Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk Management Program Modernization Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), Section 112(r)(7) (Final Rule)

ICR 201906-2050-002

OMB: 2050-0216

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Supporting Statement A
2019-06-13
IC Document Collections
ICR Details
2050-0216 201906-2050-002
Historical Active 201811-2050-002
EPA/OLEM 2537.04
Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk Management Program Modernization Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), Section 112(r)(7) (Final Rule)
New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)   No
Regular
Approved without change 09/09/2019
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 06/14/2019
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
09/30/2022 36 Months From Approved
51,825 0 0
1,778,244 0 0
8,285,600 0 0

CAA section 112(r)(7) required EPA to promulgate regulations and appropriate guidance to provide for the prevention and detection of accidental releases and for responses to such releases. EPA issued the final rule on June 20, 1996 (61 FR 31668). The regulations include requirements for submittal of an RMP, including source registration, to EPA. The RMP includes information on a sources hazard assessment, prevention program, and emergency response program. The regulations are codified in 40 CFR part 68. The rule requires sources to submit their RMPs every five years beginning June 21, 1999. The final rule establishing the list of regulated substances and threshold quantities under CAA section 112r was published on January 31, 1994 (59 FR 4478), which also includes provisions and procedures for submitting a petition to add or delete a substance. The information collection request (ICR) (EPA ICR No. 1656.15, OMB Control No. 2050-0144) addressed the following information requirements: (1) Documenting sources risk management programs and submitting a source risk management plan (RMP) under CAA Section 112(r)(7). The regulations include requirements for covered sources to implement and maintain documentation for a risk management program and submit a RMP (including information on a sources hazard assessment, prevention program, and emergency response program) to EPA. EPA has assumed responsibility for maintaining a database of submitted RMPs, which will be made available electronically to the implementing agency, states, local governments, and (except for the Offsite Consequence Analysis data) to the public. (2) Collecting and submitting information to support petitions to modify the list of regulated substances under CAA Section 112(r)(3). The regulations include requirements for a petitioner to submit sufficient information in support of a petition to scientifically support the request to add or delete a chemical from the list of regulated substances. The Agency will use this information in making the decision to grant or deny a petition. This ICR amends the existing ICR in response to a proposed rule codified in 40 CFR Part 68, and addresses the following information requirements that are part of the proposed revision to the rule: (1) Make certain information related to the risk management program available to the local community. (2) Provide information, upon request, to the LEPC and local emergency response officials with summaries of certain activities under the risk management program. (3) Hold a public meeting within 30-days of an accident subject to reporting under 68.42. (4) Hire a third-party to conduct the compliance audit after a reportable release. (5) Conduct and document a root cause analysis after a reportable release. (6) Conduct and document an incident investigation, including root cause analysis, after a near miss. (7) Conduct and document a safer technology and alternatives analysis. (8) Meet and coordinate with local responders to ensure adequate response capability exists. (9) Conduct a notification drill to verify information. (10) Conduct and document emergency response exercises. (11) Come into compliance with requirements for developing an emergency response program, including developing an emergency response plan, conducting emergency response exercises, documenting training, and providing information to the LEPC.

US Code: 42 USC 7401 Name of Law: Clean Air Act
  
None

2050-AG82 Final or interim final rulemaking 82 FR 4594 01/13/2017

No

2
IC Title Form No. Form Name
Private Sector - Risk Management Program Requirements and Petitions
State and Local Implementing Agencies

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 51,825 0 0 51,825 0 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 1,778,244 0 0 1,778,244 0 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 8,285,600 0 0 8,285,600 0 0
Yes
Changing Regulations
No
The cost and burden in this ICR are in response to a final rule codified in 40 CFR Part 68. The final rule changes include making information related to the existing risk management program available to the local community; holding a public meeting within 90-days of an accident subject to reporting under 68.42; and the costs of conducting other audits, analyses, drills, exercises, planning and public meetings, after a reportable release and for compliance with the proposed rule.

$0
No
    No
    No
No
No
No
Uncollected
James Belke 202 564-8023 belke.jim@epa.gov

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
06/14/2019


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy