Download:
pdf |
pdfUnited States
Department of
Agriculture
National
Agricultural
Statistics
Service
Cotton Ginnings
2015 Summary
May 2016
ISSN: 2159-7804
Contents
Running Bales Ginned by Crop – States and United States: 2012-2015 ................................................................................ 4
All Cotton Running Bales Ginned by Percent – States: 2015 Crop ........................................................................................ 5
Average Net Weight per Bale – States and United States: 2013-2015 ................................................................................... 5
Running Bales Produced and Equivalent 480-pound Bales Ginned by Crop – States and United States:
2014 and 2015 Crop ................................................................................................................................................................ 6
Running Bales Ginned Biweekly by Crop – States and United States: 2015 Crop ................................................................ 7
All Cotton Running Bales Ginned, Equivalent 480-pound Bales Ginned, Active Gins, and Average Bale
Weight – Counties, Districts, States, and United States: 2015 Crop .................................................................................... 10
Number of Active Gins by Size Group – States and United States: 2015 Crop Year........................................................... 18
2015 Cotton Ginnings Comments ......................................................................................................................................... 20
Statistical Methodology ........................................................................................................................................................ 20
Information Contacts ............................................................................................................................................................ 20
Cotton Ginnings 2015 Summary (May 2016)
USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service
3
Running Bales Ginned by Crop – States and United States: 2012-2015
[Excluding linters]
Crop and State
Running bales ginned
2012 Crop
2013 Crop
2014 Crop
2015 Crop
(number)
(number)
(number)
(number)
Upland
Alabama ......................
Arizona ........................
Arkansas ......................
California .....................
Florida ..........................
Georgia ........................
Kansas .........................
Louisiana .....................
Mississippi ...................
Missouri .......................
764,150
545,450
1,244,700
534,600
131,550
2,857,850
72,450
475,350
916,550
755,700
568,250
452,150
699,150
338,850
124,400
2,294,400
43,550
321,500
666,850
504,850
642,850
454,400
804,200
231,000
139,600
2,528,650
50,500
403,050
966,800
578,400
531,650
261,400
481,300
169,650
111,100
2,220,550
37,300
192,850
613,350
405,400
New Mexico .................
North Carolina ..............
Oklahoma ....................
South Carolina .............
Tennessee ...................
Texas ...........................
Virginia .........................
39,000
1,221,250
119,350
548,900
731,350
4,948,950
176,600
31,900
773,300
132,650
319,950
415,450
4,087,400
135,700
34,750
1,013,300
241,400
472,150
494,900
6,075,650
199,150
18,800
521,600
344,950
138,600
300,750
5,631,450
132,050
United States ...............
16,083,750
11,910,300
15,330,750
12,112,750
American Pima
Arizona ........................
California .....................
New Mexico .................
Texas ...........................
7,300
723,950
5,800
12,950
3,250
587,400
7,100
13,000
29,750
479,550
9,350
26,250
30,100
346,400
14,250
25,450
United States ...............
750,000
610,750
544,900
416,200
All
Alabama ......................
Arizona ........................
Arkansas ......................
California .....................
Florida ..........................
Georgia ........................
Kansas .........................
Louisiana .....................
Mississippi ...................
Missouri .......................
764,150
552,750
1,244,700
1,258,550
131,550
2,857,850
72,450
475,350
916,550
755,700
568,250
455,400
699,150
926,250
124,400
2,294,400
43,550
321,500
666,850
504,850
642,850
484,150
804,200
710,550
139,600
2,528,650
50,500
403,050
966,800
578,400
531,650
291,500
481,300
516,050
111,100
2,220,550
37,300
192,850
613,350
405,400
New Mexico .................
North Carolina ..............
Oklahoma ....................
South Carolina .............
Tennessee ...................
Texas ...........................
Virginia .........................
44,800
1,221,250
119,350
548,900
731,350
4,961,900
176,600
39,000
773,300
132,650
319,950
415,450
4,100,400
135,700
44,100
1,013,300
241,400
472,150
494,900
6,101,900
199,150
33,050
521,600
344,950
138,600
300,750
5,656,900
132,050
United States ...............
16,833,750
12,521,050
15,875,650
12,528,950
4
Cotton Ginnings 2015 Summary (May 2016)
USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service
All Cotton Running Bales Ginned by Percent – States: 2015 Crop
[United States all cotton running bales ginned is 12,528,950. Percentages may not add to 100 due to rounding]
State
Percent ginned
State
Percent ginned
(percent)
Alabama ................................................
Arizona ..................................................
Arkansas ...............................................
California ...............................................
Florida ...................................................
Georgia .................................................
Kansas ..................................................
Louisiana ...............................................
Mississippi .............................................
(percent)
4.2
2.3
3.8
4.1
0.9
17.7
0.3
1.5
4.9
Missouri ................................................
New Mexico ..........................................
North Carolina ......................................
Oklahoma .............................................
South Carolina ......................................
Tennessee ............................................
Texas ...................................................
Virginia .................................................
3.2
0.3
4.2
2.8
1.1
2.4
45.2
1.1
Average Net Weight per Bale – States and United States: 2013-2015
Crop and State
Average net weight per bale
2013 Crop
2014 Crop
2015 Crop
(pounds)
(pounds)
(pounds)
Upland
Alabama .............................................................
Arizona ...............................................................
Arkansas ............................................................
California ............................................................
Florida ................................................................
Georgia ..............................................................
Kansas ...............................................................
Louisiana ............................................................
Mississippi ..........................................................
Missouri ..............................................................
494.2
491.0
493.1
494.9
490.6
495.7
488.3
488.4
490.4
490.4
491.6
493.2
488.3
496.0
488.5
496.4
483.1
490.5
492.4
490.4
492.5
491.6
489.7
495.9
492.4
495.9
486.2
489.9
492.4
490.2
New Mexico ........................................................
North Carolina ....................................................
Oklahoma ...........................................................
South Carolina ....................................................
Tennessee ..........................................................
Texas .................................................................
Virginia ...............................................................
492.0
497.4
486.9
494.1
491.1
492.4
493.4
490.0
498.0
490.3
494.1
491.6
490.9
490.1
489.1
497.6
487.9
494.7
491.6
491.9
494.5
United States ......................................................
493.1
492.4
492.7
American Pima
Arizona ...............................................................
California ............................................................
New Mexico ........................................................
Texas .................................................................
487.4
498.3
496.9
492.9
488.8
499.4
492.0
488.2
499.1
499.7
493.2
489.9
United States ......................................................
498.2
498.2
498.9
All
United States ......................................................
493.4
492.6
492.9
Cotton Ginnings 2015 Summary (May 2016)
USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service
5
Running Bales Produced and Equivalent 480-pound Bales Ginned by Crop – States and United States:
2014 and 2015 Crop
Crop and State
Equivalent 480-pound
bales ginned
Running bales produced
2014 Crop
2015 Crop
2014 Crop
2015 Crop
(number)
(number)
(number)
(number)
Upland
Alabama ...............................................
Arizona .................................................
Arkansas ...............................................
California ..............................................
Florida ...................................................
Georgia .................................................
Kansas ..................................................
Louisiana ..............................................
Mississippi ............................................
Missouri ................................................
636,850
476,450
768,800
206,750
186,100
2,480,750
47,100
394,300
1,050,900
556,900
539,450
269,550
460,400
159,350
147,250
2,178,000
34,400
184,300
654,900
391,600
658,400
466,850
818,200
238,750
142,100
2,614,800
50,800
411,900
991,800
590,900
545,500
267,750
491,050
175,250
113,950
2,294,300
37,800
196,850
629,150
414,050
New Mexico ..........................................
North Carolina .......................................
Oklahoma .............................................
South Carolina ......................................
Tennessee ............................................
Texas ....................................................
Virginia ..................................................
62,050
959,350
263,250
510,850
481,450
6,032,100
216,650
58,350
507,850
365,600
149,200
297,650
5,576,300
138,600
35,450
1,051,250
246,550
486,050
506,900
6,214,250
203,300
19,200
540,750
350,650
142,850
308,000
5,771,000
136,000
United States ........................................
15,330,600
12,112,750
15,728,250
12,434,100
American Pima
Arizona .................................................
California ..............................................
New Mexico ..........................................
Texas ....................................................
29,300
480,000
8,050
27,550
29,700
346,800
12,650
27,050
30,300
498,950
9,600
26,700
31,300
360,650
14,600
26,000
United States ........................................
544,900
416,200
565,550
432,550
All
Alabama ...............................................
Arizona .................................................
Arkansas ...............................................
California ..............................................
Florida ...................................................
Georgia .................................................
Kansas ..................................................
Lousiana ...............................................
Mississippi ............................................
Missouri ................................................
636,850
505,750
768,800
686,750
186,100
2,480,750
47,100
394,300
1,050,900
556,900
539,450
299,250
460,400
506,150
147,250
2,178,000
34,400
184,300
654,900
391,600
658,400
497,150
818,200
737,700
142,100
2,614,800
50,800
411,900
991,800
590,900
545,500
299,050
491,050
535,900
113,950
2,294,300
37,800
196,850
629,150
414,050
New Mexico ..........................................
North Carolina .......................................
Oklahoma .............................................
South Carolina ......................................
Tennessee ............................................
Texas ....................................................
Virginia ..................................................
70,100
959,350
263,250
510,850
481,450
6,059,650
216,650
71,000
507,850
365,600
149,200
297,650
5,603,350
138,600
45,050
1,051,250
246,550
486,050
506,900
6,240,950
203,300
33,800
540,750
350,650
142,850
308,000
5,797,000
136,000
United States ........................................
15,875,500
12,528,950
16,293,800
12,866,650
6
Cotton Ginnings 2015 Summary (May 2016)
USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service
Running Bales Ginned Biweekly by Crop – States and United States: 2015 Crop
[Excluding linters]
Crop and State
Running bales ginned
October 1, 2015
October 15, 2015
November 1, 2015
(number)
(number)
(number)
Upland
Alabama ................................
Arizona ..................................
Arkansas ...............................
California ...............................
Florida ...................................
Georgia .................................
Kansas ..................................
Louisiana ...............................
Mississippi .............................
Missouri .................................
8,950
(D)
8,550
(D)
26,050
44,900
28,650
(D)
48,850
(D)
102,150
(D)
(D)
97,250
121,800
171,600
38,000
171,700
49,800
279,500
50,300
26,950
441,550
176,900
376,750
202,250
New Mexico ...........................
North Carolina .......................
Oklahoma ..............................
South Carolina .......................
Tennessee .............................
Texas ....................................
Virginia ..................................
5,700
2,200
(D)
494,900
(D)
(D)
26,100
(D)
4,650
34,250
742,800
6,600
(D)
185,400
35,000
29,000
159,600
(D)
52,400
United States .........................
(D)
1,433,800
3,622,250
American Pima
Arizona ..................................
California ...............................
New Mexico ...........................
Texas ....................................
(D)
-
(D)
(D)
-
3,500
76,500
(D)
(D)
United States .........................
(D)
13,800
81,450
All
Alabama ................................
Arizona ..................................
Arkansas ...............................
California ...............................
Florida ...................................
Georgia .................................
Kansas ..................................
Louisiana ...............................
Mississippi .............................
Missouri .................................
8,950
(D)
8,550
(D)
(D)
26,050
44,900
28,650
(D)
48,850
(D)
102,150
24,150
(D)
97,250
121,800
171,600
38,000
171,700
53,300
279,500
126,800
26,950
441,550
176,900
376,750
202,250
New Mexico ...........................
North Carolina .......................
Oklahoma ..............................
South Carolina .......................
Tennessee .............................
Texas ....................................
Virginia ..................................
5,700
2,200
(D)
494,900
(D)
(D)
26,100
(D)
4,650
34,250
742,800
6,600
1,500
185,400
35,000
29,000
159,600
1,385,100
52,400
United States .........................
634,500
1,447,600
3,703,700
See footnote(s) at end of table.
Cotton Ginnings 2015 Summary (May 2016)
USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service
--continued
7
Running Bales Ginned Biweekly by Crop – States and United States: 2015 Crop (continued)
[Excluding linters]
Crop and State
Running bales ginned
November 15, 2015
December 1, 2015
December 15, 2015
(number)
(number)
(number)
Upland
Alabama ................................
Arizona ..................................
Arkansas ................................
California ...............................
Florida ....................................
Georgia ..................................
Kansas ...................................
Louisiana ...............................
Mississippi .............................
Missouri .................................
263,050
81,850
403,300
88,100
46,050
756,900
(D)
184,350
496,100
318,400
377,050
125,300
466,450
121,000
68,300
1,193,000
(D)
188,700
575,800
391,650
469,550
172,450
481,250
139,050
99,700
1,651,700
(D)
191,900
603,100
405,300
New Mexico ...........................
North Carolina ........................
Oklahoma ..............................
South Carolina .......................
Tennessee .............................
Texas .....................................
Virginia ...................................
4,150
282,700
80,650
45,150
243,450
(D)
83,500
(D)
411,400
127,700
76,600
298,450
3,132,200
120,750
14,550
492,400
179,800
103,600
299,900
(D)
128,650
United States .........................
5,564,800
7,695,200
9,499,500
American Pima
Arizona ..................................
California ...............................
New Mexico ...........................
Texas .....................................
9,750
156,000
(D)
(D)
16,100
232,200
5,500
6,150
20,700
286,700
(D)
(D)
United States .........................
173,450
259,950
330,800
All
Alabama ................................
Arizona ..................................
Arkansas ................................
California ...............................
Florida ....................................
Georgia ..................................
Kansas ...................................
Louisiana ...............................
Mississippi .............................
Missouri .................................
263,050
91,600
403,300
244,100
46,050
756,900
(D)
184,350
496,100
318,400
377,050
141,400
466,450
353,200
68,300
1,193,000
(D)
188,700
575,800
391,650
469,550
193,150
481,250
425,750
99,700
1,651,700
(D)
191,900
603,100
405,300
New Mexico ...........................
North Carolina ........................
Oklahoma ..............................
South Carolina .......................
Tennessee .............................
Texas .....................................
Virginia ...................................
(D)
282,700
80,650
45,150
243,450
2,186,300
83,500
(D)
411,400
127,700
76,600
298,450
3,138,350
120,750
(D)
492,400
179,800
103,600
299,900
4,068,000
128,650
United States .........................
5,738,250
7,955,150
9,830,300
See footnote(s) at end of table.
8
--continued
Cotton Ginnings 2015 Summary (May 2016)
USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service
Running Bales Ginned Biweekly by Crop – States and United States: 2015 Crop (continued)
[Excluding linters]
Crop and State
Running bales ginned
January 1, 2016
January 15, 2016
February 1, 2016
March 1, 2016
(number)
(number)
(number)
(number)
Upland
Alabama ......................
Arizona ........................
Arkansas .....................
California .....................
Florida .........................
Georgia .......................
Kansas ........................
Louisiana .....................
Mississippi ...................
Missouri .......................
514,850
210,550
481,300
162,050
107,500
1,994,950
18,900
192,200
613,350
405,400
523,650
229,950
481,300
169,250
109,950
2,121,100
27,650
192,700
613,350
405,400
528,450
260,050
481,300
169,600
111,050
2,185,900
33,250
192,700
613,350
405,400
531,500
261,400
481,300
169,600
111,100
2,219,600
37,200
192,850
613,350
405,400
New Mexico .................
North Carolina .............
Oklahoma ....................
South Carolina .............
Tennessee ...................
Texas ..........................
Virginia ........................
18,300
520,100
223,400
126,700
300,200
4,697,200
131,000
18,800
520,750
269,300
135,000
300,250
5,087,550
131,300
18,800
521,400
314,400
137,950
300,350
5,429,300
132,050
18,800
521,600
342,400
138,600
300,750
5,624,450
132,050
United States ...............
10,717,950
11,337,250
11,835,300
12,101,950
American Pima
Arizona ........................
California .....................
New Mexico .................
Texas ..........................
25,800
316,900
13,850
17,050
27,800
336,350
14,250
20,850
29,600
346,400
14,250
25,000
29,600
346,400
14,250
25,200
United States ...............
373,600
399,250
415,250
415,450
All
Alabama ......................
Arizona ........................
Arkansas .....................
California .....................
Florida .........................
Georgia .......................
Kansas ........................
Louisiana .....................
Mississippi ...................
Missouri .......................
514,850
236,350
481,300
478,950
107,500
1,994,950
18,900
192,200
613,350
405,400
523,650
257,750
481,300
505,600
109,950
2,121,100
27,650
192,700
613,350
405,400
528,450
289,650
481,300
516,000
111,050
2,185,900
33,250
192,700
613,350
405,400
531,500
291,000
481,300
516,000
111,100
2,219,600
37,200
192,850
613,350
405,400
New Mexico .................
North Carolina .............
Oklahoma ....................
South Carolina .............
Tennessee ...................
Texas ..........................
Virginia ........................
32,150
520,100
223,400
126,700
300,200
4,714,250
131,000
33,050
520,750
269,300
135,000
300,250
5,108,400
131,300
33,050
521,400
314,400
137,950
300,350
5,454,300
132,050
33,050
521,600
342,400
138,600
300,750
5,649,650
132,050
United States ...............
11,091,550
11,736,500
12,250,550
12,517,400
- Represents zero.
(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations.
Cotton Ginnings 2015 Summary (May 2016)
USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service
9
All Cotton Running Bales Ginned, Equivalent 480-pound Bales Ginned, Active Gins, and Average Bale
Weight – Counties, Districts, States, and United States: 2015 Crop
County and State
Running bales
ginned
Equivalent 480-pound
bales ginned
Number of
active gins
Average weight per
running bale ginned
(number)
(number)
(number)
(pounds)
Alabama
Colbert .........................
Lauderdale ...................
Lawrence .....................
Limestone ....................
Madison .......................
District 10 .....................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
33,150
101,000
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
33,650
103,950
1
2
3
3
3
12
497.3
503.2
499.0
492.2
487.2
494.0
Blount ..........................
Cherokee .....................
District 20 .....................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
1
1
2
493.6
488.1
488.7
Chilton .........................
Tallapoosa ...................
District 30 .....................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
1
1
2
480.0
495.5
492.3
Autauga .......................
Elmore .........................
Macon ..........................
Marengo ......................
District 40 .....................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
65,000
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
66,950
1
1
1
1
4
491.8
500.8
493.1
502.9
494.4
Escambia .....................
Mobile ..........................
Monroe ........................
District 50 .....................
(D)
(D)
(D)
91,850
(D)
(D)
(D)
94,500
1
1
1
3
496.1
493.3
489.0
493.8
Coffee ..........................
Covington ....................
Geneva ........................
Henry ...........................
Houston .......................
Russell .........................
District 60 .....................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
198,100
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
202,800
1
1
1
2
1
1
7
487.7
494.0
498.5
485.6
499.2
488.0
491.4
Alabama Total ..............
531,650
545,500
30
492.5
Arizona
Cochise ........................
Graham ........................
Lapaz ...........................
Maricopa ......................
Pinal ............................
Yuma ...........................
District 80 .....................
(D)
(D)
(D)
49,200
175,050
(D)
291,200
(D)
(D)
(D)
51,300
178,550
(D)
299,050
1
2
1
4
6
1
15
483.0
503.0
480.1
500.5
490.3
490.1
492.9
Arizona total .................
291,500
299,050
15
See footnote(s) at end of table.
10
492.4
--continued
Cotton Ginnings 2015 Summary (May 2016)
USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service
All Cotton Running Bales Ginned, Equivalent 480-pound Bales Ginned, Active Gins, and Average Bale
Weight – Counties, Districts, States, and United States: 2015 Crop (continued)
County and State
Running bales
ginned
Equivalent 480-pound
bales ginned
Number of
active gins
Average weight per
running bale ginned
(number)
(number)
(number)
(pounds)
Arkansas
Clay .............................
Craighead ....................
Greene ........................
Mississippi ...................
Poinsett .......................
District 30 ....................
(D)
55,350
(D)
147,750
(D)
262,550
(D)
56,950
(D)
151,300
(D)
268,350
1
4
1
7
2
15
479.0
493.9
506.0
491.4
485.4
490.6
Crittenden ....................
Lee ..............................
Monroe ........................
Saint Francis ...............
District 60 ....................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
95,100
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
97,250
1
1
1
1
4
498.0
484.0
491.0
499.0
490.7
Ashely .........................
Chicot ..........................
Desha ..........................
Lincoln .........................
District 90 ....................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
123,650
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
125,450
4
1
1
1
7
487.5
493.0
487.0
484.0
487.0
Arkansas total ..............
481,300
491,050
26
489.7
California
Sutter ...........................
District 50 ....................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
1
1
507.6
507.6
Fresno .........................
Kern .............................
Kings ...........................
Madera ........................
Merced ........................
Tulare ..........................
District 51 ....................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
10
4
7
1
1
3
26
498.1
497.0
502.6
494.0
491.8
503.2
499.0
Riverside .....................
District 80 ....................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
1
1
486.5
486.5
California total ..............
516,050
535,900
28
498.5
Florida
Escambia .....................
Jackson .......................
Santa Rosa ..................
District 10 ....................
(D)
(D)
(D)
111,100
(D)
(D)
(D)
113,950
1
1
2
4
473.6
497.4
494.4
492.4
Florida total ..................
111,100
113,950
4
See footnote(s) at end of table.
Cotton Ginnings 2015 Summary (May 2016)
USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service
492.4
--continued
11
All Cotton Running Bales Ginned, Equivalent 480-pound Bales Ginned, Active Gins, and Average Bale
Weight – Counties, Districts, States, and United States: 2015 Crop (continued)
County and State
Running bales
ginned
Equivalent 480-pound
bales ginned
Number of
active gins
Average weight per
running bale ginned
(number)
(number)
(number)
(pounds)
Georgia
Bartow .........................
District 10 .....................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
1
1
474.8
474.8
Bleckley .......................
Dodge ..........................
Laurens ........................
Morgan ........................
Pulaski .........................
District 50 .....................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
77,250
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
80,100
1
1
2
1
1
6
493.0
510.0
500.0
498.0
499.7
497.9
Bulloch .........................
Burke ...........................
Candler ........................
Jefferson ......................
Screven .......................
District 60 .....................
(D)
65,050
(D)
(D)
(D)
283,500
(D)
68,150
(D)
(D)
(D)
294,350
2
4
2
2
1
11
498.2
502.6
489.9
497.3
498.1
498.3
Calhoun .......................
Decatur ........................
Early ............................
Lee ..............................
Miller ............................
Mitchell ........................
Randolph .....................
Seminole ......................
Sumter .........................
Terrell ..........................
Thomas ........................
District 70 .....................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
610,950
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
630,850
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
14
495.4
495.5
489.9
484.0
495.0
494.4
491.6
495.0
489.8
498.5
502.8
495.6
Berrien .........................
Brooks .........................
Coffee ..........................
Colquitt ........................
Cook ............................
Crisp ............................
Dooly ...........................
Irwin .............................
Jeff Davis .....................
Tift ...............................
Turner ..........................
Wilcox ..........................
Worth ...........................
District 80 .....................
(D)
(D)
(D)
272,800
(D)
(D)
198,650
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
1,138,450
(D)
(D)
(D)
283,000
(D)
(D)
205,050
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
1,175,700
2
2
2
6
1
2
6
1
1
2
1
1
1
28
488.1
499.3
493.0
497.9
498.4
507.0
495.5
500.0
488.3
493.2
495.8
491.1
491.3
495.7
Appling .........................
District 90 .....................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
2
2
495.6
495.6
Georgia total ................
2,220,550
2,294,300
62
495.9
Kansas
Stevens ........................
District 30 .....................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
1
1
491.0
491.0
Harper ..........................
Pratt .............................
District 60 .....................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
1
1
2
485.5
489.9
486.5
Cowley .........................
District 90 .....................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
1
1
484.0
484.0
Kansas total .................
37,300
37,800
4
See footnote(s) at end of table.
12
486.2
--continued
Cotton Ginnings 2015 Summary (May 2016)
USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service
All Cotton Running Bales Ginned, Equivalent 480-pound Bales Ginned, Active Gins, and Average Bale
Weight – Counties, Districts, States, and United States: 2015 Crop (continued)
County and State
Running bales
ginned
Equivalent 480-pound
bales ginned
Number of
active gins
Average weight per
running bale ginned
(number)
(number)
(number)
(pounds)
Louisiana
Caddo ................................
Red River ..........................
District 10 ..........................
(D)
(D)
30,050
(D)
(D)
31,100
3
1
4
498.6
491.0
496.5
East Carroll ........................
Franklin .............................
Richland ............................
Tensas ..............................
District 30 ..........................
22,650
(D)
(D)
(D)
89,700
22,650
(D)
(D)
(D)
91,350
3
2
1
2
8
479.5
493.1
499.0
488.8
488.9
Avoyelles ...........................
Catahoula ..........................
Concordia ..........................
Pointe Coupee ...................
Rapides .............................
District 50 ..........................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
73,100
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
74,400
1
2
1
1
2
7
482.0
483.2
497.0
485.0
492.1
488.5
Louisiana total ...................
192,850
196,850
19
489.9
Mississippi
Bolivar ...............................
Coahoma ...........................
Quitman .............................
Tallahatchie .......................
Tunica ...............................
District 10 ..........................
(D)
117,200
(D)
(D)
(D)
178,150
(D)
120,150
(D)
(D)
(D)
182,300
1
6
2
2
2
13
512.0
491.8
491.5
485.6
490.5
491.2
Benton ...............................
Calhoun .............................
De Soto .............................
Panola ...............................
Yalobusha .........................
District 20 ..........................
(D)
(D)
(D)
26,850
(D)
82,750
(D)
(D)
(D)
28,200
(D)
84,700
1
1
1
3
1
7
486.0
494.0
481.0
503.5
482.0
491.4
Lee ....................................
District 30 ..........................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
1
1
498.0
498.0
Humphreys ........................
Leflore ...............................
Sharkey .............................
Sunflower ..........................
Washington .......................
Yazoo ................................
District 40 ..........................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
18,250
73,200
185,700
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
18,400
75,550
190,450
2
3
1
1
3
4
14
487.4
494.8
482.3
472.0
484.0
495.5
492.4
Carroll ................................
Holmes ..............................
Montgomery ......................
District 50 ..........................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
1
1
1
3
508.0
497.0
482.0
495.3
Monroe ..............................
Noxubee ............................
District 60 ..........................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
1
1
2
503.0
495.0
496.8
Hinds .................................
District 70 ..........................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
1
1
473.0
473.0
Mississippi total .................
613,350
629,150
41
See footnote(s) at end of table.
Cotton Ginnings 2015 Summary (May 2016)
USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service
492.4
--continued
13
All Cotton Running Bales Ginned, Equivalent 480-pound Bales Ginned, Active Gins, and Average Bale
Weight – Counties, Districts, States, and United States: 2015 Crop (continued)
County and State
Running bales
ginned
Equivalent 480-pound
bales ginned
Number of
active gins
Average weight per
running bale ginned
(number)
(number)
(number)
(pounds)
Missouri
Dunklin ...............................
New Madrid ........................
Pemiscot ............................
Scott ..................................
Stoddard ............................
District 90 ...........................
171,100
124,600
29,500
(D)
(D)
405,400
174,550
127,950
30,450
(D)
(D)
414,050
9
8
4
2
2
25
489.8
493.0
495.1
491.8
482.3
490.2
Missouri total ......................
405,400
414,050
25
490.2
New Mexico
Chaves ..............................
Dona Ana ...........................
Eddy ..................................
District 90 ...........................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
1
2
2
5
480.0
491.6
491.2
490.9
New Mexico total ................
33,050
33,800
5
490.9
North Carolina
Anson ................................
Cleveland ...........................
Stanly .................................
District 60 ...........................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
1
2
1
4
499.5
507.7
496.7
497.8
Bertie .................................
Chowan .............................
Edgecombe ........................
Gates .................................
Halifax ................................
Hertford ..............................
Martin .................................
Nash ..................................
Northampton ......................
Perquimans ........................
District 70 ...........................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
87,800
(D)
(D)
(D)
71,900
(D)
297,100
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
90,500
(D)
(D)
(D)
74,600
(D)
306,850
2
1
1
1
5
1
1
1
5
1
19
497.6
492.5
503.9
483.1
495.4
505.0
485.5
502.3
498.3
491.7
495.8
Beaufort .............................
Greene ...............................
Jones .................................
Lenoir .................................
Pitt .....................................
Wayne ...............................
Wilson ................................
District 80 ...........................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
115,200
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
119,950
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
8
502.0
499.0
498.7
499.0
497.3
510.4
497.4
500.0
Bladen ...............................
Cumberland .......................
Duplin ................................
Hoke ..................................
Robeson ............................
Sampson ...........................
District 90 ...........................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
1
1
1
1
1
2
7
502.9
498.7
499.0
504.9
511.6
495.7
501.5
North Carolina total ............
521,600
540,750
38
See footnote(s) at end of table.
14
497.6
--continued
Cotton Ginnings 2015 Summary (May 2016)
USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service
All Cotton Running Bales Ginned, Equivalent 480-pound Bales Ginned, Active Gins, and Average Bale
Weight – Counties, Districts, States, and United States: 2015 Crop (continued)
County and State
Running bales
ginned
Equivalent 480-pound
bales ginned
Number of
active gins
Average weight per
running bale ginned
(number)
(number)
(number)
(pounds)
Oklahoma
Custer ..................................
Washita ...............................
District 20 ............................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
1
2
3
492.0
479.3
481.3
Caddo ..................................
Harmon ...............................
Jackson ...............................
Kiowa ..................................
Tillman .................................
District 30 ............................
(D)
(D)
205,300
(D)
46,150
321,700
(D)
(D)
210,550
(D)
45,900
327,200
1
2
3
1
3
10
480.0
484.5
492.2
506.1
477.3
488.2
Grady ..................................
District 50 ............................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
1
1
500.0
500.0
Oklahoma total ....................
344,950
350,650
14
487.9
South Carolina
Darlington ............................
Dillon ...................................
Florence ..............................
Marlboro ..............................
Williamsburg ........................
