60D Fed. reg. Notice

11857

Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 34 / Wednesday, February 20, 2013 / Notices
Burden statement: The Commission
estimates the burden of this collection
of information as follows:

ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN HOURS AND BURDEN HOUR COSTS
17 CFR

Annual
number of
respondents

Part 32, Appendix A, Form
TO.

Frequency of
response per
respondent

100

(Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
Dated: February 13, 2013.
Melissa D. Jurgens,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013–03792 Filed 2–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Docket ID DoD–2013–OS–0028]

Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
ACTION:

Notice.

srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

The Department of Defense has
submitted to OMB for clearance, the
5 The Commission estimates that entities will
spend $100 per hour. The $100 per hour estimate
was used as the average hourly wage rate in the
PRA section of the Internal Business Conduct
Standards for Swap Dealers and Major Swap
Participants final rule (see Duties Rules; Futures
Commission Merchant and Introducing Broker
Conflicts of Interest Rules; and Chief Compliance
Officer Rules for Swap Dealers, Major Swap
Participants, and Futures Commission Merchants,
77 FR 20128, 20194 (Apr. 3, 2012)) and the wage
rate for CCOs under the DCO final rules (see
Proposed Collection, Comment Request: Further
Definition of ‘‘Swap,’’ ‘‘Security-Based Swap,’’ and
‘‘Security-Based Swap Agreement’’’; Mixed Swaps;
Security-Based Swap Agreement Recordkeeping:
Book-out Agreement Confirmation, 76 FR 69344,
69428 (Aug. 16, 2012)). As the Commission
explained in the Internal Business Conduct
Standards final rule, the estimate of $100 per hour
was based on recent Bureau of Labor Statistics
findings, including the mean hourly wage of an
employee under occupation code 23–1011,
‘‘Lawyers,’’ that is employed by the ‘‘Securities and
Commodity Contracts Intermediation and Brokerage
Industry,’’ which is $85.20. The mean hourly wage
of an employee under occupation code 11–3031,
‘‘Financial Manager,’’ in the same industry is
$80.90. Additionally, SIFMA’s ‘‘Report on
Management & Professional Earnings in the
Securities Industry—2011’’ estimates the average
wage of a compliance attorney at $96.42 and a
compliance specialist in the U.S. at $74.85 per
hour. As in those rules, the Commission is using a
$100 per hour wage rate in calculating the cost
burdens imposed by this collection of information
and requests comment on the accuracy of its
estimate.

VerDate Mar<15>2010

16:13 Feb 19, 2013

Jkt 229001

Annually ......

Hours per
response
and cost

Total annual
responses

2 hours at $200 per response 5.

100 (one form per otherwise unreported trade
option participant).

following proposal for collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35).
DATES: Consideration will be given to all
comments received by March 22, 2013.
Title, Associated Form and OMB
Number: Federal Agency Retail
Pharmacy Program; OMB Control
Number 0720–0032.
Type of Request: Extension.
Number of Respondents: 250.
Responses per Respondent: 8.
Annual Responses: 2000.
Average Burden per Response: 8
hours.
Annual Burden Hours: 16,000.
Needs and Uses: The Department of
Defense (DoD) is extending the
information collection requirements
under current OMB control number
0720–0032. Specifically, under the
collection of information, respondents
(drug manufacturers) will base refund
calculation reporting requirements on
both the Federal Ceiling Price and the
Federal Supply Schedule Price,
whichever is lower. Previously, drug
manufacturers’ reporting requirements
addressed only the Federal Ceiling
Price. DoD will use the reporting and
audit capabilities of the Pharmacy Data
Transaction Service (PDTS) to validate
refunds owed to the Government. The
government received approximately
$1.5 billion from pharmaceutical
companies as a result of this program/
refund calculation reporting
requirements.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit.
Frequency: On occasion.
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
OMB Desk Officer: Mr. John Kraemer.
Written comments and
recommendations on the proposed
information collection should be sent to
Mr. Kraemer at the Office of
Management and Budget, Desk Officer
for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.
You may also submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by the following method:

PO 00000

Frm 00044

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Total hours
cost
$20,000 (100 responses
times 2 hours per response, based on
$100/hour).

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name, docket
number and title for this Federal
Register document. The general policy
for comments and other submissions
from members of the public is to make
these submissions available for public
viewing on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia
Toppings.
Written requests for copies of the
information collection proposal should
be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD
Information Management Division, 4800
Mark Center Drive, East Tower, Suite
02G09, Alexandria, VA 22350–3100.
Dated: January 31, 2013.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2013–03825 Filed 2–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[Docket No. ED–2013–ICCD–0015]

Agency Information Collection
Activities; Comment Request; William
D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program
(DL) Regulations
Department of Education (ED),
Federal Student Aid (FSA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. chapter 3501 et seq.), ED is
proposing an extension of an existing
information collection of a previously
approved information collection.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before April 22,
2013.
SUMMARY:

E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM

20FEN1

11858

Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 34 / Wednesday, February 20, 2013 / Notices

Comments submitted in
response to this notice should be
submitted electronically through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://
www.regulations.gov by selecting
Docket ID number ED–2013–ICCD–0015
or via postal mail, commercial delivery,
or hand delivery. Please note that
comments submitted by fax or email
and those submitted after the comment
period will not be accepted. Written
requests for information or comments
submitted by postal mail or delivery
should be addressed to the Director of
the Information Collection Clearance
Division, U.S. Department of Education,
400 Maryland Avenue SW., LBJ, Room
2E117, Washington, DC 20202–4537.

ADDRESSES:

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Electronically mail
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Please do not
send comments here.
The
Department of Education (ED), in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)), provides the general
public and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed,
revised, and continuing collections of
information. This helps the Department
assess the impact of its information
collection requirements and minimize
the public’s reporting burden. It also
helps the public understand the
Department’s information collection
requirements and provide the requested
data in the desired format. ED is
soliciting comments on the proposed
information collection request (ICR) that
is described below. The Department of
Education is especially interested in
public comment addressing the
following issues: (1) Is this collection
necessary to the proper functions of the
Department; (2) will this information be
processed and used in a timely manner;
(3) is the estimate of burden accurate;
(4) how might the Department enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (5) how
might the Department minimize the
burden of this collection on the
respondents, including through the use
of information technology. Please note
that written comments received in
response to this notice will be
considered public records.
Title of Collection: William D. Ford
Federal Direct Loan Program (DL)
Regulations.
OMB Control Number: 1845–0021.
Type of Review: an extension of an
existing information collection of a
previously approved information
collection.

srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

VerDate Mar<15>2010

16:13 Feb 19, 2013

Jkt 229001

Respondents/Affected Public:
Individuals or households; State, Local,
or Tribal Governments; Private Sector.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 6,603,667.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 535,998.
Abstract: The William D. Ford Federal
Direct Loan Program regulations cover
areas of program administration. These
regulations are in place to minimize
administrative burden for program
participants, to determine eligibility for
and provide program benefits to
borrowers, and to prevent fraud and
abuse of program funds to protect the
taxpayers’ interests. This request is for
continued approval of reporting and
recordkeeping related to the
administrative requirements of the
Direct Loan program.
Dated: February 13, 2013.
Kate Mullan,
Acting Director, Information Collection
Clearance Division, Privacy, Information and
Records Management Services, Office of
Management.
[FR Doc. 2013–03789 Filed 2–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards; Arts in
Education Model Development and
Dissemination Program
Office of Innovation and
Improvement, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

Overview Information
Arts in Education Model Development
and Dissemination Program
Notice inviting applications for new
awards for fiscal year (FY) 2013.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
(CFDA) Number: 84.351D.

Applications Available: February
20, 2013.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply:
March 22, 2013.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: April 22, 2013.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: June 20, 2013.

DATES:

Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The Arts in
Education Model Development and
Dissemination (AEMDD) program
supports the enhancement, expansion,
documentation, evaluation, and
dissemination of innovative, cohesive
models that are based on research and
have demonstrated that they

PO 00000

Frm 00045

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

effectively— (1) Integrate standardsbased arts education into the core
elementary and middle school
curriculum; (2) strengthen standardsbased arts instruction in these grades;
and (3) improve students’ academic
performance, including their skills in
creating, performing, and responding to
the arts. Projects funded through the
AEMDD program are intended to
increase the amount of nationally
available information on effective
models for arts education that integrate
the arts with standards-based education
programs.
Priorities: This competition includes
one absolute priority and four
competitive preference priorities that
are explained in the following
paragraphs. Absolute priority 1 is from
the notice of final priority,
requirements, and definitions for this
program, published in the Federal
Register on March 30, 2005 (70 FR
16234). The competitive preference
priorities are from the notice of
supplemental priorities and definitions
for discretionary grant programs,
published in the Federal Register on
December 15, 2010 (75 FR 78486), and
corrected on May 12, 2011 (76 FR
27637) (Supplemental Priorities).
Absolute Priority: For FY 2013 and
any subsequent year in which we make
awards from the list of unfunded
applicants from this competition, this
priority is an absolute priority. Under 34
CFR 75.105(c)(3) we consider only
applications that meet this priority.
This priority is:
This priority supports projects that
enhance, expand, document, evaluate,
and disseminate innovative, cohesive
models that are based on research and
have demonstrated their effectiveness in
(1) integrating standards-based arts
education into the core elementary or
middle school curriculum, (2)
strengthening standards-based arts
instruction in the elementary or middle
school grades, and (3) improving the
academic performance of students in
elementary or middle school grades,
including their skills in creating,
performing, and responding to the arts.
In order to meet this priority, an
applicant must demonstrate that the
model project for which it seeks funding
(1) serves only elementary school or
middle school grades, or both, and (2)
is linked to State and national standards
intended to enable all students to meet
challenging expectations and to improve
student and school performance.
Note: National standards are the arts
standards developed by the Consortium of
National Arts Education Associations or
another comparable set of national arts
standards. The standards developed by the

E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM

20FEN1