0648-0659 Supplemental Statement Part A FINAL REVISED 2019-0702

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

MARINE RECREATIONAL INFORMATION PROGRAM

ACCESS-POINT ANGLER INTERCEPT SURVEY

OMB CONTROL NO. 0648-0659

A. JUSTIFICATION

This request is for extension of a currently approved information collection.

1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary.

Collection of recreational fisheries catch and effort data is necessary to fulfill statutory requirements of Section 303 of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1852 et. seq.) and to comply with Executive Order 12962 on Recreational Fisheries. Section 303 (a) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act specifies data and analyses to be included in Fishery Management Plans (FMPs), as well as pertinent data that shall be submitted to the Secretary of Commerce under the plan.

Historically, recreational fishing catch data (numbers and species of fish) were collected through the Marine Recreational Fishery Statistics Survey (MRFSS) Access-Point Angler Intercept Survey (APAIS), an in-person site-day sampling survey of recreational anglers who have completed fishing for the day. The MRFSS survey’s precision and accuracy of catch statistics were questioned due to changes in fisheries management and the need for more accurate statistics at greater levels of resolution. To address concerns about the MRFSS, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) commissioned a review of its marine recreational fishing surveys by the National Research Council (NRC) of the National Academies of Science. The NRC review concluded that existing recreational fishing surveys are inadequate for sampling the universe of anglers and for determining their catch and effort (NRC, 2006).

NMFS addressed those concerns by implementing the Marine Recreational Information Program (MRIP). The MRIP program used a combination of expert consultants, partner statisticians and survey managers, and staff to design and test new survey methodologies for catch and effort data collections and estimation. The MRIP APAIS was the result of external review and re-design of the MRFSS' APAIS by expert survey statisticians and addressed the issues of field sampler influence, potential bias in sampling low-use sites, unknown sampling probabilities due to haphazard site selection and re-scheduling of site-days, and design and estimation inconsistencies.

The new MRIP APAIS was implemented in 2013 and has been conducted on the Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Puerto Rico. Hawaii APAIS sampling uses the same angler interview but the older MRFSS sampling protocols at the preference of the data collection partner (Hawaii Dept. Land and Natural Resources, Division of Aquatic Resources). More formalized sampling protocols with stricter control of sampler behavior implemented in the MRIP APAIS design ensures that a probability sample is consistently obtained and potential biases are eliminated or minimized, and catch and effort estimation and statistics are consistent with the data collection design.

The improved MRIP program was again reviewed by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NAS) in 2017, including the new APAIS survey (NAS 2017). The report recognized ‘the impressive progress that NMFS has made, including major improvements in the statistical soundness of its survey design’ and principally focused on the Fishing Effort Survey (FES) and the APAIS that form the backbone of the MRIP.

This request is to extend the MRIP Access-Point Angler Intercept Survey (OMB Control No. 0648-0659) that has recently been conducted from 2016-2018. The new APAIS will continue to be conducted in Maine through Florida on the Atlantic Coast, and in Florida through Mississippi on the Gulf of Mexico Coast (Louisiana not included), Hawaii, and Puerto Rico. On the Atlantic Coast, Maine and New Hampshire will be surveyed in three waves per year (May-Jun, Jul-Aug, Sep-Oct), Massachusetts-Virginia, South Carolina, and Georgia will be surveyed in 5 waves per year (Mar-Apr – Nov-Dec), and North Carolina, the Gulf States, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico will be surveyed in all 6 waves per year (Jan-Feb – Nov-Dec). These specific sampling periods by state or region encompass the majority of the recreational fishery seasons. Prior surveys indicated recreational fishing outside these periods was rare, contributed a very small percentage of annual landings of managed fishes, and would be disproportionately expensive to estimate precisely. The period of this request is for 2019 – 2021. The APAIS for this period will not be substantially changed from that of the previous 3-year data collection program (OMB Control No. 0648-0659).

