30-day notice

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

30230

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 27, 2015 / Notices

owned by others without the owners’
express permission.
The proposed project would consist of
the following: (1) A 800-foot-long, 400foot-wide intake channel; (2) a 200-footlong, 210-foot-wide powerhouse
containing four generating units with a
total capacity of 48 megawatts; (3) a
1,300-foot-long, 500-foot-wide tailrace;
(4) a 6.9/115 kilo-Volt (kV) substation;
and (5) a 5-mile-long, 115kV
transmission line. The proposed project
would have an estimated average annual
generation of 155,000 megawatt-hours,
and operate as directed by the Corps.
Applicant Contact: Mr. Jonathan
Oliver, Arkansas Electric Cooperative
Corporation, One Cooperative Way,
Little Rock, AR 72209; Phone: (501)
570–2488; Email:
jonathan.oliver@aecc.com.
FERC Contact: Christiane Casey,
christiane.casey@ferc.gov, (202) 502–
8577.
Deadline for filing comments, motions
to intervene, competing applications
(without notices of intent), or notices of
intent to file competing applications: 60
days from the issuance of this notice.
Competing applications and notices of
intent must meet the requirements of 18
CFR 4.36. Comments, motions to
intervene, notices of intent, and
competing applications may be filed
electronically via the Internet. See 18
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the
instructions on the Commission’s Web
site http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/
efiling.asp. Commenters can submit
brief comments up to 6,000 characters,
without prior registration, using the
eComment system at http://
www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/
ecomment.asp. You must include your
name and contact information at the end
of your comments. For assistance,
please contact FERC Online Support at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll
free at 1–866–208–3676, or for TTY,
(202) 502–8659. Although the
Commission strongly encourages
electronic filing, documents may also be
paper-filed. To paper-file, mail an
original and five copies to: Kimberly D.
Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street
NE., Washington, DC 20426. The first
page of any filing should include docket
number P–14663–000.
More information about this project,
including a copy of the application, can
be viewed or printed on the ‘‘eLibrary’’
link of Commission’s Web site at
http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/
elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number
(P–14663) in the docket number field to
access the document. For assistance,
contact FERC Online Support.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:45 May 26, 2015

Jkt 235001

Dated: May 20, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–12708 Filed 5–26–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. AD14–15–000]

Commission Information Collection
Activities (FERC–922); Comment
Request
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, DOE.
ACTION: Comment request.
AGENCY:

In compliance with the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C.
3507(a)(1)(D), the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (Commission or
FERC) is submitting for reinstatement a
revised information collection FERC–
922, ‘‘Performance Metrics for ISOs,
RTOs and Regions Outside ISOs and
RTOs,’’ to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for review of the
information collection requirements.
Any interested person may file
comments directly with OMB and
should address a copy of those
comments to the Commission as
explained below. The Commission
previously issued a Notice in the
Federal Register (79 FR 52313,
9/3/2014) requesting public comments.
The Commission also issued an errata
notice to fix an errant hyperlink in the
60-day notice (8/26/2014). The
Commission received seven comments
on the FERC–922. The Commission
addresses these comments in this notice
and in its submittal to OMB.
DATES: Comments on the collection of
information are due by June 26, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Comments filed with OMB,
identified by the OMB Control No.
1902–0262, should be sent via email to
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs at: oira_submission@omb.gov.
Attention: Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission Desk Officer. The Desk
Officer may also be reached via
telephone at (202) 395–4718.
A copy of the comments should also
be sent to the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, identified by the Docket
No. AD14–15–000, by either of the
following methods:
• eFiling at Commission’s Web site:
http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/
efiling.asp, or
• Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00025

