Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES) Monitoring System

Education and Human Resources Program Monitoring Data Collections

AttachmentK1_2012 TUES_updated 20121219

Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES) Monitoring System

OMB: 3145-0226

⚠️ Notice: This form may be outdated. More recent filings and information on OMB 3145-0226 can be found here:

Document [doc]

Download: doc | pdf

Attachment K1

Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)

Monitoring System

TUES: Crosswalk 3

TUES: Number of Respondents, Frequency of Response, and Annual Hour Burden 33

TUES: Hour Burden Estimates by Each Form and Aggregate Hour Burdens 34

TUES: Estimates of Annualized Cost to Respondents for the Hour Burdens 35

TUES: Estimates of Costs to Federal Government 36

TUES: Questions 37

TUES: Crosswalk

Common

Collection

Categories

Questions

Award Category

Staff and Project Participant Characteristics^¹

Project Implementation

Characteristics^²

Project Outputs^³

Single

Lead Collaborative

Non-Lead Collaborative

Notes:

The System presents only those questions that are logically relevant to the type of award and previously answered questions. All questions pertain to the current reporting period’s participants, implementation, and outputs. All requested questions are required.

Three major categories drive the tailoring of the system to the award type. We have included columns to indicate these, which are:

Single Award
Lead Collaborative Award (most questions)
Non-Lead Collaborative Award(fewest questions)

For most questions respondents have the option to select a "don’t know” option or can enter "DK."

For most questions respondents have the option to add comments. The data elements associated with these comments are not shown in the crosswalk because the comments are entirely optional.

i. Confirm Award Information

Note: If any of the respondent’s answers in this section are inconsistent with the type of award that was preloaded, the data submission will be placed on hold. The respondent will receive the following notice: “This basic project information must be correct before you can begin entering data for this project. The TUESWeb Support Desk will contact you to find out what needs to be updated.”

Is [PI Name] the lead PI on Award No. [NSF Award Number]?

What type of proposal was submitted for this award ?

A Single Proposal that resulted in only this award (possibly including subawards for collaborating organizations)
A Collaborative Proposal that included simultaneous linked proposals from investigators at different organizations, with each organization receiving its own TUES/CCLI award.

Was this the Lead Award on the collaborative proposal?

Tell Us About Your Awards

Award Details

Award information in this section is preloaded and displayed for verification purposes. PIs can contact the technical support team to report data that should be updated, but they cannot edit this data directly via the data collection instrument. Because some awards have supplemental awards, there may be more than one award associated with each report. The “embedded” awards are listed on each screen, but are not mentioned in the main questions.

NSF Award No.

Award Title

PI Organization

Official Grantee Institution

This data element appears only if it differs from the PI Organization.

Phase or Type

The system will list one of the following types:

Phase 1/Type 1
Phase 2/Type 2
Phase 3/Type 2
Central Resource Project

Award Start Date

For consolidated awards: First Award’s Start Date

Award End Date

Lead PI’s Name

Lead PI’s Discipline

TUES/CCLI Awards in this collaborative project:

[[PI]], [[PI Organization]] – Lead Award

[[PI a]], [[PI Organization a]] – Collaborating Award

…

[[PI n]], [[PI Organization n]] – Collaborating Award

Do you need to update any of this information?

If yes, please describe the details you’d like to update:

About Your Institution

Type of institution:

[PI institution name], [City], [State]

has the following classification in the Integrated Postsecondary Data System (IPEDS):

[Institution Type]

[Other specify value if present]

If you believe this is incorrect, you can change it below. If you are not sure, use the IPEDS classification:

2-year Institution
2-year Institution on a 4-year College or University Campus
Bachelor’s degree granting institution
Master’s degree granting institution
Doctoral degree granting institution
Other U.S. Department of Education IPEDs Type
Don’t know

If Other: Please specify: ____________________

Type of Organization: (mark one or more)

 Academic Consortium

 Business

 Consultant

 National Laboratory

 Museum

 Nonprofit

 Professional Society

 Research Institute

 Other (please specify): ____________________

Subawards

Were subaward funds expended or transferred from this award to any subawardees during the current reporting period?

Enter information for a subaward organization

Provide the following information for the CCLI/TUES subaward institution. This subsection repeats for each institution

What type of organization received this subaward?

Academic institution (not including academic consortiums)
Other type of organization

Academic Subaward Institution

What is the name of the institution?

Type of institution:

[PI institution name], [City], [State]

has the following classification in the Integrated Postsecondary Data System (IPEDS):

[Institution Type]

[Other specify value if present]

If you believe this is incorrect, you can change it below. If you are not sure, use the IPEDS classification:

2-year Institution
2-year Institution on a 4-year College or University Campus
Bachelor’s degree granting institution
Master’s degree granting institution
Doctoral degree granting institution
Other U.S. Department of Education IPEDs Type
Don’t know

If Other: Please specify: ____________________

How many faculty from this institution were involved?

How many students from this institution were involved?

Other Type of Subaward Organization

Which of the following describes this organization? (mark one or more)

 Academic Consortium

 Business

 Consultant

 National Laboratory

 Museum

 Nonprofit

 Professional Society

 Research Institute

 Other (please specify): __________________________

 Don’t Know

All Subaward Organization Types

Approximately what amount of subaward funds did your award transfer to this organization during the current reporting period?

Checkbox option (matching how this question can also be answered elsewhere in the instrument.)

 This organization houses or plans to house any laboratory instruments that BOTH:

1) Cost more than $5,000 each, AND

2) Were purchased with TUES/CCLI funds during the current reporting period?

Other Participating Organizations

We are interested in the types of institutions that participate in TUES/CCLI projects. Did any other organizations participate significantly in your project during the current reporting period (not including your subawardees or other awardees in the collaborative project)?

Yes
No
Don’t know

If no or don’t know, skip the questions in this section.

Which of the following types of organizations participated significantly in your project? Put a check beside each type that participated. Then, for each type, indicate the number of organizations participating, numbers of faculty/professionals participating, and numbers of students that participated altogether for that type. It is okay to count the same organization or individual in multiple categories.

DO NOT include your organization, subawardee organizations, or organizations that should be independently reported by collaborating awardees.
Include organizations that received project funds, as well as organizations that did not.
Enter 0 for none. Enter DK for anything you don’t know.

The column headers for these tables are:

How many of this type of organization participated significantly?
How many faculty or professionals from this type of organization participated?
How many students from this type of organization participated?

	A	B	C
U.S. academic institutions by highest degree granted:
2-year Institutions
2-year Institutions on a 4-year College or University Campus
Bachelor’s Degree Granting Institutions
Master’s Degree Granting Institutions
Doctoral Degree Granting Institutions
Other U.S. Department of Education IPEDs type(s) (please specify):____________________

	A	B	C
U.S. academic institutions by enrollment demographics:
Institutions with High Disabilities Enrollment (>3% Undergraduates)
Institutions with High American Indian or Alaska Native Enrollment (25% or more) – Not Tribally Controlled
Institutions with High Black or African American Enrollment (non-Hispanic) (25% or more)
Institutions with High Hispanic Enrollment (25% or more)
Institutions with High Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Enrollment (25% or more)

	A	B	C
U.S. academic institutions with special designations:
Historically Black Colleges or Universities
American Indian Tribally Controlled Colleges or Universities


	A	B	C
Nonacademic organizations
Businesses
Consultants
National Laboratories
Museums
Non-profits
Professional Societies
Other type(s) of Nonacademic organizations (please specify): ____________________

Uses of Award Funds

Student Support

During this reporting period, were funds from this award used to support students (undergraduate, graduate, or postdocs)?

Yes
No
Don’t know

If no or don’t know, skip the remaining questions in this section

If yes, how many students were paid to work on the project using funds from this award?

Number of undergraduate students paid:
Number of graduate students paid:
Number of postdocs paid:

Laboratory Instrument Purchases

Did you purchase scientific instruments for laboratory improvement with this award during this reporting period?

Yes
No
Don’t know

If no or don’t know, skip the remaining questions in this section

Total price of all laboratory instruments purchased with this award during this reporting period:

If <$5,000, skip the remaining questions in this section.

Number of instruments purchased with this award that cost more than $5,000:

If 0, skip the next question.

Where are these new laboratory instruments (that cost $5,000 or more) housed? (Or if they have not been received yet, where will they be housed?) (mark one or more)

 At [name of PI’s institution]

 At [name of lead institution]

 At [name of collaborating institution 1]

 At [name of collaborating institution 2]

[…list all collaborating institutions]

 At [name of subawardee institution 1]

 At [name of subawardee institution 2]

[…list all subawardee institutions]

 At other participating institutions

 Other (please specify): ___________________

 Don’t know

Project Management and Evaluation

Were any project evaluations conducted during the current reporting period?

Yes
No
Don’t Know

If no or don’t know, skip the next question.

If Yes, How did you use the information from your project’s evaluation? (mark one or more)

 To improve the project

 To document accomplishments

 To assess changes in knowledge, skills, or attitudes of undergraduate students

 To assess changes in knowledge, skills, or attitudes of graduate students

 To assess changes in knowledge, skills, or attitudes of faculty

 None of the above (if so, skip the next question)

 Other (please specify): ___________________

 Don’t know (if so, skip the next question)

Were the project activities supported by this award implemented in courses or course-related laboratory sections during the current reporting period?

Yes
No
Don’t Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this question.

In how many courses or course-related lab sections were project activities implemented during the current reporting period?

In all these courses or lab sections combined, approximately how many undergraduate students were exposed to the project’s materials or instructional strategies?

In all these courses or lab sections combined, what percentage of students received a passing grade

Reflection

What is the single most important project accomplishment for the reporting period? (limit 500 characters)

What is the single most significant challenge that the project faced during the reporting period? (limit 500 characters)

What changes were made to the project, as outlined in the proposal, during the reporting period? (limit 500 characters)

Tell Us About Your Project’s Activities

Tell Us About The Project as a Whole

Tell Us About Your Award's Independent

Project Activities

2.01. TUES/CCLI Program Components

During the current reporting period, did your institution, or any of your subawardee institutions, engage in any project activities or project work independent of the other awardee institutions in your TUES/CCLI Collaborative Project?

Yes, we or our subawardees engaged in independent project work.
No, all our work involved collaboration with other awardees in the TUES/CCLI Collaborative Project (if no, skip the rest of this section, but to ensure accurate counts please be sure that the Lead PI knows about your involvement in any collaborative project activities, particularly if there are any where the Lead Organization was not directly involved)

What is the primary way that your project contributes to the development of exemplary undergraduate STEM education? (mark one)

Assessing and evaluating student achievement
Conducting research on undergraduate STEM education
Developing or adapting learning materials
Developing, adapting, or implementing new instructional strategies
Developing faculty expertise

What other ways does your project contribute to the development of exemplary undergraduate STEM education? (mark one or more)

 Assessing and evaluating student achievement

 Conducting research on undergraduate STEM education

 Developing or adapting learning materials

 Developing, adapting, or implementing new

instructional strategies

 Developing faculty expertise

 None of the above

Did the independent project activities supported by your award(s) during the current reporting period include developing or adapting any of the following:

 Instructional materials

 Instructional strategies

 Assessment instruments or processes to assess student

achievement

 None of the above

Does a significant aspect of the project include the introduction of new disciplinary knowledge into undergraduate curricula?

Yes
No
Don't Know

Did the project administer any publicly available assessment instruments (e.g., SALG, FCI, NSSE)?

Yes
No
Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this question.

If yes, please list them here: (limit 500 characters)

2.02. Disciplinary Focus

What is the primary disciplinary focus of the project? (mark one)

Interdisciplinary
Astronomy
Biological Sciences
Chemistry
Computer Sciences
Engineering
Engineering Technology
Geosciences
Mathematical Sciences
Physics
Social and Behavioral Sciences
Other, please specify: ___________________
Don't Know

What are the additional disciplinary focuses of the project? (mark one or more)

Interdisciplinary
Astronomy
Biological Sciences
Chemistry
Computer Sciences
Engineering
Engineering Technology
Geosciences
Mathematical Sciences
Physics
Social and Behavioral Sciences
Other, please specify: ___________________
None
Don't Know

2.03. Target Audiences

What course levels does your project address? (mark one or more)

 Upper division

 Lower division

 Developmental

 Don’t Know

What groups are the primary focus of your project? (mark one or more)

 Faculty (e.g., developing faculty expertise)

 Preservice teachers

 Instructional staff (e.g., graduate students, lab assistants,

lab technicians, adjunct faculty)

 Undergraduate STEM majors

 Undergraduate majors other than STEM

 Other (please specify): ____________________

 Don’t Know

Does the project foster scientific and/or technical literacy among students who are in majors other than STEM majors?

Yes
No
Don't Know

2.04 Publications and Presentations

Publications

Please provide the number of project-related outputs that were accepted for publication during the current reporting period for each of the categories described below. All fields below are required. Enter DK for anything you don’t know.

Publication types	Number accepted	Formats produced
Peer-reviewed journal articles accepted for publication during the current reporting period		 Print  Online  Other electronic format
Peer-reviewed conference papers or abstracts accepted for inclusion in conference proceedings during the current reporting period		 Print  Online  Other electronic format
Conference papers or abstracts accepted without peer review during the current reporting period		 Print  Online  Other electronic format
Book chapters in edited volumes accepted for publication during the current reporting period		 Print  Online  Other electronic format
Monographs or books accepted for publication during the current reporting period		 Print  Online  Other electronic format
Other publications (e.g., newsletters, magazines) accepted for publication during the current reporting period		 Print  Online  Other electronic format

Presentations

How many presentations or workshops on the project were delivered during the current reporting period? (Include presentations that were conducted by individuals trained by the project.) All fields below are required. Enter DK for anything you don’t know.

Presentation types	No. of presentations
Peer-reviewed conference presentations
Invited conference or meeting presentations
Invited faculty development workshops

2.05 Honors and Awards

Did the project receive any honors or awards during the current reporting period? (Include individuals recognized for their contributions to the project.)

Yes
No
Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this question.

What honors or awards were received?

Honor or Award Form

Title

Year

Presenting Organization

Reason for the honor or award

2.06. Institutionalization

Are there plans to sustain the project after NSF funding ends?

Yes
No
Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this question.

During the current reporting period, were steps taken to sustain the project’s activities after NSF funding ends?
Yes, some steps to sustain the project were taken.
Yes, all of the necessary steps to sustain the project were completed.
No, no steps to sustain the project were taken during the current reporting period.
If no, when does the project plan to start? (enter month and year) ____ / ____
Don't Know

2.07. Dissemination

Where else are the project’s materials, strategies, faculty development activities, or assessment instruments/processes being used? (mark one or more)

 At lead, collaborative, or subawardee institutions by

people not directly involved with the project

 At the project’s other participating institutions by people

not directly involved with the project

 At other institutions across the U.S.

 At international institutions

 None of the above

 Don’t know

2.08. Instructional Materials

Did the project develop or adapt instructional materials during the current reporting period?

Yes
No
Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this question.

What types of instructional materials did the project develop or adapt? (mark one or more)

 Case studies

 Demonstrations

 Educational games

 Field activity guides or manuals

 Instructor materials for adapting project activities or

procedures to new settings

 Instructor guides or manuals to guide student activities

 Laboratory guides or manuals

 Lesson plans

 Practice problems or exercises for students

 Simulations

 Software tools including web-enhanced tools

 Student handbooks or workbooks

 Textbooks

 Tutorials

 Visualizations

 Workshop materials for training faculty

 Workshop materials for training students

 Other instructional materials (please specify): ________

Note to reviewers: The system will show the user the list of instructional materials above. The user will choose the materials from the list that apply to his or her project. For each item chosen, the system will display the following questions:

 Sample instructional material

During the current reporting period, our project:

 Developed or revised our own [[material type]]

 Adapted [[material type]] created by others

In these formats:

 print  online  other electronic format

2.09. Instructional Strategies

Did the project develop or adapt instructional strategies during the current reporting period?

Yes
No
Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this question.

What types of instructional strategies did the project develop or adapt? (mark one or more)

 Case-based learning strategies

 Cooperative or collaborative learning strategies

 Design activities

 Field studies

 Hands-on activities (e.g., building or testing objects)

 Integrated courses

 Intelligent tutoring systems

 Laboratory experiences

 Learning communities (e.g., student cohorts)

 Lectures

 Linked courses

 Real-time modification strategies based on student

performance (e.g., Just-in-Time Teaching)

 Peer-instruction strategies (e.g., peer tutoring, peer

mentoring)

 Personal response systems (e.g., “clickers”)

 Problem-based learning strategies

 Quantitative computational approaches

 Strategies involving real-world examples, problems, or

contexts

 Strategies involving remote laboratories

 Strategies involving formal research experience in

classroom laboratories

 Service-learning strategies

 Studio-based strategies

 Web-enabled homework submission and grading

systems

 Web-enabled instruction strategies

 Web-enabled repositories

 Web-enabled student collaboration/social networking

tools

 Other instructional strategies (please specify): _______

Note to reviewers: The system will show the user the list of instructional strategies above. The user will choose the materials from the list that apply to his or her project. For each item chosen, the system will display the following questions:

 Sample instructional strategy

During the current reporting period, our project:

 Developed or revised our own [[strategy type]]

 Adapted [[strategy type]] created by others

2.10. Assessment Instruments and Processes

Did the project develop or adapt assessment instruments or processes during the current reporting period?

Yes
No
Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this question.

What types of assessment instruments or processes did the project develop or adapt? (mark one or more)

 Assessment of general knowledge or skill (e.g., critical

thinking skills, problem-solving skills)

 Cognitive protocol interviews

 Concept inventories

 Course exams

 Standardized tests (e.g., Fundamentals of Engineering,

American Chemical Society examinations)

 Performance assessment of skills (e.g., observation and

rating of skills)

 Students’ perceptions of their own learning

 Expert review

 Other instruments and processes to determine outcomes

(please specify): ______________

 Sample assessment instrument or process

During the current reporting period, our project:

 Developed or revised our own [[assessment type]]

 Adapted [[assessment type]] created by others

In these formats:

 print  online  other electronic format

2.11. Research On Undergraduate STEM Education

Did the project conduct research on undergraduate STEM education during the current reporting period?

Yes
No
Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this section.

What is the topic of your research on undergraduate STEM education? (limit 500 characters)

What type of research does your project employ? (mark one)

Qualitative research design
Quantitative research design
Mixed method research design
Don't Know

2.12. Faculty Professional Development Component

Did the project include a faculty professional development component ‽ (e.g., seminar, workshop, meeting session) that shared project approaches with other faculty members during the current reporting period?

Yes
No
Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this section.

If YES: With whom were these approaches shared during the current reporting period? (mark one or more)

	Graduate students or postdocs	Faculty	Instructional staff	Other or unknown individuals
At the lead, collaborating, or subawardee institutions				
At other institutions				

If YES: which disciplines were the focus of the project’s faculty professional development efforts during the current reporting period? (mark one or more)

Interdisciplinary
Astronomy
Biological Sciences
Chemistry
Computer Sciences
Engineering
Engineering Technology
Geosciences
Mathematical Sciences
Physics
Social and Behavioral Sciences
Other, please specify: ____________________
Don't Know
None

If YES: What types of institutions were represented at these efforts during the current reporting period (mark one or more)

 2-year Institutions

 Bachelor’s degree granting institutions

 Master’s degree granting institutions

 Doctoral degree granting institutions

 Nonacademic organizations

 Other (please specify): ____________________

 Don’t know

 None

If YES: Did the institutions represented at the project’s faculty professional development efforts have any of the following demographics or special institutional designations? If yes, what types? (mark one or more)

 Historically Black College or University

 American Indian Tribally Controlled College or University

 Institution with High Disabilities Enrollment (>3%

Undergraduates)

 Institution with High American Indian or Alaska Native

Enrollment (25% or more) – Not Tribally Controlled

 Institution with High Black or African American Enrollment

(non-Hispanic) (25% or more)

 Institution with High Hispanic Enrollment (25% or more)

 Institution with High Native Hawaiian or Other

Pacific Islander Enrollment (25% or more)

 None

 Not Reported/Don’t Know

2.13. Involvement with Project Materials, Strategies, Instruments and Processes

Do you know approximately how many students, faculty, and staff were impacted by your award’s efforts, or the joint efforts of collaborating awardees, during the current reporting period?

Yes
No (if no, skip the rest of this section)

Student Counts

All fields below are required. Enter DK for anything you don’t know.

During the current reporting period approximately . . .	Total number of students	Number of students from 2-year institutions	Number of students from institutions with minority enrollment of 25% or greater
How many undergraduate students used the project’s instructional materials?
How many undergraduate students were taught using the project’s instructional strategies?
How many undergraduate students’ knowledge, skills, or attitudes were assessed using the project’s assessment instruments?

Faculty Counts

All fields below are required. Enter DK for anything you don’t know.

During the current reporting period approximately . . .	Total number of faculty	Number of faculty from 2-year institutions	Number of faculty from institutions with minority enrollment of 25% or greater
How many project faculty worked on the project’s instructional materials?
How many project faculty worked on the project’s instructional strategies?
How many project faculty worked on the project’s assessment instruments or processes?

Staff Counts

All fields below are required. Enter DK for anything you don’t know.

During the current reporting period approximately . . .	Total number of staff	Number of staff from 2-year institutions	Number of staff from institutions with minority enrollment of 25% or greater ‽
How many non-instructional professional staff worked on the project? (e.g., lab technicians, professional staff associated with Centers for Teaching and Learning and Centers for Institutional Research, Centers for Institutional Evaluation professional staff)?
How many non-instructional professional staff used the project’s materials, strategies, or assessment instruments with students?

We are interested in whether participants who receive funding to attend faculty professional development activities are more or less likely to implement what they learn. Please estimate how many faculty professional development participants received funds from the project or their institution to attend. Of each group, please also indicate approximately how many are implementing the ideas shared.

	Participants funded by the project	Participants funded by their institution (if known)	All other participants
Number of faculty members
Number of institutions represented by those faculty members
Number of faculty implementing what they learned

Note: Your response to this question is optional this year, but may be required in future years

2.14. Involvement with Faculty Professional Development

Faculty Professional Development Events

During the current reporting period, were any faculty professional development events conducted [, either by your award or jointly among collaborating awardees]?

Yes
No
Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this section.

If YES: All fields below are required. Enter DK for anything you don’t know.

Faculty Professional Development Events Conducted

During the current reporting period approximately . . .	Total number of events	Number of events held at 2-year institutions	Number of events held at institutions with minority enrollment of 25% or greater
How many faculty professional development events were supported by the project?

Faculty Involvement in Professional Development Events

The following 8 questions appear in a table with the columns shown below:

How many faculty were involved in creating the project’s faculty professional development events?
How many faculty were involved in leading the project’s faculty professional development events?
How many faculty participated as learners in the project’s faculty professional development events?

How many academic institutions do these learners represent?

How many faculty learners received project funding to attend the project’s faculty professional development events?

How many academic institutions do these learners represent?

How many faculty learners at the project’s events went on to implement what they learned?

How many academic institutions do these learners represent?

During the current reporting period approximately . . .	Total number of faculty	Number of faculty from 2-year institutions	Number of faculty from institutions with minority enrollment of 25% or greater
Sample Question

Graduate Student and Postdoc Involvement in Professional Development Events

During the current reporting period approximately . . .	Total number of graduate students and postdocs	Number of graduate students and postdocs from 2-year institutions	Number of graduate students and postdocs from institutions with minority enrollment of 25% or greater
How many graduate students and postdocs were involved in creating the project’s faculty professional development events?
How many graduate students and postdocs were involved in leading the project’s faculty professional development events?
How many graduate students and postdocs participated as learners in the project’s faculty professional development events?

Nonacademic Involvement in the Project’s Faculty Professional Development Events

During the current reporting period approximately . . .	Total number of nonacademic learners
How many representatives from nonacademic organizations (e.g., professional societies, industry, community organizations) participated as learners in your project’s faculty professional development events?
How many organizations do these learners represent?

Submit your report to NSF

Congratulations! Your report appears complete. We have one last question:

Approximately how many person-hours were required to complete this report? ________ person-hours (round up to a whole hour)

Create New User Account

Note: This data is only collected for participants who must use TUESWeb (usually only the PI and a data entry assistant). The data is collected in order to provide adequate technical support; it is not considered part of the data collection instrument.

E-mail Address

Project Role

Co- primary Investigator
Data Entry Personnel
Project Coordinator
Other

Name:

Honorific

First

Middle

Last

Suffix

Phone

Organization

Alternate E-mail

Alternate Phone

Access Privileges (mark all that apply)

 Can View Data

 Can Edit Data

 Can Manage User Access

 Receives Reminders (automatically set to "yes" if

Role=Project Coordinator)

(button): Remove from this report

Note: The Lead PI’s privileges are automatically set to “yes” for all privileges.

