Participant Evaluation

Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council, Examiner Education Rev. 11/16

Participant Evaluation

FFIEC Course Name

Month, Date, Year

3501 Fairfax Drive  Room B3030  Arlington, VA 22226-3550  (703) 516-5588  FAX (703) 516-5487  http://www.ffiec.gov

Agency _______ Name (optional)

Examination Experience: years Specialty Examination Experience: __________ years

Please describe your learning objectives, expectations, and/or purpose for attending this conference.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Please use the scale below to rate the content of the conference and the delivery of the instructor.

Excellent Above average Average Below average Poor

1 2 3 4 5

Content Delivery

Topic Name

Presenter/Instructor Name ______ ______

Comments:

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

(Additional topics and names will be added based on the course.)

Overall Course Rating (Please use scale above) ______

Comments:

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Please answer the questions below and provide additional information to support your rating.

How relevant was the conference content to your learning objectives, expectations, and/or purpose?

Very relevant Not Relevant

Circle one: 1 2 3 4 5

Comments:

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

To what extent was your knowledge and/or understanding enhanced as a result of attending this conference?

A lot Not at all

Circle one: 1 2 3 4 5

Highlight topics or key elements that enhanced your knowledge:

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

How likely are you to recommend this conference to others?

Very Likely Not Likely

Circle one: 1 2 3 4 5

Comments:

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The following is a list of questions that may be used to supplement the evaluation ratings requested above.

Please answer the questions below.

• What additional topics or speakers would you suggest/recommend for future sessions?

• Which topics were especially informative and useful to enhancing your knowledge and job performance?

• Which modules/topics were the MOST beneficial? Why?

• Which topics were the LEAST beneficial? Why?

• What suggestions do you have for enhancing/improving the session?

• What suggestions do you have for making it more relevant to your job responsibilities?

• Did the pre-course assignment provide adequate preparation to enhance the learning experience? YES or NO

If NO, please provide an explanation.

• Was the pre-course assignment valuable in preparing you for the in-class portion of the session? YES or NO

If NO, please provide an explanation.

• What topics would you recommend for future sessions?

• What suggestions do you have for improving the session, including structure?

• YOU CAN HELP!

Identify areas of needed training or continuing education that is not currently offered at your agency or FFIEC.

Courses accredited for continuing professional education must also solicit the information below from participants. Please indicate your agreement with the following statements.

	Agree	Disagree	Don’t know
1. Stated learning objectives were met.			
2. Stated prerequisite requirements were appropriate and sufficient.			
3. Program materials were relevant and contributed to the achievement of the learning objectives.			
4. Time allotted to the learning activity was appropriate.			
5. Individual instructors were effective.			