Level 1 Evaluation for CYB 3180 Interview and Interrogation for Cyber Investigators
Cyber Education and Training Unit (CETU)
INTRODUCTION
The
purpose of this survey is to collect the opinions of course
participants regarding their experience in CYB 3180 Interview and
Interrogation for Cyber Investigators. Please answer each question
candidly, and be specific. We encourage you to take the time to
write comments as they provide us with extremely valuable feedback.
All responses are anonymous, and results will be reported as group data. This survey will remain open for two weeks. You will have ONE attempt to open and complete this survey. Your participation should take less than 10 minutes.
The survey contains this introduction plus two sections of questions. As you complete each section, click “Submit” at the bottom of the page to proceed to the next section. At the end of the last section, select “Submit” to complete your survey.
Thank you for your participation.
SECTION 1 of 2: ASSESSMENT OF COURSE INSTRUCTION
Except
where noted, each of the questions will use a Likert scale of:
Strongly Disagree – Disagree – Neutral – Agree - Strongly Agree – Not Applicable
Feedback on Course:
The content covered in this course matched what I expected to learn when I registered.
It was clear how each lesson fit into the course as a whole.
The course included sufficient real-life examples, situations and cases to facilitate my understanding of course content.
The course provided sufficient opportunity to practice the skills learned in this course.
I found this course engaging and interactive.
The material was at an appropriate level of difficulty. [uses the following Likert Scale: Extremely Too Complex - Too Complex – Appropriate – Too Simplistic – Extremely Too Simplistic]
The length of this course was appropriate for the content taught. [uses the following Likert Scale: Much Too Long – Too Long – Just Right – Too Short – Much too Short]
What was the the overall effectiveness of this course? [uses the following Likert Scale: Unacceptable – Not Satisfied – Satisfied – Very Satisfied – Excellent]
What knowledge and/or skills acquired in this course will you be able to use on the job? [open-ended question]
Which aspects of this course were the MOST valuable to your overall learning experience? [open-ended question]
Which aspects of this course were the LEAST valuable to your overall learning experience? [open-ended question]
General Comments regarding the content of this course: [open-ended question]
Feedback on Role-Playing Interviews
Classroom instruction prepared me to successfully participate in the mock interviews.
The mock interviews were set up in a realistic way.
The criteria for evaluating my performance in the mock interviews were clear prior to the exercise.
The feedback I received after my mock interviews helped me improve my performance.
What comments and/or suggestions do you have for improving the mock interviews? [open-ended question]
Feedback on Instructors:
Enter name of Instructor 1: ____________
The instructor presented the course material in an organized manner.
The instructor spoke clearly and audibly.
The instructor knew the subject matter thoroughly.
The instructor covered the material at an appropriate pace.
The instructor provided adequate opportunities for class discussion.
The instructor effectively facilitated class participation.
The instructor captured my interest in the subject matter.
General Comments regarding this instructor: [open-ended question]
Enter name of Instructor 2: ____________
The instructor presented the course material in an organized manner.
The instructor spoke clearly and audibly.
The instructor knew the subject matter thoroughly.
The instructor covered the material at an appropriate pace.
The instructor provided adequate opportunities for class discussion.
The instructor effectively facilitated class participation.
The instructor captured my interest in the subject matter.
General Comments regarding this instructor: [open-ended question]
Enter name of Role Player 1: ____________
Did the role player execute the scenario sufficiently to evaluate the learning objectives?
Why or why not? [open-ended question]
Did the role player provide constructive feedback?
Why or why not? [open-ended question]
Enter name of Role Player 2: ____________
Did the role player execute the scenario sufficiently to evaluate the learning objectives?
Why or why not? [open-ended question]
Did the role player provide constructive feedback?
Why or why not? [open-ended question]
Enter name of Role Player 3: ____________
Did the role player execute the scenario sufficiently to evaluate the learning objectives?
Why or why not? [open-ended question]
Did the role player provide constructive feedback?
Why or why not? [open-ended question]
Enter name of Role Player 4: ____________
Did the role player execute the scenario sufficiently to evaluate the learning objectives?
Why or why not? [open-ended question]
Did the role player provide constructive feedback?
Why or why not? [open-ended question]
Enter name of Role Player 5: ____________
Did the role player execute the scenario sufficiently to evaluate the learning objectives?
Why or why not? [open-ended question]
Did the role player provide constructive feedback?
Why or why not? [open-ended question]
Feedback on Facilities:
The class environment helped me to learn. [yes/no – with comment box]
Classroom technology worked as needed. [yes/no – with comment box]
Room accommodations met my expectations. [yes/no – with comment box]
Local transportation was adequate and convenient. [yes/no – with comment box]
SECTION 2 of 2: DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
1. Field Office/Division:
Drop Down Question Format with:
Albany
Albuquerque
Anchorage
Atlanta
Baltimore
Birmingham
Boston
Buffalo
Charlotte
Chicago
Cincinnati
Cleveland
Columbia
Counterintelligence Division
Counterterrorism Division
Criminal Investigative Division
Critical Incident Response Group
Cyber Division
Dallas
Denver
Detroit
Directorate of Intelligence
El Paso
Finance and Facilities Division
Honolulu
Houston
Human Resources Division
Indianapolis
Information and Technology Branch
Inspection Division
International Operations Division
Jackson
Jacksonville
Kansas City
Knoxville
Laboratory Division
Las Vegas
Little Rock
Los Angeles
Louisville
Memphis
Miami
Milwaukee
Minneapolis
Mobile
New Haven
New Orleans
New York City
Newark
Norfolk
Oklahoma City
Omaha
Operational Technology Division
Philadelphia
Phoenix
Pittsburgh
Portland
Records Management Division
Richmond
Sacramento
Saint Louis
Salt Lake City
San Antonio
San Diego
San Francisco
San Juan
Seattle
Security Division
Springfield
Tampa
Training Division
Washington Field
Weapons of Mass Destruction Directorate
Please type your location if not listed.
|
2. Job Title:
Drop Down Question Format with:
Senior Executive Service
Assistant Legal Attaché
Assistant Special Agent in Charge
Assistant Section Chief
Computer Scientist
CyD Fellow
Detailee to the FBI
General Attorney
Information Technology Specialist
Information Technology Specialist - FE
Intelligence Analyst
Legal Attaché
Management and Program Analyst
Operational Support Technician
Staff Operations Specialist
Special Agent
Supervisory Intelligence Analyst
Supervisory Special Agent
Task Force Officer
Unit Chief
Other
If Other, please provide your job title.
|
3. Operational Assignment:
Radio Button Question Format with:
Counterintelligence
Counterterrorism
Criminal Investigation
Cyber
Intelligence
Science and Technology
Other
If Other, please provide your operational assignment.
|
4. I attended this course because:
Radio Button Question Format with:
Prerequisite for another class
Operational need
Part of OJT program
Interesting subject matter
Location
Other
If Other, please explain.
|
If needed by survey distribution method:
5. Course Number
6. Course location
7. Date training began: (MM/DD/YYYY)
Page
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
Subject | Version 4.0.9.0 |
Author | DEITRICK, MICHELE L. (TD) (FBI) |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2021-01-20 |