30-Day FR Notice

47365

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2016 / Notices
Affected entities

SDRs, SEFs, DCMs, DCOs, SD/MSPs, non-SD/MSP reporting entities

Burden type

Burden per
respondent

Number of
respondents

One-time hours burden ......................................
One-time costs ...................................................
Recurring hours burden .....................................
Recurring costs ..................................................

0 hours ...............................................................
$0 .......................................................................
200 hours ...........................................................
$0 .......................................................................

449
449
449
449

Total burden
0 hours.
$0.
89,900 hours.
$0.

Termination of original swaps:
Affected entities

DCOs

Burden type

Burden per
respondent

One-time hours burden ......................................
One-time costs ...................................................
Recurring hours burden .....................................
Recurring costs ..................................................

3,000 hours ........................................................
$0 .......................................................................
0 hours ...............................................................
$250,000 ............................................................

asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

4. Request for Comment
The NPRM on cleared swap reporting
requested comments on the burden
associated with the added and amended
PET fields, and on DCOs reporting
original swap terminations.30 Those
comments may be found on the
Commission’s Web site, http://
www.cftc.gov, at http://
comments.cftc.gov/PublicComments/
CommentList.aspx?id=1614. All
comments received in response to the
NPRM will be considered, along with
the comments received in response to
this notice, in determining the
Commission’s submission to OMB
regarding revisions to existing
information collections to account for
changes adopted in the Cleared Swap
Reporting Release.
The Commission invites comments
on:
• Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information will have a practical use;
• The accuracy of the Commission’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
• Ways to enhance the quality,
usefulness, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden of
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
30 See

77 FR 25320 at 25328.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:15 Jul 20, 2016

Jkt 238001

Number of
respondents

Specifically, the Commission invites
comments on the following questions:
1. The Commission has proposed
including a 200 hour recurring burden
in the collection to account for periodic
changes to reporting systems brought
about by changes to PET terms (such as
those under the Cleared Swap Reporting
Release) as well as other periodic
changes. Does this estimate accurately
estimate the burden associated with the
periodic updating of reporting systems
to ensure continued compliance with
part 45 reporting obligations?
2. Given that not every DCO clears
swaps in every asset class, and that not
every SDR accepts data for every asset
class, to how many SDRs must DCOs
typically connect to properly report
original swap terminations?
3. Can DCOs take advantage of
economies of scale in terms of personnel
and/or equipment when connecting to
more than one SDR?
4. Given that original swap
termination messages under revised
§ 45.4 would need to be submitted
daily—not, as with creation data, as
soon as technologically practicable—are
DCOs able to submit original swap
terminations through methods less
expensive than full connections to SDRs
that are used for reporting creation data
and real-time reporting? If so, what are
the costs associated with such
connections?
5. In the Cleared Swap Reporting
Release, the Commission encouraged
DCOs and SDRs to standardize original
swap termination messages. Are DCOs
and SDRs working towards such a
standardized message? What cost
savings could be associated with such
standardized messages?
6. Would a standardized termination
message allow DCOs to use connection

PO 00000

Frm 00022

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

12
12
12
12

Total burden
36,000 hours.
$0.
0 hours.
$3,000,000.

methods less expensive than full
connections to SDRs that are used for
reporting creation data and real-time
reporting?
7. As noted in footnote 23, the
Commission is proposing to reduce the
number of SDRs used for PRA burden
calculations from 15 to four. Would this
change accurately reflect the current
state of the data reporting industry?
8. The Commission received
comments on the hours burden
associated with establishing a DCO
connection to an SDR, but not a cost
estimate. Do the proposed revisions to
the PRA, which include an hours
burden for establishing a connection,
and a cost burden for maintaining a
connection, accurately reflect the PRA
burden on DCOs?
(Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
Dated: July 15, 2016.
Robert N. Sidman,
Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016–17208 Filed 7–20–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351–01–P

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. CPSC–2009–0073]

Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request—Virginia
Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety
Act; Compliance Form
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

In accordance with the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (‘‘PRA’’) of 1995 (44

SUMMARY:

E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM

21JYN1

47366

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2016 / Notices

U.S.C. chapter 35), the Consumer
Product Safety Commission
(‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘CPSC’’) announces
that the Commission has submitted to
the Office of Management and Budget
(‘‘OMB’’) a request for extension of
approval of a collection of information
regarding a form used to verify whether
pools and spas are in compliance with
the Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa
Safety Act. In the Federal Register of
April 25, 2016 (81 FR 24068), the CPSC
published a notice to announce the
agency’s intention to seek extension of
approval of the collection of
information. The Commission received
no comments. Therefore, by publication
of this notice, the Commission
announces that CPSC has submitted to
the OMB a request for extension of
approval of that collection of
information, without change.
DATES: Written comments on this
request for extension of approval of
information collection requirements
should be submitted by August 22,
2016.
Submit comments about
this request by email: OIRA_
submission@omb.eop.gov or fax: 202–
395–6881. Comments by mail should be
sent to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk
Officer for the CPSC, Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10235,
725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC
20503. In addition, written comments
that are sent to OMB also should be
submitted electronically at http://
www.regulations.gov, under Docket No.
CPSC–2009–0073.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information contact: Robert H.
Squibb, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, MD 20814; (301) 504–7815, or
by email to: rsquibb@cpsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: CPSC has
submitted the following currently
approved collection of information to
OMB for extension:
Title: Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and
Spa Safety Act Verification of
Compliance Form.
OMB Number: 3041–0142.
Type of Review: Renewal of
collection.
Frequency of Response: On occasion.
Affected Public: Public pools and spa
facilities.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
200 pools or facilities.
Estimated Time per Response: 3 hours
to inspect a pool or spa facility.
Total Estimated Annual Burden: The
total testing burden hours are 600 (200
inspections × 3 hours per inspection).

asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

ADDRESSES:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:36 Jul 20, 2016

Jkt 238001

General Description of Collection: On
December 19, 2008, the Virginia Graeme
Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act (‘‘Act’’)
became effective (Pub. L. 110–140). The
Act applies to public pools and spas and
requires that each swimming pool and
spa drain cover manufactured,
distributed, or entered into commerce in
the United States shall conform to the
entrapment protection standards of the
ASME/ANSI A112.19.8 performance
standard or any successor standard
regulating such swimming pool or drain
cover pursuant to section 1404(b) of the
Act.
On August 5, 2011, the Commission
published a final rule incorporating by
reference ANSI/APSP–16 2011 as the
successor standard, effective September
6, 2011. 76 FR 47436. The Act requires
that, in addition to having the antientrapment devices or systems, each
public pool and spa in the United States
with a single main drain other than an
unblockable drain shall be equipped
with one or more of the following
devices or systems designed to prevent
entrapment by pool or spa drains
including a safety vacuum release
system, suction-limiting vent system,
gravity drainage system, automatic
pump shut-off system or drain
disablement. CPSC will collect
information through the verification of
compliance form to identify drain
covers, pools, and spas that do not meet
the performance requirements in ANSI/
APSP–16 2011 and the Act.
Dated: July 18, 2016.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016–17215 Filed 7–20–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards;
Technical Assistance and
Dissemination to Improve Services and
Results for Children With Disabilities
and Technical Assistance on State
Data Collection—National Technical
Assistance Center to Increase the
Participation and Improve the
Performance of Students with
Disabilities on State and Districtwide
Assessments
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

Overview Information:
Technical Assistance and
Dissemination to Improve Services and
Results for Children with Disabilities

PO 00000

Frm 00023

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

and Technical Assistance on State Data
Collection—National Technical
Assistance Center to Increase the
Participation and Improve the
Performance of Students with
Disabilities on State and Districtwide
Assessments.
Notice inviting applications for a new
award for fiscal year (FY) 2016.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
(CFDA) Number: 84.326G.
DATES:
Applications Available: July
21, 2016.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: August 22, 2016.

Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Programs: The purpose of
the Technical Assistance and
Dissemination to Improve Services and
Results for Children with Disabilities
program is to promote academic
achievement and to improve results for
children with disabilities by providing
technical assistance (TA), supporting
model demonstration projects,
disseminating useful information, and
implementing activities that are
supported by scientifically based
research. The purpose of the Technical
Assistance on State Data Collection
program is to improve the capacity of
States to meet the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) data
collection and reporting requirements.
Priorities: This notice contains two
absolute priorities. In accordance with
34 CFR 75.105(b)(2)(v), Absolute
Priority 1 is from allowable activities
specified or otherwise authorized in the
Individuals with Disabilities Education
Act (IDEA) (see sections 663 and 681(d)
of the IDEA, 20 U.S.C. 1463 and
1481(d)). Absolute Priority 2 is from the
notice of final priorities and
requirements for the Technical
Assistance on State Data Collection
program (NFP) published elsewhere in
this issue of the Federal Register.
Absolute Priorities: These priorities
are absolute priorities. Under 34 CFR
75.105(c)(3), we consider only
applications that meet these priorities.
These priorities are:
Absolute Priority 1—Technical
Assistance and Dissemination to
Improve Services and Results for
Children with Disabilities—National
Technical Assistance Center to Increase
the Participation and Improve the
Performance of Students with
Disabilities on State and Districtwide
Assessments.
Background:
The purpose of this priority is to fund
a cooperative agreement to establish and

E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM

21JYN1