78fr69128

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

69128

Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 222 / Monday, November 18, 2013 / Notices

the original agency preferred alternative,
such as continued pursuit of a visitor
center partnership in the Miami area,
except that instead of including a
marine reserve zone, the alternatives
include a new concept referred to as a
special recreation zone. In developing
the two new alternatives, the NPS and
partner agencies are pursuing a new and
novel approach to managing special
marine ecosystems in a way that seeks
to accomplish the same goals as a
marine reserve while accommodating
recreational fishing and providing a
more enjoyable and diverse visitor
experience. The two alternatives are
described in detail in chapter 2 of the
Supplemental Draft EIS. Chapter 4
describes the key impacts of
implementing each of the two
alternatives.
In alternative 6 (the new agency
preferred alternative), the special
recreation zone would include the
following activities and limitations:
Fishing would be allowed year-round,
with a special permit required for access
to fish recreationally. There would be
some zone-specific fishing restrictions
(e.g., no grouper or lobster take, no
spearfishing), but in general all other
state fishing regulations would apply.
There would be no commercial fishing
allowed in the special recreation zone,
with exception of the existing ballyhoo
lampara net fishery. Anchoring within
the zone would be prohibited; however
additional mooring buoys would be
added over time as needed to disperse
visitor use and improve the safety of
diving operations. Snorkeling and
diving would be encouraged, and
marine debris would be removed
throughout the zone to improve the
overall visitor experience for these
activities. Alternative 7 is similar to
alternative 6 in that it includes a special
recreation zone with many of the same
zone-specific fishing limitations.
Differing from alternative 6, alternative
7 would not require an access permit to
fish in the zone, but the area would be
closed to recreational fishing during the
summer months (June to September).
This period is when the coral reef
ecosystem is most stressed by warm
water conditions and would benefit
greatest from a respite in fishing
pressure.
Adaptive management would be used
in both new alternatives to guide longterm decision-making. Both alternatives
would employ a collaborative research
and monitoring program (10-year
Science Plan) to inform adaptive
management decisions. Under
alternative 6 only, in years three, five,
and eight, the NPS would evaluate effort
and take to determine if the original

VerDate Mar<15>2010

17:33 Nov 15, 2013

Jkt 232001

assumptions are being met. Effort and
take, in this instance, refer to fishing
intensity and total harvest of fish in the
zone by permitted fishermen. If the
assumptions of effort and take are being
exceeded, a multi-agency team would
evaluate whether to reduce the number
of permits to be issued for following
years. For both Alternatives 6 and 7, a
multi-agency team would evaluate the
need for other management actions that
may be warranted to reduce recreational
impacts, through the adaptive
management process. Depending on
site-specific observations and concerns,
such actions might include adjustments
to the number and location of mooring
buoys, changes to public messaging and
law enforcement effort, and increased
effort to remove marine debris. For both
alternatives, a panel of experts would be
convened at years five and ten to
provide recommendations on the
Science Plan, the monitoring results,
and long-term management. After ten
years the NPS would consider
monitoring trends and panel
recommendations, and would consult
with state and federal agencies before
deciding whether to continue adaptively
managing visitor use in the special
recreation zone or implement a marine
reserve zone.
If you wish to comment on the
Supplemental Draft EIS, you may
submit your comments by any one of
several methods. We encourage you to
comment via the internet on the PEPC
Web site at http://
parkplanning.nps.gov/BISC. An
electronic public comment form is
provided on this Web site. You may also
comment via mail to: Biscayne National
Park GMP, National Park Service, M.
Elmer (DSC–P), P.O. Box 25287, Denver,
CO 80225–0287; or by hand delivery to
Park headquarters, located at the
address listed above.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, please be aware your entire
comment—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
The responsible official for this
Supplemental Draft EIS is the Regional
Director, NPS Southeast Region, 100
Alabama Street SW., 1924 Building,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303.

PO 00000

Frm 00089

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Dated: November 8, 2013.
Sherri Fields,
Deputy Regional Director, Southeast Region.
[FR Doc. 2013–27578 Filed 11–15–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–JD–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 332–543]

Trade, Investment, and Industrial
Policies in India: Effects on the U.S.
Economy; Proposed Information
Collection; Comment Request; Trade,
Investment, and Industrial Policies in
India Questionnaire
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: In accordance with the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the
U.S. International Trade Commission
(Commission) hereby gives notice that it
plans to submit a request for approval
of a questionnaire to the Office of
Management and Budget for review and
requests public comment on its draft
collection.
AGENCY:

To ensure consideration, written
comments must be submitted on or
before January 14, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to William Powers, Project Leader, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436 (or
via email at william.powers@usitc.gov).
Additional Information: Copies of the
questionnaire and supporting
investigation documents may be
obtained from project leader William
Powers (william.powers@usitc.gov or
202–708–5405) or deputy project leader
Renee Berry (renee.berry@usitc.gov or
202–205–3498). Supporting documents
may also be downloaded from the
Commission Web site at http://
www.usitc.gov/research_and_analysis/
What_We_Are_Working_On.htm.
Hearing-impaired individuals may
obtain information on this matter by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal at 202–205–1810. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Web site (http://www.usitc.gov). Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
Purpose of Information Collection:
The information requested by the
questionnaire is for use by the
Commission in connection with
Investigation No. 332–543, Trade,
Investment, and Industrial Policies in
DATES:

E:\FR\FM\18NON1.SGM

18NON1

Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 222 / Monday, November 18, 2013 / Notices
India: Effects on the U.S. Economy,
instituted under the authority of section
332(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19
U.S.C. 1332(g)). This investigation was
requested by both the House Committee
on Ways and Means and the Senate
Committee on Finance (the
Committees). The Committees requested
that this investigation include a survey
of U.S. firms in selected industries
affected by Indian trade, investment, or
industrial policies. The Commission
expects to deliver the results of its
investigation to the Committees by
December 15, 2014.

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Summary of Proposal
(1) Number of forms submitted: 1.
(2) Title of form: Trade, Investment,
and Industrial Policies in India
Questionnaire.
(3) Type of request: New.
(4) Frequency of use: Industry
questionnaire, single data gathering,
scheduled for 2014.
(5) Description of respondents:
Companies in industries particularly
affected by Indian trade, investment, or
industrial policies.
(6) Estimated number of respondents:
up to 15,000.
(7) Estimated total number of hours to
complete the questionnaire per
respondent: 12 hours.
(8) Information obtained from the
questionnaire that qualifies as
confidential business information will
be so treated by the Commission and not
disclosed in a manner that would reveal
the individual operations of a firm.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The House Committee on Ways and
Means and the Senate Committee on
Finance (the Committees) have directed
the Commission to produce a report that
examines Indian policies that
discriminate against U.S. trade and
investment and estimates the effects
these barriers have on the U.S. economy
and U.S. jobs. The Committees have
requested that the report should (1)
Provide an overview of trends and
policies in India affecting trade and
foreign direct investment; (2) describe
the significant policies currently
maintained by India, the U.S. sectors
most affected by these policies, and
Indian competitiveness in the affected
sectors; (3) present case studies of the
effects of particular measures; (4)
quantify the economic effects of
identified Indian measures on the U.S.
economy; and (5) survey U.S. firms in
selected sectors on their perceptions of
recent changes in Indian policies and
the effect these changes have on U.S.
firms’ strategies towards India. The

VerDate Mar<15>2010

17:33 Nov 15, 2013

Jkt 232001

Commission will base its report on a
review of available data and other
information, including the collection of
primary data through a survey of U.S.
firms in industries particularly affected
by Indian policies.
II. Method of Collection
Respondents will be mailed a letter
directing them to download and fill out
a form-fillable PDF questionnaire. Once
complete, respondents may submit it by
uploading it to a secure webserver,
emailing it to the study team, faxing it,
or mailing a hard copy to the
Commission.
III. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on (1) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary; (2) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
The draft questionnaire and other
supplementary documents may be
downloaded from the USITC Web site at
http://pubapps2.usitc.gov/
comments_332_543/.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they will also become a matter of public
record.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 12, 2013.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013–27468 Filed 11–15–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1103–0098]

Agency Information Collection
Activities; Revision of a Previously
Approved Collection, With Change;
Comments Requested: COPS
Application Package
ACTION:

60-Day notice.

The Department of Justice (DOJ)
Office of Community Oriented Policing
Services (COPS) will be submitting the
following information collection request
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in

PO 00000

Frm 00090

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

69129

accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. The revision of
a previously approved information
collection is published to obtain
comments from the public and affected
agencies.
The purpose of this notice is to allow
for 60 days for public comment until
January 17, 2014. This process is
conducted in accordance with 5 CFR
1320.10.
If you have comments, especially on
the estimated public burden or
associated response time, suggestions,
or need a copy of the proposed
information collection instrument with
instructions or additional information,
please contact Danielle Ouellette,
Department of Justice Office of
Community Oriented Policing Services,
145 N Street NE., Washington, DC
20530.
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Your
comments should address one or more
of the following four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of This Information
Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Revision of a previously approved
collection, with change; comments
requested.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection: COPS
Application Package.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection:
None. U.S. Department of Justice Office
of Community Oriented Policing
Services.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Law enforcement agencies and

E:\FR\FM\18NON1.SGM

18NON1