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Secretary of the Commission, 888 First
Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
Instructions: All submissions must be
formatted and filed in accordance with
submission guidelines at: http://
www.ferc.gov/help/submissionguide.asp. Submissions must be in an
acceptable file format, as described at:
http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary/
accept-file-formats.asp. The numeric
values corresponding to all charts and
tables containing metrics must be
submitted in an accompanying file, in
one of the following formats: Microsoft
Office 2003/2007/2010: Excel (.xls or
.xlsx), or ASCII Comma Separated Value
(.csv). For user assistance contact FERC
Online Support by email at
ferconlinesupport@ferc.gov, or by phone
at: (866) 208–3676 (toll-free), or (202)
502–8659 for TTY.
Docket: Users interested in receiving
automatic notification of activity in this
docket or in viewing/downloading
comments and issuances in this docket
may do so at http://www.ferc.gov/docsfiling/docs-filing.asp.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ellen Brown may be reached by email
at DataClearance@FERC.gov, by
telephone at (202) 502–8663, and by fax
at (202) 273–0873.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: FERC–922, Performance Metrics
for ISOs, RTOs and Regions Outside of
ISOs and RTOs.
OMB Control No.: 1902–0262.
Type of Request: Reinstatement and
revision of an information collection.
Abstract: In September 2008, the
United States Government
Accountability Office (GAO) issued a
report recommending that the Chairman
of the Commission, among other
actions, work with independent system
operators (ISOs), regional transmission
organizations (RTOs), stakeholders, and
other experts to develop standardized
measures that track the performance of
ISO/RTO operations and markets and
report the performance results to
Congress and the public annually,1
while also providing interpretation of
(1) what the measures and reported
performance communicate about the
benefits of ISOs/RTOs and, where
appropriate, (2) changes that need to be
made to address any performance
concerns. The GAO Report also
suggested that performance metrics be
explored for non-ISOs/RTO regions.
In response to the GAO Report,
Commission Staff conducted outreach
with ISOs/RTOs and other stakeholders
and in October 2010 established metrics
1 The 2008 GAO Report also recognized that the
extent of the Commission’s evaluation of ISO/RTO
performance may vary from year to year.

E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM

27MYN1

30231

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 27, 2015 / Notices
to measure ISO/RTO performance. In
April 2011, a report was sent to
Congress with an analysis of ISO/RTO
performance based on these metrics and
a commitment to analyze utilities in
non-ISO/RTO regions. After further
stakeholder outreach, in August 2014,
the Commission Staff issued a
‘‘Common Metrics Report,’’ establishing
30 common metrics that measure
performance for ISOs, RTOs and public
utilities outside of ISOs/RTOs from
2006–2010.
The Commission is continuing its
efforts to collect performance metric
information from ISOs, RTOs, and
public utilities in non-ISO/RTO regions.
This includes the submission of

information relating to dispatch
reliability, transmission planning, and
the marginal cost of energy and resource
availability. The information submitted
by ISOs, RTOs, and participating public
utilities in non-ISO/RTO regions is used
to measure the performance of
reliability and operations functions in
which ISOs, RTOs, and public utilities
in non-ISO/RTO regions perform
identical activities.
The attached list of metrics will not
be published in the Federal Register but
will be available as part of this notice in
the Commission’s eLibrary system
under Docket No. AD14–15–000.
Type of Respondents: ISOs, RTOs,
and public utilities.

Estimate of Annual Burden: 2 For
ISOs, RTOs and public utilities that
have submitted performance
information previously, their submittals
will only include performance
information for the 2010–2014 period.3
For other public utilities that have not
submitted performance information
previously, their submittals will also
provide performance information for the
2010–2014 period.4 This information is
to be filed by October 30, 2015.5 The
estimate of annual burden assumes
submittals occur every two years. For
this reason, the annual number of
responses is ‘‘0.5’’ in the table below.

FERC–922 (AD14–15–000)—PERFORMANCE METRICS FOR ISOS, RTOS AND REGIONS OUTSIDE ISOS AND RTOS 6
Information collection component

Number of
respondents

Annual
number of
responses per
respondent

Total number
of responses

Average
burden hours
and cost
per response 7

Total annual
burden hours
and total
annual cost

Cost per
respondent
per year
($)

(1)

(2)

(1)*(2)=(3)

(4)

(3)*(4)=(5)

(5)÷(1)

ENTITIES THAT HAVE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED PERFORMANCE
Metrics Data Collection ............................

