Download:
pdf |
pdfOMB No. 3117‐0016/USITC No. 19‐3‐4139; Expiration Date: 6/30/2020
(No response is required if currently valid OMB control number is not displayed)
U.S. PURCHASERS’ QUESTIONNAIRE
Sodium Sulfate Anhydrous from Canada
This questionnaire must be received by the Commission by January 8, 2020
See last page for filing instructions.
The information called for in this questionnaire is for use by the United States International Trade Commission in
connection with its antidumping investigation concerning sodium sulfate anhydrous from Canada (Inv. No. 731‐TA‐1446
(Final)). The information requested in the questionnaire is requested under the authority of the Tariff Act of 1930, title
VII. This report is mandatory and failure to reply as directed can result in a subpoena or other order to compel the
submission of records or information in your possession (19 U.S.C. § 1333(a)). Further information on this questionnaire
can be obtained from Amelia Preece (202‐205‐3250, amelia.preece@usitc.gov).
Name of firm
Address
City
State
Zip Code
Website
Has your firm purchased or imported for own use sodium sulfate anhydrous (as defined on next page) from any
source (domestic or foreign) at any time since January 1, 2016?
NO
(Sign the certification below and promptly return only this page of the questionnaire to the Commission)
YES
(Complete all parts of the questionnaire, and return the entire questionnaire to the Commission)
Return questionnaire via the U.S. International Trade Commission Drop Box by clicking on the
following link: https://dropbox.usitc.gov/oinv/. (PIN: SSAF)
CERTIFICATION
I certify that the information herein supplied in response to this questionnaire is complete and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief and understand that the information submitted is subject to audit and verification by the Commission. By
submitting this certification I also grant consent for the Commission, and its employees and contract personnel, to use the
information provided in this questionnaire and throughout this proceeding in any other import‐injury proceedings conducted by
the Commission on the same or similar merchandise.
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that information submitted in response to this request for information and throughout this
proceeding or other proceedings may be disclosed to and used: (i) by the Commission, its employees and Offices, and contract
personnel (a) for developing or maintaining the records of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in internal investigations, audits,
reviews, and evaluations relating to the programs, personnel, and operations of the Commission including under 5 U.S.C.
Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. government employees and contract personnel, solely for cybersecurity purposes. I understand that all
contract personnel will sign appropriate nondisclosure agreements.
Name of Authorized Official Title of Authorized Official
Date
Signature
Phone
Email address
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Sodium Sulfate Anhydrous (Final)
Page 2
PART I.—GENERAL INFORMATION
Background.‐‐This proceeding was instituted in response to a petition filed on March 28, 2019, by
Cooper Natural Resources, Inc., Fort Worth, Texas; Elementis Global LLC, East Windsor, New Jersey; and
Searles Valley Minerals, Inc., Overland Park, Kansas. Antidumping duties may be assessed on the subject
imports as a result of these proceedings if the Commission makes an affirmative determination of injury,
threat, or material retardation, and if the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) makes an
affirmative determination of dumping. Questionnaires and other information pertinent to this
proceeding are available at
https://www.usitc.gov/investigations/701731/2019/sodium_sulfate_anhydrous_canada/final.htm
Sodium sulfate anhydrous covered by this investigation includes sodium sulfate (Na2 SO4) (Chemical
Abstracts Service (CAS) Number 7757‐82‐6) that is anhydrous (i.e., containing no water), regardless of
purity, grade, color, production method, and form of packaging, in which the percentage of particles
between 20 mesh and 100 mesh, based on U.S. mesh series screens, ranges from 10‐95% and the
percentage of particles finer than 100 mesh, based on U.S. mesh series screens, ranges from 5‐90%.
Excluded from the scope of this investigation are specialty sodium sulfate anhydrous products, which
are products whose particle distributions fall outside the described ranges. Glauber's salt (Na2 SO4∙10H2
O), also known as sodium sulfate decahydrate, an intermediate product Start Printed Page 60377in the
production of sodium sulfate anhydrous that has no known commercial uses, is not included within the
scope of the investigation, although some end‐users may mistakenly refer to sodium sulfate anhydrous
as Glauber's salt. Other forms of sodium sulfate that are hydrous (i.e., containing water) are also
excluded from the scope of the investigation.
