Download:
pdf |
pdfLhorne on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
30720
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 103 / Friday, May 29, 2015 / Notices
Kevin Rim ACEC (4,557 Acres)
• Relevant and Important Values:
cultural, wildlife habitat.
• Limitations on the Following Uses:
oil and gas leasing, solid mineral
leasing, mineral material sales,
commercial wind energy development.
• Other Restrictions: avoidance area
for ROWs.
Mountain Plover ACEC (24,762 Acres)
• Relevant and Important Values:
wildlife habitat.
• Limitations on the Following Uses:
oil and gas leasing, solid mineral
leasing, mineral material sales,
commercial wind energy development.
• Other Restrictions: avoidance area
for ROWs.
Sweet Grass Hills ACEC (7,419 Acres)
• Relevant and Important Values:
historic, cultural.
• Limitations on the Following Uses:
oil and gas leasing, solid mineral
leasing, mineral material sales,
commercial wind energy development.
• Other Restrictions: avoidance area
for ROWs.
Frenchman Breaks ACEC (42,020 Acres)
• Relevant and Important Values:
scenic, wildlife habitat, natural
processes.
• Limitations on the Following Uses:
oil and gas leasing, solid mineral
leasing, mineral material sales,
commercial wind energy development.
• Other Restrictions: avoidance area
for ROWs.
Malta Geological ACEC (6,153 Acres)
• Relevant and Important Values:
geologic, paleontological, natural
processes.
• Limitations on the Following Uses:
oil and gas leasing, solid mineral
leasing, mineral material sales,
commercial wind energy development.
• Other Restrictions: avoidance area
for ROWs; personal collection of
common fossils would not be allowed.
Woody Island ACEC (32,869 Acres)
• Relevant and Important Values:
scenic, wildlife habitat.
• Limitations on the Following Uses:
oil and gas leasing, solid mineral
leasing, mineral material sales,
commercial wind energy development.
• Other Restrictions: avoidance area
for ROWs.
Zortman/Landusky Mine Reclamation
ACEC (2,682 Acres)
• Relevant and Important Values:
natural hazards, public safety.
• Limitations on the Following Uses:
commercial wind energy development.
• Other Restrictions: avoidance area
for ROWs, closed to all unauthorized
vehicle use during reclamation
activities.
Two areas are being considered for
designation as off-highway vehicle
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:17 May 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
(OHV) use areas. In the Proposed RMP,
40 acres in the Glasgow OHV area
would remain open until an alternate
site is located, and in the Fresno OHV
area 125 acres would be designated as
open to OHV use.
The Hiline District Proposed RMP/
Final EIS is one of a total of 15 separate
EISs that make up the BLM and Forest
Service National Greater Sage-Grouse
Planning Strategy. Greater-Sage Grouse
habitat within the planning area
consists of:
• Priority Habitat Management Area
(PHMA)—Areas identified as having the
highest conservation value for
maintaining sustainable Greater SageGrouse populations; include breeding,
late brood-rearing, and winter
concentration areas.
• General Habitat Management Area
(GHMA)—Areas of seasonal or yearround habitat outside of PHMA.
Alternative E identifies 1,006,312
acres as Greater Sage-Grouse PHMAs
and 426,355 acres as Grassland Bird/
Greater Sage-Grouse PHMAs. The latter
areas have special management
prescriptions to provide high-quality
habitat for Greater Sage-Grouse and
other sagebrush-dependent species.
These PHMAs would be closed to solid
mineral leasing, and oil and gas leasing
would be subject to a no surface
occupancy (NSO) and use stipulation
with only limited exceptions, and no
waivers or modifications. Both areas
would be designated as exclusion areas
for wind and solar energy ROWs, and
avoidance areas for all other ROWs.
The BLM and Forest Service, via the
Western Association of Fish and
Wildlife Agencies (WAFWA)
Management Zone Greater Sage-Grouse
Conservation Team, will develop a
Regional Mitigation Strategy to guide
the application of the mitigation
hierarchy to address impacts within that
Zone. The Regional Mitigation Strategy
should consider any State-level greater
sage-grouse mitigation guidance that is
consistent with the requirements. The
Regional Mitigation Strategy will be
developed in a transparent manner,
based on the best science available and
standardized metrics.
Instructions for filing a protest with
the Director of the BLM regarding the
Proposed RMP/Final EIS may be found
in the ‘‘Dear Reader’’ Letter of the
HiLine Proposed RMP/Final EIS and at
43 CFR 1610.5–2. All protests must be
in writing and mailed to the appropriate
address, as set forth in the ADDRESSES
section above. Emailed protests will not
be accepted as valid protests unless the
protesting party also provides the
original letter by either regular or
overnight mail postmarked by the close
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of the protest period. Under these
conditions, the BLM will consider the
emailed protest as an advance copy and
it will receive full consideration. If you
wish to provide the BLM with such
advance notification, please direct
emails to protest@blm.gov.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
protest, you should be aware that your
entire protest—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your protest to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10,
43 CFR 1610.2, 43 CFR 1610.5.
Jamie E. Connell,
State Director, Montana/Dakotas.
[FR Doc. 2015–12999 Filed 5–28–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–DN–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS–WASO–NRSS–SSB–18382;
PPWONRADE3, PPMRSNR1Y.NM0000 (155)]
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Programmatic
Clearance for NPS-Sponsored Surveys
National Park Service (NPS),
Interior.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
AGENCY:
We (National Park Service)
will ask the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) to approve the
Information Collection (IC) described
below. The National Park Service (NPS)
sponsors public surveys to provide park
managers with information needed for
park planning, management, operations
and evaluation of performance related to
protecting park resources and meeting
the needs of the public. In consultation
with the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) and the Department of
the Interior (DOI), the NPS has
developed a Programmatic Review and
Clearance Process for NPS-sponsored
public surveys. It significantly
streamlines the information collection
review process. To comply with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, and
as part of our continuing efforts to
reduce paperwork and respondent
burden, we invite the general public and
other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on this IC. This
IC is scheduled to expire on October 31,
2015. We may not conduct or sponsor
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29MYN1.SGM
29MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 103 / Friday, May 29, 2015 / Notices
and a person is not required to respond
to a collection unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
DATES: To ensure that your comments
on this IC are considered, we must
receive them on or before July 28, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Please send your comments
to Phadrea Ponds, Information
Collections Coordinator, National Park
Service, 1201 Oakridge Drive, Fort
Collins, CO 80525 (mail); or phadrea_
ponds@nps.gov (email). Please reference
‘‘Information Collection 1024–0224—
Programmatic Renewal’’ in the subject
line.
Bret
Meldrum, Chief, Social Science
Program, National Park Service, 1201
Oakridge Drive, Fort Collins, CO 80525–
5596 (mail); Bret_Meldrum@nps.gov
(email); or 970–267–7295 (phone).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Abstract
The Programmatic Clearance for NPSSponsored Surveys applies to surveys
designed to furnish usable information
to NPS managers and planners
concerning park visitors, visitor
services, potential park visitors, and
residents of communities near parks.
This information is intended to provide
NPS managers with data that can be
used to improve the quality and utility
of agency programs, services, and
planning efforts. Questions asked under
the programmatic review process must
show a clear tie to NPS management
and planning needs. The programmatic
review may only be used for noncontroversial surveys that are unlikely
to attract or include topics of significant
public interest in the programmatic
review process.
To qualify for the NPS generic
programmatic review process, all
information collections must be directly
tied to an area managed by the NPS or
research that will benefit NPS
management efforts. All collections
must be reviewed by the NPS and
approved by OMB before the survey can
be initiated.
Lhorne on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
II. Data
OMB Control Number: 1024–0224.
Title: Programmatic Clearance for
NPS-Sponsored Surveys.
Type of Request: Renewal of a
currently approved collection.
Affected Public: General Public (i.e.
Park Visitors, potential visitors to parks,
and residents of communities near park)
and local, state and tribal governments.
Respondent Obligation: Voluntary.
Estimated Number of Annual
Respondents: 150,000.
Estimated Annual Burden Hours:
50,000 hours. We estimate the public
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:17 May 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
reporting burden will average 20
minutes per response.
Estimated Annual Reporting and
Recordkeeping ‘‘Non-Hour Cost’’: None.
III. Request For Comments
We invite comments concerning this
IC on:
• Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the agency
to perform its duties, including whether
the information is useful;
• The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information;
• Ways to enhance the quality,
usefulness, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden on
the respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments that you submit in
response to this notice are a matter of
public record. We will include or
summarize each comment in our request
to OMB to approve this IC. Before
including your address, phone number,
email address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment, including your
personal identifying information, may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: May 26, 2015.
Debra Melton,
Acting Information Collection Clearance
Officer, National Park Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–13036 Filed 5–28–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–EH–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS–USPP–15826; PPWOUSPPS1,
PPMPRPP02.Y00000 (155)]
Proposed Information Collection;
United States Park Police Application
Forms
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice; request for comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
We (National Park Service)
will ask the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) to approve the
information collection (IC) described
below. As required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 and as part of our
continuing efforts to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, we invite the
general public and other Federal
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30721
agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on this IC. This IC is
scheduled to expire on March 31, 2017.
We may not conduct or sponsor and a
person is not required to respond to a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
DATES: You must submit comments on
or before July 28, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments on the
IC to Madonna L. Baucum, Information
Collection Clearance Officer, National
Park Service, 12201 Sunrise Valley
Drive (Room 2C114, Mail Stop 242),
Reston, VA 20192 (mail); or madonna_
baucum@nps.gov (email). Please
include ‘‘1024–0245’’ in the subject line
of your comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request additional information about
this IC, contact Pamela Blyth, United
States Park Police, 1100 Ohio Drive
SW., Washington, DC 20242 (mail); or at
pamela_blyth@nps.gov (email). Please
reference ‘‘1024–0245 Revision’’ in your
comments.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The United States Park Police (USPP)
is a unit of the National Park Service,
Department of the Interior, with
jurisdiction in all National Park Service
areas and certain other Federal and
State lands. The USPP are highly
trained, professional police officers who
prevent and detect criminal activity;
conduct investigations; apprehend
individuals suspected of committing
offenses against Federal, State, and local
laws; provide protection to the
President of the United States and
visiting dignitaries; and provide
protective services to some of the most
recognizable monuments and memorials
in the world. Applicants for USPP
officer positions must complete and
pass a competitive written examination,
an oral interview, a medical
examination and psychological
evaluation, and a battery of physical
fitness and agility tests. As part of this
application and screening process, the
USPP uses the following forms:
USPP Form (TBD) ‘‘Physician Consent
Form’’
The USPP Form TBD ‘‘Physician
Consent Form’’ is an optional form used
by the applicant to obtain clearance by
their personal physician to complete the
PEB. The applicant’s personal physician
uses this form to certify whether or not
the applicant is cleared to participate in
the Physical Efficiency Battery (PEB)
and requests the following information
E:\FR\FM\29MYN1.SGM
29MYN1
File Type | application/pdf |
File Modified | 2015-05-29 |
File Created | 2015-05-29 |