Download:
pdf |
pdfOMB No. 3117‐0016/USITC No. 14‐3‐3265; Expiration Date: 6/30/2017
(No response is required if currently valid OMB control number is not displayed)
U.S. PURCHASERS’ QUESTIONNAIRE
MONOSODIUM GLUTAMATE FROM CHINA AND INDONESIA
This questionnaire must be received by the Commission by no later than July 24, 2014
See the last page of this questionnaire for filing instructions.
The information called for in this questionnaire is for use by the United States International Trade Commission in
connection with its antidumping duty investigations concerning monosodium glutamate (“MSG”) from China and
Indonesia (Inv. Nos. 731‐TA‐1229‐1230 (Final)). The information requested in the questionnaire is requested under the
authority of the Tariff Act of 1930, Title VII. This report is mandatory and failure to reply as directed can result in a
subpoena or other order to compel the submission of records or information in your possession (19 U.S.C. § 1333(a)).
Further information on this questionnaire can be obtained from Michele Breaux (202‐205‐2781,
Michele.breaux@usitc.gov).
Name of firm
Address
City
State
Zip Code
Website address
Has your firm purchased MSG (as defined on page 2) from any source (domestic or foreign) at any time since
January 1, 2011?
NO
(Sign the certification below and promptly return only this page of the questionnaire to the Commission)
YES
(Read the instruction booklet carefully, complete all parts of the questionnaire, and return the entire
questionnaire to the Commission so as to be received by the date indicated above)
Return questionnaire via the U.S. International Trade Commission Drop Box by clicking on the
following link: https://dropbox.usitc.gov/oinv/. (PIN: MSG)
CERTIFICATION
I certify that the information herein supplied in response to this questionnaire is complete and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief
and understand that the information submitted is subject to audit and verification by the Commission.
By submitting this certification I also grant consent for the Commission, and its employees and contract personnel, to use the information
provided in this questionnaire and throughout this proceeding in any other import‐injury proceedings conducted by the Commission on the same
or similar merchandise.
I acknowledge that information submitted in this questionnaire response and throughout this proceeding may be used by the Commission, its
employees, and contract personnel who are acting in the capacity of Commission employees, for developing or maintaining the records of this
proceeding or related proceedings for which this information is submitted, or in internal audits and proceedings relating to the programs and
operations of the Commission pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3. I understand that all contract personnel will sign non‐disclosure agreements.
Name of Authorized Official Title of Authorized Official
Phone:
Date
Signature
Email address
Fax
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ MSG
Page 2
PART I.—GENERAL INFORMATION
Background.
This proceeding was instituted in response to a petition filed on September 16, 2013 by Ajinomoto
North America Inc. (“AJINA”), Itasca, Illinois.
Antidumping duties may be assessed on the subject imports as a result of these proceedings if the
Commission makes an affirmative determination of injury, threat, or material retardation, and if the U.S.
Department of Commerce makes an affirmative determination of dumping.
Merchandise covered by these investigations.
Monosodium glutamate (“MSG”) or “subject product” covered by these investigations is monosodium
glutamate (MSG), whether or not blended or in solution with other products. Specifically, MSG that has
been blended or is in solution with other product(s) is included in this scope when the resulting mix
contains 15% or more of MSG by dry weight. Products with which MSG may be blended include, but are
not limited to, salts, sugars, starches, maltodextrins, and various seasonings. Further, MSG is included in
this investigation regardless of physical form (including, but not limited to, substrates, solutions, dry
powders of any particle size, or unfinished forms such as MSG slurry), end‐use application, or packaging.
MSG has a molecular formula of C5H8NO4Na, a Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) registry number of
6106‐04‐3, and a Unique Ingredient Identifier (UNII) number of W81N5U6R6U.1
MSG is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) of the United States at subheading
2922.42.10.00. Merchandise subject to the investigation may also enter under HTS subheadings
2922.42.50.00, 2103.90.72.00, 2103.90.74.00, 2103.90.78.00, 2103.90.80.00, and 2103.90.90.91. The
tariff classifications, CAS registry number, and UNII number are provided for convenience and customs
purposes; however, the written description of the scope is dispositive.
Service of questionnaire response(s).‐‐In the event that your firm is a party to this proceeding, you are
required to serve a copy of the questionnaire(s), once completed, on parties to the proceeding that are
subject to administrative protective order (see 19 CFR ' 207.7). A list of such parties is maintained by
the Commission=s Secretary and may be obtained by calling 202‐205‐1803. A certificate of service must
accompany the copy of the completed questionnaire(s) you submit (see 19 CFR ' 207.7).
Confidentiality.‐‐The data furnished in response to this questionnaire(s) that reveal the individual
operations of your firm will be treated as confidential by the Commission to the extent that such data
are not otherwise available to the public and will not be disclosed except as may be required by law (see
19 U.S.C. ' 1677f). Such confidential information will not be published in a manner that will reveal the
individual operations of your firm; however, general characterizations of numerical business proprietary
information (such as discussion of trends) will be treated as confidential business information only at the
request of the submitter for good cause shown.
Verification.‐‐The information submitted in this questionnaire(s) is subject to audit and verification by
the Commission. To facilitate possible verification of data, please keep all of your files, worksheets, and
supporting documents used in the preparation of the questionnaire response(s).
1
Commission staff recognizes that the chemical formula in the scope as written reflects the anhydrous (no water)
form of MSG, while the CAS and UNII numbers in the scope reference the monohydrated (one water molecule)
form of MSG. The correct chemical formula corresponding to the CAS and UNII numbers referenced in the scope
can be expressed as C5H8NO4Na•H2O or C5H10NO5Na.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ MSG
Page 3
Release of information.‐‐The information provided by your firm in response to the questionnaire(s), as
well as any other business proprietary information submitted by your firm to the Commission in
connection with this proceeding, may become subject to, and released under, the administrative
protective order provisions of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. ' 1677f) and section 207.7 of the
Commission=s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR ' 207.7). This means that certain lawyers and
other authorized individuals may temporarily be given access to the information for use in connection
with this proceeding or other import‐injury proceedings conducted by the Commission on the same or
similar merchandise; those individuals would be subject to severe penalties if the information were
divulged to unauthorized individuals.
I‐1a. OMB statistics.‐‐Please report the number of hours required and the cost to your firm of
preparing your questionnaire response.
I‐1b.
Hours
Dollars
OMB feedback.‐‐We are interested in any comments you may have for improving this
questionnaire in general or the clarity of specific questions. Please attach such comments to
your response or send them to the above address.
The questions in this questionnaire have been reviewed with market participants to ensure that issues
of concern are adequately addressed and that data requests are sufficient, meaningful, and as limited as
possible. Public reporting burden for this questionnaire is estimated to average 25 hours per response,
including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering the data
needed, and completing and reviewing the questionnaire.
Send comments regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of
information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to the Office of Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW, Washington, DC 20436.
I‐2.
Establishments covered.‐‐ Provide the name and address of establishment(s) covered by this
questionnaire, if different from that listed on the cover page.
“Establishment”‐‐Each facility of a firm involved in the production, importation, and/or
purchase of the subject product, including auxiliary facilities operated in conjunction with
(whether or not physically separate from) such facilities.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ MSG
I‐3.
Ownership.‐‐Is your firm owned, in whole or in part, by any other firm?
No
Yes‐‐List the following information.
Firm name
I‐4.
Extent of ownership
(percent)
Address
Related importers/exporters from subject countries.‐‐Does your firm have any related firms,
either domestic or foreign, which are engaged in importing the subject product from China and
Indonesia into the United States or which are engaged in exporting the subject product from
China and Indonesia to the United States?
No
Yes‐‐List the following information.
Firm name
I‐5.
Page 4
Address
Affiliation
Related importers/exporters from nonsubject countries.‐‐Does your firm have any related
firms, either domestic or foreign, which are engaged in importing the subject product from
countries other than China and Indonesia into the United States or which are engaged in
exporting the subject product from countries other than China and Indonesia to the United
States?