We have streamlined the questionnaire vehicles  to reduce unique versions by region, but mostly we have transitioned on the Atlantic Coast to use of handheld tablets for data entry at point of interview - see response to Q3, use of electronic technology (or others), that also includes 'or paper forms (all other regions).'.  Other than the Atlantic Coast, there is the Gulf of Mexico (2019 MRIP Intercept Form) and Hawaii (2018 HMRFS / MRIP Intercept Survey Form - to be used 2019 and forward).  The North Carolina form has been included within the Atlantic tablet application and the Puerto Rico form will be included in either the Atlantic Coast tablet application or use the Gulf of Mexico form for scan/OCR data capture, as in previous survey years.

New Outreach materials replace the older materials submitted in the previous clearance package, with the exception of the wallet card which remains unchanged.  The messaging in the new materials has been updated and any references to summarized survey results have been updated using more recent survey results and providing updated contact information for constituent questions and feedback.

2. Explain how, by whom, how frequently, and for what purpose the information will be used. If the information collected will be disseminated to the public or used to support information that will be disseminated to the public, then explain how the collection complies with all applicable Information Quality Guidelines.

The MRIP APAIS estimates catch per trip by species for all finfish encountered. This information is combined with effort data collected through offsite surveys of fishing effort to estimate total catch by species. These recreational fishing catch and effort estimates are used on an ongoing basis by NMFS, regional fishery management councils, interstate marine fisheries commissions and state natural resource agencies in developing, implementing and monitoring fishery management programs, per statutory requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. Catch and effort statistics are fundamental for assessing the influence of fishing on any fish stock. Accurate estimates of the quantities taken, fishing effort, and both the seasonal and geographic distributions of the catch and effort are required for the development of regional management policies and plans.

The MRIP APAIS has provided more accurate recreational fishing catch and catch-rate data by eliminating or reducing the biases associated with the previous MRFSS APAIS. The APAIS uses site clusters and time intervals to dictate where and when the field interviewer collects data, eliminating sampling site and time choices by the field staff, thus eliminating sources of potential bias and unknown probability of selection. The angler counts obtained as an element of data collection are used to compute the weight for each sample, thus eliminating the need to use the 'expected' angler activity as a weighting mechanism, another potential source of bias. Therefore, the new survey allows estimation of recreational fishing catch-per-unit-effort with improved accuracy based on the survey design and improved precision for favored species/regions to meet assessment, monitoring, and management needs.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Fisheries will retain control over the information and safeguard it from improper access, modification, and destruction, consistent with NOAA standards for confidentiality, privacy, and electronic information. See response to Question 10 of this Supporting Statement for more information on confidentiality and privacy. The information collection is designed to yield data that meet all applicable information quality guidelines. The data collected by the APAIS will be subject to the quality control measures and pre-dissemination review pursuant to Section 515 of Public Law 106-554.

3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological techniques or other forms of information technology.

The surveys will be conducted in person and responses recorded on either handheld electronic tablets (Atlantic Coast, ME - GA) or paper forms (all other regions). At the discretion of the cooperating agencies administering the data, processing the responses may be captured through optical character recognition (OCR) if scannable forms are used, which would greatly increase the accuracy and efficiency of data collection. This method of data entry has been used successfully in the Gulf of Mexico region (FL to MS) for over a decade.

4. Describe efforts to identify duplication.

NMFS collaborates with state natural resource agencies and regional interstate fisheries commissions on the Atlantic and Gulf coasts to ensure that recreational fisheries data collections are not duplicative. Every five years, the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) of the U.S. Department of the Interior conducts the National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation (OMB Control No. 1018-0088). This survey collects minimal information about annual recreational saltwater fishing activity within the context of additional recreational activities. That survey does not provide the spatial or temporal resolution needed by managers of fishery resources to monitor and manage recreational fisheries landings.

