30 Day FRN

13740

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 62 / Friday, March 30, 2018 / Notices

regarding potential environmental and
socioeconomic impacts associated with
each alternative. As such, the scope of
this PEA is broad and encompasses
activities to support ABCT stationing
and planning for facilities projected to
be required from fiscal years 2018 to
2021. The programmatic approach is
designed to allow for early planning,
coordination, and flexibility throughout
implementation of the Army’s process
of stationing an ABCT.
Implementation of the proposed
action would require unit stationing
(e.g., realignment or inactivation),
garrison construction and demolition,
live-fire training, and maneuver
training. The proposed action and
alternatives do not propose or require
land expansion or acquisition.
Adverse impacts were anticipated to
be less than significant for air quality
and greenhouse gas, biological
resources, cultural resources, soils,
traffic and transportation, surface
waters, and wetlands. Negligible
adverse effects were anticipated for land
use, noise, geology, groundwater,
floodplains, airspace, facilities, energy
demand and generation, utilities,
hazardous materials, hazardous waste,
and human health and safety.
Socioeconomic impacts for Fort Carson
were anticipated to be negligible under
Alternative 1 and moderately adverse
under Alternatives 2 through 5.
Socioeconomic impacts for Fort Bliss,
Fort Hood, Fort Riley, and Fort Stewart
were anticipated to be beneficial under
the gain-scenario alternative for each
installation, with no impacts under the
remaining alternatives.
Members of the public, federallyrecognized Native American Tribes, and
federal, state, and local agencies are
invited to submit written comments on
the PEA and/or draft FNSI.
The PEA and draft FNSI may be
accessed at: https://aec.army.mil/
index.php?cID=352.
Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

Department of the Army; Corps of
Engineers
Withdrawal of Notice of Intent To
Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact
Statement for the North Branch Ecorse
Creek, Flood Risk Management
General Reevaluation Study, Wayne
County, MI
Department of the Army, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of intent; withdrawal.
AGENCY:

The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE), Detroit District, is
issuing this notice to advise Federal,
state, and local government agencies
and the public that the USACE is
withdrawing its Notice of Intent to
prepare a Draft Environmental Impact
Statement (DEIS) for the reevaluation
study of flood risk management
alternatives for the North Branch Ecorse
Creek, Wayne County, Michigan.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charles Uhlarik, Chief, Environmental
Analysis Branch, at (313) 226–2476 or
by mail at U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Detroit District; 477
Michigan Avenue, 6th Floor; Detroit, MI
48226–2550.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Corps
of Engineers published a notice of intent
to prepare a DEIS in the September 24,
2010, issue of the Federal Register (75
FR 58369). Since that time, scoping
comments and public meetings, a Draft
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Coordination Act Report, an
Environmental Assessment (EA), and
agency/public review of the EA did not
reveal any significant impacts on the
human environment. Therefore, the
Detroit District, Corps of Engineers, is
no longer considering preparation of a
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
for the North Branch Ecorse Creek,
Flood Risk Management General
Reevaluation Study.
SUMMARY:

Paul A. Powell,
Project Manager.
[FR Doc. 2018–06464 Filed 3–29–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720–58–P

[FR Doc. 2018–06459 Filed 3–29–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–03–P

amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Proposed Agency Information
Collection
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy (DOE).
ACTION: Notice and request for OMB
review and comment.
AGENCY:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:57 Mar 29, 2018

Jkt 244001

PO 00000

Frm 00020

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

The Department of Energy
(DOE) has submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
clearance, pursuant to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, a three-year
extension to its collection of
information titled: Budget Justification,
OMB No. 1910–5162. The proposed
collection will establish application
consistency for numerous Grant and
Cooperative Agreement application
packages from potential and chosen
recipients. This effort will also
streamline processes and provide
applicants with a clear and
straightforward tool to assist with
project budgeting. In addition it will
endow DOE reviewers with adequate
information to determine if proposed
costs are allowable, allocable, and
reasonable.
DATES: Comments regarding this
continued information collection must
be received on or before May 5, 2018.
If you anticipate that you will be
submitting comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, please
advise the DOE Desk Officer at OMB of
your intention to make a submission as
soon as possible. The Desk Officer may
be telephoned at (202) 395–4650.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be sent to: DOE Desk Officer, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, New
Executive Office Building, Room 10102,
735 17th Street NW, Washington, DC
20503.
And to: U.S. Department of Energy,
Golden Field Office, 15013 Denver West
Parkway, Golden, CO 80401–3111, Attn:
James Cash.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to James Cash, U.S. Department
of Energy, Golden Field Office, 15013
Denver West Parkway, Golden, CO
80401–3111, or by phone (240) 562–
1456, or by email at james.cash@
ee.doe.gov. The information collection
instrument, titled ‘‘Budget Justification’’
may also be viewed at https://
energy.gov/eere/funding/downloads/
budget-justification-eere-335-and-3351.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
information collection request contains:
(1) OMB No. 1910–5162, Budget
Justification;
(2) Information Collection Request
Title: Budget Justification;
(3) Type of Request: Renewal;
(4) Purpose: This collection of
information is necessary in order for
DOE to identify allowable, allocable,
and reasonable recipient project costs
SUMMARY:

