60 Day FRN

57200

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 183 / Tuesday, September 22, 2015 / Notices

Here, Hanwha’s assembly processes fall
short of those described in H095409. For one,
Hanwha’s assembly processes take less than
a day, whereas those in H095409 took more
than six. Moreover, although Hanwha
conducts research and development in Korea
and Poland, it is focused on the
manufacturing process, not on product
design and development.
In the scenario where Malaysian solar cells
are used, almost none of the parts in the
finished panels come from either Korea or
Poland, the two countries where the panels
are assembled. Unlike H095409, which
involved a 43% cost content of the country
of assembly, here, where Malaysian solar
cells are used, the cost content is at most
8.6% Korean for the panels assembled in
Korea and 0% Polish for the panels
assembled in Poland. Most importantly,
however, the solar cells themselves are
produced in Malaysia. As noted above, the
complex manufacturing process of the solar
cells themselves was key to our finding that
a substantial transformation had occurred in
H095409. Turning glass tubes into
functioning solar cells resulted in a product
with a new name, character, and use. Here,
assembling solar cells into finished solar
panels does not. Rather, we find that the
solar cells impart the essential character of
the solar panels. Therefore, where Malaysian
solar cells are used, the country of origin for
government-procurement purposes is
Malaysia.
Similarly, in the scenario where Korean
solar cells are used, the country of origin for
government-procurement purposes is Korea.
HOLDING:
Based on the facts of this case, the solar
panels’ country of origin for U.S. Government
procurement is Malaysia when Malaysian
solar cells are used and Korea when Korean
solar cells are used.
Sincerely,
Harold Singer,
Acting Executive Director, Regulations &
Rulings Office of International Trade.
[FR Doc. 2015–24082 Filed 9–21–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
[Docket No. DHS–2014–0010]

Infrastructure Assessments and
Training
National Protection and
Programs Directorate, DHS.
ACTION: 60-day notice and request for
comments; Reinstatement, with change,
of a previously approved collection:
1670–0009.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

AGENCY:

The Department of Homeland
Security (DHS), National Protection and
Programs Directorate (NPPD), Office of
Infrastructure Protection (IP),
Infrastructure Information Collection
Division (IICD), Infrastructure
Protection Gateway (IP Gateway)

SUMMARY:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:39 Sep 21, 2015

Jkt 235001

Program will submit the following
Information Collection Request to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13,
44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted until November 23,
2015. This process is conducted in
accordance with 5 CFR 1320.1.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
questions about this Information
Collection Request should be forwarded
to DHS/NPPD/IP/IICD, 245 Murray Lane
SW., Mail Stop 0602, Arlington, VA
20598–0602. Emailed requests should
go to Kimberly Sass, Kimberly.Sass@
hq.dhs.gov. Written comments should
reach the contact person listed no later
than November 23, 2015. Comments
must be identified by ‘‘DHS–2014–
0010’’and may be submitted by one of
the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
www.regulations.gov.
• Email: Include the docket number
in the subject line of the message.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the words ‘‘Department of
Homeland Security’’ and the docket
number for this action. Comments
received will be posted without
alteration at http://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
direction of Homeland Security
Presidential Directive-7 (2003),
Presidential Policy Directive -21, and
the National Infrastructure Protection
Plan (NIPP 2013); NPPD/IP has
developed the IP Gateway, a centrally
managed repository of infrastructure
capabilities allowing the Critical
Infrastructure community to work in
conjunction with each other toward the
same goals. This collection encompasses
three IP Gateway functions: General
User Registration, Chemical Security
Awareness Training Registration, and a
User Satisfaction Survey. Upon
requesting access to the IP Gateway, the
multi-screen registration form requests
the user’s full name, work address,
contact information Protected Critical
Infrastructure (PCII) training status,
citizenship status, supervisor and
sponsor information, and additional
questions related to the user’s role in
using the information. Upon registering
for Chemical Security Awareness
Training, a collection form requests the
trainee’s desired username, password,
proposed secret question & response,
and company type, size, name, &
location. For the voluntary User
Satisfaction Survey, the collection form

PO 00000

Frm 00056

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

requests information regarding the
user’s job duties, types of information
sought via the IP Gateway, access
patterns, and system usability ratings.
The survey information will be used to
evaluate program and training
performance as well as to gather any
additional requirements for future IP
Gateway system updates.
OMB is particularly interested in
comments that:
1. Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
2. Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
3. Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
4. Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses.
Analysis:
Agency: Department of Homeland
Security, National Protection and
Programs Directorate, Office of
Infrastructure Protection, Infrastructure
Information Collection Division,
Infrastructure Protection Gateway
Program.
Title: Infrastructure Assessments and
Training.
OMB Number: 1670–0009.
Frequency: Annually, quarterly,
monthly, and weekly.
Affected Public: Chief Information
Officers, Chief Information Security
Officers, Chief Technology Officers, and
federal and state, local, tribal and
territorial communities involved in the
protection of CI.
Number of Respondents: 9000
respondents (estimate).
Estimated Time per Respondent: .5
hours (estimate).
Total Burden Hours: 4,500 annual
burden hours (estimate).
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup):
$0.
Total Recordkeeping Burden: $0.
Total Burden Cost (operating/
maintaining): $106,515.50 (estimate).

