0570-0066 RBS Repowering Assistance Program (OIRA Comments) Revised 11 13 14

0570-0066 RBS Repowering Assistance Program (OIRA Comments) Revised 11 13 14.docx

Repowering Assistance Program

OMB: 0570-0066

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

February 2014


SUPPORTING STATEMENT

0570-0066

Repowering Assistance Program



A. Justification


1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary.


The Agency implemented the Repowering Assistance Program, Section 9004 of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008. The purpose of this program is to provide financial incentives to biorefineries in existence on the date of the enactment of the 2008 Farm Bill; to replace the use of fossil fuels used to produce heat or power at their facilities by installing new systems that use renewable biomass, or to produce new energy from renewable biomass.


The Agency may make payments under this program to any biorefinery that meets the requirements of the program for a period determined by the Agency. The Agency will determine the amount of payments to be made to a biorefinery under this program with consideration given to:

(1) the quantity of fossil fuel a renewable biomass system is replacing;

(2) the percentage reduction in fossil fuel used by the biorefinery that will result from the installation of the renewable biomass system; and

(3) the cost-effectiveness of the renewable biomass system.


Congress has appropriated mandatory funding for this program in the amount of $12 million for FY 2014, to remain available until expended. In addition, there is authorization to appropriate an additional $10 million for each of fiscal years 2015 and 2016 (discretionary). The maximum payment an applicant may receive will be 25 percent of project costs, up to the maximum amount announced in the Federal Register for the fiscal year. There is no minimum amount of payment that an applicant may receive.



2. Explain how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used.


Information gathered under this collection will be used to determine the eligibility of biorefineries to participate in the program. To be eligible for program payments, an applicant must submit a complete application for consideration of payment. Payments will be made based on ranking of applicants in relation to cost-effectiveness, availability of renewable biomass, and the reduction of fossil fuel usage resulting from the installation of a renewable biomass system. Applicants are required to provide relevant data to allow for technical analysis of their existing facilities to demonstrate significant replacement of fossil fuel by renewable biomass with reasonable costs and maximum efficiencies.


REPORTING REQUIREMENTS – NO FORM NUMBERS


Feasibility Study. The applicant must submit an independent feasibility study by a qualified consultant demonstrating that the renewable biomass system of the biorefinery is feasible, taking into account the economic, technical and environmental aspects of the system. The study must include the following:

  • executive summary, including the resume of the consultant and introduction/project overview (brief general overview of project location, size, etc.).

  • economic feasibility determination, including information regarding project site; availability of trained or trainable labor; and availability of infrastructure and rail and road service to the site.

  • technical feasibility determination, including sufficient information and analysis so that a determination may be made on the technical feasibility of achieving the levels of energy production that are projected in the statements and identification and estimation of project operation and development costs and specify the level of accuracy of these estimates and the assumptions on which these estimates have been based.

  • financial feasibility determination, including reliability of the financial projections and assumptions on which the project is based including all sources of project capital; projected balance sheets and costs associated with project operations; cash flow projections for the life of the project; adequacy of raw materials and supplies; sensitivity analysis, including feedstock and energy costs, product/co-product prices; risks related to the project; and continuity, maintenance and availability of other records and adequacy of management.

  • management feasibility determination.

  • recommendations for implementation.

  • environmental aspects of the system.

  • feedstock availability, including feedstock source management; estimates of feedstock volumes and costs; collection, pre-treatment, transportation, and storage; and impacts on existing manufacturing plants or other facilities that use similar feedstock.

  • feasibility/plans of project to work with producer associations or cooperatives including estimated amount of annual feedstock.

  • document that all and any woody biomass feedstock sourced from National Forest System lands or public lands cannot be used as a higher value wood-based product.

Request for Appeal. This requirement provides a mechanism for applicants to obtain review and additional consideration of Rural Development business programs decisions denying participation in the program or payments under the program.

Clarifying information. After the application is submitted and approved, the Agency shall require information from the eligible biorefinery to make payments.

FY2014 and FY 2015 application requests. Anticipated number of new applications for fiscal year 2014 and 2015.




REPORTING REQUIREMENTS – FORMS APPROVED WITH THIS DOCKET


Applicants will be required to submit the following forms that have been developed for, are available from, USDA’s Rural Development program offices:


Form RD 4288-4, “Repowering Assistance Program – Application”. Applicants are required to submit this form, and any attachments that may be necessary as a result of space limitations of the forms, in order to apply for participation in this Program. This form requires the applicant to provide relevant data to allow for technical analysis of their existing facilities to demonstrate significant replacement of fossil fuel by renewable biomass with reasonable costs and maximum efficiencies. The Agency is requiring this form in order to ensure that only eligible biorefineries participate in this Program.


Form RD 4288-5, “Repowering Assistance Program – Agreement”. This form constitutes the agreement between the Agency and the eligible biorefinery. This form lays out the terms and conditions associated with participation in this Program. This form is required because it provides the basis under which the Agency will make payments to participating biorefineries.


Form RD 4288-6, “Repowering Assistance Program - Payment Request”. This is the form that participating Biorefineries submit when requesting payments. Information to be provided includes the amount of the request and documentation substantiating the expenditures for construction, as well as other requirements that document the amount of energy produced by the renewable biomass system. The information in this form will be used by the Agency to determine if the biorefinery is meeting the fossil fuel reduction and energy production requirements for the biorefinery.


RD Instruction 1940-Q, Exhibit A-1, “Certification for Contracts, Grants and Loans”. This form specifies that an applicant requesting funding in excess of $100,000 agrees to certain restrictions on lobbying.


RD 400-1, “Equal Opportunity Agreement”. Applicants are required to agree that they will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex or national origin.


RD 400-4, “Assurance Agreement” (OMB 0575-0018). All applicants and recipients are required to complete this form to comply with Civil Rights Acts and laws.


RD 1940-20, “Request for Environmental Information” (first page only). This form is required of applicants to assess the potential cumulative impacts of the project as well as any environmental concerns or problems that are associated with the project that can be identified at the earliest planning stages. However, applicants are to substitute the narrative specified in the instructions to this form with the narrative outlined in RD Instruction 1940-G, Exhibit H.


AD-1047, "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters - Primary Covered Transactions" or other written documentation. This form certifies that the applicant is not presently debarred, suspended, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency.


AD-1048, "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion - Lower Tier Covered Transactions" or other written documentation. This form certifies that lower tier participants are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation by any Federal department or agency.



REPORTING REQUIREMENTS - FORMS APPROVED UNDER OTHER OMB NUMBERS


All applicants will be required to submit the following standard application form:


SF-LLL, “Disclosure of Lobbying Activities” (OMB No. 4040-0013). All applicants are required to complete this form, regardless of their involvement in lobbying activities.


SF-271, “Outlay Report and request for Reimbursement for Construction Projects” (OMB No. 4040-0011). This is the standard form used by the grantee to request advances or reimbursements of cash outlays.


RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS


Assistance payment recipients are required to keep records of information that verify compliance with program objectives. During construction, such records are associated with documents that identify the purposes for and the manner in which program funds were expended. These records are normally kept as part of the general business practice; therefore, no burden was attributed to these records.


After construction and when the project is completed, such records are associated with documenting the fossil fuel reduction and energy production requirements associated with the rule.




3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Also describe any consideration of using information technology to reduce burden.


The Agency strongly encourages applicants to submit as much material as possible electronically, which would allow the Agency to retrieve the applications electronically. Further, applicants who receive funding will be encouraged, but not required, to submit any subsequent reports that may be required electronically. However, the Agency will not totally require submission by electronic methods because some applicants may not have the technological expertise for electronic submission or may not have the equipment necessary for high technological information gathering. The Agency will prepare an application guide to help reduce the effort associated with preparing applications, which could be posted on the Agency's Web site along with all forms for the applicant to print off.


4. Describe efforts to identify duplication.


The Agency has developed forms for this program based on the specific needs of the program. The information being collected is not believed to duplicate that collected by any other Agency. However, if similar information is found to be available from another Federal agency, every effort is made to utilize that information as is or in an appropriately modified form for this program.


5. If the collection of information affects small businesses or other small entities, describe the methods used to minimize the burden.


