Questions for students/post-docs on RCR program
What is the message from the top (Chancellor; Provost; President)?
What is the evidence of this message (e.g., signed memos sent campus-wide; direction to faculty to participate; message to students, etc.)
How do faculty and students respond to the tone from the top? [worthwhile or nuisance?]
Why did you take the RCR course? [would you take it if not required?]
What do you think of the format and content [on-line vs face-to-face, didactic seminar/lecture vs discussion of case studies]?
What subject matter, if any, was missing from the RCR training? What topics should be covered in more depth?
What were the benefits and drawbacks of taking the RCR course?
What would happen if you didn’t take the course?
What does your advisor think of the RCR training?
Would you recommend this course to all students/post-docs? What about faculty?
Does everyone take the same course or is it based on your perceived needs?
What is working for/against the program?
| File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
| Author | amanka |
| File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
| File Created | 2021-01-29 |