60 Day Federal Register Notices

PMANGRUM on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

1658

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 6 / Thursday, January 9, 2014 / Notices

submitting the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
The proposed information collection is
published to obtain comments from the
public and affected agencies. Comments
are encouraged and will be accepted for
‘‘sixty days’’ until March 10, 2014. This
process is conducted in accordance with
5 CFR 1320.10.
If you have comments especially on
the estimated public burden or
associated response time, suggestions,
or need a copy of the proposed
information collection instrument with
instructions or additional information,
please contact Ramona R. Rantala,
Bureau of Justice Statistics, 810 Seventh
Street NW., Washington, DC 20531
(phone: 202–307–6170).
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Your
comments should address one or more
of the following four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of this information
collection:
(1) Type of information collection:
Existing data collection.
(2) Title of the form/collection: Survey
of Sexual Violence.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the
Department of Justice sponsoring the
collection: Form Number: SSV1, SSV2,
SSV3, SSV4, SSV5, SSV6, SSVIA,
SSVIJ; Bureau of Justice Statistics,
Department of Justice.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Primary: State, Local, or Tribal
Government. Other: Federal

VerDate Mar<15>2010

14:08 Jan 08, 2014

Jkt 232001

Government and business (privately
operated correctional institutions, both
for-profit and not-for-profit). The data
will be used to develop estimates for the
incidence and prevalence of sexual
assault within correctional facilities, as
well as characteristics of substantiated
incidents, as required under the Prison
Rape Elimination Act of 2003 (Pub. L.
108–79).
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: It is estimated that 1,340
respondents will complete each
summary form within 60 minutes and
each substantiated incident form (as
needed, we estimate about 1,000 forms
will be completed) in 15 minutes.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: There are an estimated 1,590
total annual burden hours associated
with this collection.
If additional information is required
contact: Jerri Murray, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Justice Management
Division, Planning Staff, Two
Constitution Avenue, 145 N Street NE.,
Room 3W–1407B, Washington, DC
20530.
Dated: January 3, 2014.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA,
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2014–00117 Filed 1–8–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–18–P

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
[Docket No. OSHA–2010–0021]

Grantee Quarterly Progress Report;
Extension of the Office of Management
and Budget’s (OMB) Approval of
Information Collection (Paperwork)
Requirements
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Request for public comments.
AGENCY:

OSHA solicits public
comments concerning its proposal to
extend the Office of Management and
Budget’s (OMB) approval of the
information collection requirements
specified for its Grantee Quarterly
Progress Report.
DATES: Comments must be submitted
(postmarked, sent, or received) by
March 10, 2014.
SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00039

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Electronically: You may
submit comments and attachments
electronically at http://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the
instructions online for submitting
comments.
Facsimile: If your comments,
including attachments, are not longer
than 10 pages you may fax them to the
OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–1648.
Mail, hand delivery, express mail,
messenger, or courier service: When
using this method, you must submit a
copy of your comments and attachments
to the OSHA Docket Office, Docket No.
OSHA–2010–0021, U.S. Department of
Labor, Occupational Safety and Health
Administration, Room N–2625, 200
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20210. Deliveries (hand, express
mail, messenger, and courier service)
are accepted during the Department of
Labor’s and Docket Office’s normal
business hours, 8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m.,
e.t.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the Agency name and the OSHA
docket number for the Information
Collection Request (ICR) (OSHA–2010–
0021). All comments, including any
personal information you provide, are
placed in the public docket without
change, and may be made available
online at http://www.regulations.gov.
For further information on submitting
comments see the ‘‘Public
Participation’’ heading in the section of
this notice titled SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
Docket: To read or download
comments or other material in the
docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov
or the OSHA Docket Office at the
address above. All documents in the
docket (including this Federal Register
notice) are listed in the http://
www.regulations.gov index; however,
some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to
read or download from the Web site. All
submissions, including copyrighted
material, are available for inspection
and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.
To obtain a copy of the ICR, you may
contact Theda Kenney, Directorate of
Standards and Guidance, OSHA, U.S.
Department of Labor, Room N–3609,
200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202)
693–2222.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kimberly A. Mason, OSHA Directorate
of Training and Education, 2020 S.
Arlington Heights Road, Arlington
Heights, IL 60005–4102; telephone:
(847) 759–7700; email:
HarwoodGrants@dol.gov.
ADDRESSES:

E:\FR\FM\09JAN1.SGM

09JAN1

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 6 / Thursday, January 9, 2014 / Notices

PMANGRUM on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background
The Department of Labor, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent (i.e., employer) burden,
conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the public with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and continuing information collection
requirements in accord with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA–95) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This
program ensures that information is in
the desired format, reporting burden
(time and costs) is minimal, collection
instruments are clearly understood, and
OSHA’s estimate of the information
collection burden is accurate. The
Occupational Safety and Health Act of
1970 (the OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651 et
seq.) authorizes information collection
by employers as necessary or
appropriate for enforcement of the OSH
Act or for developing information
regarding the causes and prevention of
occupational injuries, illnesses, and
accidents (29 U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act
also requires that OSHA obtain such
information with minimum burden
upon employers, especially those
operating small businesses, and to
reduce to the maximum extent feasible
unnecessary duplication of efforts in
obtaining information (29 U.S.C. 657).
Section 21 of the OSH Act (29 U.S.C.
670) authorizes OSHA to conduct
directly, or through grants and
contracts, education and training
courses. These courses must ensure an
adequate number of qualified personnel
to fulfill the purposes of the OSH Act,
provide them with short-term training,
inform them of the importance and
proper use of safety and health
equipment, and train employers and
employees to recognize, avoid, and
prevent unsafe and unhealthful working
conditions.
Under Section 21, OSHA awards
training grants to nonprofit
organizations to provide part of the
required training. The Agency requires
organizations that receive these grants to
submit quarterly progress reports that
provide information on their grantfunded training activities; these reports
allow OSHA to monitor the grantee’s
performance and to determine if an
organization is using grant funds as
specified in its grant application.
Accordingly, the Agency compares the
information provided in the quarterly
progress report to the quarterly
milestones proposed by the organization
in the work plan and budget that
accompanied the grant application. This
information includes: Identifier data
(organization name and grant number);

VerDate Mar<15>2010

14:08 Jan 08, 2014

Jkt 232001

the date and location where the training
occurred; the length of training (hours);
the number of employees and employers
attending training sessions provided by
the organization during the quarter; a
description of the training provided; a
narrative account of grant activities
conducted during the quarter; and an
evaluation of progress regarding
planned versus actual work
accomplished. This comparison permits
OSHA to determine if the organization
is meeting the proposed program goals
and objectives, and spending funds in
the manner described in the proposed
budget.
Requiring these reports on a quarterly
basis enables OSHA to identify work
plan, training, and expenditure
discrepancies in a timely fashion so that
it can implement appropriate action. In
addition, this information permits the
Agency to assess an organization’s
ability to meet projected milestones and
expenditures.
II. Special Issues for Comment
OSHA has a particular interest in
comments on the following issues:
• Whether the proposed information
collection requirements are necessary
for the proper performance of the
Agency’s functions, including whether
the information is useful;
• The accuracy of OSHA’s estimate of
the burden (time and costs) of the
information collection requirements,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• The quality, utility, and clarity of
the information collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden on
employers who must comply; for
example, by using automated or other
technological information collection
and transmission techniques.
III. Proposed Actions
OSHA is requesting that OMB extend
its approval of the information
collection requirements specified for the
Grantee Quarterly Progress Report.
OSHA is proposing to increase the
burden hours in its currently approved
information collection request from
4,944 burden hours to 5,096 burden
hours (a total increase of 152 hours).
Although the annual number of grants
managed by the Agency decreased from
a three-year average of 103 to 91, the
estimated number of hours required to
complete the report increased by 2
hours per quarter. The number of hours
required to complete the report was
increased in order to collect, compile,
and maintain evaluation information for
the narrative portion of the report. The
Agency will summarize the comments
submitted in response to this notice and

PO 00000

Frm 00040

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

1659

will include this summary in the
request to OMB.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Title: Grantee Quarterly Progress
Report.
OMB Control Number: 1218–0100.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofits; not-for-profit institutions.
Number of Respondents: 91.
Frequency of Responses: Quarterly.
Average Time per Response: 14 hours
per quarter.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 5,096.
Estimated Cost (Operation and
Maintenance): $0.
IV. Public Participation—Submission of
Comments on This Notice and Internet
Access to Comments and Submissions
You may submit comments in
response to this document as follows:
(1) Electronically at http://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal; (2) by
facsimile (fax); or (3) by hard copy. All
comments, attachments, and other
material must identify the Agency name
and the OSHA docket number for the
ICR (Docket No. OSHA–2010–0021).
You may supplement electronic
submissions by uploading document
files electronically. If you wish to mail
additional materials in reference to an
electronic or facsimile submission, you
must submit them to the OSHA Docket
Office (see the section of this notice
titled ADDRESSES). The additional
materials must clearly identify your
electronic comments by your name,
date, and the docket number so the
Agency can attach them to your
comments.
Because of security procedures, the
use of regular mail may cause a
significant delay in the receipt of
comments. For information about
security procedures concerning the
delivery of materials by hand, express
delivery, messenger, or courier service,
please contact the OSHA Docket Office
at (202) 693–2350, (TTY (877) 889–
5627).
Comments and submissions are
posted without change at http://
www.regulations.gov. Therefore, OSHA
cautions commenters about submitting
personal information such as social
security numbers and date of birth.
Although all submissions are listed in
the http://www.regulations.gov index,
some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to
read or download from this Web site.
All submissions, including copyrighted
material, are available for inspection
and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.
Information on using the http://
www.regulations.gov Web site to submit

E:\FR\FM\09JAN1.SGM

09JAN1

1660

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 6 / Thursday, January 9, 2014 / Notices

comments and access the docket is
available at the Web site’s ‘‘User Tips’’
link. Contact the OSHA Docket Office
for information about materials not
available through the Web site, and for
assistance in using the Internet to locate
docket submissions.
V. Authority and Signature
David Michaels, Ph.D., MPH,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health,
directed the preparation of this notice.
The authority for this notice is the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3506 et seq.) and Secretary of
Labor’s Order No. 1–2012 (72 FR 3912).
Signed at Washington, DC, on January 3,
2014.
David Michaels,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2014–00121 Filed 1–8–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–71233; File No. SR–CBOE–
2013–127]

Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change Relating to Order
Format 1
January 3, 2014.

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on December
24, 2013, Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Incorporated (the ‘‘Exchange’’
or ‘‘CBOE’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.

PMANGRUM on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
CBOE Rule 6.53A (Types of Order
Formats). The text of the proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange’s
Web site (http://www.cboe.com/
AboutCBOE/
1 15
2 17

U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.

VerDate Mar<15>2010

14:08 Jan 08, 2014

Jkt 232001

CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at
the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 6.53A. (Types of Order Formats),
which rule describes the types of order
formats available to Trading Permit
Holders (TPHs) to facilitate order entry.
Specifically the Exchange proposes to
amend where Order Format 1 orders are
processed.
By way of background, order formats
are message types that are used to send
orders into CBOE Command 3 through a
user’s selected API. Currently, all orders
must be submitted to CBOE using the
message type Order Format 1 (‘‘OF1’’).
Orders using the OF1 format must pass
through various processes, including
validation checks in the Order Handling
Service (‘‘OHS’’),4 before execution,
entry into the book, cancellation, or
routing for manual handling. Where an
order is routed for processing by the
OHS depends on various parameters
configured by the Exchange and the
order entry firm itself. Examples of such
parameters are firm-specific volume
restrictions (i.e., orders larger than a
firm-imposed quantity are routed to
booth/order management terminal) or
inbound limit order price reasonability
3 CBOE Command is the trading engine platform
for CBOE, C2, CBSX and CBOE Futures Exchange
(‘‘CFE’’). CBOE Command incorporates both order
handling and trade processing on the same
platform.
4 The Order Handling System (‘‘OHS’’) performs
basic validation checks and has the capability to
route orders to the trade engine for automatic
execution and book entry, to Trading Permit Holder
and PAR Official workstations located in the
trading crowds for manual handling, and/or to other
order management terminals (‘‘OMTs’’) generally
located in booths on the trading floor for manual
handling.

PO 00000

Frm 00041

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

(i.e., orders may be rerouted to booth/
order management terminal for manual
review if ‘‘too marketable’’). OF1
supports all order types, including
auction responses.
The Exchange proposes to change
where OF1 orders are processed.
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to
have orders using the OF1 format pass
through various processes, including the
validation checks in the trade engine, as
opposed to the OHS. The Exchange
notes that OF1 orders will still be
subject to the same validation checks.
The proposed rule change merely
changes where these checks occur.
As before, orders using OF1 can still
be executed in the trade engine, routed
to TPH and PAR Official workstations
located in the trading crowds for
manual handling, and/or routed to other
order management terminals (‘‘OMTs’’)
generally located in booths on the
trading floor for manual handling.
Where an order is routed will still
depend upon various parameters set by
the Exchange and the order entry firms.
For example, if during these checks in
the trade engine an order hits a certain
parameter that requires it to be routed
to a booth/order management terminal
(e.g. a firm-specific volume restriction
which requires orders larger than the
firm-imposed quantity to be routed to
booth/order management terminal), that
order will be routed to the OHS, and the
OHS will then route the order to the
appropriate booth/order management
terminal for manual review and
processing. The Exchange believes that
allowing OF1 orders to pass straight to
the trade engine for validation checks,
as opposed to stopping first in the OHS
for these checks, increases overall
efficiency. The Exchange finally notes
that the proposed new Order Format 1
will operate substantially similar to how
C2 Order Format 1 currently operates on
C2.5
The Exchange will announce the
implementation date of the proposed
rule change in an Information Circular
to be published no later than 90 days
following the effective date of this rule
filing. The implementation date will be
no later than 180 days following the
effective date of this rule filing.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the Act
and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) 6 of the Act. Specifically,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
5 See
6 15

E:\FR\FM\09JAN1.SGM

C2 Rule 6.19(i).
U.S.C. 78f(b).

09JAN1