60-Day FRN

37738

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Employment and Training
Administration

Notice of Availability of Final
Environmental Impact Statement
(FEIS)

[TA–W–70,864]

National Science Foundation.
Notice of Availability of Final
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS).
AGENCY:

Western/Scott Fetzer Company, Avon
Lake, OH; Notice of Termination of
Investigation
Pursuant to Section 223 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated in response
to a petition filed on June 2, 2009, on
behalf of workers of Western/Scott
Fetzer Company, Avon Lake, Ohio.
The petition regarding the
investigation has been deemed invalid.
The petitioner was a former company
official, but not at the time of the filing
of this petition.
Consequently, the investigation has
been terminated.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 10th day of
July 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9–18051 Filed 7–28–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–71,621]

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

Sealy Mattress Company, Clarion, PA;
Notice of Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to Section 223 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on July 9,
2009 in response to a worker petition
filed on behalf of workers of Sealy
Mattress Company, Clarion,
Pennsylvania.
The petitioning group of workers is
covered by an earlier petition (TA–W–
71,415) filed on June 26, 2009 that is the
subject of an ongoing investigation for
which a determination has not yet been
issued. Consequently, further
investigation in this case would serve
no purpose, and the investigation under
this petition has been terminated.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of
July 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9–18039 Filed 7–28–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P

VerDate Nov<24>2008

18:30 Jul 28, 2009

Jkt 217001

ACTION:

SUMMARY: The National Science
Foundation (NSF) is considering
whether to approve a proposal
submitted by the National Solar
Observatory to fund the construction of
the Advanced Technology Solar
Telescope (ATST) Project at the
Haleakala¯ High Altitude Observatory
site on the Island of Maui, Hawai‘i. The
NSF has prepared a Final
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS)
for the proposed ATST Project that
serves as a joint Federal and State of
Hawai‘i document prepared in
compliance with the Federal National
Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C.
4321, et seq. (NEPA), and the State of
Hawai‘i Chapter 343, Hawai‘i Revised
Statutes. This FEIS was also prepared to
evaluate the potential environmental
impacts associated with the issuance of
a National Park Service Special Use
Permit, pursuant to 36 CFR 5.6, to
operate commercial vehicles on the
Haleakala¯ National Park road during the
construction and operation of the
proposed ATST Project, if approved.
Please note that responses to all
comments received (including all
written comments and those provided
through testimony at the public
hearings) on both the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement
(September 2006), and on the
Supplemental Draft Environmental
Impact Statement (May of 2009), are
included in Volume IV of the FEIS. The
written comments and transcripts of
public hearings are also included in
Volume IV. The FEIS reflects the
changes made to the SDEIS based on the
comments received, availability of new
data, and correction of errors and
omissions. The FEIS is now available on
the Internet at: http://atst.nso.edu/nsfenv in Adobe® portable document
format (PDF). The FEIS has also been
distributed to interested Federal, State,
and local agencies, organizations, and
individuals, as well as selected
repositories.
DATES: The NSF will issue a record of
decision (ROD) for the proposed ATST
Project following consideration of the
entire administrative record for the
proposed ATST Project, including the
FEIS and NSF’s compliance with
Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act. The ROD will be

PO 00000

Frm 00052

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

issued no earlier than August 31, 2009,
or 30 days from the date of publication
in the Federal Register of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency’s
Notice of Availability of the FEIS,
whichever is later. Limited hard copies
of the ROD will be available, on a first
request basis, by contacting the NSF
contact, Craig Foltz, Ph.D., ATST
Program Director, 4201 Wilson
Boulevard, Room 1045, Arlington, VA
22230, Telephone: 703–292–4909, email: cfoltz@nsf.gov. The ROD will also
be available on the Internet at the web
address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Craig Foltz, Ph.D., ATST Program
Manager, National Science Foundation,
Division of Astronomical Sciences, 4201
Wilson Boulevard, Room 1045,
Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone: 703–
292–4909, Fax: 703–292–9034, E-mail:
cfoltz@nsf.gov.
Dated: July 24, 2009.
Craig Foltz,
ATST Program Manager, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. E9–18027 Filed 7–28–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
[OMB Control No. 3206–0212; Forms RI 38–
117, RI 38–118, and RI 37–22]

Proposed Information Collection;
Request for Review of a Revised
Information Collection
AGENCY: Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(Public Law 104–13, May 22, 1995), this
notice announces that the Office of
Personnel Management (OPM) intends
to submit to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) a request for review
of a revised information collection. This
information collection, ‘‘Rollover
Election’’ (OMB Control No. 3206–0212,
Form RI 38–117), is used to collect
information from each payee affected by
a change in the tax code (Pub. L. 107–
16) so that OPM can make payment in
accordance with the wishes of the
payee. ‘‘Rollover Information’’ (OMB
Control No. 3206–0212, Form RI 38–
118), explains the election. ‘‘Special Tax
Notice Regarding Rollovers’’ (OMB
Control No. 3206–0212, Form RI 37–22),
provides more detailed information.
Comments are particularly invited on:
whether this collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of