No
Yes‐‐List the following information.
Firm name and country
Address
Affiliation
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ MSG
I‐6.
Page 5
Related producers.‐‐Does your firm have any related firms, either domestic or foreign, which
are engaged in the production of the subject product?
No
Yes‐‐List the following information.
Firm name
Address
Affiliation
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ MSG
Page 6
PART II.‐‐PURCHASES
Contact information.‐‐ Please identify the responsible individual and the manner by which Commission
staff may contact that individual regarding the confidential information submitted in this questionnaire.
Name
Title
Email
Telephone
Fax
II‐1.
Purchases.‐‐Report, as indicated below, your firm’s purchases (either directly or through a sales
agent or broker) of the subject product. Report based on delivery date, not order date.
Item
2011
2012
Purchases of the subject product produced in‐
2013
Quantity (in 1,000 pounds)
United States
China
Indonesia
Brazil
All other countries
1
Please identify these countries:
In what weight units does your firm purchase MSG?
II‐2.
pounds,
kilograms, or
both (check one)
Changes in purchasing patterns.‐‐Please indicate how the shares of your firm’s purchases of the
subject product from different sources have changed in the last three years.
Source of
purchases
2014 (Jan.‐June)
Did not
purchase
Decreased
Increased Constant Fluctuated
Explanation for trend
United
States
China
Indonesia
Brazil
All other
countries
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ MSG
II‐3.
Page 7
Purchases from one country only.‐‐If your firm has purchased the subject product from only
one country, please explain the reasons for doing so.
II‐4.
Supplier identification.‐‐Please list your firm’s FIVE largest suppliers for the subject product
since 2011. Also, provide the share of the quantity of your firm’s total purchases of the subject
product that each of these suppliers accounted for in 2013.
No.
Supplier’s name
Share of quantity of
2013 purchases
City and state
1
%
2
%
3
%
4
%
5
%
II‐5. MSG mixtures.—Estimate the percentage of your firm’s MSG purchases that are only MSG, MSG
mixtures, and/or other.
Type of sale
Share of
2013 sales
100% MSG (by dry weight)
%
MSG Mixture (product mixture with more than 15% MSG
but less than 100%)
%
Other:
%
100
%
Total
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ MSG
Page 8
PART III.‐‐MARKET CHARACTERISTICS AND PURCHASING PRACTICES
III‐1. Firm type.‐‐Which of the following best describes your firm as a purchaser of the subject
product (check all that apply)?
End User
(Food Processor)
End User
(Food Service
Industry)
Retail
Distributor
Other
Describe other
If your firm is a distributor of the subject product, please answer questions III‐2 and III‐3.
III‐2. Competition for sales.‐‐Do you compete for sales to your customers with the manufacturers or
importers from which you purchase the subject product?
No
Yes
If yes, please describe.
III‐3.
Types of customers.‐‐What are the major types of consumers to which you sell the subject
product?
If your firm is an end user of the subject product, please answer questions III‐4 and III‐5.
III‐4. End uses.‐‐List the top 3 products you make using the subject product and estimate the percent
of your total production cost that is accounted for by the subject product and by other inputs
(such as labor, energy, and other raw materials).
Share of total cost in each of the product(s) you produce
accounted for by
Product(s) you produce
MSG
Other inputs
Total
%
+
%
= 100%
%
+
%
= 100%
%
+
%
= 100%
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ MSG
III‐5.
Page 9
Demand for end use products.‐‐
(a)
Has the demand for your firm’s final products incorporating the subject product
changed since January 1, 2011?
Increased
No change
(b)
III‐6.
Decreased
Fluctuated
Has this had any effect on your firm’s demand for the subject product?
No
Yes
Explain
Substitutes.‐‐Can other products be substituted for the subject product?
No
Yes‐‐Please fill out the table below.
End use in which this
substitute is used
Substitute
Have changes in the prices of this substitute
affected the price for MSG?
No Yes
Explanation
1.
2.
3.
III‐7.
Demand trends.‐‐ Indicate how demand within the United States and outside of the United
States (if known) for the subject product has changed since January 1, 2011. Explain any trends
and describe the principal factors that have affected these changes in demand.
Market
Overall
increase
No
change
Overall Fluctuate with
decrease no clear trend
Explanation and factors
Within the
United
States
Outside the
United
States
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ MSG
III‐8.
Page 10
Importance of purchasing domestic product.‐‐Please fill out the table below, estimating the
percentage of your firm’s total 2013 purchases of the subject product that required the subject
product be produced in the United States.
Purchases that did not require domestic product
Purchases that were required by law or regulation to be domestic product
(e.g., government purchases under “Buy American” provisions)
Purchases that were not required by law or regulation, but were required by
your customers to be domestic product
Purchases that were required to be domestic product for other reasons
(explain: )
III‐9.
Estimated
percentage of your
firm’s total 2013
purchases of the
subject product
%
%
%
%
100 %
Conditions of competition.‐‐
(a) Is the market for the subject product subject to business cycles (other than general
economy‐wide conditions) and/or other conditions of competition distinctive to the subject
product?
Check all that apply.
Please describe.
No
Skip to question III‐10.
Yes‐Business cycles (e.g.
seasonal business)
Yes‐Other distinctive
conditions of competition
(b) Have there been any changes in the business cycles or conditions of competition for the
subject product since January 1, 2011?
No
Yes
If yes, describe.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ MSG
Page 11
III‐10. Decisions based on producer and country‐of‐origin.‐‐How often does your firm, and if you
know, do your customers, make purchasing decisions involving the subject product based on its
producer or country of origin?
Always
Usually
Sometimes
Never
If at least sometimes, explain.
Decision based on producer
Your firm
Your
customers
Decision based on country of origin
Your firm
Your
customers
III‐11. Supply constraints.‐‐Has any firm refused, declined, or been unable to supply the subject
product since January 1, 2011 (examples include placing customers on allocation or “controlled
order entry,” declining to accept new customers or renew existing customers, delivering less
than the quantity promised, been unable to meet timely shipment commitments, etc.)?
No
Yes
If yes, please describe.
III‐12. Purchasing frequency.‐‐
(a)
How frequently do you make purchases of the subject product (check one)?
Daily
Weekly
Monthly
Quarterly
Annually
Other
If other, specify
(b)
Has this purchasing frequency changed since January 1, 2011?
No
Yes
If yes, please describe.
III‐13. Number of suppliers contacted.‐‐How many suppliers do you generally contact before making a
purchase? Between and firms
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ MSG
Page 12
III‐14. Supplier negotiations.‐‐Do your purchases of the subject product usually involve negotiations
between supplier and purchaser?
No
Yes
If yes, explain the factors you generally negotiate and note whether your
firm quotes competing prices during negotiations.
III‐15. Change in suppliers.‐‐Have you changed suppliers since January 1, 2011?
No
Yes
If yes, please list the supplier(s), whether the firm was added or dropped, the
reasons for the change.
III‐16. New suppliers.‐‐Are you aware of any new suppliers, either foreign or domestic, that have
entered the market since January 1, 2011?
No
Yes
If yes, please identify the firms.
III‐17. Supplier qualification‐‐Do you require your suppliers to be or to become certified or qualified to
sell the subject product to your firm?
If yes, provide the following information.
The number of days to qualify a new supplier.
A general description of the certification or qualification process. Also, a brief
description of the factors that you consider when qualifying a new supplier (e.g., quality
of product, reliability of supplier, etc.).
No
Yes
Number
of days Process and factors
III‐18. Failure to certify.‐‐Since January 1, 2011, have any domestic or foreign producers failed in their
attempts to certify or qualify their subject product with your firm or have any producers lost
their approved status?
No
Yes
If yes, please identify these firms, the countries where they are located, and the
reasons why they failed the certification/qualification.
III‐19. Major purchasing factors.‐‐Please list, in order of their importance, the three major factors your
firm considers in deciding from whom to purchase the subject product (examples include
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ MSG
Page 13
availability, extension of credit, contracts, price, quality, range of supplier’s product line,
traditional supplier, alternative source of supply, terms and pricing on overall purchasing
(multiple products) from supplier etc.).
1.
2.
3.
Please list any other factors that are very important in your purchase decisions:
III‐20. Purchasing factors.‐‐ Please rate the importance of the following factors in your firm’s
purchasing decisions for the subject product.
Factor
Somewhat
important
Not
important
Alternative source of supply
Availability
Delivery terms
Delivery time
Discounts offered
Extension of credit
Minimum quantity requirements
Packaging
Price
Product consistency
Product range
Quality exceeds industry standards
Quality meets industry standards
Reliability of supply
Technical support/service
Terms/pricing on overall purchases
(multiple products) from supplier
U.S. transportation costs
Very
important
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ MSG
Page 14
III‐21. Quality characteristics.‐‐What characteristics does your firm consider when determining the
quality of the subject product?
III‐22. Frequency of decisions based on price.‐‐How often does your firm purchase the subject product
that is offered at the lowest price?
Always
Usually
Sometimes
Never
III‐23. Price leaders.— A price leader is defined as (1) one or more firms that initiate a price change,
either upward or downward, that is followed by other firms, or (2) one or more firms that have a
significant impact on prices. A price leader is not necessarily the lowest‐priced supplier.
Please list the names of any firms you considered price leaders in the market for the subject
product since January 1, 2011.
Firm(s)
Describe how the firm(s) exhibited price leadership
III‐24. Reverse auctions and electronic bidding.—
(a)
Does your firm use reverse auctions or electronic bids to solicit bids from suppliers?
Reverse auctions
Electronic bidding
Both
Neither
(b)
What role do reverse auctions and/or electronic bidding play in your firm’s purchasing
process?
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ MSG
Page 15
PART IV.—PRODUCT COMPARISONS
IV‐1. Country knowledge.‐‐Please indicate the countries of origin of the subject product for which
your firm has actual marketing/pricing knowledge.
United States
China
IV‐2.
Indonesia
Brazil
Other countries (specify)
Interchangeability.‐‐Is the subject product produced in the United States and in other countries
interchangeable (i.e., can they physically be used in the same applications)?
Please indicate A, F, S, N, or 0 in the table below:
A = the products from a specified country‐pair are always interchangeable
F = the products are frequently interchangeable
S = the products are sometimes interchangeable
N = the products are never interchangeable
0 = no familiarity with products from a specified country‐pair
Country‐pair
United States
China
Indonesia
Brazil
Other countries
China
Indonesia
Brazil
For any country‐pair producing the subject product which is sometimes or never interchangeable,
please identify the country‐pair and explain the factors that limit or preclude interchangeable use:
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ MSG
IV‐3.
Page 16
Factors other than price.‐‐Are differences other than price (e.g., quality, availability,
transportation network, product range, technical support, etc.) between the subject product
produced in the United States and in other countries a significant factor in your firm’s purchases
of the products?
Please indicate A, F, S, N, or 0 in the table below:
A = such differences are always significant
F = such differences are frequently significant
S = such differences are sometimes significant
N = such differences are never significant
0 = no familiarity with products from a specified country‐pair
Country‐pair
United States
China
Indonesia
Brazil
Other countries
China
Indonesia
Brazil
For any country‐pair for which factors other than price always or frequently are a significant factor in
your firm’s purchases of the subject product, identify the country‐pair and report the advantages or
disadvantages imparted by such factors:
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ MSG
IV‐4.
IV‐5.
Page 17
Country preferences.‐‐Do you or your customers ever specifically order the subject product
from one country in particular over other possible sources of supply?
No
Yes
If yes, identify the countries and explain.
Availability of merchandise.‐‐Are certain grades/types/sizes of the subject product available
from only from certain country sources?
IV‐6.
No
Yes
Choice of product not based on price.‐‐If you purchased the subject product from one country
source although a comparable product was available from another country source at a lower
price, please explain your reasons for doing so (please specify by country).
