Published 30 Day FR Notice

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 86 / Monday, May 5, 2014 / Notices
questions regarding filing should
contact the Secretary (202–205–2000).
Any person desiring to submit a
document to the Commission in
confidence must request confidential
treatment. All such requests should be
directed to the Secretary to the
Commission and must include a full
statement of the reasons why the
Commission should grant such
treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents
for which confidential treatment by the
Commission is properly sought will be
treated accordingly. All nonconfidential
written submissions will be available for
public inspection at the Office of the
Secretary and on EDIS.5
This action is taken under the
authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337),
and of sections 201.10 and 210.8(c) of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 210.8(c)).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: April 30, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014–10230 Filed 5–2–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–744 (Remand)]

Investigations: Terminations,
Modifications and Rulings: Certain
Mobile Devices, Associated Software,
and Components Thereof
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission (‘‘the Commission’’) has
determined to terminate the abovecaptioned investigation because the
only remaining asserted patent has
expired.

SUMMARY:

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3115. Copies of all non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone 202–205–2000. General
5 Electronic Document Information System
(EDIS): http://edis.usitc.gov.

VerDate Mar<15>2010

17:56 May 02, 2014

Jkt 232001

information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov).
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at http://
edis.usitc.gov/. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
the matter can be obtained by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on November 5, 2010, based on a
complaint filed by Microsoft
Corporation of Redmond, Washington
(‘‘Microsoft’’). 75 FR 68379–80 (Nov. 5,
2010). The complaint alleges violations
of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain mobile devices, associated
software, and components thereof by
reason of infringement of U.S. Patent
Nos. 5,579,517 (‘‘the ’517 patent’’);
5,758,352 (‘‘the ’352 patent’’); 6,621,746
(‘‘the ’746 patent’’); 6,826,762 (‘‘the ’762
patent’’); 6,909,910 (‘‘the ’910 patent’’);
7,644,376 (‘‘the ’376 patent’’); 5,664,133
(‘‘the ’133 patent’’); 6,578,054 (‘‘the ’054
patent’’); and 6,370,566 (‘‘the ’566
patent’’). Subsequently, the ’517 and the
’746 patents were terminated from the
investigation. The notice of
investigation, as amended, names
Motorola Mobility, Inc., of Libertyville,
Illinois, and Motorola, Inc., of
Schaumburg, Illinois (collectively,
‘‘Motorola’’), as respondents. Motorola,
Inc., n/k/a Motorola Solutions, was
terminated from the investigation based
on withdrawal of infringement
allegations on July 12, 2011.
The presiding ALJ issued the final ID
on violation in this investigation on
December 20, 2011, finding a violation
of section 337 only with respect to the
’566 patent. The Commission affirmed
the ALJ’s finding and issued a limited
exclusion order barring the entry of
articles that infringe the ’566 patent. See
Commission Opinion at 36 (May 18,
2012).
Microsoft appealed to the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the Federal Circuit for
review of the Commission’s
determination of no violation with
respect to the ’054, ’762, ’376, and ’133
patents. On October 3, 2013, the Federal
Circuit affirmed the Commission’s
determination of no violation with
respect to the ’054, ’762, and ’376
patents. The Federal Circuit remanded
consideration of the ’133 patent to the
Commission, with instructions to apply
a different construction of the asserted

PO 00000

Frm 00057

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

25617

’133 patent claims. Microsoft Corp. v.
Int’l Trade Comm’n, 731 F.3d 1354
(Fed. Cir. 2013). On December 16, 2013,
the Federal Circuit affirmed the
Commission’s exclusion order based on
infringement of the ’566 patent.
Motorola Mobility, LLC v. Int’l Trade
Comm’n, 737 F.3d 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2013).
On December 13, 2013, the remanded
’133 patent expired. On December 16,
2013, Motorola filed a motion with the
Federal Circuit seeking to have the
court’s decision with respect to that
patent vacated based on mootness due
to the expiration of the ’133 patent. On
January 3, 2014, in a non-precedential
order, the Federal Circuit denied
Motorola’s motion. Microsoft Corp. v.
Int’l Trade Comm’n, Appeal No. 2012–
1445, Order (Fed. Cir. Jan. 3, 2014). The
court stated its conclusion was not
dependent on ‘‘whether the Commission
can any longer take action on the ’133
patent or otherwise has any continuing
interest in this matter.’’ Id. at 2.
Because the ’133 patent has expired,
the Commission has determined no
remedy may issue in this investigation.
The Commission has therefore
terminated the investigation.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: April 30, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014–10231 Filed 5–2–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1125–0002]

Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed eCollection;
eComments Requested; Notice of
Appeal From a Decision of an
Immigration Judge
Executive Office for
Immigration Review, Department of
Justice.
ACTION: 30-day notice.
AGENCY:

The Department of Justice
(DOJ), Executive Office for Immigration
Review (EOIR), will be submitting the
following information collection request
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed
information collection was previously
published in the Federal Register

SUMMARY:

E:\FR\FM\05MYN1.SGM

05MYN1

25618

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 86 / Monday, May 5, 2014 / Notices

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Volume 79, Number 37, page 10563, on
February 25, 2014, allowing for a 60 day
comment period.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted for an additional 30
days until June 4, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have comments especially on the
estimated public burden or associated
response time, suggestions, or need a
copy of the proposed information
collection instrument with instructions
or additional information, please
contact Jeff Rosenblum, General
Counsel, USDOJ–EOIR–OGC, Suite
2600, 5107 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church,
Virginia 20530; telephone: (703) 305–
0470.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
process is conducted in accordance with
5 CFR 1320.10. Written comments and
suggestions from the public and affected
agencies concerning the proposed
collection of information are
encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of This Information
Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Extension of a currently approved
collection.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection:
Notice of Appeal from a Decision of an
Immigration Judge.
(3) Agency form number: EOIR–26
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Primary: A party (either the
U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement of the Department of
Homeland Security or the respondent/
applicant) who appeals a decision of an
Immigration Judge to the Board of

VerDate Mar<15>2010

17:56 May 02, 2014

Jkt 232001

Immigration Appeals (Board). Other:
None. Abstract: A party affected by a
decision of an Immigration Judge may
appeal that decision to the Board,
provided the Board has jurisdiction
pursuant to 8 CFR 1003.1(b). An appeal
from an Immigration Judge’s decision is
taken by completing the Form EOIR–26
and submitting it to the Board.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: It is estimated that 20,141
respondents will complete the form
annually with an average of thirty
minutes per response.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: There are an estimated
10,070.5 total burden hours associated
with this collection annually.
If additional information is required
contact: Jerri Murray, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Two Constitution
Square, 145 N Street NE., Room
3E.405B, Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: April 30, 2014.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S.
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2014–10183 Filed 5–2–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–30–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1122–NEW]

Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed eCollection
eComments Requested; New
Collection Certification of Compliance
With the Statutory Eligibility
Requirements of the Violence Against
Women Act as Amended and the
Prison Rape Elimination Act for
Applicants to the STOP (Services*
Training* Officers* Prosecutors)
Violence Against Women Formula
Grant Program
Office on Violence Against
Women, Department of Justice.
ACTION: 30-Day notice.
AGENCY:

The Department of Justice
(DOJ), Office on Violence Against
Women, will be submitting the
following information collection request
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed
information collection was previously
published in the Federal Register
Volume 79, Number 17, page 10557, on

SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00058

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

February 25, 2014, allowing for a 60 day
comment period.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted for 30 days until June
4, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have comments especially on the
estimated public burden or associated
response time, suggestions, or need a
copy of the proposed information
collection instrument with instructions
or additional information, please
contact Cathy Poston, Attorney Advisor,
Office on Violence Against Women, 145
N Street NE., Washington, DC 20530
(phone: 202–514–5430).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
process is conducted in accordance with
5 CFR 1320.10. Written comments and
suggestions from the public and affected
agencies concerning the proposed
collection of information are
encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of This Information
Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection:
New collection.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection:
Certification of Compliance with the
Statutory Eligibility Requirements of the
Violence Against Women Act as
Amended and the Prison Rape
Elimination Act for Applicants to the
STOP (Services* Training* Officers*
Prosecutors) Violence Against Women
Formula Grant Program.
(3) Agency form number: 1122–XXXX.
The applicable component within the
Department of Justice is the Office on
Violence Against Women.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief

E:\FR\FM\05MYN1.SGM

05MYN1