In accordance
with 5 CFR 1320, the information collection is approved for three
years.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
02/28/2017
36 Months From Approved
03/31/2014
1,335
0
709
85,444
0
61,630
0
0
0
Compliance with Federal Power Act
(FPA) Sections 205 and 206 make the FERC-919 information collection
necessary. Specifically, Section 205 of the FPA requires just and
reasonable rates and charges. Section 206 allows the Commission to
revoke a seller's market-based rate authorization if it determines
that the seller may have gained market power since its original
authorization to charge market-based rates. The information
collection requirements for FERC-919 are contained within the
following categories: • Initial market power analyses to qualify
for authority to charge market-based rates; • Triennial market
power analysis in Category 2 seller updates ; • Quarterly land
acquisition reports ; • Change in status reports . The Commission
will use information collected under FERC-919 to ensure that
market-based rates charged by public utilities are just and
reasonable, as Congress has mandated it to do. 18 CFR 35 contains
the regulations necessary to require sellers to submit market power
analyses and related reports. Because public utilities are natural
monopolies, the market power analyses FERC requires must address
both horizontal and vertical market power. To demonstrate lack of
horizontal market power, the Commission requires two screens: a
pivotal supplier power analysis, based on the annual peak demand of
the relevant market, and a market share analysis applied on a
seasonal basis. Together, these screens examine a seller's ability
to exercise horizontal market power. A seller that fails either
screen may submit a delivered price test analysis to rebut the
presumption of horizontal market power. If a seller fails to rebut
the presumption of horizontal market power, the Commission sets the
just and reasonable rate at the default cost-based rate unless it
approves different mitigation based on case-specific circumstances.
For a seller already charging market-based rates, rates are not
revoked and cost-based rates are not imposed until the Commission
issues an order making a definitive finding that the seller has
market power or, where the seller accepts a presumption of market
power, an order is issued addressing whether default cost-based
rates or case-specific cost-based rates are to be applied. Once an
order is issued, the Commission revokes the market-based rate
authority in all geographic markets where a seller is found to have
market power.
The estimates for number of
responses are based on records the Commission maintains about the
number of market-based rate filings received at the Commission. The
Commission estimates that there is approximately one response
(filing) per respondent (filer) for entities filing initial
applications, changes in status, and triennial filings. These
numbers are based on an average number of initial applications and
change in status filings received per year from September 1, 2011
to August 31, 2013. The estimated number of triennial filings was
based on the average number of triennial filings received over the
course of three years from June 2010 to June 2013. Quarterly land
acquisition reports are often jointly filed with multiple filers
per land acquisition report. Due to the large number of filers per
land acquisition report, the Commission counted the number of land
acquisition filers over four quarters from July 2012 to June 2013.
Over those four quarters, 802 filers made land acquisition reports.
Approximately, 373 of those filers filed more than one land
acquisition report over the course of a year. In addition to
updates regarding estimates, the December 2013 Notice for the
FERC-919 revised the description of one of the requirements from
"Appendix B addition to change in status reports" to "change in
status reports" to clarify that the 237 estimated annual number of
filings accounts for all types of change in status filings rather
than only "Appendix B addition of change in status filings". The
modification of the description explains the increase in estimated
respondents from 58 in the July 2010 Notice for the FERC-919 to 237
in the October 2013 Notice for the FERC-919, which estimated all
change in status reports rather than just change in status filings
that add an asset appendix as directed in Appendix B to Order No.
697. The October 2013 Notice mistakenly described "change in status
filings" as just change in status filings that add an asset
appendix, which is only a subset of all change in status filings
that the Commission receives. The Commission has not changed the
average burden hours estimates for any of the requirements used in
the July 2010 FERC-919 renewal because none of the requirements
have changed since 2010. In addition, no comments were submitted in
the October 2013 Notice to challenge any of the burden estimates.
The Commission's records show that the amount of filings per year
has increased for all categories of filings since 2010.
Fluctuations in the amounts of filings received may be attributed
to an increase in the total number of entities with market-based
rate authorization since three years ago. In addition, the
Commission's records of filings have become easier to search and
collect information on under the electronic filing system in effect
since April 1, 2010 that was mentioned in Question #3. This
electronic filing system has contributed to making the Commission
estimates more accurate, which may account for some of the
variation in estimates. The Commission estimates the total number
of filings expected under the FERC-919 to continue to increase
because more entities are seeking market-based rate authority each
year over the previous year.
$2,918,610
No
No
No
No
No
Uncollected
Norma McOmber 202
502-8022
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.