Sodium sulfate anhydrous is currently imported under statistical reporting number 2833.11.5010 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). It may also be imported under HTSUS
statistical reporting numbers 2833.11.1000, 2833.11.5050, and 2833.19.0000. The HTSUS provisions and
CAS registry number are for convenience and customs purposes; the written description of the scope is
dispositive.
Importer.‐‐Any person or firm engaged, either directly or through a parent company or subsidiary, in
importing sodium sulfate anhydrous (as defined above) into the United States from a foreign
manufacturer or through its selling agent.
Reporting of information.‐‐If information is not readily available from your records, provide carefully
prepared estimates. If your firm is completing more than one questionnaire (i.e., a producer, importer,
and/or purchaser questionnaire), you need not respond to duplicated questions.
Confidentiality.‐‐The commercial and financial data furnished in response to this questionnaire that
reveal the individual operations of your firm will be treated as confidential by the Commission to the
extent that such data are not otherwise available to the public and will not be disclosed except as may
be required by law (see 19 U.S.C. § 1677f). Such confidential information will not be published in a
manner that will reveal the individual operations of your firm; however, general characterizations of
numerical business proprietary information (such as discussion of trends) will be treated as confidential
business information only at the request of the submitter for good cause shown.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Sodium Sulfate Anhydrous (Final)
Page 3
Verification.‐‐ The information submitted in this questionnaire is subject to audit and verification by the
Commission. To facilitate possible verification of data, please keep all files, worksheets, and supporting
documents used in the preparation of the questionnaire response. Please also retain a copy of the final
document that you submit.
Release of information.‐‐The information provided by your firm in response to this questionnaire, as
well as any other business proprietary information submitted by your firm to the Commission in
connection with this proceeding, may become subject to, and released under, the administrative
protective order provisions of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1677f) and section 207.7 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR § 207.7). This means that certain lawyers and
other authorized individuals may temporarily be given access to the information for use in connection
with this proceeding or other import‐injury proceedings conducted by the Commission on the same or
similar merchandise; those individuals would be subject to severe penalties if the information were
divulged to unauthorized individuals.
I‐1a. Establishments covered.‐‐Provide the name and address of your U.S. establishment(s) covered
by this questionnaire, if different from that listed on the cover page. Firms operating more than
one establishment should combine the data for all establishments into a single response.
“Establishment”‐‐Each facility of a firm involved in the purchase of sodium sulfate anhydrous,
including auxiliary facilities operated in conjunction with (whether or not physically separate
from) such facilities.
I‐1b.
I‐1c.
Stock symbol information.‐‐ If your firm or parent firm is publicly traded, please specify the
stock exchange and trading symbol: .
External counsel.‐‐ If your firm or parent firm is represented by external counsel in relation to
this proceeding, please specify the name of the law firm and the lead attorney(s).
Law firm: .
Lead attorney(s): .
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Sodium Sulfate Anhydrous (Final)
I‐2.
Ownership.‐‐Is your firm owned, in whole or in part, by any other firm?
No
Yes‐‐List the following information.
I‐3.
I‐4.
Address
Extent of ownership
(percent)
Related importers/exporters.‐‐Does your firm have any related firms, either domestic or
foreign, which import sodium sulfate anhydrous into the United States or which export sodium
sulfate anhydrous to the United States?
No
Yes‐‐List the following information.
Firm name
Country
Affiliation
Related producers.‐‐Does your firm have any related firms, either domestic or foreign, which
produce sodium sulfate anhydrous?
No
Yes‐‐List the following information.
Firm name
Page 4
Firm name
Country
Affiliation
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Sodium Sulfate Anhydrous (Final)
Page 5
PART II.‐‐PURCHASES
Contact information.‐‐Please identify the responsible individual and the manner by which Commission
staff may contact that individual regarding the confidential information submitted in this questionnaire.
Name
Title
Email
Telephone
II‐1. Purchases and imports.‐‐Report separately your firm’s domestic purchases and imports of
sodium sulfate anhydrous.
“Purchase” – Purchase from a U.S. entity such as a U.S. producer, a U.S. importer, or other U.S.
firm.
“Import” – Purchase directly from a foreign supplier and your firm is the importer of record.
Calendar year
Item
2016
2017
Jan‐Sept
2018
2019
Quantity (in short tons)
Purchases of sodium sulfate
anhydrous produced in‐‐
United States
Canada
1
All other countries
Sources unknown2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total purchases
Imports of sodium sulfate
anhydrous from‐‐
Canada
1
All other countries
3
Total imports
1
Please identify these countries: .
