GROUNDFISH TRAWL CATCHER/PROCESSOR ECONOMIC DATA REPORT (EDR) OMB CONTROL NO. 0648-0564
COLLECTIONS OF INFORMATION EMPLOYING STATISTICAL METHODS
Describe (including a numerical estimate) the potential respondent universe and any sampling or other respondent selection method to be used. Data on the number of entities (e.g., establishments, State and local governmental units, households, or persons) in the universe and the corresponding sample are to be provided in tabular form. The tabulation must also include expected response rates for the collection as a whole. If the collection has been conducted before, provide the actual response rate achieved.
Entity Type |
Sample Size |
30 catcher/processors in GOA |
100% |
Groundfish harvest includes both the GOA and BSAI; therefore groundfish activity from both areas is included. Each catcher/processor is required to have one Amendment 80 QS permit and one LLP license, or an LLP groundfish license. Owners of multiple licenses and associated vessels are required annually to submit one EDR for each licensed vessel. In 2016, 30 entities submitted an EDR, and 16 of those were Amendment 80 catcher/processors.
The sample selection method is an annual census of all 30 catcher/processors, as any other sampling methodology would produce too few observations to estimate representative levels of cost, earnings, and other outputs required for this collection. As the EDR is a mandatory collection, and valuable fishing privileges will be withheld if an EDR is not submitted, we anticipate a 100 percent response rate from QS holders. QS and LLP licenses that designate participation in the GOA trawl fisheries are issued to entities, rather than vessels, and specific provisions require that each participant is responsible for including data from any acquired vessel in this sector.
Given that a maximum of 30 catcher/processors will be participating in this fishery, it is not feasible to generate enough observations on any one of the variables without applying this collection annually. And, random sampling from this population is not a viable option for statistical reasons. Based upon the degrees of freedom and number of observations required for estimating the statistical relationship among the variables in this collection, data in the Annual Trawl Catcher/Processor EDR may be pooled to create a time-series of cross-sectional data in order to generate sufficient observations for economic and statistical analysis. Although the strata to be used in preparing analyses (either deterministic or statistical) of management actions
for this fleet will depend on the specific questions of interest, vessels are commonly stratified by vessel length and the distribution and amount of catch, by species.
Each of the owners and leaseholders in the catcher/processor sector are required to annually submit the EDR. Therefore, the response to mandatory data requirements should be very high. Those individuals who do not submit their EDR by the submission date will receive a follow-up phone call from Pacific States. If a solution cannot be reached at that point, their information will be referred to the NOAA Office of Law Enforcement. Therefore, we anticipate response rates of 95 to 100 percent.
Enforcement of the GOA Trawl EDR Program with regard to non-compliance has been different from enforcement programs used to ensure that accurate landings are reported. The economic data are not be used for in-season management; persons submitting the data are given an opportunity to correct omissions and errors before any enforcement action is taken.
Giving the person submitting data a chance to correct problems is important because of the complexities associated with generating these data. Only if the agency and the person submitting the data cannot reach a solution will the enforcement agency be contacted. The intent of this program is to ensure that accurate data are collected without being overly burdensome on industry for unintended errors.
Since the GOA Trawl EDR Program has been in place, informal testing has taken place by meeting with EDR submitters to discuss ways in which the forms used to request information could be improved. The accountants that perform the data quality audits, as well as Pacific States (who administers the data collection), also document ways in which the EDRs could be clarified, and this information is used to clarify instructions and variable definitions for this EDR.
Brian Garber-Yonts, Ph.D. [statistical design and analysis of data]
Research Economist
NOAA/NMFS, Alaska Fisheries Science Center PH: (206) 526-6301
Email Address: Brian.Garber-yonts@noaa.gov
Stephanie Warpinski [specialist on EDR regulations]
NOAA/NMFS, Alaska Region
PH: (907) 586-7234
Email Address: stephanie.warpinski@noaa.gov
Geana Tyler [collection of data, verification of accuracy of data]
Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission
PH: (503) 595-3100
Email Address: gtyler@psmfc.org
Tracy Buck [permits, permit data]
Supervisor of Permits
PH: (907) 586-7889
NOAA/NMFS, Alaska Region
Email Address: tracy.buck@noaa.gov
Steve Whitney [administers Amendment 80 Program]
NOAA/NMFS, Alaska Region
PH: (907) 586-7269
Email Address: steve.whitney@noaa.gov
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
Author | Sarah Brabson |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2021-01-21 |