E:\FR\FM\22SEN1.SGM

22SEN1

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 183 / Tuesday, September 22, 2015 / Notices
Dated: September 14, 2015.
Scott Libby,
Deputy Chief Information Officer, National
Protection and Programs Directorate,
Department of Homeland Security.

Comments Invited

[FR Doc. 2015–24108 Filed 9–21–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–9P–P

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Transportation Security Administration
New Agency Information Collection
Activity Under OMB Review: Office of
Law Enforcement/Federal Air Marshal
Service LEO Reimbursement
Request—Invoice
Transportation Security
Administration, DHS.

AGENCY:
ACTION:

30-Day notice.

This notice announces that
the Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) has forwarded the
new Information Collection Request
(ICR) abstracted below to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). The
ICR describes the nature of the
information collection and its expected
burden. TSA published a Federal
Register notice, with a 60-day comment
period soliciting comments, of the
following collection of information on
July 6, 2015, at 80 FR 38454. The
collection involves the reimbursement
of expenses incurred by airport
operators for the provision of law
enforcement officers (LEOs) to support
airport security checkpoint screening.

SUMMARY:

Send your comments by October
22, 2015. A comment to OMB is most
effective if OMB receives it within 30
days of publication.

DATES:

Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments on
the proposed information collection to
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, OMB. Comments should be
addressed to Desk Officer, Department
of Homeland Security/TSA, and sent via
electronic mail to oira_submission@
omb.eop.gov or faxed to (202) 395–6974.

ADDRESSES:

tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christina A. Walsh, TSA PRA Officer,
Office of Information Technology (OIT),
TSA–11, Transportation Security
Administration, 601 South 12th Street,
Arlington, VA 20598–6011; telephone
(571) 227–2062; email TSAPRA@
tsa.dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:39 Sep 21, 2015

Jkt 235001

In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), an agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a valid OMB control
number. The ICR documentation is
available at http://www.reginfo.gov.
Therefore, in preparation for OMB
review and approval of the following
information collection, TSA is soliciting
comments to—
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
information requirement is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including using
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Information Collection Requirement
Title: LEO Reimbursement Request—
Invoice.
Type of Request: Extension of
currently approved collection.
OMB Control Number: 1652–0063.
Form(s): LEO Reimbursement
Request—Invoice.
Affected Public: Airport operators.
Abstract: Pursuant to 49 U.S.C.
106(m) and 114(m), TSA has authority
to enter into agreements with airport
operators to reimburse expenses they
incur for the provision of LEOs in
support of screening at airport security
checkpoints. Consistent with this
authority, TSA, through its Office of
Law Enforcement/Federal Air Marshal
Service (OLE/FAMS), has created the
LEO Reimbursement Program. TSA
requires that participants in the LEO
Reimbursement Program record the
details of all reimbursements sought on
the LEO Reimbursement Request—
Invoice form. TSA will use this form to
provide for the orderly tracking of
reimbursements.
Number of Respondents: 326.
Estimated Annual Burden Hours: An
estimated 3,912 hours annually.
Dated: September 16, 2015.
Christina A. Walsh,
TSA Paperwork Reduction Act Officer, Office
of Information Technology.
[FR Doc. 2015–24010 Filed 9–21–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–05–P

PO 00000

Frm 00057

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

57201

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services
[OMB Control Number 1615–0107]

Agency Information Collection
Activities: H–2 Petitioner’s
Employment Related or Fee Related
Notification, No Form; Extension,
Without Change, of a Currently
Approved Collection
U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services, Department of
Homeland Security.
ACTION: 60-Day notice.
AGENCY:

The Department of Homeland
Security (DHS), U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration (USCIS) invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
comment upon this proposed extension
of a currently approved collection of
information. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of
1995, the information collection notice
is published in the Federal Register to
obtain comments regarding the nature of
the information collection, the
categories of respondents, the estimated
burden (i.e. the time, effort, and
resources used by the respondents to
respond), the estimated cost to the
respondent, and the actual information
collection instruments.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted for 60 days until
November 23, 2015.
ADDRESSES: All submissions received
must include the OMB Control Number
1615–0107 in the subject box, the
agency name and Docket ID USCIS–
2009–0015. To avoid duplicate
submissions, please use only one of the
following methods to submit comments:
(1) Online. Submit comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal Web site at
http://www.regulations.gov under eDocket ID number USCIS–2009–0015;
(2) Email. Submit comments to
USCISFRComment@uscis.dhs.gov;
(3) Mail. Submit written comments to
DHS, USCIS, Office of Policy and
Strategy, Chief, Regulatory Coordination
Division, 20 Massachusetts Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20529–2140.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
USCIS, Office of Policy and Strategy,
Regulatory Coordination Division, Laura
Dawkins, Chief, 20 Massachusetts
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20529–
2140, telephone number 202–272–8377
(This is not a toll-free number.
Comments are not accepted via
telephone message). Please note contact
information provided here is solely for
SUMMARY:

E:\FR\FM\22SEN1.SGM

22SEN1