Survey 2 - Survey of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Habitat Conservation Bank Managers

Survey of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Habitat Conservation Bank Sponsors and Managers

1018-Conservation Bank Survey 2 (manager) Instrument- rev 11-23-15 final 2015

Survey 2 - Survey of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Habitat Conservation Bank Managers

OMB: 1018-0161

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

OMB Control No: 1018-XXXX

Expiration Date: XX/XX/2018

Survey of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Habitat Conservation Bank Managers




The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the Department of the Interior’s Office of Policy Analysis are undertaking an analysis of the USFWS habitat conservation banking program. As part of this analysis, we are surveying conservation bank sponsors and managers to obtain information on experiences with and opinions of various aspects of the conservation banking program. Your responses as a conservation bank manager are critical to our efforts. Responses to the survey are anonymous and will be reported in aggregate form.

If you have any questions or have trouble completing the survey, please contact Sarah Cline, DOI Office of Policy Analysis, at 202-208-6018 or sarah_cline@ios.doi.gov.





















Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This survey is authorized by the Endangered Species Act. It will provide information necessary for us to understand the current performance of the conservation banking program and to identify areas where the program can be improved. Your response is voluntary. We may not conduct or sponsor and you are not required to respond to an information collection unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. We estimate that it will take conservation bank managers about 15 minutes to complete this survey, including time to gather information, read instructions, and complete the survey. You may send comments on any aspect of this information collection to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 5275 Leesburg Pike, (Mail Stop BPHC), Falls Church, VA 22041

The questions in this survey pertain to your direct professional experiences with habitat conservation banking, not wetlands or stream mitigation banking. Please answer the following questions based solely on your experience with habitat conservation banks administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service or jointly by the USFWS and another agency.



  1. Are you involved with the development and/or management of individual conservation banks (preparing and submitting banking documents, land management, etc.)?

    1. Yes

    2. No





  1. What is your role in conservation banking? (Please choose all that apply)

  1. Bank Sponsor

  2. Landowner

  3. Bank Manager

  4. Other: _____________________________



  1. How many years have you been involved in conservation banking?

______________________________



  1. How many banks have you helped develop?

______________________________



  1. Have you participated in any conservation banking training (as an instructor or participant)? (Please select all that apply)

  1. Yes – Instructor

  2. Yes – Participant

  3. No



  1. How familiar are you with 2003 USFWS “Guidance for the Establishment, Use, and Operation of Conservation Banks”? (Please select one answer below)

  1. Very familiar

  2. Somewhat familiar

  3. Unfamiliar



  1. Currently, no regulations exist to guide the development of conservation banks. Do you feel that changes to the current guidance (mentioned in Question 6) or the development of new conservation banking regulations are needed? (Please select one answer below)

    1. Yes – Changes to current guidance

    2. Yes – Development of new regulations

    3. Yes – Both changes to guidance and development of new regulations

    4. No

    5. No opinion



  1. In your opinion, what is the perception of conservation banks as a conservation tool for each of the different groups listed below? (Please select one response for each item below)


Very negative

Somewhat negative

Neutral

Somewhat positive

Very positive

Don’t know/No opinion

List Field/Regional Office

USFWS - Field office








USFWS - Regional office








USFWS - National office








Other Federal agencies








State agencies








Local government








Local Non-Governmental Organizations








Energy, mining & related industries








Manufacturing








Shipping/transportation industries








Real estate developers








Private landowners










  1. Based on your experience, how likely is each of the following factors to lengthen the USFWS review time for banking agreements? (Please select one response for each item below)


Extremely unlikely

Unlikely

Neutral

Likely

Extremely likely

Don’t know/No Opinion

Insufficient USFWS staffing







Unsupportive USFWS management







USFWS staff not adequately trained







Government legal review and approval







Inexperienced bankers







Long or complex banking agreements







Lack of standardized documents/templates







Determination of credits







Coordination with other Federal, State, or local agencies







Lack of defined timeline







Other: _____________________









  1. In your opinion, how important are each of the following factors in hindering conservation bank creation? (Please select one response for each item below)


Not at all important

Somewhat important

Important

Very important

Don’t know/No opinion

Unsuitability of species for banking






Weak demand for credits






Lack of start-up funding






Landowners not willing to sell land or easement






Economic uncertainty/risk






Other mitigation options substitute for banking






Lack of USFWS support






Lack of USFWS Field Office experience






Lack of clear deadlines/timelines for USFWS






Delayed USFWS response






Lack of ESA enforcement






Lack of species and habitat data






Other: ______________








  1. To what extent do you agree that each of the following changes to the FWS conservation banking program would make conservation bank creation easier? (Please select one response for each item below)


Strongly disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Don’t know/No opinion

