60-day FR Notice

65218

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 / Notices

asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
All comments must be submitted in
English, or if not, accompanied by an
English translation. Comments will be
posted as received to http://
www.cftc.gov. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. If you wish the
Commission to consider information
that you believe is exempt from
disclosure under the Freedom of
Information Act, a petition for
confidential treatment of the exempt
information may be submitted according
to the procedures established in § 145.9
of the Commission’s regulations.1
The Commission reserves the right,
but shall have no obligation, to review,
pre-screen, filter, redact, refuse or
remove any or all of your submission
from http://www.cftc.gov that it may
deem to be inappropriate for
publication, such as obscene language.
All submissions that have been redacted
or removed that contain comments on
the merits of the Information Collection
Request will be retained in the public
comment file and will be considered as
required under the Administrative
Procedure Act and other applicable
laws, and may be accessible under the
Freedom of Information Act.
Burden Statement: The respondent
burden for this collection is estimated to
average 2 hours per response for an
estimated annual burden of 504 hours
per respondent. This estimate includes
the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to
generate, maintain, retain, disclose, or
provide information to or for a federal
agency.
Respondents/Affected Entities: Swap
dealers, Major Swap Participants, and
Futures Commission Merchants.
Estimated number of respondents:
239 (105 Swap Dealers and Major Swap
Participants and 134 Futures
Commission Merchants).
Estimated number of responses: 253.
Estimated total annual burden on
respondents: 120,456 hours.
Frequency of collection: As needed.
There are no capital costs or operating
and maintenance costs associated with
this collection.
(Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
Dated: October 21, 2015.
Robert N. Sidman,
Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015–27164 Filed 10–23–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
1 17

CFR 145.9.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:53 Oct 23, 2015

Jkt 238001

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. CPSC–2012–0034]

Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Baby Bouncers
and Walker-Jumpers
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

As required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35), the Consumer Product
Safety Commission (‘‘CPSC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) requests comments on a
proposed extension of approval of a
collection of information relating to
certain children’s articles known as
baby-bouncers and walker-jumpers,
approved previously under OMB
Control No. 3041–0019. The
Commission will consider all comments
received in response to this notice
before requesting an extension of this
collection of information from the Office
of Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’).
DATES: Submit written or electronic
comments on the collection of
information by December 28, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. CPSC–2012–
0034, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit
electronic comments to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at: http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
The Commission does not accept
comments submitted by electronic mail
(email), except through
www.regulations.gov. The Commission
encourages you to submit electronic
comments by using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal, as described above.
Written Submissions: Submit written
submissions by mail/hand delivery/
courier to: Office of the Secretary,
Consumer Product Safety Commission,
Room 820, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone (301)
504–7923.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this notice. All
comments received may be posted
without change, including any personal
identifiers, contact information, or other
personal information provided, to:
http://www.regulations.gov. Do not
submit confidential business
information, trade secret information, or
other sensitive or protected information
that you do not want to be available to
the public. If furnished at all, such
information should be submitted in
writing.
SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00024

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to: http://
www.regulations.gov, and insert the
docket number CPSC–2012–0034, into
the ‘‘Search’’ box, and follow the
prompts.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robert H. Squibb, Consumer Product
Safety Commission, 4330 East West
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; (301)
504–7815, or by email to: rsquibb@
cpsc.gov.
CPSC
seeks to renew the following currently
approved collection of information:
Title: Ban of Certain Articles Known
as Baby-Bouncers or Walker-Jumpers.
OMB Number: 3041–0019.
Type of Review: Renewal of
collection.
Frequency of Response: On occasion.
Affected Public: Manufacturers and
importers of baby-bouncers or walkerjumpers.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 33
firms that supply baby-bouncers or
walker-jumpers to the United States
market have been identified; there are
approximately 4 new models per firm
annually.
Estimated Time per Response: 30
minutes/model associated with labeling
requirements and 1 hour/model
associated with recordkeeping
requirements.
Total Estimated Annual Burden: 132
hours on recordkeeping (33 firms × 1
hour × 4 models) and 66 hours for
labeling (33 firms × 1⁄2 hour × 4 models)
for a total annual burden of 198 hours
per year.
General Description of Collection:
Under 16 CFR 1500.18(a)(6), certain
articles known as ‘‘baby-bouncers’’ and
‘‘walker-jumpers’’ which are intended to
support very young children while
sitting, bouncing, jumping, and/or
reclining, are banned if they are
designed in such a way that exposed
parts present hazards such as
amputation, crushing, laceration,
fracture, hematoma, bruise, or other
injury to fingers, toes, or other parts of
the anatomy of young children. An
exemption from the ban is provided at
16 CFR 1500.86(a)(4) if the products are
designed to guard against or prevent
those same injuries. Among other
requirements, the regulations require
manufacturers, including importers, to
meet the collection of information
requirements for labeling and
recordkeeping requirements.
Products that are the subject of this
information collection are
distinguishable from the infant bouncer
seats that are the subject of the

