State and Local Governments

The Evaluation of Demonstrations of NSLP/SBP Direct Certification of Children Receiving Medicaid Benefits

Appendix D.3 (5-6-13)

State and Local Governments

OMB: 0584-0586

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

Appendix D.3: State Cost Survey Letter 2nd-4th Quarters (Child Nutrition Agency Version)

Anne R. Gordon

Senior Researcher


OMB #: 0584-xxxx

Expiration Date: xx/xx/20xx

NSLP DC-M-14

October 5, 2012

Dear State Child Nutrition Director:

As part of the evaluation of the Demonstrations of Direct Certification of Children Receiving Medicaid (DC-M) conducted by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food and Nutrition Service, Mathematica Policy Research will collect data on the costs of implementing DC-M at both the State and local levels. Your responses will help us determine the types of costs associated with the demonstration at the State agency level. Ultimately, we will look at your cost changes in conjunction with cost changes at the local level to assess whether there are savings in administrative costs from the demonstration, and the extent of those savings. Your responses will also help us understand the various types of activities your agency performs when conducting DC-M.

Attached is this quarter’s form to report costs to your agency of implementing DC-M from [month] to [month], 2012. We hope that you or your designee will be able to complete the form, but we recognize that the information might have to come from several sources. The form is provided as an Excel workbook with six spreadsheet tabs, plus a seventh optional tab. The tabs include the following:

  1. Activity descriptions. These show detailed descriptions of the activities to be considered/included when completing the Time Log (provided for clarification purposes). Note that we have provided a separate line for activities related to the evaluation.

  1. Time Log. Record time spent specifically on DC-M activities by relevant staff.

  2. Salary information. Provide information on pay and fringe benefits for each employee listed in the Time Log.

  3. Other direct costs. List other direct costs related to DC-M by type and amount for the quarter.

  4. Indirect costs. Provide information on how indirect costs are defined and assessed.

  5. Contact information. Provide contact information to enable us to reach the respondent(s) for a brief follow-up interview, in which we will go over the form and ask about how DC-M activities and associated costs are likely to change over time.

7. Time Log—optional weekly version. Record time spent specifically on DC-M activities by relevant staff on a weekly basis.

We are sending a similar form to our contact at the [State Medicaid Agency] to track information on costs incurred by that agency’s staff for DC-M. Therefore, please do not include information on costs to the [State Medicaid Agency] on this form. However, please do include any DC-M implementation costs for tasks not completed by Child Nutrition Program-funded staff, but by other staff within your agency (such as information technology staff).

Throughout the form, we would like you to include only time or costs incurred to implement DC-M that are in addition to time or costs already associated with other forms of direct certification for the National School Lunch Program/School Breakfast Program (that is, direct certification through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, or the Food Distribution Program on Indian Reservations). Please note that some of the activities listed in the drop-down menu in the third column of the Time Log tab, and described in the Activity Definitions tab, might not be relevant to your State. Likewise, you may conduct activities that are not listed in the drop-down menu of the Time Log tab. If so, you can select “Other activities” from the drop-down menu and describe the additional activities in the “Notes” column (Column G). We will provide a similar form for each quarter of the demonstration, but we recognize that many direct certification activities are concentrated in the first quarter of the school year.

We request that you complete and return the form for the quarter that includes October, November, and December 2012 (the second quarter form) by January 31, 2013. We understand that tracking costs requires the investment of your time and greatly appreciate your participation. Costs at the State level are an important offset to costs or savings at the local school district level in assessing the overall cost-effectiveness of the DC-M approach. Although we have tried to make these forms both flexible and straightforward, we will appreciate any suggestions for improvements. We will contact you to set up a brief follow-up interview around mid-November. You may also direct questions you might have when working with the form to Joshua Leftin or me using the contact information provided below.

The next page provides more detailed instructions for each tab. Thank you for your time and assistance.

Sincerely,

Anne R. Gordon, Ph.D.

Cost Study Task Leader

agordon@mathematica-mpr.com

609-275-2318

Joshua Leftin

Research Analyst

jleftin@mathematica-mpr.com

202-250-3531


According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0584-XXXX. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 3 minutes per response.

D.1 An Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer

File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
AuthorDPatterson
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-29

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy