Rule 3a68-2 (Interpretation of Swaps, Security-Based Swaps, and Mixed Swaps) and Rule 3a68-4(c) (Process for Determining Regulatory Treatment for Mixed Swaps)
ICR 201508-3235-003
OMB: 3235-0685
Federal Form Document
⚠️ Notice: This information collection may be outdated. More recent filings for OMB 3235-0685 can be found here:
Rule 3a68-2 (Interpretation
of Swaps, Security-Based Swaps, and Mixed Swaps) and Rule 3a68-4(c)
(Process for Determining Regulatory Treatment for Mixed Swaps)
Extension without change of a currently approved collection
Rule 3a68-2 creates a process for
interested persons to request a joint interpretation by the
Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading
Commission regarding whether a particular instrument (or class of
instruments) is a swap, a security-based swap, or both (i.e., a
mixed swap). Rule 3a68-4(c) establishes a process for persons to
request that the Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity
Futures Trading Commission issue a joint order permitting such
persons (and any other person or persons that subsequently lists,
trades, or clears that class of mixed swap) to comply, as to
parallel provisions only, with specified parallel provisions of
either the Commodity Exchange Act or the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and related rules and regulations, instead of being required
to comply with parallel provisions of both the CEA and the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. For purposes of rule 3a68-4(c)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, "parallel provisions"
means comparable provisions of the CEA and the Exchange Act that
were added or amended by Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act with
respect to security-based swaps and swaps, and the rules and
regulations thereunder.
The Costs to Respondents
changed from that previously submitted based upon an amortization
of the number of requests the SEC expects to receive over three
years, eliminating the differentiation between the numbers of
requests the SEC expects to receive during the first versus the
subsequent two years. In the Paperwork Reduction Act supporting
statement previously submitted, the SEC estimated receiving 50
requests for a joint interpretation pursuant to Rule 3a68-2 in the
first year and 10 requests in the ensuing years, totaling 70
requests for three years. The SEC now estimates receiving 25
requests for a joint interpretation pursuant to Rule 3a68-2 each
year, totaling 75 requests for three years. In the Paperwork
Reduction Act supporting statement previously submitted, the SEC
estimated receiving 20 requests for a joint order pursuant to Rule
3a68-4(c) in the first year and 5 requests in the ensuing years,
totaling 30 requests for three years. The SEC now estimates
receiving 10 requests for a joint order pursuant to Rule 3a68-4(c)
each year, totaling 30 requests for three years.
$0
No
No
No
Yes
No
Uncollected
Kateryna Imus 202
551-5763
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.