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM

26OCN1

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 / Notices
Commission’s recent proposed safety
standard on infant bouncer seats at 80
FR 63168 (Oct. 19, 2015). Infant bouncer
seats described in the Commission’s
proposed standard are intended to hold
young infants that cannot sit up
unassisted in a reclined position
(approximately 0 to 6 months of age).
Comments related to the Paperwork
Reduction Act on the proposed safety
standard for infant bouncer seats should
be directed to the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, the Office of
Management and Budget, Attn: CPSC
Desk Officer, FAX: 202–395–6974, or
emailed to oira_submission@
omb.eop.gov.
The products subject to this
information collection are typically
described as baby walkers, and allow
the child to jump in place or assist with
walking. Such products are intended for
use with children that are beginning to
develop leg strength to aid in learning
to walk. Comments on the information
collection requirements for these
products should be submitted through
the process outlined in the Addresses
section above.
Request for Comments
The Commission solicits written
comments from all interested persons
about the proposed collection of
information. The Commission
specifically solicits information relevant
to the following topics:

asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

—Whether the collection of information
described above is necessary for the
proper performance of the
Commission’s functions, including
whether the information would have
practical utility;
—Whether the estimated burden of the
proposed collection of information is
accurate;
—Whether the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected could be enhanced; and
—Whether the burden imposed by the
collection of information could be
minimized by use of automated,
electronic or other technological
collection techniques, or other forms
of information technology.
Dated: October 21, 2015.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015–27114 Filed 10–23–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:53 Oct 23, 2015

Jkt 238001

CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND
COMMUNITY SERVICE
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request
Corporation for National and
Community Service.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

The Corporation for National
and Community Service (CNCS), as part
of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden,
conducts a pre-clearance consultation
program to provide the general public
and federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing collections of
information in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA95) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This
program helps to ensure that requested
data can be provided in the desired
format, reporting burden (time and
financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly
understood, and the impact of collection
requirement on respondents can be
properly assessed.
Currently, CNCS is soliciting
comments concerning the Operation
AmeriCorps Evaluation. This two year
evaluation seeks to assess the
implementation of the new Operation
AmeriCorps initiative, and to report on
early results from the intended
outcomes of each grantee’s project. The
evaluation will examine the extent to
which multiple streams of national
service are integrated and complement
one another in each project; determine
whether and how community capacity
is being developed and sustained; and
examine the Operation AmeriCorps
grant making process to determine if
this type of grant could be successfully
used in future grants competitions.
Researchers from CNCS will collect
qualitative and quantitative data from
grantees and their partners, AmeriCorps
members, member supervisors, and
program beneficiaries. Operation
AmeriCorps grantees are required to
participate in the evaluation as a
condition of grant award.
Copies of the information collection
request can be obtained by contacting
the office listed in the Addresses section
of this Notice.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted to the individual and office
listed in the ADDRESSES section by
December 28, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by the title of the information
collection activity, by any of the
following methods:
SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00025

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

65219

(1) By mail sent to: Corporation for
National and Community Service, Office
of Research and Evaluation; Attention
Joseph Breems, Policy Analyst, Room
10902B; 1201 New York Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC, 20525.
(2) By hand delivery or by courier to:
CNCS mailroom at Room 8100 at the
mail address given in paragraph (1)
above, between 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.
Eastern Time, Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
(3) Electronically through
www.regulations.gov.
Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TTY–TDD) may call 1–800–833–3722
between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joseph Breems, 202–606–6992, or by
email at jbreems@cns.gov.
CNCS is
particularly interested in comments
that:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the efficient performance of the
functions of CNCS, including whether
the information will have practical
utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are expected to respond, including the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology
(e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background
This proposed two year evaluation
seeks to assess the implementation of
the new Operation AmeriCorps grant
initiative, and to report on early results
from the intended outcomes of each
grantee’s project. The evaluation will
examine the extent to which multiple
streams of national service are
integrated and complement one another
in each project; determine whether and
how community capacity is being
developed and sustained; and examine
the Operation AmeriCorps grant making
process to determine if this type of grant
making process could be successful in
the future.

E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM

26OCN1