11

0.5

5.5

Write Performance Analysis ....................

11

0.5

5.5

Management Review ...............................

11

0.5

5.5

Subtotal .............................................

........................

........................

........................

INFORMATION 8
229
$18,366
139
$11,148
33
$2,796

1,260
$101,012
765
$61,313
182
$15,377

........................

2,207
$177,702

9,183
5,574
1,398
16,155

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

ENTITIES THAT HAVE NOT PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED PERFORMANCE INFORMATION 9
Collection, writing, and review .................

5

0.5

2.5

427
$34,403

1,068
$86,008

Total ..................................................

16

........................

........................

........................

3,275
$263,710

Public Comments and FERC’s
Responses: Comments were filed by the
public in response to the FERC–922
Federal Register Notice of Information
Collection and Request for Comments
and the Commission’s responses to
those comments are provided below.

Burden Estimate

2 Burden is defined as the total time, effort, or
financial resources expended by persons to
generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide
information to or for a Federal agency. For further
explanation of what is included in the information
collection burden, see 5 CFR 1320.3 (2014).
3 ISOs, RTOs and public utilities who wish to file
revisions to previously submitted data (i.e., from
periods prior to 2010), may do so.
4 Public utilities who have not previously
submitted performance information may also
voluntarily submit data from the 2008–2009 period
along with their 2010–2014 submittals, if they
believe that such information would be important
to this initiative.

5 The Commission will provide public notice
prior to the due date for any subsequent collection
within the approved information collection period.
6 The results in this table have been rounded for
display purposes.
7 The estimates for cost per response are derived
using the following formula: Average Burden Hours
per Response * $XX per Hour = Average Cost per
Response. The hourly cost figure for the metrics
data collection and writing the performance
analysis is based on the loaded average wage (salary
plus benefits) of $80.20/hour for an analyst,
attorney, engineer, and economist. The hourly cost
figure for the management review is based on the
loaded average wage (salary plus benefits) of
$84.72/hour for management. Wage and benefits
data are from the Bureau of Labor Statistics at

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:45 May 26, 2015

Jkt 235001

Edison Electric Institute (EEI)
considers the burden estimate to be
significantly understated, particularly
for ‘‘stand-alone utilities’’ without
access to data collection and
compilation activities performed by ISO

PO 00000

Frm 00026

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

17,202

and RTO staff. EEI estimates the
response time for stand-alone utilities to
be as high as 300–400 hours per utility.
FERC Response: We address EEI’s
concern by revising the burden estimate.
We recognize that certain EEI members
have experienced the process of
collecting, summarizing, reviewing, and
http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics2_22.htm and
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.nr0.htm.
8 Assumes responses from the six RTOs and ISOs
and five public utilities that previously submitted
data.
9 Assumes five public utilities that have not
previously submitted information will submit data.
Assumes that four of these public utilities will
submit data for the period covering 2010–2014, and
that one public utility will voluntarily provide data
for 2008–2009 in addition to 2010–2014. The
weighted average wage (salary plus benefits)
assumed for new respondents is $80.57 per hour,
which reflects the hour-weighted average of the
wages assumed for entities that have previously
submitted performance information.

E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM

27MYN1

30232

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 27, 2015 / Notices

submitting information as part of this
initiative, and therefore might be better
positioned to estimate the time and
resources involved. In response, we
revise the burden estimate to be
approximately 400 hours per
respondent (401 hours for previous
participants and 427 hours for new
participants). We believe that the
updated burden estimate accounts for
the higher response times of certain
participants. We also believe that the
updated burden estimate accounts for
any additional time associated with the
instruction to submit the numeric
values corresponding to charts and
tables in an accompanying file.10
Ways To Minimize Information
Collection Burden

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

The ISO/RTO Council (IRC)
recommends that data be provided only
for the 2010–2014 period. IRC notes that
its members have already submitted
information through 2010. Southern
Company Services, Inc. (Southern) also
recommends that only one data
collection be required for the 2010–2014
time period. Noting that the Common
Metrics Report issued by the
Commission in August 2014 provides
information for the 2006–2010 period,
Southern considers information
collection on the 2008–2012 period to
be an additional burden and argues that
it should be eliminated. Noting that
utilities outside of ISOs/RTOs will have
to devote considerable resources and
expenses to provide data, EEI
recommends that the Commission retain
the voluntary approach for these
utilities and that data collection for ISO
and RTO regions only occur when data
is readily available and the data
collection process can be streamlined.
New York Transmission Owners
(NYTOs) 11 support continued data
collection. NYTOs consider this
information to be helpful for analyzing
ISO and RTO performance and that the
benefits of the information to the
Commission and affected parties
outweigh any related burdens on
respondents. International Transmission
Company (ITC) supports the proposed
data collection as necessary and not
overly burdensome. American Public
Power Association (APPA) and
American Wind Energy Association
10 The purpose of the additional instruction is to
reduce the potential for error in compiling reports
on the information submitted.
11 NYTOs are Central Hudson Gas & Electric
Corporation, Consolidated Edison Company of New
York, Inc., Power Supply Long Island, New York
Power Authority, New York State Electric & Gas
Corporation, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation
d/b/a National Grid, Orange and Rockland Utilities,
Inc., and Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:45 May 26, 2015

Jkt 235001

(AWEA) also support continued data
collection.
FERC Response: We note concerns
raised by IRC and Southern over the
potential redundancy and additional
burden for providing information for the
2008–2012 period. Additionally, we
note EEI’s concerns with streamlining
the collection process. In designing the
information collection process, we aim
to balance the goal of creating
comparable data series across entities
with the goals of wide participation and
practical submission criteria.
Accordingly, all participating entities
may submit a single report with
information on the 2010–2014 period
rather than submitting two reports for
the 2008–2012 and 2010–2014 periods.
This includes ISOs, RTOs, and public
utilities in non-ISO/RTO regions that
have submitted performance
information previously, and public
utilities in non-ISO/RTO regions that
have not submitted performance
information previously. The reports may
be submitted by October 30, 2015. Going
forward, Commission Staff will
continue to consult with ISOs, RTOs
and participating public utilities in the
voluntary and collaborative data
collection process to address ways to
minimize the burden of data collection.
Necessity and Practical Utility of
Information Collection
Southern states that developing
metrics for bilateral markets is not
necessary for the Commission to
develop proper standardized measures
that track the performance of ISO and
RTO operations and markets, which is
the goal set for the Commission’s
performance metrics efforts in a
Government Accountability Office
(GAO) report.12 EEI does not consider
further data collection to be necessary
for the Commission to properly perform
its functions. EEI suggests that if the
Commission believes data collection is
necessary, then the Commission should
explain the importance of this data to
the Commission’s functions and the
Commission’s intentions for using the
data. Southern and EEI also consider the
practical usefulness of the information
to be limited due to the differences in
market structures between utilities
outside ISO and RTO markets and ISO
and RTO market operators. Southern
and EEI state that the usefulness of the
information is diminished by errors in
the Common Metrics Report, arguing
12 See U.S. Government Accountability Office,
Report to the Committee on Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate, Electricity
Restructuring: FERC Could Take Additional Steps
to Analyze Regional Transmission Organizations’
Benefits and Performance (Sept. 2008).

