The Federal Mine Safety and Health Act
of 1977 (Mine Act), as amended, places the ultimate responsibility
on mine operators for ensuring the safety and health of miners. The
legislative history of the Mine Act emphasizes that Congress
included the pattern of violations (POV) provision for mine
operators who demonstrated a disregard for the safety and health of
miners through a recurring pattern of significant and substantial
(S&S) violations. MSHA was to use the POV provision in
situations where other enforcement actions had been ineffective at
bringing the mines into compliance with safety and health
standards. This final rule will simplify the POV criteria, improve
consistency in applying the POV criteria, and more adequately
achieve the statutory intent. It also will encourage chronic
violators to take proactive measures to comply with the Mine Act
and MSHA's safety and health standards to bring their mines into
compliance. This final rule contains a provision subject to review
and approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA). MSHA is submitting this information collection package to
OMB for review under 44 U.S.C. § 3504, paragraph (h) of the PRA, as
amended (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). The existing rule included
mitigating circumstances under the initial screening criteria, but
does not define mitigating circumstances. MSHA explains its intent
in policy. The final rule incorporates the initial screening
criteria into the pattern criteria for placing a mine in a POV
status. The preamble to the final rule states that MSHA will
consider an operator's effective implementation of an MSHA-approved
corrective action program as a mitigating circumstance. MSHA
expects that most mine operators, who compare their compliance
record with the POV criteria on MSHA's Web site and determine that
they are approaching a POV level, will submit a written corrective
action program to the District Manager for approval and work to
bring their mines into compliance to avoid being issued a POV
notice, which could result in the temporary closure of the mine or
sections of the mine. MSHA believes that an operator who implements
a corrective action program is demonstrating a commitment to
complying with MSHA's standards and regulations, and to restoring
safe and healthful conditions for miners.
US Code:
30 USC 814(e) 957 Name of Law: Federal Mine Safety and Health
Act of 1977 (Mine Act)
US Code:
30 USC 814(e)(1,2,3 &4) Name of Law: Federal Mine Safety
and Health Act of 1977 (Mine Act)
Respondents: There has been a
decrease of respondents (from 249 to 100). This is due to a high
Agency estimate to what the Agency currently experiences and can be
attributed in part to improved compliance as a result of actions
taken by MSHA such as impact inspections. Responses: There has been
a decrease of responses (from 249 to 100). This is due to the
decrease in respondents. Burden Hours: There has been a decrease of
20,264 burden hours (from 33,864 to 13,600). This is due to a high
Agency estimate to what the Agency currently experiences and can be
attributed in part to improved compliance as a result of actions
taken by MSHA such as impact inspections. Cost: There has been a
decrease in annual cost of $14,900 (from $24,900 to $10,000). This
is due to a high Agency estimate to what the Agency currently
experiences and can be attributed in part to improved compliance as
a result of actions taken by MSHA such as impact inspections.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.