District 30 ............................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
1
1
1
2
1
6
499.1
497.0
503.8
507.8
480.0
499.0
Calhoun ...............................
Clarendon ............................
Lee ......................................
Lexington .............................
Orangeburg .........................
Sumter .................................
District 50 ............................
(D)
(D)
6,750
(D)
(D)
(D)
81,650
(D)
(D)
6,950
(D)
(D)
(D)
83,850
3
1
3
1
2
2
12
490.1
495.9
496.4
492.0
495.4
491.0
492.7
Hampton ..............................
District 80 ............................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
1
1
494.5
494.5
South Carolina total .............
138,600
142,850
19
494.7
Tennessee
Lake ....................................
Lauderdale ..........................
Tipton ..................................
District 10 ............................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
1
2
1
4
490.0
491.6
499.9
494.2
Carroll ..................................
Crockett ...............................
Fayette ................................
Gibson .................................
Hardeman ............................
Haywood .............................
Madison ...............................
District 20 ............................
(D)
75,400
(D)
(D)
(D)
47,200
(D)
222,100
(D)
77,100
(D)
(D)
(D)
48,650
(D)
227,550
1
4
2
2
1
4
1
15
492.5
491.3
492.0
489.6
499.0
494.6
483.0
491.8
Lincoln .................................
District 40 ............................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
1
1
481.7
481.7
Tennessee total ...................
300,750
308,000
20
See footnote(s) at end of table.
Cotton Ginnings 2015 Summary (May 2016)
USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service
491.6
--continued
15
All Cotton Running Bales Ginned, Equivalent 480-pound Bales Ginned, Active Gins, and Average Bale
Weight – Counties, Districts, States, and United States: 2015 Crop (continued)
County and State
Running bales
ginned
Equivalent 480-pound
bales ginned
Number of
active gins
Average weight per
running bale ginned
(number)
(number)
(number)
(pounds)
Texas
Briscoe .................................
Carson .................................
Castro ..................................
Deaf Smith ...........................
Floyd ....................................
Hale .....................................
Hansford ..............................
Moore ..................................
Parmer .................................
Swisher ................................
District 11 .............................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
216,700
155,150
(D)
(D)
(D)
61,500
707,700
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
225,400
160,550
(D)
(D)
(D)
63,300
733,050
2
1
1
2
8
7
1
1
2
4
29
499.5
493.0
495.0
501.1
499.2
496.7
497.6
488.2
501.1
494.3
497.2
Bailey ...................................
Cochran ...............................
Crosby .................................
Dawson ................................
Gaines .................................
Glasscock ............................
Hockley ................................
Howard ................................
Lamb ....................................
Lubbock ...............................
Lynn .....................................
Martin ...................................
Midland ................................
Terry ....................................
Yoakum ...............................
District 12 .............................
(D)
(D)
200,200
289,150
470,500
(D)
377,150
149,200
226,450
505,300
297,950
131,750
(D)
147,200
193,700
3,219,050
(D)
(D)
204,800
295,700
480,950
(D)
386,100
150,000
234,150
520,350
303,650
132,650
(D)
150,600
196,700
3,293,600
2
2
5
9
8
1
7
4
6
10
6
4
1
6
4
75
490.0
493.2
491.0
490.9
490.7
501.6
491.4
482.6
496.3
494.3
489.2
483.3
490.0
491.1
487.4
491.1
Childress ..............................
Collingswoth ........................
Cottle ...................................
Dickens ................................
Donley .................................
Hall ......................................
Hardeman ............................
Kent .....................................
Motley ..................................
Wilbarger .............................
District 21 .............................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
83,500
(D)
(D)
(D)
27,900
348,150
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
87,100
(D)
(D)
(D)
27,500
358,400
1
2
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
3
15
480.6
504.3
485.0
488.4
481.7
500.6
499.8
497.6
490.7
473.4
494.1
Fisher ...................................
Haskell .................................
Jones ...................................
Knox ....................................
Mitchell ................................
Nolan ...................................
Runnels ...............................
Scurry ..................................
District 22 .............................
(D)
47,100
81,850
(D)
(D)
(D)
82,600
(D)
452,250
(D)
48,450
83,750
(D)
(D)
(D)
83,550
(D)
463,250
2
5
3
1
3
1
5
2
22
486.0
493.7
491.1
492.0
481.9
507.0
485.6
494.9
491.7
Ellis ......................................
Falls .....................................
Hill .......................................
Hunt .....................................
Lamar ..................................
Navarro ................................
Williamson ...........................
District 40 .............................
11,200
(D)
28,700
(D)
(D)
(D)
23,600
99,500
11,600
(D)
29,750
(D)
(D)
(D)
23,750
101,250
3
1
4
1
1
1
4
15
496.8
484.6
497.0
480.4
479.5
479.2
483.2
488.3
See footnote(s) at end of table.
16
--continued
Cotton Ginnings 2015 Summary (May 2016)
USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service
All Cotton Running Bales Ginned, Equivalent 480-pound Bales Ginned, Active Gins, and Average Bale
Weight – Counties, Districts, States, and United States: 2015 Crop
County and State
Running bales
ginned
Equivalent 480-pound
bales ginned
Number of
active gins
Average weight per
running bale ginned
(number)
(number)
(number)
(pounds)
Texas - continued
Brazos .................................
Robertson ............................
Walker .................................
District 52 ............................
(D)
(D)
(D)
45,050
(D)
(D)
(D)
45,150
2
1
1
4
481.1
481.0
489.2
481.2
El Paso ................................
Pecos ..................................
Reeves ................................
District 60 ............................
(D)
(D)
(D)
54,200
(D)
(D)
(D)
54,900
1
1
1
3
491.8
472.5
481.0
486.0
Tom Green ..........................
Upton ...................................
District 70 ............................
(D)
(D)
114,550
(D)
(D)
119,050
2
1
3
500.2
495.2
498.7
Burleson ..............................
Caldwell ...............................
District 81 ............................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
1
1
2
453.0
483.0
464.5
Kleberg ................................
Nueces ................................
Refugio ................................
San Patricio .........................
District 82 ............................
(D)
(D)
(D)
154,250
232,050
(D)
(D)
(D)
157,500
237,650
1
4
1
8
14
489.0
491.1
512.6
490.0
491.6
Brazoria ...............................
