,000), you may be unable to enter in numbers greater than
999 in numeric form fields. This issues stem from your computer number formatting setting (e.g., not
the MS Word document itself, but the computer from which you are opening up the document). In the
United States commas (,) delineate multiples of 1000 and periods (.) delineate fractions less than
one. Many EU countries use the reverse where multiples of 1000 are delineated with periods (.) and
fractions less than one are delineated with commas (,). The U.S. International Trade Commission’s
questionnaires are set-up in the United States with the U.S. number formatting. When this formatting
interacts with a computer set to EU number formatting, we believe this may cause this issue.
The solution to this data entry issue is to temporarily change your operating system’s number
formatting to be consistent with the U.S. number formatting system while you complete the
questionnaire.
To temporarily change your computer’s number settings to U.S. settings, please do the following (for
Microsoft Windows Operating system):
START
Control Panel
Region and Language (under Clock, Language, and Region category)
Format tab
Change the Format from your existing one (e.g. “Italian (Italy)”) to “English (United States)” (see
screen shots below)
When you do this the number “twelve million dollars and thirty five cents” would change from
$12.000.000,35 (Italy format) to $12,000,000.35 (U.S. format), and then there will be no conflict with
the questionnaire. When you finish reporting the data then you can close the questionnaire and switch
back to Italy settings.
Contains Business Proprietary Information
U.S. Importers’ Questionnaire – Silicon Metal from Russia (Third Review)
Page 30
HOW TO FILE YOUR QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONSE
This questionnaire is available as a “fillable” form in MS Word format on the
Commission’s website at:
https://www.usitc.gov/investigations/701731/2019/silicon_metal_russia/full_review.ht
m
Please do not attempt to modify the format or permissions of the questionnaire
document. Please submit the completed questionnaire using one of the methods noted
below. If your firm is unable to complete the MS Word questionnaire or cannot use one
of the electronic methods of submission, please contact the Commission for further
instructions.
• Upload via Secure Drop Box.—Upload the MS Word questionnaire along with a scanned copy of the
signed certification page (page 1) through the Commission’s secure upload facility:
Web address: https://dropbox.usitc.gov/oinv/
Pin: SMFR
• E-mail.—E-mail the MS Word questionnaire to nitin.joshi@usitc.gov; include a scanned copy of the
signed certification page (page 1). Submitters are strongly encouraged to encrypt nonpublic documents
that are electronically transmitted to the Commission to protect your sensitive information from
unauthorized disclosure. The USITC secure drop-box system and the Electronic Document Information
System (EDIS) use Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) 140-2 cryptographic algorithms to
encrypt data in transit. Submitting your nonpublic documents by a means that does not use these
encryption algorithms (such as by email) may subject your firm’s nonpublic information to unauthorized
disclosure during transmission. If you choose a non-encrypted method of electronic transmission, the
Commission warns you that the risk of such possible unauthorized disclosure is assumed by you and not
by the Commission.
If your firm does not import this product, please fill out page 1, print, sign, and submit a scanned copy
to the Commission.
Parties to this proceeding.—If your firm is a party to this proceeding, it is required to serve a copy of the
completed questionnaire on parties to the proceeding that are subject to administrative protective
order (see 19 CFR § 207.7). A list of such parties may be obtained from the Commission’s Secretary (202205-1803). A certificate of service must accompany the completed questionnaire you submit (see 19 CFR
§ 207.7). Service of the questionnaire must be made in paper form.
File Type | application/pdf |
File Title | Microsoft Word - Importers questionnaire |
Author | lawrence.jones |
File Modified | 2019-12-11 |
File Created | 2019-12-11 |