Download:
pdf |
pdfREQUEST FOR DETERMINATION OF RESEARCH STATUS
To be completed by the staff member with lead responsibility for the project and approved by branch chief (if applicable) and Division
ADS. A separate PGO funding memo is required if project is research and involves human subjects regardless of the CDC staff role.
Instructions:
(1) Use this form to declare: (a) the research status of any project, (b) role or roles of CDC staff
(2) A short summary should be attached offering specific details about the project and the role of staff.
(3) Be sure to complete all applicable items, obtain appropriate signatures and submit this form for approval.
Tracking Number:
BPA (OADC)/2016-016
(Use PGO number if cooperative agreement, grant, etc.)
Date submitted:
03/11/2016
Title of Project:
Inside Knowledge: Get the Facts About Gynecologic Cancer Campaign
Dates for project period:
Dates for funding (if applicable):
Beginning:
09/02/2016
Beginning:
Ending:
09/01/2021
Ending:
Project is (choose one):
NOTE: Revision, as used below, refers to any substantive change made to the project including scope of project, funding restrictions,
personnel, role of CDC staff member, determination of research status, etc.
[]
New
[]
Revision
[X]
Continuation, without revision(s)
[]
Continuation, with revision(s)
Lead staff member:
Contact information:
Please indicate your role(s) in this project:
Name:
Cynthia Gelb
Division:
User ID:
CMG7
Telephone: 770-488-4708
Scientific Ethics number:
4187 Mailstop:
DCPC
MS: F76
[]
Project officer
[X]
Technical monitor
[]
Principal
investigator
[]
Investigator
[]
Consultant
[X]
Other (please explain)
COR
1.
Are any or all of the activities within this project DESIGNED to contribute to generalizable knowledge (i.e., research)?
[]
[X]
YES
NO
If YES, list those activities which are research:
2.
Is this CDC project research or public health practice (check all that apply)?
[]
Research
[X]
Public health practice
Check one:
Check all that apply:
[]
Human subjects involved
[]
Emergency Response
[]
Surveillance
[]
Human subjects not involved
[]
Program evaluation
[X]
Other (please explain)
Education
and
awareness
3.
If RESEARCH involving human subjects, has the project or research activities been reviewed by the CDC IRB for human
subjects protection?
a. [ ]
NO, New project, not yet reviewed
d. [ ]
b. [ ] NO, Existing project, not ready to submit
YES, Reviewed and approved by CDC
If YES, please list protocol number and
c. [ ] NO, Submitted for approval
expiration date
e. [ ]
NO, RESEARCH, no CDC investigators (CDC IRB not
required)
f. [ ]
N/A (Not Applicable)
If RESEARCH, list any other CDC staff involved in this project, please include the name, role, and scientific ethics number
Form 684R_NR (revised January 2003)
ID:
26017
1
Tracking NO. BPA (OADC)/2016-016
Name
Role (project officer, investigator,
consultant, etc.)
Scientific ethics
number Prin
Cynthia Gelb
4187
IF YOU THINK THE RESEARCH PROJECT MIGHT QUALIFY AS EXEMPT RESEARCH (as identified in 45CFR46.101),
PLEASE ANSWER questions 4-6, OTHERWISE SKIP TO question 7.
4.
5.
Does the proposed research involve prisoners?
[ ]
YES
[ ]
NO
If YES, this research cannot be exempted and must be reviewed by an IRB (skip to question 7).
Does the proposed research involve fetuses, pregnant women, or human in vitro fertilization as targets (such that Subpart B
would apply)?
[ ]
YES
[ ]
NO
If YES, this research cannot be exempted and must be reviewed by an IRB (skip to
question 7).
Educational Research
6.1
Is this research conducted in established or commonly accepted educational settings, AND does the research involve
normal educational practices (e.g., research on regular and special education strategies or research on the
effectiveness of, or comparison among instrucational techniques, curricula or classroom management methods)?
[ ]
YES
[ ]
NO
Research Involving Surveys, Interview Procedures (including Focus groups), Observation of Public Behavior, or Educational
Tests
6.2
Will this research use educational tests (cognitive, diagnostic, aptitude, achievement), survey procedures, interview
procedures or observation of public behavior?
[ ]
YES
[ ]
NO
If NO skip 6.3
Will children (<18 years of age) be research subjects?
[ ]
YES
[ ]
NO
6.2.1
Is the information obtained recorded in such a manner that human subjects can be identified directly or
indirectly through identifiers (such as a code) linked to the subjects;
[ ]
6.2.2
YES
[ ]
NO
Will any disclosure of the human subjects' responses outside of the research setting have the potential to
place the subjects at risk of criminal or civil liability, or be damaging to the subjects' financial standing,
employability or reputation? (Examples here may include: the collection of sensitive data regarding the
subjects' (or relatives' or associates') possible substance abuse, sexuality, criminal history or intent, medical
or psychological condition, financial status, or similarly compromising information).
[ ]
6.3
If YES, this research cannot be exempted and must be reviewed by an IRB (skip to item 7)
YES
[ ]
NO
Will this research use educational tests (cognitive, diagnostic, aptitude, achievement), survey procedures, interview
procedures, or observation of public behavior but the research is not exempt under paragraph 6.2 of this section:
[ ]
YES
6.3.1
Will this research involve human subjects that are elected or appointed public officials or candidates for
public office?
[ ]
6.3.2
[ ]
YES
NO
[ ]
If NO skip to 6.4
NO
Does federal statute(s) require(s) without exception that confidentiality of the personally identifiable
information will be maintained throughout the research and thereafter? (Note: CDC can use this exemption
criterion only in the case where a 308(d) Assurance of Confidentiality has been obtained to cover the
research).
[ ]
YES
[ ]
NO
Existing Data Which Is Publicly Available or Unidentifiable
6.4
Does this research involve only the collection or study of existing* data, documents, records, pathological or
diagnostic specimens? (* 'existing' means existing before the study begins)?
[ ]
YES
6.4.1
Is this material or information publicly available?
[ ]
[ ]
YES
Form 684R_NR (revised January 2003)
ID:
26017
NO
[ ]
If NO skip to 7
NO
2
Tracking NO. BPA (OADC)/2016-016
6.4.2
Is this material or information recorded in such a manner by the investigator that the subjects cannot be
identified directly or indirectly through identifiers linked to the subjects?
(Note: If a link is created by an investigator even temporarily, for research purposes, this criterion is not met.
If a temporary link is created by clinical staff who already have access to the data, this criterion is met).
7.
[ ]
YES
(there are no identifying information and no unique identifiers or codes)YES
[ ]
NO
(there are identifiers (including codes))
Please prepare and attach a short summary paragraph (<1 page);
if this is new:
a.
Be sure to include the purpose of the project, specific details about the project and the role of the CDC staff member
(s) in the project. In explaining one's role as a consultant be particularly careful to identify involvement in things
like: study design decisions, oversight of protocol development, participation in review of data collection procedures,
and particpation in data analysis and/or manuscript preparation, as well as whether there will be access to
identifiable or personal data.
b.
Explain your project status selection (research--non-exempt, exempt, no CDC investigator or not involving human
subjects; public health practice). If you selected research not involving human subjects be sure to indicate if the data
includes any personal information (e.g., name, SSN), linkable study identification numbers or codes, or geographical
information.
CDC promotes awareness of gynecologic cancer through its Inside Knowledge: Get the Facts About Gynecologic Cancer
(Inside Knowledge) campaign. In collaboration with the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office on Women’s
Health, CDC established Inside Knowledge to educate women and health care providers about the signs, symptoms, risk
factors, and prevention strategies related to the five main types of gynecologic cancer. When gynecologic cancers are found
early, treatment can be most effective. Inside Knowledge supports the Gynecologic Cancer Education and Awareness Act of
2005, or Johanna's Law.
The purpose of this project is to inform and improve the content, messaging, and communication strategies of the Inside
Knowledge campaign. Messages and materials about the signs, symptoms, and risk factors related to gynecological cancers
will be reviewed and revised through information shared in focus groups by women aged 35-65, the primary audience of Inside
Knowledge. Focus groups would be conducted in 3-4 cities in the United States, with at least 3 English groups and 1-2
Spanish groups held in each city. Up to 9 participants may be included in each focus group and will reflect demographic
diversity to the extent necessary to ensure a diverse perspective. We will also ask participants to review consumer materials
and creative approaches to assess whether they are clear, compelling, and engaging. The feedback provided by these
consumers will provide information to campaign planners that will guide further development and dissemination of campaign
materials and messages.
The CDC project manager will lead the development of a recruitment plan, moderator’s guide, and other testing tools, and the
communications contractor will conduct focus groups. All activities shall be upon the direction and approval of the Contracting
Officer Representative.
This activity is public health practice because the primary purpose is to inform and improve an existing public health
awareness campaign. The findings are not generalizable beyond the specific content of the Inside Knowledge campaign.
8.
Please list the primary project site and all collaborating site(s).
Explanation of project components:
9.
If project involves research that is funded extramurally, list amount of award that should be restricted pending IRB
approval and describe which project components will be affected, if known:
Approvals (signature and position title)
Cynthia Gelb - Health Communications
Specialist
Date
03/11/2016
Research Determination / Remarks
[X]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
Public health practice
Research not involving human subjects
Research involving human subjects, no CDC investigators
Research involving human subjects, CDC investigators, exempt
Research involving human subjects, CDC investigators, not exempt
(check if applicable)
[ ]
Local IRB
[ ]
CDC Exemption
[ ]
CDC IRB
staff member completing this form
Form 684R_NR (revised January 2003)
ID:
26017
Comments:
Thank you for reviewing this!
3
Janine Cory - Lead Health
Communications Speci
03/14/2016
[X]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
Public health practice
Research not involving human subjects
Research involving human subjects, no CDC investigators
Research involving human subjects, CDC investigators, exempt
Research involving human subjects, CDC investigators, not exempt
(check if applicable)
[ ]
Local IRB
[ ]
CDC Exemption
[ ]
CDC IRB
Team Lead
Comments:
Cheryll Thomas - Epidemiologist
03/17/2016
[X]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
Public health practice
Research not involving human subjects
Research involving human subjects, no CDC investigators
Research involving human subjects, CDC investigators, exempt
Research involving human subjects, CDC investigators, not exempt
(check if applicable)
[ ]
Local IRB
[ ]
CDC Exemption
[ ]
CDC IRB
Division ADS
Comments:
Joan Redmond Leonard - PUBLIC
HEALTH ANALYST
03/17/2016
[X]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
Public health practice
Research not involving human subjects
Research involving human subjects, no CDC investigators
Research involving human subjects, CDC investigators, exempt
Research involving human subjects, CDC investigators, not exempt
(check if applicable)
[ ]
Local IRB
[ ]
CDC Exemption
[ ]
CDC IRB
CUC ADS, Deputy ADS, or Human
Subjects Contact
Form 684R_NR (revised January 2003)
ID:
26017
Comments:
4
File Type | application/pdf |
File Title | rpt684 |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2018-03-01 |