TUES: Number of Respondents, Frequency of Response, and Annual Hour Burden

The estimated average number of annual respondents is 1,210, with an estimated average annual response burden of 4,840 hours. The Web-based collection is an annual activity of the TUES program that opened for its first data collection cycle in February 2012. There will be approximately 1,210 active respondents at a given point in time, and new respondents will enter at approximately the same rate that respondents leave the program or projects as their funding expires.

The burden estimate is outlined below:

Respondent Type	Estimated Average Annual No. of Respondents	Estimated Average Annual Burden Hours Per Respondent	Estimated Annual Burden Hour Total
PIs	1,210	4	4,840

Total	1,210		4,840

TUES: Hour Burden Estimates by Each Form and Aggregate Hour Burdens

Respondents will be project PIs. The estimated total annual response burden is 4,840 hours. The annual burden by form was calculated as follows:

Form

Type

Respondent Type

No. of Respondents

Burden Hours Per Respondent

Total Burden Hours

TUES data collection form

PIs

1,210

4,840

Total

1,210

4,840

TUES: Estimates of Annualized Cost to Respondents for the Hour Burdens

The overall annualized cost to the respondents is estimated to be $198,440. The following table shows the annualized estimates of costs to PI respondents, who are generally university professors. This estimated hourly rate is based on a report from the American Association of University Professors, “Annual Report on the Economic Status of the Profession, 2011-12,” Academe, March–April 2012, Survey Report Table 4. According to this report, the average salary of an associate professor across all types of doctoral-granting institutions (public, private-independent, religiously affiliated) was $86,319. When divided by the number of standard annual work hours (2,080), this calculates to approximately $41 per hour.

Respondent
Type

No. of Respondents

Burden Hours Per Respondent

Average Hourly Rate

Estimated Annual

Cost

PIs

1,210

$41

$198,440

Total

1,210

$198,440

TUES: Estimates of Costs to Federal Government

Computing the annualized cost to NSF for the TUES data collection was done by taking the budgets for three years and calculating the costs for each of the following operational activities involved in producing, maintaining, and conducting the TUES data collection:

Operational Activities	Cost Over Three Years
System Development (includes initial development of the database and Web-based application, and later changes requested by the program, e.g., increased reporting tools, additional validations)	$858,970
System Maintenance, Updates, and Technical Support (the system requires updates each year before opening the collection; maintenance is required to keep the system current with technology, e.g., database servers, operating systems)	$370,536
Data Collection Opening and Support (e.g., online and telephone support to respondents and contacting respondents to encourage completion of the questions), Reporting (as defined by DUE), and Followup Activities (e.g., providing data to other consultants)	$454,749
Three-Year Total for All Operational Activities	$1,684,255

The annualized cost was computed as one-third of the total three-year costs; thus, the annualized cost to NSF for the TUES data collection is $561,418.

TUES: Questions

Award Category

Single

Lead Collaborative

Non-Lead Collaborative

Notes:

The System presents only those questions that are logically relevant to the type of award and previously answered questions. All questions pertain to the current reporting period’s participants, implementation, and outputs. All requested questions are required.

Three major categories drive the tailoring of the system to the award type. We have included columns to indicate these, which are:

Single Award
Lead Collaborative Award (most questions)
Non-Lead Collaborative Award(fewest questions)

For most questions respondents have the option to select a "don’t know” option or can enter "DK."

For most questions respondents have the option to add comments. The data elements associated with these comments are not shown in the crosswalk because the comments are entirely optional.

i. Confirm Award Information

Is [PI Name] the lead PI on Award No. [NSF Award Number]?

What type of proposal was submitted for this award ?

A Single Proposal that resulted in only this award (possibly including subawards for collaborating organizations)
A Collaborative Proposal that included simultaneous linked proposals from investigators at different organizations, with each organization receiving its own TUES/CCLI award.

Was this the Lead Award on the collaborative proposal?

Tell Us About Your Awards

Award Details

NSF Award No.

Award Title

PI Organization

Official Grantee Institution

This data element appears only if it differs from the PI Organization.

Phase or Type

The system will list one of the following types:

Phase 1/Type 1
Phase 2/Type 2
Phase 3/Type 2
Central Resource Project

Award Start Date

For consolidated awards: First Award’s Start Date

Award End Date

Lead PI’s Name

Lead PI’s Discipline

TUES/CCLI Awards in this collaborative project:

[[PI]], [[PI Organization]] – Lead Award

[[PI a]], [[PI Organization a]] – Collaborating Award

…

[[PI n]], [[PI Organization n]] – Collaborating Award

Do you need to update any of this information?

If yes, please describe the details you’d like to update:

About Your Institution

Type of institution:

[PI institution name], [City], [State]

has the following classification in the Integrated Postsecondary Data System (IPEDS):

[Institution Type]

[Other specify value if present]

If you believe this is incorrect, you can change it below. If you are not sure, use the IPEDS classification:

2-year Institution
2-year Institution on a 4-year College or University Campus
Bachelor’s degree granting institution
Master’s degree granting institution
Doctoral degree granting institution
Other U.S. Department of Education IPEDs Type
Don’t know

If Other: Please specify: ____________________

Type of Organization: (mark one or more)

 Academic Consortium

 Business

 Consultant

 National Laboratory

 Museum

 Nonprofit

 Professional Society

 Research Institute

 Other (please specify): ____________________

Subawards

Were subaward funds expended or transferred from this award to any subawardees during the current reporting period?

Enter information for a subaward organization

Provide the following information for the CCLI/TUES subaward institution. This subsection repeats for each institution

What type of organization received this subaward?

Academic institution (not including academic consortiums)
Other type of organization

Academic Subaward Institution

What is the name of the institution?

Type of institution:

[PI institution name], [City], [State]

has the following classification in the Integrated Postsecondary Data System (IPEDS):

[Institution Type]

[Other specify value if present]

If you believe this is incorrect, you can change it below. If you are not sure, use the IPEDS classification:

2-year Institution
2-year Institution on a 4-year College or University Campus
Bachelor’s degree granting institution
Master’s degree granting institution
Doctoral degree granting institution
Other U.S. Department of Education IPEDs Type
Don’t know

If Other: Please specify: ____________________

How many faculty from this institution were involved?

How many students from this institution were involved?

Other Type of Subaward Organization

Which of the following describes this organization? (mark one or more)

 Academic Consortium

 Business

 Consultant

 National Laboratory

 Museum

 Nonprofit

 Professional Society

 Research Institute

 Other (please specify): __________________________

 Don’t Know

All Subaward Organization Types

Approximately what amount of subaward funds did your award transfer to this organization during the current reporting period?