If yes, please identify the countries and the grade/type/size.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ MSG
Page 18
IV‐7. Factor country comparisons.‐‐For the factors listed below, please rate how the subject product
produced in each country you identified in your response to the first question in Part IV compares with
the subject product produced in each of the other countries you identified.
Please note: If you are unfamiliar with the product from a particular country, please leave the boxes
for those country comparisons blank.
Availability
Delivery terms
Delivery time
Discounts offered
Extension of credit
Minimum quantity requirements
Packaging
1
Price
Product consistency
Product range
Quality exceeds industry standards
Quality meets industry standards
Reliability of supply
Technical support/service
U.S. transportation costs1
1
A rating of superior on price and U.S. transportation costs indicates that the first country generally has lower
prices/U.S. transportation costs than the second country.
Inferior
Superior
Comparable
Product from
China
compared to
product from
Indonesia
Inferior
Comparable
Product from
United States
compared to
product from
Indonesia
Superior
Inferior
Comparable
Superior
Product from
United States
compared to
product from
China
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ MSG
Continued.
Inferior
Availability
Delivery terms
Delivery time
Discounts offered
Extension of credit
Minimum quantity requirements
Packaging
Price1
Product consistency
Product range
Quality exceeds industry standards
Quality meets industry standards
Reliability of supply
Technical support/service
1
U.S. transportation costs
1
A rating of superior on price and U.S. transportation costs indicates that the first country generally has lower
prices/U.S. transportation costs than the second country.
Please identify nonsubject countries:
Inferior
Comparable
Product from
Indonesia
compared to
product from
Nonsubject
countries
Superior
Product from
China
compared to
product from
Nonsubject
countries
Comparable
Inferior
Comparable
Superior
Product from
United States
compared to
product from
Nonsubject
countries
Superior
IV‐7.
Page 19
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ MSG
IV‐8.
Page 20
Minimum quality.‐‐How often does the subject product from the following countries meet
minimum quality specifications for your uses or your customers’ uses?
Source
Always
Usually
Sometimes
Rarely or
never
Don’t know
United States
China
Indonesia
Other:
IV‐9.
Other explanations‐‐If your firm would like to further explain a response to any question that
did not provide a narrative response box, please note the question number and the explanation
in the space provided below.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ MSG
Page 21
OPTIONS FOR FILING THIS QUESTIONNAIRE
RESPONSE WITH THE ITC
This questionnaire is available as a “fillable” form in MS Word format on the
Commission’s website at:
http://usitc.gov/trade_remedy/731_ad_701_cvd/investigations/2014/msg/finalphase.htm
Please do not attempt to modify the format or permissions of the questionnaire
document. Please complete the questionnaire and submit it electronically using
one of the methods noted below. If your firm is unable to complete the MS
Word questionnaire or cannot use one of the electronic methods of submission,
please contact the Commission for further instructions.
• Upload via Secure Drop Box.—Upload the completed questionnaire in MS Word format along
with a scanned copy of the signed certification page (page 1) through the Commission’s secure
upload facility:
Web address: https://dropbox.usitc.gov/oinv/ Pin: MSG
• E‐mail.—E‐mail your questionnaire to the investigator identified on page 4 of this
questionnaire; include a scanned copy of the signed certification page (page 1).
Please note that submitting your questionnaire by e‐mail may subject your firm’s business
proprietary information to transmission over an unsecure environment and to possible
disclosure. If you choose this option, the Commission warns you that any risk involving possible
disclosure of such information is assumed by the submitter and not by the Commission.
Note: If you are a party to the proceeding, and service of the questionnaire is required, such
service should be made in paper form.
If you determine that your firm does not purchase MSG, please complete page 1: (1) Fil in your
name and address, (2) Check the “no” box, (3) Sign the bottom of page 1, and (4) Return page 1
to the Commission using any of the methods listed above.
| File Type | application/pdf |
| File Title | Microsoft Word - MSG_US Purchaser Questionnaire |
| Author | amy.sherman |
| File Modified | 2014-06-23 |
| File Created | 2014-06-23 |