Download:
pdf |
pdfINTRODUCTION – CYB 5220 EXECUTIVE SEMINAR LEVEL COURSE IN CYBER SECURITY LEVEL 1 EVALUATION
The purpose of this survey is to collect the opinions of course participants in CYB 5220 Executive Seminar Level Course in
Cyber Security. Please answer each question candidly, and be specific. We encourage you to take the time to write comments
as they provide us with extremely valuable feedback.
All responses are anonymous and results will be reported as group data. Your participation should take less than five (5)
minutes.
Thank you for your participation.
Office of Management and Budget Approval (1110-0076 FBI Training Generic Clearance)
The information collected from this evaluation will enable the FBI to determine the effectiveness of this FBI training course, and to address improvements or
alterations that can be used to make this course more useful for future course attendees. This will be accomplished by assessing respondents’ views of the
course, instructors, curriculum, and learning environment. Having attended this course, the respondents are the best source for obtaining feedback. This
evaluation represents the most cost-effective method to provide such feedback and, as a result, create the opportunity for the FBI to improve this training
course.
This data collection is justified under 5 U.S.C. 410.601(f) (Office of Personnel Management, Training, Evaluation of Training). This section reads as follows:
Under provisions of chapter 41 of title 5, United States Code, and Executive Order 11348, the agency head shall evaluate training to determine how well it
meets short and long-range program needs by occupations, organizations, or other appropriate groups. The agency head may conduct the evaluation in the
manner or frequency he or she considers appropriate.
Date Training Began: ______________________________________
Course Location: ____________________________________________
FEEDBACK ON COURSE:
1. The content covered in this course matched what I expected to learn when I registered.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Not Applicable
2. It was clear how each lesson fit into the course as a whole.
Strongly Disagree
3.
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Not Applicable
The course included sufficient real-life examples, situations and cases to facilitate my understanding
of course content.
Strongly Disagree
4.
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Not Applicable
Strongly Agree
Not Applicable
The material presented was useful and pertinent.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
CYB 5220 Course Feedback
Cyber Education and Training Unit (CETU)
5.
I found this course engaging and interactive.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Not Applicable
6. The length of this course was appropriate for the content taught.
Much Too Long
Too Long
Just Right
Too Short
Much Too Short
7. How would you rate the overall effectiveness of this course?
Unacceptable
Not Satisfied
Satisfied
Very Satisfied
Excellent
8. What knowledge and/or skills acquired in this course will you be able to use on the job?
9. Do you anticipate any obstacles when trying to implement what you learned in this course?
Yes
No
Comments:
10. Which aspects of this course were the MOST valuable to your overall learning experience?
11. Which aspects of this course were the LEAST valuable to your overall learning experience?
12. General Comments regarding the content of this course:
Page 2
CYB 5220 Course Feedback
Cyber Education and Training Unit (CETU)
FEEDBACK ON INSTRUCTOR:
Name of Instructor: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________
1. The instructor presented the course material in an organized manner.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Not Applicable
Agree
Strongly Agree
Not Applicable
Strongly Agree
Not Applicable
2. The instructor spoke clearly and audibly.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
3. The instructor knew the subject matter thoroughly.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
4. The instructor covered material at an appropriate pace.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Not Applicable
5. The instructor provided adequate opportunities for class discussion.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Not Applicable
Strongly Agree
Not Applicable
6. The instructor effectively facilitated class participation.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
7. The instructor provided context which enabled me to understand how the lesson material applies to
my job role.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Not Applicable
8. The instructor captured my interest in the subject matter.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Not Applicable
9. I received sufficient feedback on my class performance to help improve my learning.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Not Applicable
10. General comments regarding this instructor:
Page 3
CYB 5220 Course Feedback
Cyber Education and Training Unit (CETU)
DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
1. Field Office/Division: _________________________________________________________________________
2. Job Title:
Assistant Director (AD)
Executive Assistant Director (EAD)
Assistant Director in Charge (ADIC)
Section Chief
Assistant Special Agent in Charge (ASAC)
Special Agent in Charge (SAC)
Deputy Assistant Director (DAD)
Other: ___________________________________________________________
3. Operational Assignment:
Counterintelligence
Cyber
Counterterrorism
Intelligence
Criminal Investigation
Science and Technology
Other: ___________________________________________________________
Page 4
File Type | application/pdf |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 0000-00-00 |