Form MP-10002 2015 MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATIONAL PRACTICES SURVEY

Attachment C
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Economics and Statistics Administration

U.S. CENSUS BUREAU
FORM

2015 MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATIONAL
PRACTICES SURVEY

MP-10002(DRAFT)

OMB No. 0607-0963: Approval Expires

O
N
LY

MP-10002

PU
RP
O
SE
S

Need help or have questions
about filling out this form?
Visit https://econhelp.census.gov/mops

RE
SE
A
RC
H

Call 1-800-233-6136, between 8am 4:30pm, Eastern time, Monday through
Friday.
- OR -

U.S. CENSUS BUREAU
1201 East 10th Street
Jeffersonville, IN 47132-0001

D
RA
FT
PR
EL
IM
IN
A
RY

Mail your completed form to:

FO
R

Write to the address below.
Include your 11-digit Census File
Number (CFN) printed in the
mailing address.

(Please correct any errors in this mailing address.)
YOUR RESPONSE IS REQUIRED BY LAW. Title 13, United States Code, Sections 131 and 182 authorizes this collection.
Sections 224 and 225 require businesses and other organizations that receive this questionnaire to answer the questions
and return the report to the U.S. Census Bureau. By Section 9 of the same law, your census report is confidential. It may
be seen only by persons sworn to uphold the confidentiality of Census Bureau information and may be used only for
statistical purposes. Further, copies retained in respondents' files are immune from legal process.

INTERNET REPORTING OPTION AVAILABLE - We encourage you to complete this survey
online at: https://www.census.gov/econhelp/mops
User ID:

Password:

10002012

Public reporting burden for this collection is estimated to average 45 minutes per response, including the time for
reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing
and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of
this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: ECON Survey Comments 0607-0963,
U.S. Census Bureau, 4600 Silver Hill Road, Room EMD-8K122, Washington, DC 20233. You may e-mail comments to
ECON.Survey.Comments@census.gov. Be sure to use ECON Survey Comments 0607-0963 as the subject.
You are not required to respond to this collection of information if it does not display a valid approval number from
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The eight-digit OMB number is 0607-0963 and appears in the upper right
corner of this form.
The reporting unit for this form is an establishment which is generally a single physical location where business is
conducted or where services or industrial operations are performed.

PENALTY FOR FAILURE TO REPORT

CONTINUE ON PAGE 2

Form MP-10002

Page 2

(DRAFT)

Section A - Management Practices
1

In 2010 and 2015, what best describes what happened at this establishment when a problem in the production
process arose?
Examples: Finding a quality defect in a product or a piece of machinery breaking down.
2010

Mark one box for each year
We fixed it but did not take further action

2015

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

We fixed it and took action to make sure that it did not happen again . . . . . . . . .
We fixed it and took action to make sure that it did not happen again, and had a
continuous improvement process to anticipate problems like these in advance . . . . .
No action was taken
2

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

In 2010 and 2015, how many key performance indicators were monitored at this establishment?
Examples: Metrics on production, cost, waste, quality, inventory, energy, absenteeism and deliveries on time.
2010

Mark one box for each year
1-2 key performance indicators

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3-9 key performance indicators

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2015

10 or more key performance indicators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
No key performance indicators
(If no key performance indicators in both years, SKIP to
3

6

) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

During 2010 and 2015, how frequently were the key performance indicators reviewed by managers at this
establishment?
Mark all that apply
A manager is someone who has employees directly reporting to them, with whom they meet on a regular basis, and
whose pay and promotion they may be involved with, e.g., Plant Manager, Human Resource Manager, Quality Manager.
2010

2015

Yearly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Quarterly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Monthly

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Weekly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Daily . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hourly or more frequently . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

10002020

Never

CONTINUE ON PAGE 3

Form MP-10002

Page 3

(DRAFT)

If not shown, please enter your 11-digit Census File
Number (CFN) from the mailing address.
4

During 2010 and 2015, how frequently were the key performance indicators reviewed by non-managers at this
establishment?
Mark all that apply
Non-managers are all employees at the establishment who are not managers as defined in

3

.
2010

2015

Yearly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Quarterly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Monthly

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Weekly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Daily . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hourly or more frequently . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Never
5

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

During 2010 and 2015, where were the production display boards showing output and other key performance indicators
located at this establishment?
Mark one box for each year

2010

All display boards were located in one place (e.g. at the end of the production line)

2015

. .

Display boards were located in multiple places (e.g. at multiple stages of the production
line) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
We did not have any display boards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6

In 2010 and 2015, what best describes the time frame of production targets at this establishment?
Mark one box for each year
Examples of production targets are: production, quality, efficiency, waste, on-time delivery.
2010

2015

Main focus was on short-term (less than one year) production targets . . . . . . . . .
Main focus was on long-term (more than one year) production targets . . . . . . . . .
Combination of short-term and long-term production targets

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

No production targets (If no production targets in both years, SKIP to

10002038

7

13 )

. . . . . . .

In 2010 and 2015, how easy or difficult was it for this establishment to achieve its production targets?
Mark one box for each year

2010

2015

Possible to achieve without much effort . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Possible to achieve with some effort . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Possible to achieve with normal amount of effort . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Possible to achieve with more than normal effort . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Only possible to achieve with extraordinary effort

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

CONTINUE ON PAGE 4

Form MP-10002
8

Page 4

(DRAFT)

In 2010 and 2015, who was aware of the production targets at this establishment?
2010

Mark one box for each year

2015

Only senior managers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Most managers and some production workers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Most managers and most production workers
All managers and most production workers
9

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

In 2010 and 2015, what were non-managers' performance bonuses usually based on at this establishment?
Mark all that apply

2010

2015

Their own performance as measured by production targets . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Their team or shift performance as measured by production targets . . . . . . . . . .
Their establishment's performance as measured by production targets . . . . . . . . .
Their company's performance as measured by production targets . . . . . . . . . . .
No performance bonuses (If no performance bonuses in both years, SKIP to

11 )

. . . .

10 In 2010 and 2015, when production targets were met, what percent of non-managers at this establishment received
performance bonuses?
Mark one box for each year

2010

2015

0% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1-33%

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

34-66% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
67-99% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
100% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Production targets not met

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

11 In 2010 and 2015, what were managers' performance bonuses usually based on at this establishment?
Mark all that apply

2010

2015

Their own performance as measured by production targets . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Their team or shift performance as measured by production targets . . . . . . . . . .

10002046

Their establishment's performance as measured by production targets . . . . . . . . .
Their company's performance as measured by production targets . . . . . . . . . . .
No performance bonuses (If no performance bonuses in both years, SKIP to

13 )

. . . .

CONTINUE ON PAGE 5

Form MP-10002

Page 5

(DRAFT)

If not shown, please enter your 11-digit Census File
Number (CFN) from the mailing address.
12 In 2010 and 2015, when production targets were met, what percentage of managers at this establishment received
performance bonuses?
2010

Mark one box for each year

2015

0% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1-33%

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

34-66% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
67-99% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
100% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Production targets not met

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

13 In 2010 and 2015, what was the primary way non-managers were promoted at this establishment?
2010

Mark one box for each year

2015

Promotions were based solely on performance and ability . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Promotions were based partly on performance and ability, and partly on other factors
(for example, tenure or family connections) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Promotions were based mainly on factors other than performance and ability (for
example, tenure or family connections) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-managers are normally not promoted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
14 In 2010 and 2015, what was the primary way managers were promoted at this establishment?
2010

Mark one box for each year

2015

Promotions were based solely on performance and ability . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Promotions were based partly on performance and ability, and partly on other factors
(for example, tenure or family connections) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Promotions were based mainly on factors other than performance and ability (for
example, tenure or family connections) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Managers are normally not promoted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
15 In 2010 and 2015, when was an under-performing non-manager reassigned or dismissed at this establishment?
2010

Mark one box for each year
Within 6 months of identifying non-manager under-performance

2015

. . . . . . . . . . .

After 6 months of identifying non-manager under-performance . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rarely or never . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

10002053

16 In 2010 and 2015, when was an under-performing manager reassigned or dismissed at this establishment?
Mark one box for each year

2010

2015

Within 6 months of identifying manager under-performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
After 6 months of identifying manager under-performance

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Rarely or never . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

CONTINUE ON PAGE 6

Form MP-10002

Page 6

(DRAFT)

Section B - Organization
17 In 2010 and 2015, was the headquarters for this company at the same location as this establishment?
2010

Mark one box for each year
Yes (If yes in both years, SKIP to

24 )

2015

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

No . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
If no, what state (if in the US) or country (if abroad)? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
18 In 2010 and 2015, where were decisions on hiring permanent full-time employees made for this establishment?
Mark one box for each year

2010

2015

Only at this establishment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Only at headquarters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Both at this establishment and at headquarters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other (please specify)
19 In 2010 and 2015, where were decisions to give an employee a pay increase of at least 10% made for
this establishment?
Mark one box for each year

2010

2015

Only at this establishment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Only at headquarters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Both at this establishment and at headquarters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other (please specify)
20 In 2010 and 2015, where were decisions on new product introductions made for this establishment?
Mark one box for each year

2010

2015

2010

2015

Only at this establishment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Only at headquarters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Both at this establishment and at headquarters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other (please specify)
21 In 2010 and 2015, where were product pricing decisions made for this establishment?

10002061

Mark one box for each year
Only at this establishment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Only at headquarters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Both at this establishment and at headquarters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other (please specify)

CONTINUE ON PAGE 7

Form MP-10002

Page 7

(DRAFT)

If not shown, please enter your 11-digit Census File
Number (CFN) from the mailing address.
22 In 2010 and 2015, where were advertising decisions for products made for this establishment?
Mark one box for each year

2010

2015

Only at this establishment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Only at headquarters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Both at this establishment and at headquarters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other (please specify)
23 In 2010 and 2015, what was the dollar amount that could be used to purchase a fixed/capital asset for this establishment
without prior authorization from headquarters?
Mark one box for each year

2010

2015

Under $1,000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$1,000 to $9,999

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$10,000 to $99,999
$100,000 to $999,999
$1 million or more

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Section C - Data and Decision Making
24 In 2010 and 2015, what best describes the availability of data to support decision making at this establishment?
Mark one box for each year

2010

2015

Data to support decision making are not available. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A small amount of data to support decision making is available . . . . . . . . . . . .
A moderate amount of data to support decision making is available . . . . . . . . . .
A great deal of data to support decision making is available . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
All the data we need to support decision making is available

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

25 In 2010 and 2015, what best describes the use of data to support decision making at this establishment?
Mark one box for each year

10002079

Decision making does not use data

2010

2015

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Decision making relies slightly on data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decision making relies moderately on data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decision making relies heavily on data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decision making relies entirely on data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

CONTINUE ON PAGE 8

Form MP-10002

Page 8

(DRAFT)

26 In 2010 and 2015, who chose what type of data to collect at this establishment?
Mark all that apply

2010

2015

Managers at this establishment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Managers at other establishments including headquarters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Production workers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Engineers

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Customers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Government regulations or agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
27 a) Consider each of the following sources of data and rate how frequently each source was used in
decision making at this establishment in 2015.
Mark all that apply

Daily

Weekly

Monthly

Yearly

Never

Production performance indicators (as defined in
question 2 ) from production technology or instruments
Formal or informal feedback from managers . . . . . .
Formal or informal feedback from production workers . .
Data from outside the firm (suppliers, customers, outside
data providers) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
b) Now think back to five years ago. How frequently was each source of data used in decision making at
this establishment in 2010?
Mark all that apply

Daily

Weekly

Monthly

Yearly

Never

Production performance indicators (as defined in
question 2 ) from production technology or instruments
Formal or informal feedback from managers . . . . . .
Formal or informal feedback from production workers . .
Data from outside the firm (suppliers, customers, outside
data providers) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
28 a) How often was each of these activities influenced by data analysis at this establishment in 2015?
Mark all that apply
Design of new products or services

Daily

Weekly

Monthly

Yearly

Never

. . . . . . . . . .

Demand forecasting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

10002087

Supply chain management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
b) Now think back to five years ago. How often was each of these activities influenced by data analysis at
this establishment in 2010?
Mark all that apply
Design of new products or services

Daily

Weekly

Monthly

Yearly

Never

. . . . . . . . . .

Demand forecasting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Supply chain management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

CONTINUE ON PAGE 9

Form MP-10002

Page 9

(DRAFT)

If not shown, please enter your 11-digit Census File
Number (CFN) from the mailing address.
29 How frequently does this establishment typically rely on predictive analytics (statistical models that provide forecasts in
areas such as demand, production, or human resources)?
2010

Mark all that apply

2015

Daily . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weekly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Monthly

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Yearly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Never

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Section D - Uncertainty
This section on Uncertainty will be used to measure the amount of uncertainty faced by manufacturing establishments.
The questions that follow ask for your views on current and future outcomes for your plant. When responding, please
estimate current outcomes and project future outcomes to the best of your ability.
30

For calendar years 2015 and 2016, what are the approximate dollar values of products shipped, including interplant
transfers, exports and other receipts at this establishment? Exclude freight charges and excise taxes.
$Bil.

Mil.

Thou.

For 2015 calendar year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Estimate for 2016 calendar year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
31 Looking ahead to the 2017 calendar year, what is the approximate dollar value of products shipped you would
anticipate for this establishment in the following scenarios, and what likelihood do you assign to each scenario?

10002095

2017 scenarios,
from lowest to
highest

Approximate dollar value of
shipments in 2017
$Bil.

Mil.

Thou.

Percentage likelihood
(values in this column
should sum to 100)

LOWEST

%

LOW

%

MEDIUM

%

HIGH

%

HIGHEST

%

Total

1 0 0

%

CONTINUE ON PAGE 10

Form MP-10002

Page 10

(DRAFT)

32 For calendar years 2015 and 2016, what are the approximate dollar values of capital expenditures for new and used
depreciable assets at this establishment? Include buildings and other structures, machinery and equipment. Exclude land.
$Bil.

Mil.

Thou.

For 2015 calendar year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Estimate for 2016 calendar year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
33 Looking ahead to the 2017 calendar year, what is the approximate dollar value of capital expenditures you would
anticipate for this establishment in the following scenarios, and what likelihood do you assign to each scenario?
2017 scenarios,
from lowest to
highest

Approximate dollar value of capital
expenditures in 2017
$Bil.

Mil.

Thou.

Percentage likelihood
(values in this column
should sum to 100)

LOWEST

%

LOW

%

MEDIUM

%

HIGH

%

HIGHEST

%

Total

1 0 0

%

34 For the following dates, what was the total number of employees (full-time plus part-time) on the payroll at this
establishment? Exclude full- or part-time leased employees whose payroll was filed by an employee leasing company,
temporary staffing obtained from a staffing service, and purchased professional and technical services.
Number

On March 12, 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

10002103

On March 12, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

CONTINUE ON PAGE 11

Form MP-10002

Page 11

(DRAFT)

If not shown, please enter your 11-digit Census File
Number (CFN) from the mailing address.
35 Looking ahead, approximately how many employees would you anticipate on this establishment's payroll as of March
12, 2017 in the following scenarios, and what likelihood do you assign to each scenario?
2017 scenarios,
from lowest to
highest

Approximate number of
employees on payroll as
of March 12, 2017

Percentage likelihood
(values in this column
should sum to 100)

LOWEST

%

LOW

%

MEDIUM

%

HIGH

%

HIGHEST

%

Total

1 0 0

%

36 For calendar years 2015 and 2016, what are the approximate dollar expenditures for this establishment on production
related costs? Include the cost of materials, parts, containers, packaging; the cost of products bought and sold without
further processing; the cost of purchased fuels consumed for heat power, or the generation of electricity; the cost of
purchased electricity; and the cost of work done for you by others on your materials.
$Bil.

Mil.

Thou.

For 2015 calendar year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

10002111

Estimate for 2016 calendar year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

CONTINUE ON PAGE 12

Form MP-10002

Page 12

(DRAFT)

37 Looking ahead to the 2017 calendar year, what are the approximate dollar expenditures on production related costs
you would anticipate for this establishment in the following scenarios, and what likelihood do you assign to each
scenario?
2017 scenarios,
from lowest to
highest

Approximate dollar cost of
production related costs in 2017
$Bil.

Mil.

Thou.

Percentage likelihood
(values in this column
should sum to 100)

LOWEST

%

LOW

%

MEDIUM

%

HIGH

%

HIGHEST

%

Total

%

Section E - Background Characteristics
Year

38 What year did you start working at this establishment? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
39 What was the number of managers at this establishment for the pay periods including March 12, 2010 and
March 12, 2015?
A manager is someone who has employees directly reporting to them, with whom they meet on a regular basis, and
whose pay and promotion they may be involved with, e.g., Plant Manager, Human Resource Manager, Quality Manager.
2010

Number of managers at this establishment (Estimates are acceptable)

2015

. . . . . . . . . . .

40 In 2010 and 2015, what was the percent of managers at this establishment with a bachelors degree?
Mark one box for each year

2010

2015

20% or less . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

10002129

21%-40% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
41%-60% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
61%-80% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
More than 80% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

CONTINUE ON PAGE 13

Form MP-10002

Page 13

(DRAFT)

If not shown, please enter your 11-digit Census File
Number (CFN) from the mailing address.
41 In 2010 and 2015, what was the percent of non-managers at this establishment with a bachelors degree?
Mark one box for each year

2010

2015

0% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1-10%

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

11-20% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
More than 20% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
42 In 2010 and 2015, what percent of all employees at this establishment were members of a labor union?
Mark one box for each year

2010

2015

0% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1-20%

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

21-40% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
41-60% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
61-80% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
More than 80% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
43 In 2010 and 2015, what percent of employees at this establishment could be classified in the following ways?
Estimates are acceptable.

2010

2015

Employees who were part-time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

%

%

Employees who were working flexible hours . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

%

%

Employees who were cross-trained or rotated jobs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

%

%

44 In 2010 and 2015, which of the following best described the production of this establishment?
Mark one box for each year

2010

2015

Job shop . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Batch production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

10002137

Continuous flow

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Research and development or prototyping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cellular manufacturing

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

CONTINUE ON PAGE 14

Form MP-10002

Page 14

(DRAFT)

45 Is this establishment owned by a family firm?
Mark one box
Yes, the founder owns it
Yes, a relative of the founder owns it (e.g., daughter, son, sister, brother)
No, not a family firm or a family firm not owned by the founder's family
If yes to either of the above, is the CEO of the firm also a family member?
Yes
No
46 Is this establishment part of a multinational firm which has production establishments in other countries?
Yes
No
REMARKS (Please use this space for any explanations that may be essential in understanding your reported data.)

$$CENSUS_REMARKS$$

47 CERTIFICATION - This report is substantially accurate and was prepared in accordance with the instructions.
Is the time period covered by this report a calendar
year?

10002145

Yes

Month

No - Enter time period covered

Telephone

-

Year

TO
Title

Number

-

Month

FROM

Name of person to contact regarding this report

Area code

Year

Extension

-

Area code

Fax

Internet e-mail address

Number

Month

Day

Year

Date
completed

Thank you for completing your 2015 MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATIONAL PRACTICES form.
PLEASE PHOTOCOPY THIS FORM FOR YOUR RECORDS AND RETURN THE ORIGINAL.