Download:
pdf |
pdfSUPPORTING STATEMENT FOR PROPOSED RULES
UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 AND
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
This submission, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C.
§3501, et seq., consists of this supporting statement and the following attachments:
A. Statutory Authority
B. Proposing Release
A.
JUSTIFICATION
1.
CIRCUMSTANCES MAKING THE COLLECTION OF INFORMATION
NECESSARY
On August 24, 2016, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“Commission”) proposed rule and form amendments that would require registrants to
include a hyperlink to the exhibits in their filings. Item 601 of Regulation S-K specifies
the exhibits that registrants must file with registration statements filed under the
Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) and Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(“Exchange Act”) and with periodic and current reports under the Exchange Act. Item
601 also requires registrants to include an exhibit index that lists each exhibit included
with the filing. Specifically, the proposed amendments would require registrants that file
registration statements and periodic and current reports that are subject to the exhibit
requirements under Item 601 of Regulation S-K, or that file on Forms F-10 or 20-F, to
include a hyperlink to each exhibit listed in the exhibit index of the filings. The
amendments would also require that registrants submit all of these filings in HyperText
Markup Language (HTML) format. A copy of Commission Release No. 33-10201,
which contains the proposed amendments, is attached.
2.
PURPOSE OF THE INFORMATION COLLECTION
The purpose of the proposed amendments is to assist investors and other users in
identifying and locating exhibits. Under the current system, someone seeking to retrieve
and access an exhibit that has been incorporated by reference must review the exhibit
index to determine the filing in which the exhibit is included, and then must search
through the registrant’s filings to locate the relevant filing to review for the particular
exhibit. This process can be both time consuming and cumbersome. The Commission
believes that the changes described above would substantially ease the difficulties in
retrieving exhibits.
3.
CONSIDERATION GIVEN TO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
The collection of information requirements of the proposed amendments are set
forth in amended rules and forms. All of the affected forms are filed electronically with
the Commission using the Commission’s Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and
Retrieval (“EDGAR”) system.
4.
DUPLICATION OF INFORMATION
The proposed amendments do not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with other federal
rules.
5.
REDUCING THE BURDEN ON SMALL ENTITIES
The proposed amendments would affect all registrants that file the affected
registration statements and periodic and current reports. However, the software tools to
prepare and file documents in HTML and create hyperlinks are widely used and available
at minimal cost. Accordingly, the Commission preliminarily believes that the proposed
amendments would not have a significant impact on small businesses.
6.
CONSEQUENCES OF NOT CONDUCTING COLLECTION
Item 601 of Regulation S-K specifies the exhibits that registrants must file with
registration statements filed under the Securities Act and Exchange Act, and with
periodic and current reports filed under the Exchange Act. Item 601 also requires
registrants to include an exhibit index that lists each exhibit included with the filing. The
proposed amendments amend Forms F-10 and 20-F, Item 601 of Regulation S-K, and
Rules 11, 102 and 105 of Regulation S-T to require registrants to include a hyperlink to
each filed exhibit as identified in the exhibit index, unless the exhibit is filed in paper
pursuant to a temporary or continuing hardship exemption. Less frequent collection
would deprive investors of access to information that is important to their voting and
investment decisions.
7.
SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCE
Not applicable.
8.
CONSULTATIONS WITH PERSONS OUTSIDE THE AGENCY
The Commission has amended the above mentioned rules and forms several times
since their adoption. In addition, the Commission will solicit comment on the proposed
amendments.
9.
PAYMENT OR GIFT TO RESPONDENTS
Not applicable.
2
10.
CONFIDENTIALITY
Not applicable.
11.
SENSITIVE QUESTIONS
No information of a sensitive nature, including social security numbers, will be
required under this collection of information. Regulation S-K and Regulation S-T does
not collect personally identifiable information (PII). The agency has determined that a
system of records notice (SORN) and privacy impact assessment (PIA) are not required
in connection with the collection of information.
12. and 13.
ESTIMATES OF HOUR AND COST BURDENS
The Commission anticipates that the proposed amendments would increase the
burdens and costs for registrants to prepare and file the affected forms.1 The Commission
believes the burdens associated with hyperlinking exhibits would be small as the
registrant would already be preparing the exhibits and exhibit index for the related filing
and would have readily available all the information necessary to create the hyperlinks.
However, the paperwork burdens from Regulations S-K and S-T are imposed through the
forms that are subject to the requirements in these regulations and are reflected in the
analysis of those forms. To avoid a PRA inventory reflecting duplicative burdens and for
administrative convenience, we assign a one-hour burden to each of Regulation S-K and
Regulation S-T. In addition, there is no cost associated with Regulations S-K and S-T.
14.
COST TO FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
The estimated cost of preparing the proposed amendments was approximately
$150,000.
15.
REASON FOR CHANGES IN BURDEN
The paperwork burdens from Regulations S-K and S-T are imposed through the
forms that are subject to the requirements in these regulations and are reflected in the
analysis of those forms. For administrative purpose each Regulation is assigned one
administrative burden.
16.
INFORMATION COLLECTION PLANNED FOR STATISTICAL
PURPOSES
Not applicable.
1
A detailed discussion of our PRA analysis is included in Commission Release No. 33-10201, which is
attached.
3
17.
APPROVAL TO OMIT OMB EXPIRATION DATE
We request authorization to omit the expiration date on the electronic version of
the form. Including the expiration date on the electronic version of the form will result in
increased costs, because the need to make changes to the form may not follow the
application’s scheduled version release dates. The OMB control number will be
displayed.
18.
EXCEPTIONS TO CERTIFICATION FOR PAPERWORK REDUCTION
ACT SUBMISSIONS
Not applicable.
B.
STATISTICAL METHODS
Not applicable.
4
File Type | application/pdf |
File Title | SUPPORTING STATEMENT FOR PROPOSED RULES |
File Modified | 2018-06-08 |
File Created | 2018-06-08 |