Checkbox option (matching how this question can also be answered elsewhere in the instrument.)

 This organization houses or plans to house any laboratory instruments that BOTH:

1) Cost more than $5,000 each, AND

2) Were purchased with TUES/CCLI funds during the current reporting period?

Other Participating Organizations

Yes
No
Don’t know

If no or don’t know, skip the questions in this section.

DO NOT include your organization, subawardee organizations, or organizations that should be independently reported by collaborating awardees.
Include organizations that received project funds, as well as organizations that did not.
Enter 0 for none. Enter DK for anything you don’t know.

The column headers for these tables are:

How many of this type of organization participated significantly?
How many faculty or professionals from this type of organization participated?
How many students from this type of organization participated?

	A	B	C
U.S. academic institutions by highest degree granted:
2-year Institutions
2-year Institutions on a 4-year College or University Campus
Bachelor’s Degree Granting Institutions
Master’s Degree Granting Institutions
Doctoral Degree Granting Institutions
Other U.S. Department of Education IPEDs type(s) (please specify):____________________

	A	B	C
U.S. academic institutions by enrollment demographics:
Institutions with High Disabilities Enrollment (>3% Undergraduates)
Institutions with High American Indian or Alaska Native Enrollment (25% or more) – Not Tribally Controlled
Institutions with High Black or African American Enrollment (non-Hispanic) (25% or more)
Institutions with High Hispanic Enrollment (25% or more)
Institutions with High Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Enrollment (25% or more)

	A	B	C
U.S. academic institutions with special designations:
Historically Black Colleges or Universities
American Indian Tribally Controlled Colleges or Universities


	A	B	C
Nonacademic organizations
Businesses
Consultants
National Laboratories
Museums
Non-profits
Professional Societies
Other type(s) of Nonacademic organizations (please specify): ____________________

Uses of Award Funds

Student Support

During this reporting period, were funds from this award used to support students (undergraduate, graduate, or postdocs)?

Yes
No
Don’t know

If no or don’t know, skip the remaining questions in this section

If yes, how many students were paid to work on the project using funds from this award?

Number of undergraduate students paid:
Number of graduate students paid:
Number of postdocs paid:

Laboratory Instrument Purchases

Did you purchase scientific instruments for laboratory improvement with this award during this reporting period?

Yes
No
Don’t know

If no or don’t know, skip the remaining questions in this section

Total price of all laboratory instruments purchased with this award during this reporting period:

If <$5,000, skip the remaining questions in this section.

Number of instruments purchased with this award that cost more than $5,000:

If 0, skip the next question.

Where are these new laboratory instruments (that cost $5,000 or more) housed? (Or if they have not been received yet, where will they be housed?) (mark one or more)

 At [name of PI’s institution]

 At [name of lead institution]

 At [name of collaborating institution 1]

 At [name of collaborating institution 2]

[…list all collaborating institutions]

 At [name of subawardee institution 1]

 At [name of subawardee institution 2]

[…list all subawardee institutions]

 At other participating institutions

 Other (please specify): ___________________

 Don’t know

Project Management and Evaluation

Were any project evaluations conducted during the current reporting period?

Yes
No
Don’t Know

If no or don’t know, skip the next question.

If Yes, How did you use the information from your project’s evaluation? (mark one or more)

 To improve the project

 To document accomplishments

 To assess changes in knowledge, skills, or attitudes of undergraduate students

 To assess changes in knowledge, skills, or attitudes of graduate students

 To assess changes in knowledge, skills, or attitudes of faculty

 None of the above (if so, skip the next question)

 Other (please specify): ___________________

 Don’t know (if so, skip the next question)

Were the project activities supported by this award implemented in courses or course-related laboratory sections during the current reporting period?

Yes
No
Don’t Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this question.

In how many courses or course-related lab sections were project activities implemented during the current reporting period?

In all these courses or lab sections combined, approximately how many undergraduate students were exposed to the project’s materials or instructional strategies?

In all these courses or lab sections combined, what percentage of students received a passing grade

Reflection

What is the single most important project accomplishment for the reporting period? (limit 500 characters)

What is the single most significant challenge that the project faced during the reporting period? (limit 500 characters)

What changes were made to the project, as outlined in the proposal, during the reporting period? (limit 500 characters)

Tell Us About Your Project’s Activities

Tell Us About The Project as a Whole

Tell Us About Your Award's Independent

Project Activities

2.01. TUES/CCLI Program Components

Yes, we or our subawardees engaged in independent project work.
No, all our work involved collaboration with other awardees in the TUES/CCLI Collaborative Project (if no, skip the rest of this section, but to ensure accurate counts please be sure that the Lead PI knows about your involvement in any collaborative project activities, particularly if there are any where the Lead Organization was not directly involved)

What is the primary way that your project contributes to the development of exemplary undergraduate STEM education? (mark one)

Assessing and evaluating student achievement
Conducting research on undergraduate STEM education
Developing or adapting learning materials
Developing, adapting, or implementing new instructional strategies
Developing faculty expertise

What other ways does your project contribute to the development of exemplary undergraduate STEM education? (mark one or more)

 Assessing and evaluating student achievement

 Conducting research on undergraduate STEM education

 Developing or adapting learning materials

 Developing, adapting, or implementing new

instructional strategies

 Developing faculty expertise

 None of the above

Did the independent project activities supported by your award(s) during the current reporting period include developing or adapting any of the following:

 Instructional materials

 Instructional strategies

 Assessment instruments or processes to assess student

achievement

 None of the above

Does a significant aspect of the project include the introduction of new disciplinary knowledge into undergraduate curricula?

Yes
No
Don't Know

Did the project administer any publicly available assessment instruments (e.g., SALG, FCI, NSSE)?

Yes
No
Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this question.