Please indicate the firm(s) from which you purchased this merchandise: .
3
If your firm imported sodium sulfate anhydrous at any time since January 1, 2016, please also
complete and return a U.S. importers' questionnaire in this proceeding.
2
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Sodium Sulfate Anhydrous (Final)
Page 6
II‐2. Changes in purchasing patterns.‐‐Please indicate how the shares of your firm’s purchases of
sodium sulfate anhydrous from different sources have changed since January 1, 2016.
Source of
purchases
Did not
purchase Decreased Increased Constant Fluctuated
Explanation for trend
United States
Canada
All other countries
Sources unknown
II‐3.
Purchases of natural and synthetic sodium sulfate anhydrous.‐‐Report your firm’s purchases of
natural and synthetic sodium sulfate anhydrous.
Calendar year
Item
2016
2017
Jan‐Sept
2018
2019
Quantity (in short tons)
Purchases and imports of—
Natural sodium sulfate
anhydrous
Synthetic sodium sulfate
anhydrous
Sodium sulfate anhydrous (type
unknown)
0
0
0
0
Total purchases
RECONCILIATION OF PURCHASES.‐‐Please ensure that the quantities reported for total purchases of
natural, synthetic, and unknown sodium sulfate anhydrous (i.e.,II‐3) in each time period equal the
quantity reported for total purchases (i.e., II‐1) in each time period. If the calculated fields below return
values other than zero (i.e., “0”), the data reported must be revised prior to submission to the
Commission.
2016
2017
2018
Jan‐Sept 2019
Total Purchases (II‐1) – Total
Purchases (II‐3)
0
0
0
0
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Sodium Sulfate Anhydrous (Final)
Page 7
II‐4. Changes in purchases of natural and synthetic sodium sulfate anhydrous.‐‐Please indicate how
the shares of your firm’s purchases of natural and synthetic sodium sulfate anhydrous have
changed since January 1, 2016.
Type of sodium
Did not
sulfate anhydrous purchase Decreased Increased Constant Fluctuated
Explanation for trend
Natural
Synthetic
II‐5.
Country knowledge.‐‐Please indicate the countries of origin with which your firm has
experience or information in the sodium sulfate anhydrous market.
United
States
II‐6.
Canada
Other
countries
Other countries (specify)
Supplier identification.‐‐Please list your firm’s FIVE largest suppliers for sodium sulfate
anhydrous since January 1, 2016. Also, provide the share of the quantity of your firm’s total
purchases of sodium sulfate anhydrous that each of these suppliers accounted for in 2018.
No.
Supplier’s name
City and state
Share of quantity of
2018 purchases
1
%
2
%
3
%
4
%
5
%
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Sodium Sulfate Anhydrous (Final)
Page 8
PART III.‐‐MARKET CHARACTERISTICS AND PURCHASING PRACTICES
III‐1. Firm type.‐‐Which of the following best describes your firm as a purchaser of sodium sulfate
anhydrous (check all that apply)?
End user Distributor
Other
Describe other
If your firm is a distributor of sodium sulfate anhydrous, please answer questions III‐2 and III‐3.
III‐2. Competition for sales.‐‐Does your firm compete for sales to customers with the manufacturers
or importers from which your firm purchases sodium sulfate anhydrous?
No
Yes If yes, please describe.
III‐3.
Types of customers.‐‐What are the major types of consumers to which your firm sells sodium
sulfate anhydrous?
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Sodium Sulfate Anhydrous (Final)
Page 9
If your firm is an end user of sodium sulfate anhydrous, please answer questions III‐4 and III‐5.
III‐4. End uses.‐‐List the top 3 products your firm makes using sodium sulfate anhydrous and estimate
the percent of your total production cost that is accounted for by sodium sulfate anhydrous and
by other inputs (such as labor, energy, and other raw materials).
Share of total cost in each of the product(s) your
Total
firm produces accounted for by
(should
sum to
100.0%
Product(s) your firm
Sodium sulfate
across)
produces
anhydrous
Other inputs
III‐5.
% +
% =
0.0 %
% +
% =
0.0 %
% +
% =
0.0 %
Demand for end‐use products.‐‐
(a)
Has the demand for your firm’s final products incorporating sodium sulfate anhydrous
changed since January 1, 2016?
