10 CFR Part 31, 30-day Federal Register Notice

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Notices

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

no significant increase in individual or
cumulative public or occupational
radiation exposure; (iv) there is no
significant construction impact; (v)
there is no significant increase in the
potential for or consequences from
radiological accidents; and (vi) the
requirements from which an exemption
is sought involve: Surety, insurance, or
indemnity requirements
The Director, Division of Operating
Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, has determined that
approval of the exemption request
involves no significant hazards
consideration because reducing the
licensee’s onsite property damage
insurance for KPS does not (1) involve
a significant increase in the probability
or consequences of an accident
previously evaluated; or (2) create the
possibility of a new or different kind of
accident from any accident previously
evaluated; or (3) involve a significant
reduction in a margin of safety. The
exempted financial protection
regulation is unrelated to the operation
of KPS. Accordingly, there is no
significant change in the types or
significant increase in the amounts of
any effluents that may be released
offsite; and no significant increase in
individual or cumulative public or
occupational radiation exposure. The
exempted regulation is not associated
with construction, so there is no
significant construction impact. The
exempted regulation does not concern
the source term (i.e., potential amount
of radiation in an accident), nor
mitigation. Therefore, there is no
significant increase in the potential for,
or consequences of, a radiological
accident. In addition, there would be no
significant impacts to biota, water
resources, historic properties, cultural
resources, or socioeconomic conditions
in the region. The requirement for onsite
property damage insurance may be
viewed as involving surety, insurance,
or indemnity matters.
Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR
51.22(b) and 51.22(c)(25), no
environmental impact statement or
environmental assessment need be
prepared in connection with the
approval of this exemption request.
IV. Conclusions
Accordingly, the Commission has
determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
50.12(a), the exemption is authorized by
law, will not present an undue risk to
the public health and safety, and is
consistent with the common defense
and security. Also, special
circumstances are present. Therefore,
the Commission hereby grants DEK an
exemption from the requirements of 10

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:02 Apr 10, 2015

Jkt 235001

CFR 50.54(w)(1), to permit the licensee
to reduce its onsite property damage
insurance to a level of $50 million.
The exemption is effective upon
issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 3rd day
of April, 2015.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Michele G. Evans,
Director, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2015–08395 Filed 4–10–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P

NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2014–0247]

Information Collection: General
Domestic Licenses for Byproduct
Material
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of submission to the
Office of Management and Budget;
request for comment.
AGENCY:

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) has recently
submitted a request for renewal of an
existing collection of information to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review. The information
collection is entitled, General Domestic
Licenses for Byproduct Material.’’
DATES: Submit comments by May 13,
2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments directly
to the OMB reviewer at: Vlad Dorjets,
Desk Officer, Office of Information, and
Regulatory Affairs (3150–0016), NEOB–
10202, Office of Management and
Budget, Washington, DC 20503;
telephone: 202–395–1741, email:
Vladik_Dorjets@omb.eop.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tremaine Donnell, NRC Clearance
Officer, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001; telephone: 301–415–6258; email:
INFOCOLLECTS.Resource@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:

I. Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2014–
0247 when contacting the NRC about
the availability of information for this
action. You may obtain publiclyavailable information related to this
action by any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
http://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2014–0247.

PO 00000

Frm 00072

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

19701

• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
supporting statement is available in
ADAMS under Accession No ADAMS
ML15040A059.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
• NRC’s Clearance Officer: A copy of
the collection of information and related
instructions may be obtained without
charge by contacting the NRC’s
Clearance Officer, Tremaine Donnell,
Office of Information Services, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone:
301–415–6258; email:
INFOCOLLECTS.Resource@NRC.GOV.
B. Submitting Comments
The NRC cautions you not to include
identifying or contact information in
comment submissions that you do not
want to be publicly disclosed in your
comment submission. All comment
submissions are posted at http://
www.regulations.gov and entered into
ADAMS. Comment submissions are not
routinely edited to remove identifying
or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating
comments from other persons for
submission to the OMB, then you
should inform those persons not to
include identifying or contact
information that they do not want to be
publicly disclosed in their comment
submission. Your request should state
that comment submissions are not
routinely edited to remove such
information before making the comment
submissions available to the public or
entering the comment into ADAMS.
II. Background
Under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the NRC recently
submitted a request for renewal of an
existing collection of information to
OMB for review entitled, ‘‘General
Domestic Licenses for Byproduct
Material.’’ The NRC hereby informs
potential respondents that an agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and that a

E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM

13APN1

19702

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Notices

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
The NRC published a Federal
Register notice with a 60-day comment
period on this information collection on
November 19, 2014, 79 FR 68917.
1. The title of the information
collection: 10 CFR part 31, ‘‘General
Domestic Licenses for Byproduct
Material.’’
2. OMB approval number: 3150–0016
3. Type of submission: Extension with
burden revision
4. The form number if applicable: Not
applicable
5. How often the collection is required
or requested: Reports are submitted as
events occur. General license
registration requests may be submitted
at any time. Changes to the information
on the registration may be submitted as
they occur.
6. Who will be required or asked to
respond: Persons receiving, possessing,
using, or transferring devices containing
byproduct material.
7. The estimated number of annual
responses: 138,429 (10,929 responses +
127,500 recordkeepers).
8. The estimated number of annual
respondents: 10,929 (971 NRC licensee
respondents + 9,958 Agreement State
licensee responses).
9. An estimate of the total number of
hours needed annually to comply with
the information collection requirement
or request: 36,186 hours (4,843 hours for
NRC licensees + 31,343 hours for
Agreement State licensees).
10. Abstract: Part 31 of Title 10 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR),
establishes general licenses for the
possession and use of byproduct
material in certain devices. General
licensees are required to keep testing
records and submit event reports
identified in Part 31, which assist the
NRC in determining with reasonable
assurance that devices are operated
safely and without radiological hazard
to users or the public.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 7th day
of April, 2015.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Tremaine Donnell,
NRC Clearance Officer, Office of Information
Services.
[FR Doc. 2015–08381 Filed 4–10–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:02 Apr 10, 2015

Jkt 235001

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–255; NRC–2014–0216]
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.;
Palisades Nuclear Plant
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Director’s decision under 10
CFR 2.206; issuance.
AGENCY:

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) has issued a final
director’s decision with regard to a
petition dated March 5, 2014, as
supplemented on April 8, May 21, and
September 3, 2014, filed by Mr. Michael
Mulligan (the petitioner), requesting
that the NRC take action with regard to
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (ENO
or the licensee) at Palisades Nuclear
Plant (PNP). The petitioner’s requests
and the final director’s decision are
included in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
DATES: April 13, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2014–0216 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may obtain publicly-available
information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
http://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2014–0216. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced in this document
(if that document is available in
ADAMS) is provided the first time that
a document is referenced.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00073

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Jennivine Rankin, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–415–
1530, email: Jennivine.Rankin@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that the Deputy Director,
Nuclear Reactor Regulation, has issued
a final director’s decision (ADAMS
Accession No. ML15054A365), on a
petition filed by the petitioner on March
5, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML14071A006), as supplemented on
April 8, May 21, and September 3, 2014
(ADAMS Accession Nos.
ML14143A212, ML14142A101, and
ML14259A135, respectively). The
petitioner requested a number of actions
be taken by the NRC and the licensee for
equipment failures at PNP. As the basis
for the request, the petitioner stated that
there have been recent plant events and
equipment failures at PNP, such as parts
of the primary coolant pump (PCP)
impeller breaking off and lodging in the
reactor vessel (RV) and flaws in the
control rod drive mechanisms (CRDMs).
The petitioner requested immediate
action to prevent the PNP from
restarting due to a piece of PCP impeller
that was lodged between the RV and the
flow skirt and due to flawed CRDMs.
By email dated March 19, 2014
(ADAMS Accession No. ML14083A680),
the NRC staff denied the petitioner’s
request for immediate action to prevent
PNP from restarting, based on the
following factors:
1. The NRC performed an in-depth
independent review of the licensee’s
analysis and concluded that the
impeller piece did not pose a threat to
safe operation of the reactor and RV.
2. The licensee replaced all of the
CRDM housings prior to plant startup.
By teleconference on April 8, 2014,
and again on September 3, 2014, the
petitioner addressed the Petition Review
Board (PRB). The meetings provided the
petitioner with an opportunity to
provide additional information and to
clarify issues cited in the petition. The
transcripts of these meeting were treated
as supplements to the petition and are
available in ADAMS, as previously
noted.
In the agency’s letter dated September
25, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML14237A726), the NRC accepted the
following specific issues of the petition
for review under Section 2.206 of Title
10 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(10 CFR):
1. Request for PNP to open every PCP for
inspection and clear up all flaws.
2. Request for PNP to replace the PCPs
with others designed for their intended duty.

E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM

13APN1