60-day FRN

asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

69044

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 5, 2016 / Notices

Fisheries and the Atlantic and Gulf
States Marine Fisheries Commissions,
have implemented the Southeast Data,
Assessment and Review (SEDAR)
process, a multi-step method for
determining the status of fish stocks in
the Southeast Region. SEDAR is a threestep process including: (1) Data
Workshop; (2) Assessment Process
utilizing Webinars; and (3) Review
Workshop. The product of the Data
Workshop is a data report which
compiles and evaluates potential
datasets and recommends which
datasets are appropriate for assessment
analyses. The product of the Assessment
Process is a stock assessment report
which describes the fisheries, evaluates
the status of the stock, estimates
biological benchmarks, projects future
population conditions, and recommends
research and monitoring needs. The
assessment is independently peer
reviewed at the Review Workshop. The
product of the Review Workshop is a
Summary documenting panel opinions
regarding the strengths and weaknesses
of the stock assessment and input data.
Participants for SEDAR Workshops are
appointed by the Gulf of Mexico, South
Atlantic, and Caribbean Fishery
Management Councils and NOAA
Fisheries Southeast Regional Office,
Highly Migratory Species Management
Division, and Southeast Fisheries
Science Center. Participants include:
Data collectors and database managers;
stock assessment scientists, biologists,
and researchers; constituency
representatives including fishermen,
environmentalists, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs);
international experts; and staff of
Councils, Commissions, and state and
federal agencies.
SEDAR 50 is providing an assessment
of Atlantic blueline tilefish. During a
Stock Identification Workshop held in
July 2016, it was recommended that the
western boundary of the Atlantic stock
be extended to include the west coast of
Florida. The SEDAR Steering
Committee, responsible for program
oversight and assessment project
scheduling, recommended convening a
meeting of SSC representatives to
consider stock and management unit
overlap between the Gulf and South
Atlantic Council areas of jurisdiction
and provide recommendations on risks
to the stock posed by continued
management per the Gulf Council
jurisdiction. Each Council has identified
representatives of its SSC to participate
in this meeting.
The items of discussion for the Stock
Identification SSC Review via Webinar
are as follows:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:15 Oct 04, 2016

Jkt 241001

1. Review the SEDAR 50 Stock
Identification Work Group Report
(SEDAR50–DW12).
2. Provide advice on the level of
overlap between the Atlantic blueline
tilefish stock and the management
jurisdictions of the Gulf of Mexico and
South Atlantic Fishery Management
Councils.
3. Provide guidance on the risks
associated with management based on
the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management
Council boundary.
Although non-emergency issues not
contained in this agenda may come
before this group for discussion, those
issues may not be the subject of formal
action during this meeting. Action will
be restricted to those issues specifically
identified in this notice and any issues
arising after publication of this notice
that require emergency action under
section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act, provided the public has been
notified of the intent to take final action
to address the emergency.
Special Accommodations
This meeting is accessible to people
with disabilities. Requests for auxiliary
aids should be directed to the SAFMC
office (see ADDRESSES) at least 5
business days prior to the meeting.
Note: The times and sequence specified in
this agenda are subject to change.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: September 30, 2016.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–24051 Filed 10–4–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Proposed Information Collection—
Renewal/Revision; Comment Request;
Educational Partnership Program
(EPP), Ernest F. Hollings
Undergraduate Scholarship Program,
Dr. Nancy Foster Scholarship Program,
Recruitment, Training, and Research
Program
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general

SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00009

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before December 5,
2016.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6616,
14th and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at JJessup@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to Todd Christenson, 301 628
2916 or todd.christenson@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
This request is for extension of a
current information collection.
The National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
Office of Education (OEd) collects,
evaluates and analyzes student data for
the purpose of selecting successful
candidates, and for generating reports
and news articles to communicate the
success of its program. The OEd
requires applicants to its undergraduate
scholarship programs to complete an
application in order to be considered.
The application package requires two
faculty and/or academic advisors to
complete a NOAA student scholar
reference form in support of the
scholarship application. NOAA OEd
student scholar alumni are also
requested to provide information to
NOAA for internal tracking purposes.
NOAA OEd grant recipients are required
to update the student tracker database
with the required student information.
The collected student data supports
NOAA OEd’s program performance
measures. The Dr. Nancy Foster
Scholarship Program and the NMFS
Recruiting, Training, and Research
Program also collect student data for
their programs and are also covered by
this notice.
II. Method of Collection
Electronic applications and electronic
forms are required from participants,
and the primary methods of submittal
are email and Internet submission of
electronic forms. Approximately 1% of
the application and reference forms may
be mailed to accommodate those
without internet access. New student
records may also be provided via
spreadsheet by OEd grant recipients for

E:\FR\FM\05OCN1.SGM

05OCN1

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 5, 2016 / Notices
bulk upload to the student tracker
database by NOAA OEd staff.

OMB Number: 0648–0568.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular submission
(extension of a current information
collection).
Affected Public: Individuals or
households; business or other for-profit;
not-for-profit institutions; State, Local or
Tribal Government.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
Student Performance Achievement
Reporting (SPAR) database form, 8;
undergraduate application form, 600;
reference forms, 1200; alumni update
form, 200.
Estimated Time per Response: SPAR
database form, 17 hours; undergraduate
application form, 8 hours; reference
forms, 1 hour; alumni update form, 1
hour.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 6,336.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $300 in recordkeeping/reporting
costs.
IV. Request for Comments

asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: September 30, 2016.
Sarah Brabson,
NOAA PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016–24048 Filed 10–4–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–00–P

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:15 Oct 04, 2016

Jkt 241001

Please do not submit business
information that is confidential or
National Telecommunications and
otherwise protected. NTIA will accept
Information Administration
anonymous comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[Docket No. 160810714–6714–01]
Ashley Heineman, National
RIN 0660–XC029
Telecommunications and Information
Administration, U.S. Department of
The Incentives, Benefits, Costs, and
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
Challenges to IPv6 Implementation
NW., Room 4701, Washington, DC
AGENCY: National Telecommunications
20230; telephone (202) 482–0298; email
and Information Administration, U.S.
aheineman@ntia.doc.gov. Please direct
Department of Commerce.
media inquiries to NTIA’s Office of
Public Affairs, (202) 482–7002 or by
ACTION: Notice; reopening of comment
email at press@ntia.doc.gov.
period.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
SUMMARY: On August 18, 2016, the
original notice sought public comment
National Telecommunications and
to guide NTIA in its future efforts to
Information Administration (NTIA)
engage more directly in promoting IPv6
issued a notice and request for public
deployment and use, with a particular
comments seeking input to guide NTIA
focus on implementation. See Notice
in future Internet Protocol version 6
and request for public comment, The
(IPv6) promotional activities. Through
Incentives, Benefits, Costs, and
this Notice, NTIA invited adopters and
Challenges to IPv6 Implementation, 81
implementers of IPv6 as well as any
FR 55182 (Aug. 18, 2016), available at:
other interested stakeholders to share
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/
information on the benefits, costs, and
publications/
challenges they have experienced, as
fr_ipv6_implementation_08182016.pdf.
well as any insight into additional
To assist in this purpose, NTIA is asking
incentives that could aid future
those who have implemented IPv6 to
adoption, implementation, and support
share their experiences and to highlight
of IPv6. In response to requests for
in particular the factors and
additional time in which to comment,
circumstances that supported their
NTIA through this notice reopens the
decision to move ahead and adopt the
comment period. Comments received
protocol. NTIA hopes to utilize input
between the October 3, 2016 due date
received through this request for
for comments announced in the August
comments to guide and inform future
18, 2016 notice, and publication of this
promotion efforts, including the IPv6
notice in the Federal Register, will be
Best Practice Forum being organized for
deemed to be timely.
the 2016 Internet Governance Forum,
DATES: Comments are due no later than
which will be held in December 2016,
5:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on
in Guadalajara, Mexico.1
October 17, 2016.
The original deadline for submission
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
of comments was October 3, 2016. In
submitted by email to
response to requests for additional time
ipv6@ntia.doc.gov. Comments
in which to comment, NTIA reopens the
submitted by email should be machinecomment period with this notice.
readable and should not be copyComments received between the
protected. Written comments also may
October 3, 2016 due date for comments
be submitted by mail to the National
announced in the August 18, 2016
Telecommunications and Information
notice, and publication of this notice in
Administration, U.S. Department of
the Federal Register, are deemed to be
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
timely.
NW., Room 4725, Attn: IPv6 RFC 2016,
Request for Comment: NTIA invites
Washington, DC 20230. Responders
comment on the following questions, in
should include the name of the person
whole or in part:
or organization filing the comment, as
Benefits:
well as a page number on each page of
1. What are the benefits of
the submission. All comments received
implementing IPv6? For example, what
are a part of the public record and will
are the direct performance benefits of
generally be posted to https://
implementing IPv6 for end users, or for
www.ntia.doc.gov/federal-registernotice/ enhanced network security, as
2016/incentives-benefits-costsandcompared to IPv4?
challenges-ipv6-implementation
2. What are the expected or
without change. All personal identifying unexpected benefits of implementing
information (for example, name,
IPv6?
address) voluntarily submitted by the
1 http://www.igf2016.mx/.
commenter may be publicly accessible.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

III. Data

69045

PO 00000

Frm 00010

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\05OCN1.SGM

05OCN1