SUPPORTING STATEMENT
Internal Revenue Service
(Form 4255) Recapture of Investment Credit
OMB #1545-0166
1. CIRCUMSTANCES NECESSITATING COLLECTION OF INFORMATION
IRC section 50(a) requires that a taxpayer’s income tax be increased by the investment credit recapture tax if the taxpayer disposes of investment credit property before the close of the recapture period used in figuring the original investment credit. Form 4255 provides for the computation of the recapture tax.
2. USE OF DATA
The form provides the IRS with the information needed to determine if the recapture tax was properly figured.
3. USE OF IMPROVED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE BURDEN
We are currently offering electronic filing for Form 4255.
4 EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY DUPLICATION
The information obtained through this collection is unique and is not already available for use or adaptation from another source.
5. METHODS TO MINIMIZE BURDEN ON SMALL BUSINESSES OR OTHER SMALL ENTITIES
The collection of information requirement will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
CONSEQUENCES OF LESS FREQUENT COLLECTION ON FEDERAL PROGRAMS OR POLICY ACTIVITIES
Consequences of less frequent collection on federal programs or policy activities would result in: Taxpayers providing insufficient information to determine if the recapture tax was properly figured.
SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRING DATA COLLECTION TO BE
INCONSISTENT WITH GUIDELINES IN 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)
There are no special circumstances requiring data collection to be inconsistent with Guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2).
CONSULTATION WITH INDIVIDUALS OUTSIDE OF THE AGENCY ON AVAILABILITY OF DATA, FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION, CLARITY OF INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS, AND DATA ELEMENTS
In response to the Federal Register notice dated November 13, 2018 (83 FR 56404), we received no comments during the comment period regarding Form 4255.
9. EXPLANATION OF DECISION TO PROVIDE ANY PAYMENT OR GIFT TO RESPONDENTS
No payment or gift will be provided to any respondents.
10. ASSURANCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY OF RESPONSES
Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.
11 JUSTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE QUESTIONS
A privacy impact assessment (PIA) has been conducted for information collected under this request as part of the “Business Master file (BMF)”, and a Privacy Act System of Records notice (SORN) has been issued for these systems under IRS 22.062 – Electronic Filing Records; IRS 24.030 – Customer Account Data Engine (CADE) Individual Master File; IRS 24.046 - CADE Business Master File (BMF);IRS 34.037 - IRS Audit Trail and Security Records System. The Internal Revenue Service PIA’s can be found at https://www.irs.gov/uac/Privacy-Impact-Assessments-PIA.
Title 26 USC 6109 requires inclusion of identifying numbers in returns, statements, or other documents for securing proper identification of persons required to make such returns, statements, or documents and is the authority for social security numbers (SSNs) in IRS systems.
12. ESTIMATED BURDEN OF INFORMATION COLLECTION
The burden estimate is as follows:
Authority |
Description |
# of Respondents |
#Responses per Respondent |
Annual Responses |
Hours per Response |
Total Burden |
IRC §50(a) |
Form 4255 |
1,320 |
1 |
1,320 |
9.81 |
12,949 |
Totals |
|
1,320 |
|
|
|
12,949 |
The following regulation imposes no additional burden. Please continue to assign OMB number 1545-0166 to these regulations.
1.47-1 and 1.47-3
ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL COST BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS
To ensure more accuracy and consistency across its information collections, IRS is currently in the process of revising the methodology it uses to estimate burden and costs. Once this methodology is complete, IRS will update this information collection to reflect a more precise estimate of burden and costs.
14. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COSTS TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
The Federal government cost estimate is based on a model that considers the following three cost factors for each information product: aggregate labor costs for development, including annualized start up expenses, operating and maintenance expenses, and distribution of the product that collects the information.
The government computes cost using a multi-step process. First, the government creates a weighted factor for the level of effort to create each information collection product based on variables such as; complexity, number of pages, type of product and frequency of revision. Second, the total costs associated with developing the product such as labor cost, and operating expenses associated with the downstream impact such as support functions, are added together to obtain the aggregated total cost. Then, the
aggregated total cost and factor are multiplied together to obtain the aggregated cost per product. Lastly, the aggregated cost per product is added to the cost of shipping and printing each product to IRS offices, National Distribution Center, libraries and other outlets. The result is the Government cost estimate per product.
The government cost estimate for this collection is
summarized in the table below.
Product |
Aggregate Cost per Product (factor applied) |
|
Printing and Distribution |
|
Government Cost Estimate per Product |
Form 4255 |
10,936 |
+ |
0 |
= |
10,936 |
Instructions |
4,101 |
|
|
|
4,101 |
Grand Total |
15,037 |
|
|
|
15,037 |
Table costs are based on 2016 actuals obtained from IRS Chief Financial Office and Media and Publications |
|||||
* New product costs will be included in the next collection update. |
15. REASONS FOR CHANGE IN BURDEN
There are no changes to the collection however the estimates are being updated to eliminate double counting associated with the business collection.
The information collection requirements and burden associated business for Form 4255 is accounted for in OMB control number 1545-0123, U. S. Business Income Tax Return and has been removed from this information collection 1545-0166.
|
Requested |
Program Change Due to New Statute |
Program Change Due to Agency Discretion |
Change Due to Adjustment in Agency Estimate |
Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA |
Previously Approved |
Annual Number of Responses for this IC |
1320 |
0 |
-11880 |
0 |
0 |
13200 |
Annual IC Time Burden (Hours) |
12949 |
0 |
-116543 |
0 |
0 |
129492 |
PLANS FOR TABULATION, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND PUBLICATION
There are no plans for tabulation, statistical analysis and publication.
17. REASONS WHY DISPLAYING THE OMB EXPIRATION DATE IS INAPPROPRIATE
IRS believes that displaying the OMB expiration date is inappropriate because it could cause confusion by leading taxpayers to believe that the form sunsets as of the expiration date. Taxpayers are not likely to be aware that the IRS intends to request renewal of the OMB approval and obtain a new expiration date before the old one expires.
EXCEPTIONS TO THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT
There are no exceptions to the certification statement.
Note: The following paragraph applies to all of the
collections of information in this submission:
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control
number. Books or records relating to a collection of
information must be retained as long as their contents may
become material in the administration of any internal
revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return
information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C.
6103.
File Type | application/msword |
Author | J11FB |
Last Modified By | SYSTEM |
File Modified | 2019-05-14 |
File Created | 2019-05-14 |