PO 00000

Frm 00027

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

that such errors could have been
avoided with review and feedback by
participating utilities. Southern and EEI
also dispute a statement in the Common
Metrics Report that utilities outside of
ISOs and RTOs have an incentive to
discriminate, and EEI stresses that data
voluntarily provided to the Commission
should not be used to indicate
misconduct or used as record evidence
in contested proceedings or in
enforcement proceedings against
entities providing such data. However,
EEI states that utilities will continue to
provide data voluntarily to assist the
Commission in identifying trends or to
highlight areas that could be improved
through Commission policy. Similarly,
Southern notes its intention to continue
to coordinate and work with
Commission Staff should the
Commission continue with this
initiative.
FERC Response: The Commission
considers it important to compare the
performance of ISOs and RTOs with
non-ISO and -RTO regions because large
portions of the country, notably the
Pacific Northwest and the Southeast,
have not engaged in restructuring and
remain outside of ISOs/RTOs. GAO and
other experts were concerned that the
benefits of ISOs and RTOs cannot be
assessed in isolation, but are best
considered in comparison with nonrestructured regions.13 Furthermore, as
the metrics developed by Commission
Staff seek to glean information across
various categories, the Commission aims
to assess whether certain particular
features of ISOs and RTOs demonstrate
superior performance and/or certain
(other) features of non-ISO/RTO regions
demonstrate superior performance, with
a goal of improving the performance of
each type of electricity market.
The practical usefulness of the
information is not limited by the
differences in market structures between
utilities outside ISO and RTO regions
and between each ISO and RTO market
operator. The metrics common to ISOs
and RTOs and public utilities in nonISO/RTO regions measure the
performance of reliability and
operations functions in which ISOs and
RTOs and public utilities in non-ISO/
RTO regions perform identical
activities, and therefore the common
performance metrics provide useful and
meaningful information.
The errors and misstatements cited by
Southern and EEI do not diminish the
practical usefulness of the information
submitted because the public record in
Docket Nos. AD12–8–000 and AD14–
15–000 includes all the correct
13 Id.

at 56–57.

E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM

27MYN1

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 27, 2015 / Notices
information submitted by Southern. The
Common Metrics Report of concern to
Southern was intended to evaluate
whether the common metrics are
measuring the same activities and have
the same meaning across the industry.14
Accordingly, the purpose of the report
was not intended to be the primary data
source. Nor did the mentioned errors
and misstatements,15 have any impact
on the common metrics evaluation.
As for the statement in the Common
Metrics Report regarding a utility’s
incentive to discriminate among users of
transmission services, this statement has
no bearing on the usefulness or quality
of the information collected. Southern’s
and EEI’s comments on the potential use
of data in enforcement proceedings are
also beyond the scope of this data
collection notice and are not reflective
of the intention of this data collection
which is to measure the performance of
reliability and operations functions in
which ISOs and RTOs and public
utilities outside ISO and RTO markets
perform identical activities.
Additional Data Collection
APPA, AWEA, and ITC recommend
that additional data be collected and
reported in order to further improve the
usefulness of the performance metrics.
ITC does not consider information on
transmission facilities approved for
construction for reliability purposes to
be meaningful without proper context.
Southern and EEI state that the
proposed common wholesale price
metric for ISOs and RTOs and utilities
in non-ISO/RTO regions 16 would not
provide relevant or useful information
since ISO and RTO markets differ
significantly from the bilateral markets
in non-ISO/RTO regions.
FERC Response: Commission Staff
will discuss additional data collection
and metrics of interest to commenters,
as well as ways to make the metrics
more meaningful, in the ongoing
voluntary and collaborative process
with ISOs, RTOs, participating utilities
in non-ISO/RTO regions, and
stakeholders.
Dated: May 20, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–12701 Filed 5–26–15; 8:45 am]

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
14 Common

Metrics Report at 4.
an inaccurate listing of Southern’s
transmission loading relief data as ‘‘No Data’’
instead of zero and a mischaracterization of
Southern’s transmission planning process as a
SERC planning process instead of a Southeastern
Regional Transmission Planning Process (SERTP)
planning process.
16 See Common Metrics Report at 80.
15 I.e.,

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:45 May 26, 2015

Jkt 235001

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
Combined Notice of Filings #1
Take notice that the Commission
received the following electric rate
filings:
Docket Numbers: ER10–1946–008;
ER11–3864–011; ER10–3231–001;
ER10–3233–001.
Applicants: Broad River Energy LLC,
EquiPower Resources Management,
LLC, Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc.,
Wheelabrator South Broward Inc.
Description: Supplement to December
31, 2014 Triennial Market Power
Analysis of the ECP MBR Sellers.
Filed Date: 5/19/15.
Accession Number: 20150519–5180.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/9/15.
Docket Numbers: ER14–1464–002.
Applicants: Duke Energy Carolinas,
LLC.
Description: Tariff Amendment per
35.17(b): Amendment to EUEMC NITSA
SA No. 366 to be effective 5/1/2015.
Filed Date: 5/19/15.
Accession Number: 20150519–5168.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/9/15.
Docket Numbers: ER15–1185–001.
Applicants: Midcontinent
Independent System Operator, Inc.
Description: Compliance filing per 35:
2015–05–20_SA 766 ATC–WPSC Bill of
Sale Compliance to be effective N/A.
Filed Date: 5/20/15.
Accession Number: 20150520–5057.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/10/15.
Docket Numbers: ER15–1188–001.
Applicants: Midcontinent
Independent System Operator, Inc.
Description: Compliance filing per 35:
2015–05–20_SA 2756 ATC–WPSC CFA
Compliance to be effective N/A.
Filed Date: 5/20/15.
Accession Number: 20150520–5056.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/10/15.
Docket Numbers: ER15–1538–000.
Applicants: Safe Harbor Water Power
Corporation.
Description: Amendment to April 20,
2015 Safe Harbor Water Power
Corporation tariff filing to be effective 4/
21/2015.
Filed Date: 5/19/15.
Accession Number: 20150519–5185.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/9/15.
Docket Numbers: ER15–1750–000.
Applicants: Southwest Power Pool,
Inc.
Description: § 205(d) rate filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii): 3026 Steele Flats GIA;
Cancellation of 2893SO to be effective
4/23/2015.
Filed Date: 5/20/15.

PO 00000

Frm 00028

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 9990

30233

Accession Number: 20150520–5044.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/10/15.
Docket Numbers: ER15–1751–000.
Applicants: Southwest Power Pool,
Inc.
Description: § 205(d) rate filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii): 2573R1 Buckeye Wind
Energy LLC GIA to be effective 4/29/
2015.
Filed Date: 5/20/15.
Accession Number: 20150520–5051.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/10/15.
Docket Numbers: ER15–1752–000.
Applicants: Southwest Power Pool,
Inc.
Description: § 205(d) rate filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii): 1166R24 Oklahoma
Municipal Power Authority NITSA and
NOA to be effective 6/1/2015.
Filed Date: 5/20/15.
Accession Number: 20150520–5093.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/10/15.
Docket Numbers: ER15–1753–000.
Applicants: Southwest Power Pool,
Inc.
Description: § 205(d) rate filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii): 1313R9 Oklahoma Gas
and Electric Company NITSA and NOA
to be effective 6/1/2015.
Filed Date: 5/20/15.
Accession Number: 20150520–5095.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/10/15.
Docket Numbers: ER15–1754–000.
Applicants: Alpaca Energy LLC.
Description: Initial rate filing per
35.12 FERC Electric MBR Tariff
Application to be effective 7/17/2015.
Filed Date: 5/20/15.
Accession Number: 20150520–5100.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/10/15.
The filings are accessible in the
Commission’s eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the
docket number.
Any person desiring to intervene or
protest in any of the above proceedings
must file in accordance with Rules 211
and 214 of the Commission’s
Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern
time on the specified comment date.
Protests may be considered, but
intervention is necessary to become a
party to the proceeding.
eFiling is encouraged. More detailed
information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests,
service, and qualifying facilities filings
can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/
docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For
other information, call (866) 208–3676
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659.
Dated: May 20, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–12696 Filed 5–26–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM

27MYN1