Known timeline after complete submission







Expressed preference by USFWS for advance compensatory mitigation







Equivalent standards for all types of compensatory mitigation







Policy preference for conservation banking above other compensatory mitigation options







Approved conservation banking document templates in use in all regions







Formal conservation banking regulations







Other: ______________









  1. In your opinion, to what extent are the following factors good measures of conservation bank success for your company, for species and for credit purchasers? (Please select one response for each item below)


Very Poor Measure

Poor Measure

Neutral

Good Measure

Very Good Measure

Don’t know

Meeting criteria for recovery plan/Accomplishing conservation goals







Maintaining a stable population/growing the species







Linking existing conservation/natural areas







Increasing the number of acres of “preserved” habitat







Increasing the number of acres of critical habitat secured







Preserving ecologically valuable private lands







Minimizing costs to project proponents







Number of credit sales







Conservation bank profitability







Reinvestment of capital in additional banks







Other:________________









  1. In your opinion, to what extent is each of the following factors a good measure of conservation bank ecological performance? (Please select one response for each item below)


Very Poor Measure

Poor Measure

Neutral

Good Measure

Very Good Measure

Don’t know/No opinion

Index of biological integrity







Indicator species number and diversity







Habitat conditions







Number of individuals of the species







Health of ecosystem







Species threats addressed







Other: ______________









  1. How would you rate the availability of species and habitat data in your region(s)? (Please answer for each region in which you work)

Region

Very poor

Poor

Fair

Good

Very good

Don’t know/No opinion

1

(Pacific)







2

(Southwest)







3

(Great Lakes-Big Rivers)







4

(Southeast)







5

(Northeast)







6

(Mountain-Prairie)







7

(Alaska)







8

(California & Nevada)







Region 1: ID, OR, WA, HI, Pacific Islands; Region 2: AZ, NM, OK, TX; Region 3: IL, IN, IA, MI, MO, MN, OH, WI; Region 4: AL, AR, FL, GA, KY, LA, MS, NC, PR/VI, SC, TN; Region 5: CT, DE, ME, MD, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT, VA, WV; Region 6: CO, KS, MT, ND, NE, SD, UT, WY; Region 7: AK; Region 8: CA, NV



  1. In your opinion, how important are the following factors in impeding conservation bank operations? (Please select one response for each item below)


Not at all important

Somewhat important

Important

Very important

Don’t know/No opinion

USFWS reticence to publicize availability of conservation banking






HCPs without conservation banking option






State or local government agencies unwilling to accept use of conservation banks






Other:______________________








Wetlands Mitigation Banking

The questions in this section pertain to your experiences with wetlands and stream mitigation banking only, not habitat conservation banking. Please answer the following questions based solely on your direct professional experience with wetlands and/or stream mitigation banking only.

  1. How familiar are you with wetlands mitigation banking? (Please select one answer below)

  1. Very familiar

  2. Somewhat familiar

  3. Unfamiliar

If you answered c, skip to Question 19

  1. In your view, how does conservation banking compare with wetlands mitigation banking in the following areas? (Please select one response for each item below)


Worse

About the Same

Better

Don’t know

Length of time required for review/approval of conservation banks





Ease of application process for conservation banks





Developer’s cost to establish conservation banks





Ease of determining the total number of available credits for conservation banks





Monitoring requirements – timing, cost, complexity for conservation banks





Ecological performance of conservation banks





Ability to measure ecological performance of conservation banks





Government administrative costs of conservation banks (including oversight)







  1. How familiar are you with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Final Rule (2008) related to wetlands mitigation banking? (Please select one answer below)

  1. Very familiar

  2. Somewhat familiar

  3. Unfamiliar.

  1. Do you think any of these elements in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Final Rule (2008) related to wetlands mitigation banking should be considered for addition to USFWS' conservation banking guidance? (Please select one response for each item below)


Add

Already Exists

Don’t Add

No opinion

Establish equivalent standards for all mitigation mechanisms





Establish timelines for agency review of bank proposals and instruments





Require short-term financial assurances that restoration would be completed as planned (usually through bonds, letters of credits, or escrow funds)





Establish an explicit preference for bank credits (when available) over other forms of mitigation





Require the establishment of ‘service areas’ for banks and in-lieu fee programs. Service areas are defined as the geographic area within which impacts can be mitigated at a specific bank or in-lieu fee program





Other: ____________________________________









  1. Is there anything else you would like to add that was not addressed in the questions above?









Thank You!



Thank you for participating in our survey! Your responses are very valuable for our analysis of the USFWS conservation banking program.

Please click "Done" to submit your responses.



If you have any questions or comments about the survey, please contact Sarah Cline at the DOI Office of Policy Analysis: sarah_cline@ios.doi.gov, phone: 202-208-6018.



File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
AuthorCline Sarah A
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-25

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy