Company-Run Annual Stress Test Reporting Template and Documentation for Covered Institutions with Total Consolidated Assets of over $50 Billion

ICR 201701-1557-003

OMB: 1557-0319

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
IC Document Collections
IC ID
Document
Title
Status
209184 Modified
209179 Modified
209178 Modified
209177 Modified
209176 Modified
ICR Details
1557-0319 201701-1557-003
Historical Active 201602-1557-001
TREAS/OCC
Company-Run Annual Stress Test Reporting Template and Documentation for Covered Institutions with Total Consolidated Assets of over $50 Billion
Revision of a currently approved collection   No
Regular
Approved without change 04/03/2017
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 02/03/2017
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
04/30/2020 36 Months From Approved 08/31/2019
125 0 110
13,414 0 12,254
0 0 0

Section 165(i)(2) of the Dodd-Frank Act requires certain financial companies, including national banks and Federal savings associations, to conduct annual stress tests and requires the primary financial regulatory agency of those financial companies to issue regulations implementing the stress test requirements. The OCC issued an anuual stress test rule to meet this requirement in 2012. The OCC also issued related reporting templates for institutions with consolidated assets of over $50 billion in 2012. The revisions to the DFAST-14A reporting templates consist of the following: • Adding line items to the Regulatory Capital Instruments Schedule. • Updating the Summary Schedule to collect items related to the supplementary leverage ratio. • Removing sub-schedules of the Operational Risk Schedule for all covered institutions and adding sub-schedules to the Operational Risk Schedule for a subset of covered institutions. • Creating a new supplemental schedule to collect certain items not included in the Board’s FR Y-14A. • Requiring a bank-specific scenario. Covered institutions would be required to submit bank-specific baseline and stress scenarios. • Requiring the assumption of largest counterparty default. The largest trading covered institutions that also submit the Global Market Shock scenario would be required to assume the default of their largest counterparty in the supervisory severely adverse and adverse scenarios.

PL: Pub.L. 111 - 203 165(i) Name of Law: Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
  
None

Not associated with rulemaking

  81 FR 70717 11/16/2016
82 FR 9273 02/03/2017
Yes

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 125 110 0 0 15 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 13,414 12,254 0 1,000 160 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Yes
Miscellaneous Actions
No
The change is burden is due to the fact that more respondents are expected to complete the templates. Also, the OCC’s burden estimate is based upon the Board’s estimate of the burden of completing the FR Y-14A reporting form, which is very similar to these reporting templates. To the extent the burden of completing the FR Y-14A increases or decreases, the burden of completing the OCC’s reporting templates will also increase or decrease.

No
No
No
Yes
No
Uncollected
Henry Barkhausen 202 649-7191 henry.barkhausen@occ.treas.gov

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
02/03/2017


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy