Internal Revenue Service
SUPPORTING STATEMENT
OMB# 1545-2024
Limited Payability
Form 13818 (Claim Against the United States
for the Proceeds of an Internal Revenue Refund Check).
CIRCUMSTANCES NECESSITATING COLLECTION OF INFORMATION
This form is used by taxpayers for completing a claim against the United States for the proceeds of an Internal Revenue refund check per Title 26, Treasury Regulation 3331.
USE OF DATA
This form will provide eligible taxpayers a standardized format to file a claim for their refund check.
USE OF IMPROVED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE BURDEN
IRS publication, regulations, notices and letters are to be electronically enabled on an as practicable basis in accordance with the IRS Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998. IRS has no plans at this time to offer electronic filing because of the low volume compared to the cost of electronic enabling.
EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY DUPLICATION
The information obtained through this collection is unique and is not already available for use or adaptation from another source.
METHODS TO MINIMIZE BURDEN ON SMALL BUSINESSES OR OTHER SMALL ENTITIES
There is no burden on small businesses or entities by this collection due to the inapplicability of the authorizing statute to this type of entity.
CONSEQUENCES OF LESS FREQUENT COLLECTION ON FEDERAL PROGRAMS OR POLICY ACTIVITIES
With a less frequent collection, taxpayers will be unable to complete their claim against the United States for the proceeds of an Internal Revenue refund check in a timely manner thereby hindering the IRS from meeting its mission.
SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRING DATA COLLECTION TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH GUIDELINES IN 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)
There are no special circumstances requiring data collection to be inconsistent with guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2).
CONSULTATION WITH INDIVIDUALS OUTSIDE OF THE AGENCY ON AVAILABILITY OF DATA, FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION, CLARITY OF INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS, AND DATA ELEMENTS
Periodic meetings are held between IRS personnel and Representatives of the American Bar Association, the National Society of Public Accountants, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and other professional groups to discuss tax law and tax forms. During these meetings, there is an opportunity for those attending to make comments regarding this form.
In response to the Federal Register notice (82 FR 22386), dated May 15, 2017, we received no comments during the comment period regarding this form.
EXPLANATION OF DECISION TO PROVIDE ANY PAYMENT OR GIFT TO RESPONDENTS
No gifts or payments are being provided to any respondents.
ASSURANCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY OF RESPONSES
Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential as required by 26 USC 6103.
JUSTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE QUESTIONS
A privacy impact assessment (PIA) has been conducted for information collected under this request as part of the “Individual Master File (IMF) #424”, and a Privacy Act System of Records Notices (SORN) has been issued for this system under Treasury/IRS 24.030–Individual Master File. The Internal Revenue Service PIAs can be found at
https://www.irs.gov/privacy-disclosure/privacy-impact-assessments-pia
Title 26 USC 6109 requires inclusion of identifying numbers in returns, statements, or other documents for securing proper identification of persons required to make such returns, statements, or documents and is the authority for social security numbers (SSNs) in IRS systems.
ESTIMATED BURDEN OF INFORMATION COLLECTION
List the number of responses, time per response, and total burden for each form included in the submission. The burden estimate is as follows:
Authority |
Description |
# of Respondents |
# Responses per Respondent |
Annual Responses |
Hours per Response |
Total Burden |
Treas Reg 3331 |
Form 13818 |
6,000 |
1 |
6,000 |
1 |
6,000 |
Totals |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
6,000 |
ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL COST BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS
To ensure more accuracy and consistency across its information collections, IRS is currently in the process of revising the methodology it uses to estimate burden and costs. Once this methodology is complete, IRS will update this information collection to better reflect its annual cost burden.
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
After consultation with various functions within the Service, we have determined that the cost of developing, printing, processing, distribution and overhead for the form is $5,000.
REASONS FOR CHANGE IN BURDEN
The increase in burden previously approved by OMB by 2,000 hours is from a correction in the computation. In the prior collection, the number of responses per respondent was erroneously reported as .6667 annually when the number of responses per respondent should have been one time annually. This form also is being submitted for renewal purposes only.
|
# of Respondents |
# Responses per Respondent |
Annual Responses |
Hours per Response |
Total Burden |
2014 Collection |
6,000 |
.6667 |
4,000 |
1 |
4,000 |
2017 Collection |
6,000 |
1 |
6,000 |
1 |
6,000 |
Increase in Burden |
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
PLANS FOR TABULATION, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND PUBLICATION
There are no plans for tabulation, statistical analysis and publication.
REASONS WHY DISPLAYING THE OMB EXPIRATION DATE IS INAPPROPRIATE
We believe that displaying the OMB expiration date is inappropriate because it could cause confusion by leading taxpayers to believe that the form sunsets as of the expiration date.
EXCEPTIONS TO THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT ON OMB FORM 83-I
There are no exceptions.
Note: The following paragraph applies to all of the collections of information in this submission:
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.
OMB EXPIRATION DATE
We believe the public interest will be better served by not printing an expiration date on the form(s) in this package.
Printing the expiration date on the form will result in increased costs because of the need to replace inventories that become obsolete by passage of the expiration date each time OMB approval is renewed. Without printing the expiration date, supplies of the form could continue to be used.
The time period during which the current edition of the form(s) in this package will continue to be usable cannot be predicted. It could easily span several cycles of review and OMB clearance renewal. In addition, usage fluctuates unpredictably. This makes it necessary to maintain a substantial inventory of forms in the supply line at all times. This includes supplied owned by both the Government and the public. Reprinting of the form cannot be reliably scheduled to coincide with an OMB approval expiration date. This form may be privately printed by users at their own expense. Some businesses print complex and expensive marginally punched continuous versions, their expense, for use in their computers. The form may be printed by commercial printers and stocked for sale. In such cases, printing the expiration date on the form could result in extra costs to the users.
Not printing the expiration date on the form(s) will also avoid confusion among taxpayers who may have identical forms with different expiration dates in their possession.
For the above reasons we request authorization to omit printing the expiration date on the form(s) in this package.
File Type | application/msword |
Author | Carol |
Last Modified By | SYSTEM |
File Modified | 2017-10-02 |
File Created | 2017-10-02 |