Increased
No change
(b)
Decreased
Fluctuated
Has this had any effect on your firm’s demand for sodium sulfate anhydrous?
No
Yes
Explain
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Sodium Sulfate Anhydrous (Final)
III‐6. Substitutes.‐‐Can other products be substituted for sodium sulfate anhydrous?
No
Yes‐‐Please fill out the table.
End use in which this
substitute is used
Substitute
Have changes in the price of this substitute
affected the price for sodium sulfate anhydrous?
No Yes
Explanation
1.
2.
3.
III‐7.
Page 10
Demand trends.‐‐Indicate how demand within the United States and outside of the United
States (if known) for sodium sulfate anhydrous has changed since January 1, 2016. Explain any
trends and describe the principal factors that have affected these changes in demand.
Overall
increase
Market
Fluctuate
No
Overall
with no
change decrease clear trend
Explanation and factors
Within the United States
Outside the United States
III‐8.
Country preferences.‐‐Do you or your customers ever specifically order sodium sulfate
anhydrous from one country in particular over other possible sources of supply?
No
Yes
If yes, identify the countries and explain.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Sodium Sulfate Anhydrous (Final)
III‐9.
Page 11
Importance of purchasing domestic product.‐‐Please fill out the table below, estimating the
percentage of your firm’s total 2018 purchases of sodium sulfate anhydrous that required
sodium sulfate anhydrous produced in the United States.
Purchases that did not require domestic product
Purchases that were required by law or regulation to be domestic product
(e.g., government purchases under “Buy American” provisions)
Purchases that were not required by law or regulation, but were required by
your customers to be domestic product
Purchases that were required to be domestic product for other reasons
(explain: )
Total (should sum to 100.0%)
Estimated percentage of
your firm’s total 2018
purchases of sodium
sulfate anhydrous
%
%
%
%
0.0 %
III‐10. Conditions of competition.‐‐
(a)
Is the sodium sulfate anhydrous market subject to business cycles (other than general
economy‐wide conditions) and/or other conditions of competition distinctive to sodium
sulfate anhydrous?
Check all that apply.
Please describe.
No
Skip to question III‐11.
Yes‐Business cycles (e.g.
seasonal business)
Yes‐Other distinctive
conditions of competition
(b)
Have there been any changes in the business cycles or conditions of competition for
sodium sulfate anhydrous since January 1, 2016?
No
Yes
If yes, describe.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Sodium Sulfate Anhydrous (Final)
Page 12
III‐11. Competition between natural and synthetic sodium sulfate anhydrous.‐‐If your firm has
knowledge of natural and synthetic sodium sulfate anhydrous, please answer the following
questions. If not, please skip to III‐13.
(a)
How frequently are natural and synthetic sodium sulfate anhydrous interchangeable
(i.e., they can physically be used in the same applications? If never, please answer (b). If
at least sometimes, please skip to (c).
Always
Usually
Sometimes
Never
Please explain.
(b)
Please indicate the different uses, if any, where your firm only uses natural or synthetic
sodium sulfate anhydrous.
Type
Uses exclusive to the type of sodium sulfate anhydrous.
Natural
Synthetic
(c)
Do price changes in one type of sodium sulfate anhydrous affect the price for the other
type of sodium sulfate anhydrous?
No
Yes
(d)
Please explain, indicating which type of sodium sulfate anhydrous affects
the price of the other type of sodium sulfate anhydrous.
Are there factors other than price that your firm considers when choosing between
natural or synthetic sodium sulfate anhydrous?
No
Yes
Please list the non‐price factors your firm considers when purchasing
natural versus synthetic sodium sulfate anhydrous.
(e) Does the price of natural sodium sulfate anhydrous differ from the price of synthetic
sodium sulfate anhydrous?
Always
Usually
Sometimes
Never
If at least sometimes, explain.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Sodium Sulfate Anhydrous (Final)
Page 13
III‐12. Decisions based on producer and country‐of‐origin.‐‐How often does your firm, and if known,
do your customers, make purchasing decisions involving sodium sulfate anhydrous based on its
producer or country of origin?
Item
Always
Usually
Sometimes
Never
If at least sometimes, explain.
Decision based on producer
Your firm
Your
customers
Decision based on country of origin
Your firm
Your
customers
III‐13. Availability of supply.‐‐Has the availability of sodium sulfate anhydrous in the U.S. market
changed since January 1, 2016?
Availability in the U.S.
