National Diabetes Prevention Program’s (NATIONAL DPP) RE-AIM Evaluation Protocol
Developed 2012 for DP12-1212PPHF12 Grantees
Purpose of framework for evaluation: National DPP to examine process/qualitative and outcome measures that are pertinent to program delivery and program implementation. Data can be correlated with biometric data captured by the Diabetes Prevention Recognition Program (DPRP) to examine which strategies are effective in contributing to positive health outcomes. Also, it’s important to examine those strategies that are less effective and which ones do not achieve the program goals. Strategies that will be examined include, but are not limited to, criteria for program enrollment (i.e., BMI; screening or diagnostic test), referral sources, media and communications approaches, recruitment and retention efforts, program fidelity (e.g., how program is delivered, by whom with what credentials, # of participants, program drop-out rates, completion rates core and post-core, etc.), employer coverage and/or insurance reimbursement for the lifestyle change program (i.e., policy approaches).
Overarching evaluation question: What are the best practices around scaling and sustaining the National DPP?
RE-AIM Evaluation Framework |
National DPP Grantee Evaluation |
National DPP Site Evaluation |
|||
Submitter |
|
Date |
|
Grantee/Organization Name |
Grantee/Organization Name |
Intervention Name (if applicable) |
|
Year Initiated National DPP |
|
Grant Year Fiscal Year |
Year lifestyle change program initiated
|
Implementing Organization’s Name |
|
Please provide the name and organizational code for all NEW sites recruited or selected in the current grant year. |
Site Name (MUST be the Org code that is provided by the DPRP) |
||
INTERVENTION |
|
|
|||
Brief Description
|
|
Did you engage in any activities to recruit participants directly or connect them to a program site? If so, what activities? Please select ALL that apply.
What was the policy that was changed? Please select ALL that apply. |
What was the policy that was established? Please select ALL that apply. |
||
Resources Required |
Prompts: Partnerships/coalition, in-kind contributions, etc.
Prompt: Office/classroom space, computer or printing equipment, etc.
Prompt: Days of training received, content of training, costs related to training,
|
For the current grant year, how many master trainer lifestyle coaches were trained?
For the current grant year, what was the average number of days of training received for master trainers? Please select from the list who trained NEW lifestyle coaches. Please select ALL that apply. Did lifestyle coaches receive an additional one day of motivational interview training?
|
What is the funding source for lifestyle coaches? Please select ALL that apply.
|
||
Reach (The absolute number, proportion, and representativeness of individuals who are willing to participate in a given initiative, intervention, or program; RE-AIM.org.)
|
From this, calculate a percentage (%) of participants who completed the 16-week core program (# completed/total # of those enrolled).
From this, calculate a % of participants who completed both the 16-week core program AND the 6 month post-core follow-up at end of year 1 (i.e., completed both/total # of those enrolled).
|
|
|
||
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES |
|
|
|||
Brief Description of Implementation (In short, fidelity and use of intervention strategies; RE-AIM.org.) |
Prompt: Using the same curriculum, same credentials in terms of lifestyle coaches, same type of reminders, etc.
Prompt: Lay professional (i.e., Community Health Worker), Certified Diabetes Educator, nutritionist, etc.
|
For the current grant year, please provide the number of employer council events attended to educate participants about the benefits and cost-savings of the evidence-based lifestyle change program. For current grant year, please provide the number of health care purchasing coalitions educated about the benefits and cost-savings of the evidence-based lifestyle change program. For current grant year, please provide the number of insurance broker events attended to educate participants about the benefits and cost-savings of the evidence-based lifestyle change program.
Please select from the list strategies to address barriers listed above at organizational level for Year 3. Please select ALL that apply.
|
Which DPP curriculum are you using at this site? How have you adapted the lifestyle change program to address the specific cultural needs or preferences of one or more of your targeted populations? Please select ALL that apply.
Please select from the list strategies to address barriers listed above at site level. Please select ALL that apply.
|
||
Adoption [The absolute number, proportion, and representativeness of settings and intervention agents (people who deliver the program) who are willing to initiate a program; RE-AIM.org.] |
Prompt: Other healthcare facilities, including hospitals, private clinics/FQHCs; YMCAs or other non-profit organizations, etc.
|
For current grant year, please provide the number of employers offering the National DPP lifestyle change program as a covered benefit or as a wellness benefit for employees. For the current grant year, please provide the number of employers who offer the National DPP program on-site. |
Please list the full address of your site.
Were there any NEW referral sources (i.e., clinics, employers/worksites, state health departments, physicians, health centers, private organizations, non-profits, insurers, etc.)? Please select ALL that apply. |
||
Maintenance/ Sustainability (The extent to which a program or policy becomes institutionalized or part of the routine organizational practices and policies; RE-AIM.org.) |
|
|
For the current grant year, was there any change from the previous grant year regarding how lifestyle coaches were paid?
If the site was not active in Year 3, please provide reasons.
|
||
EVALUATION |
|
|
|||
Efficacy/ Effectiveness (The impact of an intervention on important outcomes, including potential negative effects, quality of life, and economic outcomes; RE-AIM.org.)
|
What is the estimated annual cost of the NATIONAL DPP lifestyle change program per participant? If funding or reimbursement is provided by an employer or insurance carrier, what are their costs per participant?
Prompt: If so, what are the outcomes? Are any related directly or indirectly to the expected outcomes (e.g., % of weight loss, increase in physical activity, lower BMI, no current diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, increase in healthy eating, etc.)? |
Have you calculated the average cost per participant amongst your program sites? If you are able to report, what is the numeric value of the cost?
|
What is the average salary of a program coordinator, if you are able to report this data?
|
Sources: CDC/RTI Effective Strategies interview protocol for reimbursement, 2011; RE-AIM.org (http://re-aim.org/about-re-aim/what-does-re-aim-mean.aspx).
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
Author | Nevin Laib |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2021-01-24 |