2017 15C2-5 Supporting Statement

SUPPORTING STATEMENT
for the Paperwork Reduction Act Information Collection Submission for
Rule 15c2-5 – Disclosure and other requirements when extending or arranging credit in certain
transactions
A.

JUSTIFICATION
1.

Necessity of Information Collection

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) adopted Rule 15c2-5 1 under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) to counter abuses in transactions known
as “equity funding” programs. In these transactions, a broker-dealer sells securities to a
customer and the securities act as collateral for loans. The proceeds of the loans are used to fund
the premiums on a life insurance policy which is sold to the customer. Prior to the adoption of
Rule 15c2-5, some broker-dealers offered such programs without determining and documenting
their suitability for customers. In addition, customers were sometimes inadequately informed of
the nature and extent of their obligations under the program, the charges to be incurred, and the
risks assumed. Furthermore, a substantial portion of the payments would go to the brokerdealer. 2 Although Rule 15c2-5 was prompted by the abuses associated with equity funding
programs, the rule encompasses other transactions that share the same characteristics as these
programs.
Rule 15c2-5 prohibits a broker-dealer from arranging or extending certain loans to
persons in connection with the offer or sale of securities unless, before any element of the
transaction is entered into, the broker-dealer: (1) delivers to the person a written statement
containing the exact nature and extent of the person’s obligations under the loan arrangement;
the risks and disadvantages of the loan arrangement; and all commissions, discounts, and other
remuneration received and to be received in connection with the transaction by the broker-dealer
or certain related persons (unless the person receives certain materials from the lender or brokerdealer which contain the required information); and (2) obtains from the person information on
the person’s financial situation and needs, reasonably determines that the transaction is suitable
for the person, and retains on file and makes available to the person on request a written
statement setting forth the broker-dealer’s basis for determining that the transaction was suitable.
The Commission is statutorily authorized by Section 15(c)(2) of the Exchange Act to
adopt rules and regulations that define and prescribe means reasonably designed to prevent acts
and practices that are fraudulent, deceptive or manipulative. 3 Further statutory authority is in
Section 23(a) of the Exchange Act. 4

1

See 17 CFR 240.15c2-5.

2

See Exchange Act Release Nos. 34-6809 (May 22, 1962), 27 FR 5204, 5205 (June 2, 1962) (proposing
release); see also 34-6851 (July 17, 1962), 27 FR 7091 (July 26, 1962) (adopting release).

3

See 15 U.S.C. 78o(c)(2).

4

See 15 U.S.C. 78w.

2.

Purpose and Use of the Information Collection

The information required by Rule 15c2-5 is necessary to execute the Commission’s
mandate under the Exchange Act of preventing fraudulent, manipulative, and deceptive acts and
practices by broker-dealers. In addition, the information required by Rule 15c2-5 provides the
broker-dealer must reasonably determine that the transaction is suitable for the customer and
deliver to the customer a written statement setting forth the basis upon which this determination
was made.
3.

Consideration Given to Information Technology

The collection of information is done on an individual transactional basis. Thus,
improved technology would not reduce the burden.
4.

Duplication

The requirements of Rule 15c2-5 are not duplicated elsewhere. In certain circumstances,
information specified in the rule must also be produced when complying with other regulatory
requirements, such as those of the Commission or the self-regulatory organizations. Rule 15c2-5
requirements generally conform to obligations imposed by other statutory or regulatory
provisions.
5.

Effect on Small Entities

To the extent that some broker-dealers covered by Rule 15c-5 5 are small entities, the rule
would impact these entities. The impact would, however, be mitigated by the lower number of
Rule 15c2-5 transactions these firms execute. Moreover, a prudent businessperson would
comply with the rule in the ordinary course of business.
6.

Consequences of Not Conducting Collection

The information is collected as each transaction warrants, and therefore the collection
cannot be less frequent without undermining the purpose of the rule.
7.

Inconsistencies with Guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)

There are no special circumstances. This collection is consistent with the guidelines in 5
CFR 1320.5(d).
8.

Consultations Outside the Agency

The required Federal Register notice with a 60-day comment period soliciting comments
on this collection of information was published. No public comments were received.

5

See 17 CFR 240.15c-5.

2

9.

Payment or Gift

No payments or gifts have been provided to respondents.
10.

Confidentiality

No assurances of confidentiality are provided in Section 15(c)(2) or Rule 15c2-5. The
records required by Rule 15c2-5 would be available only to the Commission staff, state securities
authorities, and self-regulatory organizations. Subject to the provisions of the Freedom of
Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, and the Commission’s rules thereunder,6 the Commission does not
generally publish or make available information contained in any reports, summaries, analyses,
letters, or memoranda arising out of, in anticipation of, or in connection with an examination or
inspection of the books and records of any person or any other investigation.
11.

Sensitive Questions

No questions of a sensitive nature are asked. The information collection does not collect
any Personally Identifiable Information (PII).
12.

Burden of Information Collection

The Commission estimates that there are approximately 50 respondents that require an
aggregate total of 600 hours to comply with Rule 15c2-5. 7 Each of these approximately 50
registered broker-dealers makes an estimated six annual responses, for an aggregate total of 300
responses per year. 8 Each response takes approximately two hours to complete. Thus, the total
compliance burden per year is 600 burden hours. 9 The approximate internal compliance cost per
hour is $57.00 for clerical labor, resulting in a total internal compliance cost of $34,200. 10 These
reflect internal labor costs; there are no external labor, capital, or start-up costs.
13.

Costs to Respondents

Respondents will not incur any capital, start-up, operational or maintenance costs to
comply with the rule.
14.

Costs to Federal Government

Not applicable.

6

See 17 CFR 200.80(b)(4)(iii).

7

50 respondents x 6 responses per year x 2 hours per response = 600 hours per year.

8

50 respondents x 6 responses per year = 300 responses per year.

9

300 responses per year x 2 hours per response = 600 hours per year.

10

600 hours per year x $57.00 per hour = $34,200 per year.

3

15.

Changes in Burden

None.
16.

Information Collection Planned for Statistical Purposes

Not applicable. The information collected is not used for statistical purposes.
17.

Approval to Omit OMB Expiration Date

The Commission is not seeking approval to omit the expiration date.
18.

Exceptions to Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions

This collection complies with the requirements in 5 CFR 1320.9.
B.

COLLECTIONS OF INFORMATION EMPLOYING STATISTICAL METHODS
This collection does not involve statistical methods.

4