Please explain, noting the countries and reasons for the
market
No Yes changes.
U.S.‐produced product
Imports from Canada
Imports from other
countries
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Sodium Sulfate Anhydrous (Final)
Page 14
III‐14. Supply constraints.‐‐Has any firm refused, declined, or been unable to supply your firm with
sodium sulfate anhydrous since January 1, 2016 (examples include placing customers on
allocation or “controlled order entry,” declining to accept new customers or renew existing
customers, delivering less than the quantity promised, being unable to meet timely shipment
commitments, etc.)?
No
Yes
If yes, please describe.
III‐15. Availability of specific product types.‐‐Are certain grades/types/sizes of sodium sulfate
anhydrous only available from certain country sources?
No
Yes
If yes, please identify the countries and the grade/type/size.
III‐16. Purchasing frequency.‐‐
(a)
How frequently does your firm make purchases of sodium sulfate anhydrous (check
one)?
Daily Weekly
Monthly
Quarterly Annually
Other If other, specify
(b)
Has this purchasing frequency changed since January 1, 2016?
No
Yes If yes, please describe.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Sodium Sulfate Anhydrous (Final)
Page 15
III‐17. Raw material prices.—
(a)
Is your firm familiar with the prices for raw materials used in the production of sodium
sulfate anhydrous?
No
Yes – please answer (b)
(b)
Has information on raw material prices affected your firm’s negotiations or contracts to
purchase sodium sulfate anhydrous since 2016?
No
Yes Explain
III‐18. Number of suppliers contacted.‐‐How many suppliers does your firm generally contact before
making a purchase? Between and firms
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Sodium Sulfate Anhydrous (Final)
Page 16
III‐19. Supplier negotiations.‐‐Do your firm’s purchases of sodium sulfate anhydrous usually involve
negotiations between supplier and purchaser?
No
Yes
If yes, explain the factors your firm generally negotiates and note whether
your firm quotes competing prices during negotiations.
II‐20. Change in suppliers.‐‐Has your firm changed suppliers since January 1, 2016?
No
Yes
If yes, please list the supplier(s), whether the firm was added or dropped,
and the reasons for the change.
III‐21. New suppliers.‐‐Are you aware of any new suppliers, either foreign or domestic, that have
entered the market since January 1, 2016?
No
Yes
If yes, please identify the firms.
III‐22. Supplier qualification.‐‐Do you require your suppliers to be or to become certified or qualified
to sell sodium sulfate anhydrous to your firm?
If yes, provide the following information.
The number of days to qualify a new supplier.
A general description of the certification or qualification process. Also, a brief
description of the factors that you consider when qualifying a new supplier (e.g., quality
of product, reliability of supplier, etc.).
No
Yes
Number
of days Process and factors
III‐23. Failure to certify.‐‐Since January 1, 2016, have any domestic or foreign producers failed in their
attempts to certify or qualify their sodium sulfate anhydrous with your firm or have any
producers lost their approved status?
No
Yes
If yes, please identify these firms, the countries where they are located,
and the reasons why they failed the certification/qualification.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Sodium Sulfate Anhydrous (Final)
Page 17
III‐24. Major purchasing factors.‐‐Please list, in order of their importance, the main factors your firm
considers in deciding from whom to purchase sodium sulfate anhydrous (examples include
availability, extension of credit, contracts, price, quality, range of supplier’s product line,
traditional supplier, etc.).
1.
2.
3.
Please list any other factors that are very important in your purchase decisions:
III‐25. Purchasing factors.‐‐Please rate the importance of the following factors in your firm’s
purchasing decisions for sodium sulfate anhydrous.
Factor
Very
important
Somewhat
important
Not
important
Availability
Delivery terms
Delivery time
Discounts offered
Minimum quantity requirements
Packaging
Payment terms
Price
Product consistency
Product range
Quality meets industry standards
Quality exceeds industry standards
Reliability of supply
Technical support/service
U.S. transportation costs
III‐26. Quality characteristics.‐‐What characteristics does your firm consider when determining the
quality of sodium sulfate anhydrous?
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Sodium Sulfate Anhydrous (Final)
Page 18
III‐27. Minimum quality.‐‐How often does sodium sulfate anhydrous from the following countries
meet minimum quality specifications for your uses or your customers’ uses?