The MRIP APAIS Head Boat mode sampling and estimation overlap with the Southeast Head Boat Logbook Program (SEHB) conducted by the Beaufort Laboratory of the NMFS Southeast Fisheries Science Center (OMB No. 0648-0016). The SEHB includes only head boats that typically target reef-fish species, whereas the APAIS coverage includes all identified head boats in the region, regardless of target or landed species. The APAIS method of at-sea interviews of head boat anglers includes direct observations of the discarded catch, identification of discarded fish to species by trained interviewer/observers, evaluation of discard disposition, and length measurements of discarded fish. This information is not available in the SEHB logbooks.

5. If the collection of information involves small businesses or other small entities, describe the methods used to minimize burden.

The respondents are individual recreational fishers and, by definition, are not businesses. Therefore, no small businesses will be impacted by this survey design or conduct.

6. Describe the consequences to the Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently.

If the survey is not conducted, NMFS will not have recreational fisheries catch information from a majority of saltwater anglers to support fishery stock assessments and management. An ongoing survey of recreational anglers is required to monitor changing conditions in the fishery and support modifications in fishery regulations both within fishing seasons and among fishing years. In addition, a continuous time series of data is scientifically essential to assess the impact of recreational fishing on fish stocks.

7. Explain any special circumstances that require the collection to be conducted in a manner inconsistent with OMB guidelines.

The collection is consistent with OMB guidelines.

8. Provide information on the PRA Federal Register Notice that solicited public comments on the information collection prior to this submission. Summarize the public comments received in response to that notice and describe the actions taken by the agency in response to those comments. Describe the efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instructions and recordkeeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported.

A Federal Register Notice published on Tuesday, October 9, 2018 (83 FR 50643) solicited public comment on this continuing data collection program. No comments were received.

MRIP is a collaborative effort among government agencies, independent scientists, recreational fishing groups, and conservation organizations to ensure scientifically rigorous collection of appropriate information that meets manager and stakeholder needs. NMFS staff maintains regular communication with customers, through workshops, workgroup meetings and one-on-one consultations, to ensure that needs for recreational fishing statistics are being met. At various open meetings (Fishery Management Councils and Commissions) the details of the MRIP data collection surveys have been commented on and discussed, leading to improved outreach and education materials, updated websites, and revisions to sample allocation with the ultimate goals of improved interview response and respondent burden reduction. Changes to APAIS sampling were implemented in 2015 including multi-mode angler interviewing at sampling sites, rather than single mode assignments, and definition of a peak sample period of 11 am – 5 pm for sampling. And, in 2016 the APAIS survey conduct was transitioned from a private contracted company to a cooperative venture among the Atlantic Coast states similar to the Gulf Fishery Information Network (GulfFIN program of Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission) model with the Atlantic Coast Cooperative Statistics Program (ACCSP) as the central administrator and data processor. This change put state resource agency staff in the field conducting APAIS interviews which was widely viewed by constituents in the recreational fishing community as an improvement in data collection quality and customer service. These changes have all been favorably accepted by the recreational fishing community and the end users of the MRIP survey products.

All survey questionnaires are presented to the cooperating state participants at both ACCSP Recreational Technical Committee meetings and Gulf FIN meetings to ensure the meaning, intent, and wording of questions to be put to respondents are clear and appropriate for the information being requested. The questionnaires are also reviewed, question by question, at annual training sessions conducted by the ACCSP and GulfFIN for the field interviewers to further ensure the question sequence and administration are understood for proper delivery. Advice on circumstances that may require follow-up response to respondent questions and appropriate probing replies to obtain appropriate responses are also included in these training sessions.

The APAIS survey is conducted in-person and therefore the respondent burden (time to respond to interview questions) is known by the NMFS, the respondent does not need to read or interpret instructions, participation is voluntary, and there is no cost, other than time, to respond to the interview questions, so the requirement for directed consultation with respondent groups concerning burden is not necessary. Respondents are informed of approximate time of response when the interview is requested.

9. Explain any decisions to provide payments or gifts to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees.

This data collection will not include any incentives to prospective respondents.

10. Describe any assurance or confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.

As stated on the instruments, responses are kept confidential as required by section 402(b) of the Magnuson-Stevens and NOAA Administrative Order 216-100, Confidentiality of Fisheries Statistics, and will not be released for public use except in aggregate statistical form without identification as to its source. Section 402(b) stipulates that data required to be submitted under an FMP shall be confidential and shall not be released except to Federal employees and Council staff responsible for FMP monitoring and development or when required under court order. Data such as personal addresses and phone numbers will remain confidential.

11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private.

No sensitive questions are asked.

12. Provide an estimate in hours of the burden of the collection of information.

The Access-Point Angler Intercept Survey will be completed by approximately 100,000 respondents resulting in a total estimated burden of 8,333 hours (100,000 responses *5 minutes / 60 minutes = 8,333 hours). The expected number of respondents is based on the results of previous APAIS angler interviews in the regions the MRIP APAIS is to be conducted (Maine – Mississippi, Puerto Rico, Hawaii). An hourly rate of $25.03 is based on the average for all civilian workers from the National Compensation Survey (preliminary, 3rd quarter, 2018; https://beta.bls.gov/dataViewer/view). There are no other costs to respondent. A total of 8,333 burden hours are anticipated, resulting in a labor cost to respondents of approximately $208,583.

13. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to the respondents or record-keepers resulting from the collection (excluding the value of the burden hours in Question 12 above).

This data collection survey will incur no cost burden on respondents beyond the costs of response time.

14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government.

Annual cost to the Federal government is approximately $9,500,000: $9,200,000 in contractor data collection costs and $300,000 in federal professional staff and computing costs.

15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments.

The small increase in total responses expected and burden hour estimates are due to improvements in angler-interview productivity per sampling day realized since the transition on the Atlantic Coast to state-agency field interviewers (from the contractor, which ended in 2015).  In addition to the change in data collection partners, the maintenance of the Site Register (=the sample frame) has allowed for more efficient sampling, resulting in fewer sample days that produced no angler-interviews.  The estimated time per interview remains unchanged, 5 minutes.

Response rates for the APAIS will be maintained at the high levels achieved to date with the current version of the intercept survey, through intensive interviewer training and monitoring, and stakeholder outreach efforts. Additional training will be developed to address conversion of the initial refusals, which have increased in recent years.

16. For collections whose results will be published, outline the plans for tabulation and publication.

Each year, NMFS administers recreational fishing surveys for six discrete, two-month reference waves, beginning with wave 1 (January/February) and continuing through wave 6 (November/December). The MRIP APAIS will be administered for six successive waves per year, for 3 years, beginning with wave 1 (January/February), 2019 and continuing through wave 6, 2021.

All data collected and analyzed will be included in table format available on the Web page of the Fisheries Statistics Division, Office of Science and Technology, National Marine Fisheries Service. The Web site address is https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/recreational-fishing-data/saltwater-recreational-data-and-statistics-queries. Data from this survey may support research and analyses to be presented at appropriate professional meetings (e.g. American Fisheries Society, Joint Statistical Meetings) and may be submitted for publication in appropriate statistical or fisheries peer-reviewed journals. Summary marine recreational fishery catch statistics produced using data from this survey are included in the annual publication by NMFS, Fisheries of the United States (e.g. FUS 2017, available online: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/document/fisheries-united-states-2017-report)

17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons why display would be inappropriate.

This question is not applicable.

18. Explain each exception to the certification statement.

This question is not applicable.

References

Fisheries of the United States, 2017 (2018) U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA, National Marine Fisheries Service, Office of Science and Technology, USGPO, October 2015,

https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/document/fisheries-united-states-2017-report

National Research Council (2006). Review of Recreational Fisheries Survey Methods. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

 

6