Attach_2_60day_FRN

18986

Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 60 / Thursday, March 28, 2013 / Notices

Survey items collect information
about emotional, physical, and sexual
peer and dating violence victimization
and perpetration, use of healthy
relationship skills, relationships
characteristics, peer relationships,
demographics, use of other teen dating
violence prevention services, social
desirability, and attitudes toward dating
violence. These measures were
developed in collaboration with
scientists at the Centers for Disease

Control and Prevention and (1) are
adapted from validated measures of teen
dating violence, and (2) reflect the
behaviors of interest and theory of
change of Expect Respect. The Reactive
Proactive Questionnaire (Raine et al.,
2006) has also been included in the
instrument packet and will be used to
determine if subtype of aggression
moderates response to intervention.
Participation in this study is
voluntary and intrusions to the

No. of
respondents

No. of
responses per
respondent

Response
burden
(in hours)

Intake assessment .....................................

400

1

15/60

100

Baseline Survey .........................................
Completion Survey .....................................
Follow-up Survey 1 (12 month) ..................
Intake assessment .....................................

300
200
200
400

1
1
1
1

1
1
1
15/60

300
200
200
100

Baseline Survey .........................................
Completion Survey .....................................
Follow-up Survey 1 (12 month) ..................
ERSG Facilitator Program Implementation
Fidelity Measure.
ERSG Observational Program Implementation Fidelity Measure.
Mid-Year Qualitative Interview with ERSG
Facilitators.
End of Year Qualitative Interview with
ERSG Facilitators.

300
200
200
8

1
1
1
2

1
1
1
15/60

300
200
200
4

1

16

15/60

4

8

1

45/60

6

8

1

1

8

.....................................................................

....................

........................

................

1622

Type of
respondent
Control Schools (School
rounding Austin.

Form name
districts

sur-

Independent School District) ......................
Intervention Schools (Austin Independent
School District).

ERSG Facilitator .........................................
ERSG Facilitator Supervisor .......................
ERSG Facilitator .........................................
ERSG Facilitator .........................................
Total .....................................................

Dated: March 21, 2013.
Ron A. Otten,
Director, Office of Scientific Integrity, Office
of the Associate Director for Science, Office
of the Director, Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2013–07232 Filed 3–27–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[60Day-13–0733]

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Proposed Data Collections Submitted
for Public Comment and
Recommendations
In compliance with the requirement
of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for
opportunity for public comment on
proposed data collection projects, the
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic
summaries of proposed projects. To
request more information on the
proposed projects or to obtain a copy of
the data collection plans and

VerDate Mar<15>2010

20:20 Mar 27, 2013

Jkt 229001

participants’ sense of privacy will be
minimized by only using data collected
from students who have agreed for us to
do so (through student assent and
signed distribution of passive parental
consent forms) and having the data
coded in such a way to protect subjects’
confidentiality.
There are no costs to respondents
other than their time.

instruments, call 404–639–7570 or send
comments to Ron Otten, at 1600 Clifton
Road, MS–D74, Atlanta, GA 30333 or
send an email to omb@cdc.gov.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology. Written comments should
be received within 60 days of this
notice.
Proposed Project
CDC Early Hearing Detection and
Intervention Hearing Screening and
Follow-up Survey (OMB No. 0920–
0733, Expiration 06/30/2013)—
Reinstatement with Change—National
Center on Birth Defects and
Developmental Disabilities (NCBDDD),

PO 00000

Frm 00033

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Total
burden
hours

Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
The National Center on Birth Defects
and Developmental Disabilities at CDC
promotes the health of babies, children,
and adults with disabilities. As part of
these efforts the Center is actively
involved in addressing hearing loss (HL)
among newborns and infants. HL is a
common birth defect that affects
approximately 12,000 infants each year
and, when left undetected, can result in
developmental delays. As awareness
about infant HL increases, so does the
demand for accurate information about
rates of screening, referral, loss to
follow-up, and prevalence. This
information is important for helping to
ensure infants and children are
receiving recommended screening and
follow-up services, documenting the
occurrence of differing degrees of HL
among infants, and assessing progress
towards national goals. These data will
also assist state Early Hearing Detection
and Intervention (EHDI) programs with
quality improvement activities and
provide information that will be helpful
in assessing the impact of federal
initiatives. The public will be able to

E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM

28MRN1

18987

Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 60 / Thursday, March 28, 2013 / Notices
access this information via the CDC
EHDI Web site (www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/
hearingloss/ehdi-data.html).
Given the lack of a standardized and
readily accessible source of data, the
CDC EHDI program developed a survey
to be used annually that utilizes
uniform definitions to collect aggregate,
standardized EHDI data from states and
territories. The request to complete this
survey is planned to be disseminated to
respondents via an email, which will
include a summary of the request and
other relevant information. Minor
changes to this survey, based on
respondent feedback, are planned in
order to make the survey easier to
complete and further improve data
quality. These changes include splitting
the previously combined question about
the number of infants that were nonresidents or moved out jurisdiction into
two separate questions and adding new
questions. These include questions
about how many infants were in a
neonatal intensive care unit for more
than 5 days, transferred without any
documentation of a hearing screening,

experience with the survey since the
original Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) approval.
It is expected that 55 of the 59
potential respondents will complete the
survey and therefore incur an additional
burden of up to 4 hours per respondent.
However, based on feedback from
consulted experts about the length of
time required to complete the original
information collection it is anticipated
that it will only take some respondents
a few minutes to complete the revised
data request. This is because
jurisdictions often have already
gathered and compiled the requested
data for their own internal uses.
Nevertheless, the more conservative
time estimate of 4 hours per response
from each of the 55 anticipated
participants is shown in the table below.
The estimated annualized burden is 230
hours. This estimate is identical to the
time estimate for the reinstated OMB
approved estimate from 2010; the only
change is the estimated number of
respondents. There are no costs to the
respondents other than their time.

unable to be screened or receive
diagnostic testing due to a medical
reason, number of cases where a
primary care physician did not refer an
infant for diagnostic testing, and cases
of permanent hearing loss among nonresident infants. The table for reporting
type and severity of hearing loss data
has also been updated so this data can
be reported using either the
classification system from the American
Speech and Hearing Association or the
current system from the Directors of
Speech and Language Programs in State
Health and Welfare Agencies.
A total of 59 respondents will be
asked to complete the updated data
request each year during the 3-year
requested data collection approval
timeframe. Based on findings from the
previous information collection, it is
estimated that the burden for
individuals to read through the survey
and decide whether or not to complete
it is 10 minutes per person. The 10
minute calculation was based on
feedback received in pre-tests with 5
individuals and confirmed by the

ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Total burden
(in hours)

Form name

State and territory EHDI Program Coordinators.
EHDI Program State Program Coordinators.
TOTAL ..............................................

Survey Directions .......................

59

1

10/60

10

Survey ........................................

55

1

4

220

....................................................

........................

........................

........................

230

Dated: March 21, 2013.
Ron A. Otten,
Director, Office of Scientific Integrity, Office
of the Associate Director for Science, Office
of the Director, Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2013–07230 Filed 3–27–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
Statement of Organization, Functions,
and Delegations of Authority
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Average
burden
per response
(in hours)

No. of
responses per
respondent

No. of
respondents

Respondents

Part C (Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention) of the Statement of
Organization, Functions, and
Delegations of Authority of the
Department of Health and Human
Services (45 FR 67772–76, dated
October 14, 1980, and corrected at 45 FR
69296, October 20, 1980, as amended

VerDate Mar<15>2010

20:20 Mar 27, 2013

Jkt 229001

most recently at 78 FR 5812, dated
January 28, 2013) is amended to reflect
the reorganization of the Office of the
Associate Director for Science, Office of
the Director, Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention.
Section C–B, Organization and
Functions, is hereby amended as
follows:
Revise the functional statement for
the Office of Science Quality (CASH), as
follows:
After item (11), insert the following:
(12) Plans, develops, coordinates, and
manages policies and/or activities that
assure CDC intellectual property
transfer, scientific training and technical
assistance, critical external laboratory
partnerships and the provision of
essential laboratory services; (13)
transfers and translates research
findings, technologies, and information
from CDC’s laboratory and science in
practice recommendations; and (14)
manages CDC’s intellectual property
(e.g., patents, trademarks, copyrights)

PO 00000

Frm 00034

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 9990

and promotes the transfer of new
technology from CDC research to the
private sector to facilitate and enhance
the development of diagnostic products,
vaccines, and products to improve
occupational safety
Dated: March 7, 2013.
Sherri A. Berger,
Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2013–07102 Filed 3–27–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–18–M

E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM

28MRN1