If yes, please list them here: (limit 500 characters)

2.02. Disciplinary Focus

What is the primary disciplinary focus of the project? (mark one)

Interdisciplinary
Astronomy
Biological Sciences
Chemistry
Computer Sciences
Engineering
Engineering Technology
Geosciences
Mathematical Sciences
Physics
Social and Behavioral Sciences
Other, please specify: ___________________
Don't Know

What are the additional disciplinary focuses of the project? (mark one or more)

Interdisciplinary
Astronomy
Biological Sciences
Chemistry
Computer Sciences
Engineering
Engineering Technology
Geosciences
Mathematical Sciences
Physics
Social and Behavioral Sciences
Other, please specify: ___________________
None
Don't Know

2.03. Target Audiences

What course levels does your project address? (mark one or more)

 Upper division

 Lower division

 Developmental

 Don’t Know

What groups are the primary focus of your project? (mark one or more)

 Faculty (e.g., developing faculty expertise)

 Preservice teachers

 Instructional staff (e.g., graduate students, lab assistants,

lab technicians, adjunct faculty)

 Undergraduate STEM majors

 Undergraduate majors other than STEM

 Other (please specify): ____________________

 Don’t Know

Does the project foster scientific and/or technical literacy among students who are in majors other than STEM majors?

Yes
No
Don't Know

2.04 Publications and Presentations

Publications

Publication types	Number accepted	Formats produced
Peer-reviewed journal articles accepted for publication during the current reporting period		 Print  Online  Other electronic format
Peer-reviewed conference papers or abstracts accepted for inclusion in conference proceedings during the current reporting period		 Print  Online  Other electronic format
Conference papers or abstracts accepted without peer review during the current reporting period		 Print  Online  Other electronic format
Book chapters in edited volumes accepted for publication during the current reporting period		 Print  Online  Other electronic format
Monographs or books accepted for publication during the current reporting period		 Print  Online  Other electronic format
Other publications (e.g., newsletters, magazines) accepted for publication during the current reporting period		 Print  Online  Other electronic format

Presentations

Presentation types	No. of presentations
Peer-reviewed conference presentations
Invited conference or meeting presentations
Invited faculty development workshops

2.05 Honors and Awards

Did the project receive any honors or awards during the current reporting period? (Include individuals recognized for their contributions to the project.)

Yes
No
Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this question.

What honors or awards were received?

Honor or Award Form

Title

Year

Presenting Organization

Reason for the honor or award

2.06. Institutionalization

Are there plans to sustain the project after NSF funding ends?

Yes
No
Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this question.

During the current reporting period, were steps taken to sustain the project’s activities after NSF funding ends?
Yes, some steps to sustain the project were taken.
Yes, all of the necessary steps to sustain the project were completed.
No, no steps to sustain the project were taken during the current reporting period.
If no, when does the project plan to start? (enter month and year) ____ / ____
Don't Know

2.07. Dissemination

Where else are the project’s materials, strategies, faculty development activities, or assessment instruments/processes being used? (mark one or more)

 At lead, collaborative, or subawardee institutions by

people not directly involved with the project

 At the project’s other participating institutions by people

not directly involved with the project

 At other institutions across the U.S.

 At international institutions

 None of the above

 Don’t know

2.08. Instructional Materials

Did the project develop or adapt instructional materials during the current reporting period?

Yes
No
Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this question.

What types of instructional materials did the project develop or adapt? (mark one or more)

 Case studies

 Demonstrations

 Educational games

 Field activity guides or manuals

 Instructor materials for adapting project activities or

procedures to new settings

 Instructor guides or manuals to guide student activities

 Laboratory guides or manuals

 Lesson plans

 Practice problems or exercises for students

 Simulations

 Software tools including web-enhanced tools

 Student handbooks or workbooks

 Textbooks

 Tutorials

 Visualizations

 Workshop materials for training faculty

 Workshop materials for training students

 Other instructional materials (please specify): ________

 Sample instructional material

During the current reporting period, our project:

 Developed or revised our own [[material type]]

 Adapted [[material type]] created by others

In these formats:

 print  online  other electronic format

2.09. Instructional Strategies

Did the project develop or adapt instructional strategies during the current reporting period?

Yes
No
Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this question.

What types of instructional strategies did the project develop or adapt? (mark one or more)

 Case-based learning strategies

 Cooperative or collaborative learning strategies

 Design activities

 Field studies

 Hands-on activities (e.g., building or testing objects)

 Integrated courses

 Intelligent tutoring systems

 Laboratory experiences

 Learning communities (e.g., student cohorts)

 Lectures

 Linked courses

 Real-time modification strategies based on student

performance (e.g., Just-in-Time Teaching)

 Peer-instruction strategies (e.g., peer tutoring, peer

mentoring)

 Personal response systems (e.g., “clickers”)

 Problem-based learning strategies

 Quantitative computational approaches

 Strategies involving real-world examples, problems, or

contexts

 Strategies involving remote laboratories

 Strategies involving formal research experience in

classroom laboratories

 Service-learning strategies

 Studio-based strategies

 Web-enabled homework submission and grading

systems

 Web-enabled instruction strategies

 Web-enabled repositories

 Web-enabled student collaboration/social networking

tools

 Other instructional strategies (please specify): _______

 Sample instructional strategy

During the current reporting period, our project:

 Developed or revised our own [[strategy type]]

 Adapted [[strategy type]] created by others

2.10. Assessment Instruments and Processes

Did the project develop or adapt assessment instruments or processes during the current reporting period?

Yes
No
Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this question.

What types of assessment instruments or processes did the project develop or adapt? (mark one or more)

 Assessment of general knowledge or skill (e.g., critical

thinking skills, problem-solving skills)

 Cognitive protocol interviews

 Concept inventories

 Course exams

 Standardized tests (e.g., Fundamentals of Engineering,

American Chemical Society examinations)

 Performance assessment of skills (e.g., observation and

rating of skills)

 Students’ perceptions of their own learning

 Expert review

 Other instruments and processes to determine outcomes

(please specify): ______________

 Sample assessment instrument or process

During the current reporting period, our project:

 Developed or revised our own [[assessment type]]

 Adapted [[assessment type]] created by others

In these formats:

 print  online  other electronic format

2.11. Research On Undergraduate STEM Education

Did the project conduct research on undergraduate STEM education during the current reporting period?

Yes
No
Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this section.

What is the topic of your research on undergraduate STEM education? (limit 500 characters)

What type of research does your project employ? (mark one)

Qualitative research design
Quantitative research design
Mixed method research design
Don't Know

2.12. Faculty Professional Development Component

Yes
No
Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this section.

