SUPPORTING STATEMENT
OMB# 1545-1016
Form 8613, Return of Excise Tax on Undistributed Income of Regulated Investment Companies (RICS).
1. CIRCUMSTANCES NECESSITATING COLLECTION OF INFORMATION
Section 4982 of the Internal Revenue Code imposes an excise tax on a regulated investment company in the amount of 4 percent of the excess, if any, of the required distribution for a calendar year over the distributed amount for
such calendar year. Regulations section 55.6011-1 requires that Form 8613 be filed to report and pay this tax.
2. USE OF DATA
The information contained on Form 8613 is used to help verify that the tax has been figured correctly.
3. USE OF IMPROVED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE BURDEN
Low filing volume does not justify the cost of electronic enabling for Form 8613.
4. EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY DUPLICATION
We have attempted to eliminate duplication within the agency wherever possible.
5. METHODS TO MINIMIZE BURDEN ON SMALL BUSINESSES OR OTHER SMALL ENTITIES
There are no methods to minimize burden on small businesses or other small entities.
6. CONSEQUENCES OF LESS FREQUENT COLLECTION ON FEDERAL PROGRAMS OR POLICY ACTIVITIES
Consequences of less frequent collection on federal programs or policy activities would result in inaccurate figured and computed excise taxes.
7. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRING DATA COLLECTION TO BE
INCONSISTENT WITH GUIDELINES IN 5 CFR 1320.5(d) (2)
There are no special circumstances requiring data collections to be inconsistent with Guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5(d) 2).
8. CONSULTATION WITH INDIVIDUALS OUTSIDE OF THE AGENCY ON
AVAILABILITY OF DATA, FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION, CLARITY
OF INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS, AND DATA ELEMENTS
Periodic meetings are held between IRS personnel and representatives of the American Bar Association, the National Society of Public Accountants, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and other professional groups to discuss tax law and tax forms. During these meetings, there is an opportunity for those attending to make comments regarding Form 8613.
In response to the Federal Register notice dated December 1, 2015(80 FR 75171), we received no comments during the comment
Period regarding Form 8613.
9. EXPLANATION OF DECISION TO PROVIDE ANY PAYMENT OR GIFT TO
RESPONDENTS
No payment or gift has been provided to any respondents.
10. ASSURANCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY OF RESPONSES
Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential as required by 26 USC 6103.
11. JUSTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE QUESTIONS
A privacy impact assessment (PIA) has been conducted for information collected under this request as part of the “Business Master file (BMF)”, Excise Filing Information Retrieval System (Ex-FIRS) and a Privacy Act System of Records notice (SORN) has been issued for these systems under IRS 22.062 – Electronic Filing Records; IRS 24.030 – Customer Account Data Engine (CADE) Individual Master File; IRS 24.046 - CADE Business Master File (BMF);IRS 34.037 - IRS Audit Trail and Security Records System. The Internal Revenue Service PIA’s can be found at https://www.irs.gov/uac/Privacy-Impact-Assessments-PIA.
Title 26 USC 6109 requires inclusion of identifying numbers in returns, statements, or other documents for securing proper identification of persons required to make such returns, statements, or documents and is the authority for social security numbers (SSNs) in IRS systems.
12. ESTIMATED BURDEN OF INFORMATION COLLECTION
Form Number of Time per Responses Response Total hours |
|
8613 1,500 11.52 17,820 |
The following regulations impose no additional burden. Please continue to assign OMB number 1545-1016 to these regulations:
55.6011-1
55. h (a) (2) (vi)
5h.5
13. ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL COST BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS
There are no capital/ start-up/ or ongoing operation/ maintenance costs associated with this information collection.
14. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
After consultation with various functions within the Service, we have determined that the cost of developing, printing, processing, distribution, and overhead for Form 8613 is
$3,475.
15. REASONS FOR CHANGE IN BURDEN
There are no changes being made to the form at this time. We are making this submission for renewal purposes.
16. PLANS FOR TABULATION, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND PUBLICATION
There are no plans for tabulation, statistical, analysis and publication.
17. REASONS WHY DISPLAYING THE OMB EXPIRATION DATE IS
INAPPROPRIATE
See attachment.
18. EXCEPTIONS TO THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT
There are no exceptions to the certification statement for this collection.
Note: The following paragraph applies to all of the collections of information in this submission:
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.
OMB EXPIRATION DATE
We believe the public interest will be better served by not printing an expiration date on the form(s) in this package.
Printing the expiration date on the form will result in increased costs because of the need to replace inventories that become obsolete by passage of the expiration date each time OMB approval is renewed. Without printing the expiration date, supplies of the form could continue to be used.
The time period during which the current edition of the form(s) in this package will continue to be usable cannot be predicted. It could easily span several cycles of review and OMB clearance renewal. In addition, usage fluctuates unpredictably. This makes it necessary to maintain a substantial inventory of forms in the supply line at all times. This includes supplied owned by both the Government and the public. Reprinting of the form cannot be reliably scheduled to coincide with an OMB approval expiration date. This form may be privately printed by users at their own expense. Some businesses print complex and expensive marginally punched continuous versions, their expense, for use in their computers. The form may be printed by commercial printers and stocked for sale. In such cases, printing the expiration date on the form could result in extra costs to the users.
Not printing the expiration date on the form(s) will also avoid confusion among taxpayers who may have identical forms with different expiration dates in their possession.
For the above reasons we request authorization to omit printing the expiration date on the form(s) in this package.
File Type | application/msword |
File Title | SUPPORTING STATEMENT |
Author | QP1KB |
Last Modified By | Department of Treasury |
File Modified | 2016-02-03 |
File Created | 2016-01-25 |