About the Research
Browse Indicator Information
Demonstrations
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neither Agree nor Disagree |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
The website was easy to navigate. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The website content was well organized. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The available content was informative. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I was able to find information of interest to me. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The overall website experience was engaging. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes
No
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neither Agree nor Disagree |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
DOSII research resources and interactive pages were informative. |
|
|
|
|
|
It was easy to use the features (e.g., sort, filter, search) in the search utility. |
|
|
|
|
|
It was easy to find information I was looking for. |
|
|
|
|
|
The appropriate level of information was presented. |
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator source websites or information was accessible. |
|
|
|
|
|
The User's Guide was easy to find and understand. |
|
|
|
|
|
It was easy to find related downloadable material. |
|
|
|
|
|
The overall organization of the information made sense. |
|
|
|
|
|
Yes
No
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neither Agree nor Disagree |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
EQI research resources and interactive map(s) were informative. |
|
|
|
|
|
It was easy to use the map features (e.g., zoom, pan, pop-up information) in the map utility. |
|
|
|
|
|
Map legend(s) were understandable. |
|
|
|
|
|
It was easy to find information I was looking for. |
|
|
|
|
|
The appropriate level of information was presented. |
|
|
|
|
|
It was easy to find related downloadable material and additional map features using the link to EPA's GeoPlatform Map Services. |
|
|
|
|
|
The overall organization of the information made sense. |
|
|
|
|
|
Yes
No
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neither Agree nor Disagree |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
HWBI research resources and interactive map visualization were informative. |
|
|
|
|
|
It was easy to use the features available in the interactive demonstration (e.g., zoom, pan, pop-up information, drill-down levels, regional views). |
|
|
|
|
|
Map legends were understandable. |
|
|
|
|
|
It was easy to find information I was looking for. |
|
|
|
|
|
The appropriate level of information was presented. |
|
|
|
|
|
The User's Guide was easy to find and understand. |
|
|
|
|
|
It was easy to find related downloadable material. |
|
|
|
|
|
The overall organization of the information made sense. |
|
|
|
|
|
User's Guides (if applicable)
Links to indicator, map and publication sources.
Indicator information summaries (Human Well-Being Index interactive feature)
Downloadable material options
Definition of terms
Other - Write In:
Using an interactive, slider-based scenario builder to help visualize the potential influence of decision choices on the Human Well-Being Index and related components.
Community-specific and/or health outcome -related demonstration(s) of the Environmental Quality Index
An interactive feature that demonstrates the influence of community values/priorities in characterizing well-being.
Information that describes how others are using or have used the indicator results or development approaches described in the website.
Downloads or links to external sources.
Inform own research.
Inform sustainability decision-making activities.
Conduct community outreach and engagement.
Explore topics of personal interest.
Other - Write In:
I'm not sure what I'd use it for.
It is too difficult to navigate or find information.
There is not enough information.
The website content is difficult to understand or interpret.
The website content is not interesting or engaging.
Other - Write In:
Planning
Policy
Research/Academia
Education
General
Other - Write In:
National
Regional
State/Local
Tribal
Other - Write In:
Affiliation/Organization::
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
Author | Suzuki, Judy |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2021-01-24 |