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM

30MRN1

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 62 / Friday, March 30, 2018 / Notices
eligible for Grants and Cooperative
Agreements under Energy Efficiency
and Renewable Energy (EERE)
programs;
(5) Annual Estimated Number of
Respondents: 400;
(6) Annual Estimated Number of
Total Responses: 400;
(7) Annual Estimated Number of
Burden Hours: 24 hours, per response;
(8) Annual Estimated Reporting and
Recordkeeping Cost Burden: $940.80
per one time response;
(9) Statutory Authority: Section 989(a)
EPACT 2005 [Merit Review] {42 U.S.C.
16353(a)}; Section 646 DOE
Organization Act [Contracts] {42 U.S.C.
7256(a)}; and 31 U.S.C. 503 (the Chief
Financial Officers Act, Functions of the
Deputy Director for Management), 31
U.S.C. 1111 (Improving Economy and
Efficiency of the United States
Government), 41 U.S.C. 1101–1131 (the
Office of Federal Procurement Policy
Act), Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1970,
and Executive Order 11541
(‘‘Prescribing the Duties of the Office of
Management and Budget and the
Domestic Policy Council in the
Executive Office of the President’’), the
Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996,
(31 U.S.C. 7501–7507), as well as The
Federal Program Information Act (Pub.
L. 95–220 and Pub. L. 98–169, as
amended, codified at 31 U.S.C. 6101–
6106).
Issued in Golden, CO, on March 22, 2018.
Derek Passarelli,
Director, Golden Field Office, U.S.
Department of Energy, Office of Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden
Field Office.
[FR Doc. 2018–06458 Filed 3–29–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. CP17–101–000]

amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES

Notice of Availability of the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Proposed Transcontinental Gas
Pipe Line Company, LLC, Northeast
Supply Enhancement Project
The staff of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) has prepared a draft
environmental impact statement (EIS)
for the Northeast Supply Enhancement
Project (NESE Project or Project) as
proposed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe
Line Company, LLC (Transco) in the
above-referenced docket. Transco
requests authorization to construct and
operate 36.9 miles of onshore and

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:57 Mar 29, 2018

Jkt 244001

offshore natural gas transmission
pipeline loop 1 and associated facilities,
one new natural gas-fired compressor
station, and modifications at one
existing compressor station. The Project
would provide about 400,000
dekatherms per day of natural gas to end
use residential and commercial
customers in the New York City area.
The draft EIS assesses the potential
environmental effects of the
construction and operation of the
Project in accordance with the
requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The
FERC staff concludes that approval of
the Project would result in some adverse
environmental impacts; however, all
impacts would be reduced to less-thansignificant levels with the
implementation of Transco’s proposed
mitigation and the additional measures
recommended in the draft EIS.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
and the City of New York participated
as cooperating agencies in the
preparation of the draft EIS. Cooperating
agencies have jurisdiction by law or
special expertise with respect to
resources potentially affected by the
proposals and participate in the NEPA
analysis. Although the cooperating
agencies provide input to the
conclusions and recommendations
presented in the draft EIS, the agencies
will each present its own conclusions
and recommendations in its respective
record of decision or determination for
the Project.
The draft EIS addresses the potential
environmental effects of the
construction and operation of the
following Project facilities:
• 10.2 miles of 42-inch-diameter
pipeline loop in Lancaster County,
Pennsylvania (the Quarryville Loop);
• 3.4 miles of 26-inch-diameter
pipeline loop in Middlesex County,
New Jersey (the Madison Loop);
• 23.5 miles of 26-inch-diameter
pipeline loop in Middlesex and
Monmouth Counties, New Jersey, and
Queens and Richmond Counties, New
York (the Raritan Bay Loop 2);
• modification of existing Compressor
Station 200 in Chester County,
Pennsylvania;
• construction of new Compressor
Station 206 in Somerset County, New
Jersey; and
1 A loop is a segment of pipe that is installed
adjacent to an existing pipeline and connected to
it at both ends. A loop generally allows more gas
to move through the system.
2 Except for 0.2 mile of pipe in onshore
Middlesex County, New Jersey, the Raritan Bay
Loop would occur in offshore New Jersey waters
(6.0 miles) and offshore New York waters (17.3
miles).

PO 00000

Frm 00021

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

13741

• ancillary facilities (including
cathodic protection systems, new and
modified mainline valves with tie-in
assemblies, new and modified launcher/
receiver facilities, and facilities to
connect the Raritan Bay Loop to the
existing Rockaway Delivery Lateral at
the Rockaway Transfer Point).
The FERC staff mailed copies of the
draft EIS to federal, state, and local
government representatives and
agencies; elected officials;
environmental and public interest
groups; Native American tribes;
potentially affected landowners and
other interested individuals and groups;
and newspapers and libraries in the
Project area. Paper copy versions of this
draft EIS were mailed to those
specifically requesting them; all others
received a CD version. In addition, the
draft EIS is available for public viewing
on the FERC’s website (www.ferc.gov)
using the eLibrary link. A limited
number of copies are available for
distribution and public inspection at:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
Public Reference Room, 888 First Street
NE, Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426,
(202) 502–8371.
Any person wishing to comment on
the draft EIS may do so. To ensure
consideration of your comments on the
proposal in the final EIS, it is important
that the Commission receive your
comments on or before May 14, 2018.
For your convenience, there are four
methods you can use to submit your
comments to the Commission. The
Commission will provide equal
consideration to all comments received,
whether filed in written form or
provided verbally. The Commission
encourages electronic filing of
comments and has expert staff available
to assist you at (202) 502–8258 or
FercOnlineSupport@ferc.gov. Please
carefully follow these instructions so
that your comments are properly
recorded.
(1) You can file your comments
electronically using the eComment
feature on the Commission’s website
(www.ferc.gov) under the link to
Documents and Filings. This is an easy
method for submitting brief, text-only
comments on a project;
(2) You can file your comments
electronically by using the eFiling
feature on the Commission’s website
(www.ferc.gov) under the link to
Documents and Filings. With eFiling,
you can provide comments in a variety
of formats by attaching them as a file
with your submission. New eFiling
users must first create an account by
clicking on ‘‘eRegister.’’ If you are filing
a comment on a particular project,

E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM

30MRN1