E:\FR\FM\29JYN1.SGM

29JYN1

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Notices
functions of the Office of Personnel
Management, and whether it will have
practical utility; whether our estimate of
the public burden of this collection is
accurate, and based on valid
assumptions and methodology; and
ways in which we can minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, through
the use of the appropriate technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
The estimated number of respondents
is 1,500. We estimate it takes
approximately 30 minutes to complete
the form. The annual burden is 750
hours.
For copies of this proposal, contact
Cyrus S. Benson on (202) 606–0623, Fax
(202) 606–0910 or via E-mail to
Cyrus.Benson@opm.gov. Please include
a mailing address with your request.
DATES: Comments on this proposal
should be received within 60 calendar
days from the date of this publication.
ADDRESS: Send or deliver comments
to—James K. Freiert, Deputy Assistant
Director, Retirement Services Program,
Center for Retirement and Insurance
Services, U.S. Office of Personnel
Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Room
3305, Washington, DC 20415–3500.
For information regarding
administrative coordination contact:
Cyrus S. Benson, Team Leader,
Publications Team, RIS Support
Services/Support Group, U.S. Office of
Personnel Management, 1900 E Street,
NW.—Room 4H28, Washington, DC
20415, (202) 606–0623.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
John Berry,
Director.
[FR Doc. E9–18080 Filed 7–28–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–38–P

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. CP2009–53; Order No. 254]

Global Expedited Package Services
Contract
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.

AGENCY:

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

ACTION:

SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a
recently-filed Postal Service request to
add a Global Expedited Package
Services 1 contract to the Competitive
Product List. This notice addresses
procedural steps associated with these
filings.
DATES:

Comments are due August 3,

2009.
Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
ADDRESSES:

VerDate Nov<24>2008

18:30 Jul 28, 2009

Jkt 217001

Filing Online system at http://
www.prc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
202–789–6820 and
stephen.sharfman@prc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Introduction
II. Notice of Filing
III. Ordering Paragraphs

I. Introduction
On July 22, 2009, the Postal Service
filed a notice announcing that it has
entered into an additional Global
Expedited Package Services 1 (GEPS 1)
contract.1 GEPS 1 provides volumebased incentives for mailers that send
large volumes of Express Mail
International (EMI) and/or Priority Mail
International (PMI). The Postal Service
believes the instant contract is
functionally equivalent to previously
submitted GEPS 1 contracts, and is
supported by the Governors’ Decision
filed in Docket No. CP2008–4.2 Notice at
1.
It further notes that in Order No. 86,
which established GEPS 1 as a product,
the Commission held that additional
contracts may be included as part of the
GEPS 1 product if they meet the
requirements of 39 U.S.C. 3633, and if
they are functionally equivalent to the
initial GEPS 1 contract filed in Docket
No. CP2008–5.3 Notice at 1.
The instant contract. The Postal
Service filed the instant contract
pursuant to 39 CFR 3015.5. In addition,
the Postal Service contends that the
contract is in accordance with Order No.
86. The Postal Service states that the
instant contract replaces the contract for
the customer in Docket No. CP2008–12,
which will end on August 31, 2009. Id.
at 2. It submitted the contract and
supporting material under seal, and
attached a redacted copy of the contract
and certified statement required by 39
CFR 3015.5(c)(2) to the Notice as
Attachments 1 and 2, respectively. Id. at
1–2. The term of the instant contract is
1 year from the date the Postal Service
notifies the customer that all necessary
regulatory approvals have been
received.
1 Notice of United States Postal Service Filing of
Functionally Equivalent Global Expedited Package
Services 1 Negotiated Service Agreement, July 16,
2009 (Notice).
2 See Docket No. CP2008–4, Notice of United
States Postal Service of Governors’ Decision
Establishing Prices and Classifications for Global
Expedited Package Services Contents, May 20,
2008.
3 See Docket No. CP2008–5, Order Concerning
Global Expedited Package Services Contracts, June
27, 2008, at 7 (Order No. 86).

PO 00000

Frm 00053

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

37739

The Notice advances reasons why the
instant GEPS 1 contract fits within the
Mail Classification Schedule language
for GEPS 1. The Postal Service asserts
that the instant contract is functionally
equivalent to the GEPS 1 contracts filed
previously. It states that in Governors’
Decision No. 08–7, a pricing formula
and classification system were
established to ensure that each contract
meets the statutory and regulatory
requirements of 39 U.S.C. 3633. The
Postal Service contends that the instant
contract demonstrates its functional
equivalence with the previous GEPS 1
contracts because of several factors: The
customers are small or medium-sized
businesses that mail directly to foreign
destinations using EMI and/or PMI, the
contract term of one year applies to all
GEPS 1 contracts, the contracts have
similar cost and market characteristics,
and each requires payment through
permit imprint. Id. at 4. It asserts that
even though prices may be different
based on volume or postage
commitments made by the customers, or
updated costing information, these
differences do not affect the contracts’
functional equivalency because the
GEPS 1 contracts share similar cost
attributes and methodology. Id. at 4–5.
The Postal Service also identifies
several other contractual differences
including provisions that clarify the
availability of other Postal Service
products and services, exclude certain
flat rate products from the mail
qualifying for discounts, simplify
mailing notice requirements, modify
mail tender locations, clarify the
mailer’s volume and revenue
commitment in the event of early
termination, and change certain
provisions in the prior contract in minor
respects. Id. at 5–6.
The Postal Service states that these
differences related to a particular mailer
are ‘‘incidental differences’’ and do not
change the conclusion that these
agreements are functionally equivalent
in all important respects. Id. at 6.
The Postal Service requests that this
contract be included within the GEPS 1
product. Id. at 7.
The Postal Service maintains that
certain portions of the contract and
certified statement required by 39 CFR
3015.5(c)(2), names of GEPS 1
customers, related financial
information, portions of the certified
statement which contain costs and
pricing as well as the accompanying
analyses that provide prices, terms,
conditions, and financial projections
should remain under seal. Id. at 3.

E:\FR\FM\29JYN1.SGM

29JYN1