Rarely or
Don’t
Source
Always
Usually
Sometimes
never
know
United States
Canada
Other:
III‐28. Frequency of decisions based on price.‐‐How often does your firm purchase the sodium sulfate
anhydrous that is offered at the lowest price?
Always
Usually
Sometimes
Never
III‐29. Price leaders.‐‐A price leader is defined as (1) one or more firms that initiate a price change,
either upward or downward, that is followed by other firms, or (2) one or more firms that have a
significant impact on prices. A price leader is not necessarily the lowest‐priced supplier.
Please list the names of any firms you considered price leaders in the sodium sulfate anhydrous
market since January 1, 2016.
Firm(s)
Describe how the firm(s) exhibited price leadership
III‐30. Unsolicited offers.—
(a)
Since January 2016, has your firm received an unsolicited bid to sell your firm sodium
sulfate anhydrous?
Number firms giving unsolicited bids
Source
No
Yes
received in 2018
United States
Canada
(b)
Did any of these unsolicited bidders request that you break a contract?
If yes, please identify the firms, the countries where they are located, and what
Yes they requested.
No
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Sodium Sulfate Anhydrous (Final)
Page 19
III‐31. Purchasing subject imports rather than domestic products.—
(a) Since January 2016, did your firm import and/or purchase imports of sodium sulfate
anhydrous from Canada instead of purchasing U.S.‐produced sodium sulfate anhydrous?
Yes
No
Source
(also respond to parts (b) and (c))
(If “No”, skip to next question)
Canada
(b)
If you responded “Yes” to part (a), was the imported product priced lower than the
domestic product?
Source
Yes
No
Canada
(c)
If you responded “Yes” to part (a), was price a primary reason for importing and/or
purchasing subject imports rather than domestic product?
Source
Yes
If Yes, estimate the quantity
of imports purchased and/or
imported instead of domestic
product since January 2016
(in short tons)
Canada
No
If No, please indicate the
reason your firm imported
and/or purchased imports
instead of domestic product
III‐32. Role of Giles and Saltex in prices.—Explain how Giles and Saltex affect the price of sodium
sulfate anhydrous?
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Sodium Sulfate Anhydrous (Final)
Page 20
III‐33. U.S. producers and import competition.—
(a)
Since January 1, 2016, in connection with a sale or offer to sell sodium sulfate anhydrous
to your firm, did U.S. producers reduce their prices of domestically produced sodium
sulfate anhydrous in order to compete with lower‐priced imports of sodium sulfate
anhydrous from Canada?
Yes (also respond to
No (If “No”, skip to next
Source
question part (b))
question)
Don’t know
Canada
(b)
If your firm responded “yes”, please provide an estimate of the reduction in U.S.
producers’ prices, and any additional explanations, such as timing (e.g., months/years),
frequency of price reductions, or other market/competitive factors.
Source
Canada
Estimated
reduction in U.S.
prices
(percent)
%
Additional explanation, including such information as
timing (e.g., months/years), frequency of price
reductions, or other market/competitive factors
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Sodium Sulfate Anhydrous (Final)
Page 21
PART IV.—PRODUCT COMPARISONS
IV‐1. Interchangeability.‐‐Is sodium sulfate anhydrous produced in the United States and in other
countries interchangeable (i.e., can they physically be used in the same applications)?
Please indicate A, F, S, N, or 0 in the table below:
A = the products from a specified country‐pair are always interchangeable
F = the products are frequently interchangeable
S = the products are sometimes interchangeable
N = the products are never interchangeable
0 = no familiarity with products from a specified country‐pair
Country‐pair
United States
Canada
Canada
Other countries
For any country‐pair producing sodium sulfate anhydrous that is sometimes or never
interchangeable, identify the country‐pair and explain the factors that limit or preclude
interchangeable use:
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Sodium Sulfate Anhydrous (Final)
Page 22
IV‐2. Factors other than price.‐‐Are differences other than price (e.g., quality, availability,
transportation network, product range, technical support, etc.) between sodium sulfate
anhydrous produced in the United States and in other countries a significant factor in your firm’s
purchases of the products?
Please indicate A, F, S, N, or 0 in the table below:
A = such differences are always significant
F = such differences are frequently significant
S = such differences are sometimes significant
N = such differences are never significant
0 = no familiarity with products from a specified country‐pair
Country‐pair
United States
Canada
Canada
Other countries
For any country‐pair for which factors other than price always or frequently are a
significant factor in your firm’s purchases of sodium sulfate anhydrous, identify the
country‐pair and report the advantages or disadvantages imparted by such factors:
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Sodium Sulfate Anhydrous (Final)
Page 23
IV‐3. Factor country comparisons.‐‐For the factors listed below, please rate how sodium sulfate
anhydrous produced in each country you identified in your response to the first question in Part
IV compares with sodium sulfate anhydrous produced in each of the other countries you
identified.
Inferior
Superior
Comparable
Inferior
Superior
Comparable
Inferior
Delivery terms
Delivery time
Discounts offered
Minimum quantity requirements
Packaging
Payment terms
Price
Product consistency
Product range
Quality meets industry standards
1
Quality exceeds industry
standards
Reliability of supply
Technical support/service
U.S. transportation costs1
1
Comparable
Availability
Factor
Superior
If you are unfamiliar with the product from a particular country, please leave the boxes for those
country comparisons blank.
Product from
Product from
United States
Product from
United States
Canada compared
compared to
product from
compared to product
to product from
Nonsubject
from
Nonsubject
Canada
countries
countries
A rating of superior on price and U.S. transportation costs indicates that the first country generally has lower
prices/U.S. transportation costs than the second country.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Sodium Sulfate Anhydrous (Final)
Page 24
PART V.—ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
V‐1. Other explanations.‐‐If your firm would like to further explain a response to any question that
for which a narrative response box was not provided, please note the question number and the
explanation in the space provided below.
V‐2.
OMB statistics.‐‐Please report the actual number of hours required and the cost to your firm of
completing this questionnaire.
Hours
Dollars
The questions in this questionnaire have been reviewed with market participants to ensure that
issues of concern are adequately addressed and that data requests are sufficient, meaningful,
and as limited as possible. Public reporting burden for this questionnaire is estimated to average
25 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering data, and
completing and reviewing the questionnaire.
We welcome comments regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate, suggestions for
reducing the burden, and any suggestions for improving this questionnaire. Please attach such
comments to your response or send to the Office of Investigations, USITC, 500 E St. SW,
Washington, DC 20436.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ Sodium Sulfate Anhydrous (Final)
Page 25
HOW TO FILE YOUR QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONSE
This questionnaire is available as a “fillable” form in MS Word format on the
Commission’s website at:
https://www.usitc.gov/investigations/701731/2019/sodium_sulfate_anhydrous_canada
/final.htm
Please do not attempt to modify the format or permissions of the questionnaire
document. Please submit the completed questionnaire using one of the methods noted
below. If your firm is unable to complete the MS Word questionnaire or cannot use one
of the electronic methods of submission, please contact the Commission for further
instructions.
• Upload via Secure Drop Box.—Upload the MS Word questionnaire along with a scanned copy of the
signed certification page (page 1) through the Commission’s secure upload facility:
Web address: https://dropbox.usitc.gov/oinv/
Pin: SSAF
• E‐mail.—E‐mail the MS Word questionnaire to amelia.preece@usitc.gov; include a scanned copy of
the signed certification page (page 1). Submitters are strongly encouraged to encrypt nonpublic
documents that are electronically transmitted to the Commission to protect your sensitive information
from unauthorized disclosure. The USITC secure drop‐box system and the Electronic Document
Information System (EDIS) use Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) 140‐2 cryptographic
algorithms to encrypt data in transit. Submitting your nonpublic documents by a means that does not
use these encryption algorithms (such as by email) may subject your firm’s nonpublic information to
unauthorized disclosure during transmission. If you choose a non‐encrypted method of electronic
transmission, the Commission warns you that the risk of such possible unauthorized disclosure is
assumed by you and not by the Commission.
If your firm does not purchase this product, please fill out page 1, print, sign, and submit a scanned
copy to the Commission.
Parties to this proceeding.—If your firm is a party to this proceeding, it is required to serve a copy of the
completed questionnaire on parties to the proceeding that are subject to administrative protective
order (see 19 CFR § 207.7). A list of such parties may be obtained from the Commission’s Secretary (202‐
205‐1803). A certificate of service must accompany the completed questionnaire your firm submits (see
19 CFR § 207.7). Service of the questionnaire must be made in paper form.
File Type | application/pdf |
File Title | Microsoft Word - US purchasers--SSA(F) |
Author | keysha.martinez |
File Modified | 2019-11-19 |
File Created | 2019-11-19 |