If YES: With whom were these approaches shared during the current reporting period? (mark one or more)

	Graduate students or postdocs	Faculty	Instructional staff	Other or unknown individuals
At the lead, collaborating, or subawardee institutions				
At other institutions				

If YES: which disciplines were the focus of the project’s faculty professional development efforts during the current reporting period? (mark one or more)

Interdisciplinary
Astronomy
Biological Sciences
Chemistry
Computer Sciences
Engineering
Engineering Technology
Geosciences
Mathematical Sciences
Physics
Social and Behavioral Sciences
Other, please specify: ____________________
Don't Know
None

If YES: What types of institutions were represented at these efforts during the current reporting period (mark one or more)

 2-year Institutions

 Bachelor’s degree granting institutions

 Master’s degree granting institutions

 Doctoral degree granting institutions

 Nonacademic organizations

 Other (please specify): ____________________

 Don’t know

 None

 Historically Black College or University

 American Indian Tribally Controlled College or University

 Institution with High Disabilities Enrollment (>3%

Undergraduates)

 Institution with High American Indian or Alaska Native

Enrollment (25% or more) – Not Tribally Controlled

 Institution with High Black or African American Enrollment

(non-Hispanic) (25% or more)

 Institution with High Hispanic Enrollment (25% or more)

 Institution with High Native Hawaiian or Other

Pacific Islander Enrollment (25% or more)

 None

 Not Reported/Don’t Know

2.13. Involvement with Project Materials, Strategies, Instruments and Processes

Do you know approximately how many students, faculty, and staff were impacted by your award’s efforts, or the joint efforts of collaborating awardees, during the current reporting period?

Yes
No (if no, skip the rest of this section)

Student Counts

All fields below are required. Enter DK for anything you don’t know.

During the current reporting period approximately . . .	Total number of students	Number of students from 2-year institutions	Number of students from institutions with minority enrollment of 25% or greater
How many undergraduate students used the project’s instructional materials?
How many undergraduate students were taught using the project’s instructional strategies?
How many undergraduate students’ knowledge, skills, or attitudes were assessed using the project’s assessment instruments?

Faculty Counts

All fields below are required. Enter DK for anything you don’t know.

During the current reporting period approximately . . .	Total number of faculty	Number of faculty from 2-year institutions	Number of faculty from institutions with minority enrollment of 25% or greater
How many project faculty worked on the project’s instructional materials?
How many project faculty worked on the project’s instructional strategies?
How many project faculty worked on the project’s assessment instruments or processes?

Staff Counts

All fields below are required. Enter DK for anything you don’t know.

During the current reporting period approximately . . .	Total number of staff	Number of staff from 2-year institutions	Number of staff from institutions with minority enrollment of 25% or greater ‽
How many non-instructional professional staff worked on the project? (e.g., lab technicians, professional staff associated with Centers for Teaching and Learning and Centers for Institutional Research, Centers for Institutional Evaluation professional staff)?
How many non-instructional professional staff used the project’s materials, strategies, or assessment instruments with students?

	Participants funded by the project	Participants funded by their institution (if known)	All other participants
Number of faculty members
Number of institutions represented by those faculty members
Number of faculty implementing what they learned

Note: Your response to this question is optional this year, but may be required in future years

2.14. Involvement with Faculty Professional Development

Faculty Professional Development Events

During the current reporting period, were any faculty professional development events conducted [, either by your award or jointly among collaborating awardees]?

Yes
No
Don't Know

If no or don’t know, skip the rest of this section.

If YES: All fields below are required. Enter DK for anything you don’t know.

Faculty Professional Development Events Conducted

During the current reporting period approximately . . .	Total number of events	Number of events held at 2-year institutions	Number of events held at institutions with minority enrollment of 25% or greater
How many faculty professional development events were supported by the project?

Faculty Involvement in Professional Development Events

The following 8 questions appear in a table with the columns shown below:

How many faculty were involved in creating the project’s faculty professional development events?
How many faculty were involved in leading the project’s faculty professional development events?
How many faculty participated as learners in the project’s faculty professional development events?

How many academic institutions do these learners represent?

How many faculty learners received project funding to attend the project’s faculty professional development events?

How many academic institutions do these learners represent?

How many faculty learners at the project’s events went on to implement what they learned?

How many academic institutions do these learners represent?

During the current reporting period approximately . . .	Total number of faculty	Number of faculty from 2-year institutions	Number of faculty from institutions with minority enrollment of 25% or greater
Sample Question

Graduate Student and Postdoc Involvement in Professional Development Events

During the current reporting period approximately . . .	Total number of graduate students and postdocs	Number of graduate students and postdocs from 2-year institutions	Number of graduate students and postdocs from institutions with minority enrollment of 25% or greater
How many graduate students and postdocs were involved in creating the project’s faculty professional development events?
How many graduate students and postdocs were involved in leading the project’s faculty professional development events?
How many graduate students and postdocs participated as learners in the project’s faculty professional development events?

Nonacademic Involvement in the Project’s Faculty Professional Development Events

During the current reporting period approximately . . .	Total number of nonacademic learners
How many representatives from nonacademic organizations (e.g., professional societies, industry, community organizations) participated as learners in your project’s faculty professional development events?
How many organizations do these learners represent?

Submit your report to NSF

Congratulations! Your report appears complete. We have one last question:

Approximately how many person-hours were required to complete this report? ________ person-hours (round up to a whole hour)

Create New User Account

E-mail Address

Project Role

Co- primary Investigator
Data Entry Personnel
Project Coordinator
Other

Name:

Honorific

First

Middle

Last

Suffix

Phone

Organization

Alternate E-mail

Alternate Phone

Access Privileges (mark all that apply)

 Can View Data

 Can Edit Data

 Can Manage User Access

 Receives Reminders (automatically set to "yes" if

Role=Project Coordinator)

(button): Remove from this report

Note: The Lead PI’s privileges are automatically set to “yes” for all privileges.

1 Elements of these characteristics include: Name, address, date of birth, gender, ethnicity, race, disability status, class, major, grade point average, yearly fellowship or stipend amount, or project role.

2 Elements of these characteristics include: Sources and amount of funds, fellowships, scholarships, traineeships, partnerships, training, research methods.

3 Elements of these characteristics include: research findings, publications, presentations, degrees granted, educational materials.

Page 59 of 59

File Type	application/msword
File Title	Common
Author	Larry Suter
Last Modified By	21773
File Modified	2012-12-20
File Created	2012-12-20

Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES) Monitoring System

Education and Human Resources Program Monitoring Data Collections

AttachmentK1_2012 TUES_updated 20121219