Calhoun ...............................
Fort Bend .............................
Jackson ...............................
Matagorda ...........................
Wharton ...............................
District 90 ............................
(D)
(D)
31,450
(D)
(D)
91,150
168,900
(D)
(D)
32,000
(D)
(D)
93,500
172,700
2
1
4
1
1
4
13
490.0
488.2
488.5
488.3
490.1
492.2
490.8
Zavala .................................
District 96 ............................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
2
2
485.8
485.8
Cameron ..............................
Hidalgo ................................
Willacy .................................
District 97 ............................
55,450
(D)
(D)
127,550
56,200
(D)
(D)
129,950
3
4
2
9
486.5
486.2
497.1
489.0
Texas total ...........................
5,656,900
5,797,000
206
491.9
Virginia
Greensville ..........................
Isle Of Wight ........................
Southampton .......................
Suffolk City ..........................
District 90 ............................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
132,050
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
136,000
1
1
1
1
4
489.3
494.4
493.9
499.0
494.5
Virginia total .........................
132,050
136,000
4
494.5
United States ......................
12,528,950
12,866,650
560
492.9
(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations.
Cotton Ginnings 2015 Summary (May 2016)
USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service
17
Number of Active Gins by Size Group – States and United States: 2015 Crop Year
State and gin size group
Number of active gins
State and gin size group
(number)
Number of active gins
(number)
Alabama
1 to 2,999 ...............................................
3,000 to 4,999 ........................................
5,000 to 6,999 ........................................
7,000 to 9,999 ........................................
10,000 to 14,999 ....................................
15,000 to 19,999 ....................................
20,000 to 39,999 ....................................
40,000 and over .....................................
1
2
6
4
4
2
7
4
Georgia
1 to 2,999 ..............................................
3,000 to 4,999 .......................................
5,000 to 6,999 .......................................
7,000 to 9,999 .......................................
10,000 to 14,999 ...................................
15,000 to 19,999 ...................................
20,000 to 39,999 ...................................
40,000 and over ....................................
3
1
3
1
5
2
21
26
Alabama total .........................................
30
Georgia total .........................................
62
Arizona
1 to 2,999 ...............................................
3,000 to 4,999 ........................................
5,000 to 6,999 ........................................
7,000 to 9,999 ........................................
10,000 to 14,999 ....................................
15,000 to 19,999 ....................................
20,000 to 39,999 ....................................
40,000 and over .....................................
2
2
1
1
1
2
4
2
Kansas
1 to 2,999 ..............................................
3,000 to 4,999 .......................................
5,000 to 6,999 .......................................
7,000 to 9,999 .......................................
10,000 to 14,999 ...................................
15,000 to 19,999 ...................................
20,000 to 39,999 ...................................
40,000 and over ....................................
2
1
1
-
Arizona total ...........................................
15
Kansas total ..........................................
4
Arkansas
1 to 2,999 ...............................................
3,000 to 4,999 ........................................
5,000 to 6,999 ........................................
7,000 to 9,999 ........................................
10,000 to 14,999 ....................................
15,000 to 19,999 ....................................
20,000 to 39,999 ....................................
40,000 and over .....................................
2
2
1
5
4
4
4
4
Louisiana
1 to 2,999 ..............................................
3,000 to 4,999 .......................................
5,000 to 6,999 .......................................
7,000 to 9,999 .......................................
10,000 to 14,999 ...................................
15,000 to 19,999 ...................................
20,000 to 39,999 ...................................
40,000 and over ....................................
3
4
4
5
1
2
-
Arkansas total ........................................
26
Louisiana total .......................................
19
California
1 to 2,999 ...............................................
3,000 to 4,999 ........................................
5,000 to 6,999 ........................................
7,000 to 9,999 ........................................
10,000 to 14,999 ....................................
15,000 to 19,999 ....................................
20,000 to 39,999 ....................................
40,000 and over .....................................
1
4
4
9
2
4
4
Mississippi
1 to 2,999 ..............................................
3,000 to 4,999 .......................................
5,000 to 6,999 .......................................
7,000 to 9,999 .......................................
10,000 to 14,999 ...................................
15,000 to 19,999 ...................................
20,000 to 39,999 ...................................
40,000 and over ....................................
3
2
6
5
10
8
3
4
California total ........................................
28
Mississippi total .....................................
41
Florida
1 to 2,999 ...............................................
3,000 to 4,999 ........................................
5,000 to 6,999 ........................................
7,000 to 9,999 ........................................
10,000 to 14,999 ....................................
15,000 to 19,999 ....................................
20,000 to 39,999 ....................................
40,000 and over .....................................
1
1
2
Missouri
1 to 2,999 ..............................................
3,000 to 4,999 .......................................
5,000 to 6,999 .......................................
7,000 to 9,999 .......................................
10,000 to 14,999 ...................................
15,000 to 19,999 ...................................
20,000 to 39,999 ...................................
40,000 and over ....................................
1
2
2
5
5
2
8
-
Florida total ............................................
4
Missouri total .........................................
See footnote(s) at end of table.
18
25
--continued
Cotton Ginnings 2015 Summary (May 2016)
USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service
Number of Active Gins by Size Group – States and United States: 2015 Crop Year (continued)
State and gin size group
Number of active gins
State and gin size group
(number)
Number of active gins
(number)
New Mexico
1 to 2,999 ..............................................
3,000 to 4,999 ........................................
5,000 to 6,999 ........................................
7,000 to 9,999 ........................................
10,000 to 14,999 ....................................
15,000 to 19,999 ....................................
20,000 to 39,999 ....................................
40,000 and over .....................................
3
1
1
-
Tennessee
1 to 2,999 .............................................
3,000 to 4,999 .......................................
5,000 to 6,999 .......................................
7,000 to 9,999 .......................................
10,000 to 14,999 ...................................
15,000 to 19,999 ...................................
20,000 to 39,999 ...................................
40,000 and over ....................................
2
3
5
3
7
-
New Mexico total ...................................
5
Tennessee total ....................................
20
North Carolina
1 to 2,999 ..............................................
3,000 to 4,999 ........................................
5,000 to 6,999 ........................................
7,000 to 9,999 ........................................
10,000 to 14,999 ....................................
15,000 to 19,999 ....................................
20,000 to 39,999 ....................................
40,000 and over .....................................
3
2
4
4
10
8
6
1
Texas
1 to 2,999 .............................................
3,000 to 4,999 .......................................
5,000 to 6,999 .......................................
7,000 to 9,999 .......................................
10,000 to 14,999 ...................................
15,000 to 19,999 ...................................
20,000 to 39,999 ...................................
40,000 and over ....................................
13
13
12
21
21
17
65
44
North Carolina total ................................
38
Texas total ............................................
206
Oklahoma
1 to 2,999 ..............................................
3,000 to 4,999 ........................................
5,000 to 6,999 ........................................
7,000 to 9,999 ........................................
10,000 to 14,999 ....................................
15,000 to 19,999 ....................................
20,000 to 39,999 ....................................
40,000 and over .....................................
1
4
1
1
1
3
3
Virginia
1 to 2,999 .............................................
3,000 to 4,999 .......................................
5,000 to 6,999 .......................................
7,000 to 9,999 .......................................
10,000 to 14,999 ...................................
15,000 to 19,999 ...................................
20,000 to 39,999 ...................................
40,000 and over ....................................
3
1
Oklahoma total ......................................
14
Virginia total ..........................................
4
South Carolina
1 to 2,999 ..............................................
3,000 to 4,999 ........................................
5,000 to 6,999 ........................................
7,000 to 9,999 ........................................
10,000 to 14,999 ....................................
15,000 to 19,999 ....................................
20,000 to 39,999 ....................................
40,000 and over .....................................
3
4
3
6
1
1
1
-
United States
1 to 2,999 .............................................
3,000 to 4,999 .......................................
5,000 to 6,999 .......................................
7,000 to 9,999 .......................................
10,000 to 14,999 ...................................
15,000 to 19,999 ...................................
20,000 to 39,999 ...................................
40,000 and over ....................................
36
45
47
65
78
55
139
95
South Carolina total ...............................
19
United States total ................................
560
- Represents zero.
Cotton Ginnings 2015 Summary (May 2016)
USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service
19
2015 Cotton Ginning Comments
Cotton Ginnings: A total of 12.5 million running bales were ginned during the 2015 season, down 21 percent from the
2014 season. There were 560 active cotton gins during the 2015 season, down from the 601 gins that operated in 2014.
Forty-two percent of the gins processed more than 20,000 running bales compared with 53 percent the previous season.
Statistical Methodology
Survey Procedure: The cotton ginnings survey is an enumeration of all active gins and every effort is made to obtain a
report from all ginners. Data are collected on the first and fifteenth of each month (September – January, February 1, and
March 1) for all estimating States while data collection begins with an August 1 survey in Texas. A final survey is
conducted after gins finish ginning for the season. Ginners are asked to report the number of Upland and American Pima
bales ginned prior to the data collection date. Data are collected by telephone, fax, and internet. If a completed report is
not received from an active gin, the bales ginned are estimated using administrative data or imputed using current survey
data for neighboring gins and the previously reported data for the imputed gin.
Estimating Procedures: Information obtained from the cotton ginnings survey is used to establish estimates of Upland
and American Pima bales ginned to date. These estimates are reviewed for errors, reasonableness, and consistency with
historical estimates.
Revision Policy: Cotton ginnings estimates are subject to revision in the annual report released in May and are based on a
thorough review of all available data.
Reliability: Cotton ginnings estimates are based on a census of all known ginners and therefore, have no sampling
variability. However, estimates are subject to errors such as omissions, duplication, and mistakes in reporting, recording,
and processing of the data. While these errors cannot be measured directly, they are minimized through strict quality
controls in the data collection process and a careful review of all reported data for consistency and reasonableness.
Information Contacts
Listed below are the commodity statisticians in the Crops Branch of the National Agricultural Statistics Service to contact
for additional information. E-mail inquiries may be sent to nass@nass.usda.gov
Lance Honig, Chief, Crops Branch ....................................................................................................... (202) 720-2127
Anthony Prillaman, Head, Field Crops Section .................................................................................... (202) 720-2127
Angie Considine – Cotton, Cotton Ginnings, Sorghum ................................................................... (202) 720-5944
Tony Dahlman – Oats, Soybeans ..................................................................................................... (202) 690-3234
Chris Hawthorn – Corn, Flaxseed, Proso Millet .............................................................................. (202) 720-9526
James Johanson – County Estimates, Hay ....................................................................................... (202) 690-8533
Scott Matthews – Crop Weather, Barley .......................................................................................... (202) 720-7621
Jean Porter – Rye, Wheat ................................................................................................................. (202) 720-8068
Bianca Pruneda – Peanuts, Rice ....................................................................................................... (202) 720-7688
Travis Thorson – Sunflower, Other Oilseeds ................................................................................... (202) 720-7369
20
Cotton Ginnings 2015 Summary (May 2016)
USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service
Access to NASS Reports
For your convenience, you may access NASS reports and products the following ways:
All reports are available electronically, at no cost, on the NASS web site: www.nass.usda.gov
Both national and state specific reports are available via a free e-mail subscription. To set-up this free
subscription, visit www.nass.usda.gov and click on “National” or “State” in upper right corner above “search”
box to create an account and select the reports you would like to receive.
For more information on NASS surveys and reports, call the NASS Agricultural Statistics Hotline at (800) 727-9540,
7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. ET, or e-mail: nass@nass.usda.gov.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for
employment on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where
applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual's
income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information in employment or in any program
or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or
employment activities.)
If you wish to file a Civil Rights program complaint of discrimination, complete the USDA Program Discrimination
Complaint Form (PDF), found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html, or at any USDA office, or
call (866) 632-9992 to request the form. You may also write a letter containing all of the information requested in the
form. Send your completed complaint form or letter to us by mail at U.S. Department of Agriculture, Director, Office of
Adjudication, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, by fax (202) 690-7442 or email at
program.intake@usda.gov.
File Type | application/pdf |
File Title | Cotton Ginnings 2015 Summary 05/10/2016 |
Author | USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service |
File Modified | 2016-05-09 |
File Created | 2016-05-09 |