ATTACHMENT b
Proposed outcomes, measures and data sources
This page left blank for double-sided copying.
B.1. Proposed outcomes, measures, and data sources
Proposed Outcomes |
Proposed Measures |
Proposed Data Source(s) |
||
|
|
New data collection |
Existing data |
|
I.1. What systems and external factors are in place in communities that could help or hinder grantees in improving outcomes? (Environmental Scan: Program Year 1 and ongoing) |
|
|||
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I.2. What are the characteristics of the environment where the program operates and how have changes in environmental factors and policies affected the delivery of services (e.g., effect on coverage of the services, provider case mix, provider caseload, etc.)? (Domain 3) |
|
|||
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
II.1. To what extent are grantees implementing team-based care and other program components to address hypertension control according to approved protocols (i.e., with fidelity)? What are the barriers and promising approaches to implementing program models? (Domain 3) |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
II.2. To what extent is health coaching being implemented according to approved protocols? What are the barriers and promising approaches to implementing program models? What QI processes are used to improve implementation? (Domain 3) |
|
|||
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
||
|
None |
|
||
|
None |
|
||
|
None |
|
||
|
None |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
II.3. To what extent are the grantees making referrals to the LSPs according to approved protocols? What are the barriers and promising approaches to implementing program models? (Domain 3) |
|
|||
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
||
|
None |
|
||
|
None |
|
||
|
None |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
II.4. What linkages and referrals do grantees make to resources in the communities (by risk factor) other than LSPs/health coaching? (Domain 4) |
|
|||
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
II.5. What systems do the grantees have in place to track participants, their service utilization, completion of referrals, and other follow-up activities? How well the systems work? (Domains 1 and 3) |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
II.6. What are key formal and informal partnerships exist in the community to address cardiovascular health (e.g., type of linkages and partnerships)? What is WISEWOMAN’s role in these partnerships? What are the strengths and gaps in the linkages and networks? Which ones are working? (Domains 2 and 4) |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
II.7. What are the costs (direct and in-kind) associated with delivering WISEWOMAN? |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluation Questions: III.1. What are the changes in participant behaviors, risk, and CVD outcomes from base year to option year 2/Program Year 3? (Domains 2-4)
III.4. What
are the changes in disparities from base year to option year
2/Program Year 3? How did WISEWOMAN programs tailor their efforts
to address disparities?
|
|
|||
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|||
III.2. What are the changes in rates of recommended referrals (and completion) to LSPs, health coaching, and tobacco cessation resources in the context of risk from base year to option year 2/Program Year 3? (Domains 2-4) |
|
|||
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
III.3. What are some unintended effects from the WISEWOMAN program (such as increased empowerment and social capital among individuals and the community)? (Domains 2-4) |
|
|||
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
IV.1. What are the grantee characteristics that may influence outcomes (for example, WISEWOMAN program components, LSP and health coaching curricula, and organizational properties)? (Domains 2-4) IV.2. What are the types and characteristics of community-clinical linkages and agency/organizational-level networks that may influence outcomes? (Domains 2-4)
|
|
|||
|
|
None |
|
a Social Capital Assessment Tool (SOCAT) is a multifaceted instrument designed by the World Bank to collect cognitive and structural social capital data at the household level, which is crucial to link social capital information with poverty and household welfare outcomes.
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
Author | Emily Wharton |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2021-01-26 |