The 2010 rule amended FAA regulations
pertaining to certification and operation of transport category
airplanes to preclude widespread fatigue damage in those airplanes.
For existing airplanes with a maximum gross takeoff weight greater
than 75,000 pounds, the rule required design approval holders to
establish limits of validity (LOV) of the engineering data that
supports the maintenance program. For new airplanes, the rule
required all applicants for type certificates of transport category
airplanes to establish an LOV and demonstrate that the airplane
will be free from WFD up to the LOV. The rule required that
operators of affected airplanes incorporate the LOV into the
maintenance program for that airplane. Operators may not fly an
airplane beyond its LOV, although this rule provided means for
extending that limit.
US Code:
49
USC 40101 Name of Law: Policy
US Code: 49
USC 44701 Name of Law: General Requirements
The FAA adjusted the hourly
burden and costs to reflect that all affected design approval
holders have complied with the requirement to establish compliance
plans and sent them to the FAA for approval by April 14, 2011.
Section 26.21 does not require a compliance plan to be submitted to
the FAA for approval after that date.
$18,210
No
No
No
No
No
Uncollected
Walter Sippel 425 227-2774
walter.sippel@faa.gov
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.