The information collection required places little or nominal burden on small entities beyond that performed in normal business practice. The Agency is using industry-standardized data elements and documents, supplementing them with Government-wide forms that are familiar to many applicants.






6. Describe the consequences to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.


The information collected under this program is the minimum necessary to conform to the requirements of the program regulations established by law. Information is collected when needed and cannot be collected less frequently and still meets the requirements of the program. Failure to collect proper information could result in improper determinations of eligibility and improper payments.


7. Explain any special circumstances that would cause the collection of information to be conducted in a manner:


a. Requiring respondents to report information to the Agency more often than quarterly.


b. Requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it.


c. Requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document.


d. Requiring respondents to retain records for more than 3 years.


e. Not using statistical sampling.


f. Requiring use of statistical data classification that has not be reviewed and approved by Office of Management and Budget (OMB).


g. Requiring a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or which unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use.


h. Requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secrets or other confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information’s confidentiality to the extent permissible by law.


There are no special circumstances. The collection of information is consistent with the guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.6.


8. Comments on Agency’s notice in the Federal Register and efforts to consult with persons outside the Agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of the instructions and recordkeeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported.


As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, a 60-day notice soliciting comments was published on April 2, 2014, [79 FR 18509].


No comments related to the potential burden of implementing the Repowering Assistance program were received. The following individuals were interviewed about the reasonableness of the forms involved and the amount of information being collected. None of the parties had any adverse comments and indicated that they thought the burden was reasonable for the program.


Bret Turner – Silicon Valley Bank - (303) 410-3411

Ben Ivey – BB&T - (910) 815 2710

Julie Nowicki – Comerica Bank - (248) 442-1675


9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees.


No payments or gifts will be provided to respondents.


10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or Agency policy.


Confidentiality is not assured. Requests for release of records and information are processed in accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974.


11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior or attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private.


There is no collection of any information that would be considered sensitive in nature or commonly considered private.


12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information.


As shown in the attached spreadsheet, the burden associated with this collection is expected to be approximately 351 hours per year based on the receipt of 7 applications.


Item

Responses

Burden Hours

Written Reporting Requirements

12

297

Form Reporting Requirements

57

47

Recordkeeping

3

7

Totals

72

351


13. Provide an estimate for the total annual cost burden to the respondents or recordkeepings resulting from the collection of information.


There are no capital/start-up costs or operation/maintenance costs associated with this collection.


14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal Government.


The estimated wage of federal employees compiling the information is $41.00 per hour. Administrative costs include the cost of promulgating the regulations, publication in the Federal Register, and development of forms, etc. The 3-year average annual cost to the Government is estimated to be $16,467. The breakdown of cost to the Government by activity is as follows:


Allocation of Federal Government Costs


Activity

Estimated 3-Year Govt Cost

Acknowledge and review applications

$6,888

Evaluate and score applications

$13,776

Inform applicants of selection results

$1,722

Legal document preparation

$2,296

Review payment requests and issue payments

$9,840

Review of annual report (4288-6)

$287

Monitoring and review of records

$4,592

Administration

$10,000

Total

$49,401



15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments reported in Items 13 or 14 of the OMB Form 83-I.


This was a new program three years ago. Our estimate was higher than actual use. After three years, the Agency now has a more accurate estimation of respondents so there was decrease from 67 to 7 respondents. This decrease in respondents has, therefore, resulted in a decrease of 575 responses and 13,283 burden hours.


16. For collection of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication.


The results of this collection of information will not be published.


17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.


These forms are used in other Rural Development information collections; therefore, it is not practical to include an OMB expiration date because of the different expiration dates for each collection. The public would have no way of knowing which burden package/expiration date applied to their particular program. RD is seeking approval to not display the OMB expiration date on these forms.


18. Explain each exception to the certification statement in identified in item 19 of OMB 83-I.


There are no exceptions to the certification. The Agency is able to certify compliance with all provisions under item 19.





19. How is this information collection related to the Service Center Initiative (SCI)? Will the information collection be part of the one stop shopping concept?


The SCI calls for changes to improve services to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) customers. One aspect is providing one stop service for greater customer convenience in accessing USDA programs, including access to required forms.


10

File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
File TitleSupporting Statement
Authorkrmeardon
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-27

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy