60-day FRN

TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

39988

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 130 / Friday, July 6, 2012 / Notices

acres in the northwestern portion of the
Placer Pod. To facilitate construction,
on-going maintenance and emergency
access, a bridge crossing Middle
Boulder Creek and two road segments
would be constructed to connect Hessie
Road (north of Middle Boulder Creek) to
the proposed Placer Express bottom
terminal site. The bridge would be gated
year-round and restricted to
administrative use.
2. Additional Back Side Terrain—
Construct three new traditional trails
(two Intermediate and one Expert ability
level trail), a new gladed area (Bryan
Glades II), and an addition to the Salto
Glades on the back side of the resort.
New terrain in this area would provide
approximately 20 acres of new
traditional terrain and approximately 30
acres of gladed terrain projects.
3. Trail Widening—Widen Lower
Diamondback and Lower Ambush trails
on the back side of Eldora to improve
skier circulation.
4. Jolly Jug Lift and Trails—Install a
new four or six-person chairlift and
construct seven new Intermediate trails
(approximately 55 acres of terrain) and
approximately 20 acres of Intermediate
ability level glades. A Forest Plan
amendment would be required to adjust
the SUP boundary to include
approximately 17 acres of the southern
portion of the Jolly Jug Pod.
5. Snowmaking—Expand
snowmaking coverage to include all
new traditional trails (not in any of the
gladed areas) totaling approximately 105
acres.
6. Roads and Utilities—Build new
road spurs and install utilities to
construct and maintain the following
proposed lifts and facilities: Placer
Express Lift, Jolly Jug Express Lift,
Challenge Lift, The Lookout Facility,
and Challenge Mountain Facility.
Construction and maintenance access
for the proposed Jolly Jug Express
bottom terminal would utilize an
existing road. The existing snowmaking
infrastructure would deliver drinking
water to The Lookout and Challenge
Mountain facilities, as is the current
method for The Lookout Facility. Onsite septic systems would accommodate
sewage deposal for the proposed
Lookout Facility and Challenge
Mountain Facility.
7. Corona Lift—Remove the existing
four-person Corona Lift and replace
with an upgraded six-person chairlift.
8. Challenge and Cannonball Lifts—
Remove the existing Challenge and
Cannonball lifts and replace with a
single, upgraded six-person chairlift in
an alignment that provides direct out-ofbase access to the summit of Challenge
Mountain.

VerDate Mar<15>2010

17:33 Jul 05, 2012

Jkt 226001

9. The Lookout Facility—Remodel the
Lookout facility increasing from 3,000
square feet to between 7,700 and 9,700
square feet.
10. The Challenge Mountain
Facility—Construct a new
approximately 850 seat guest services
facility, between 16,000 and 20,000
square feet in size, at the summit of
Challenge Mountain.
11. Parking—Construct additional
guest parking on private lands. This
project component is not subject to ARP
authorization.
12. Vegetation Management Projects—
Eldora is currently preparing a
Vegetation Management Plan in
accordance with the SUP. Vegetation
management projects may be
incorporated into this EIS as
components of the proposed action or
may be incorporated into a separate,
future NEPA project.
Responsible Official: The responsible
official is the Forest Supervisor for the
Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests
and Pawnee National Grassland.
Nature of Decision To Be Made: Based
on the analysis that will be documented
in the forthcoming EIS, the responsible
official will decide whether or not to
implement, in whole or in part, the
proposed action or another alternative
that may be developed by the Forest
Service as a result of scoping.
Permits or Licenses Required: Based
on proposed projects, a Clean Water Act
Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers may be required
prior to potential implementation of
project components.
Scoping Process: This notice of intent
initiates the scoping process, which
guides the development of the
environmental impact statement. The
Forest Service is soliciting comments
from Federal, State, and local agencies
and other individuals or organizations
that may be interested in or affected by
implementation of the proposed
projects. Public questions and
comments regarding this proposal are an
integral part of this environmental
analysis process. Input provided by
interested and/or affected individuals,
organizations and governmental
agencies will be used to identify
resource issues that will be analyzed in
the Draft EIS. The Forest Service will
identify significant issues raised during
the scoping process, and use them to
formulate alternatives, prescribe
mitigation measures and project design
features, or analyze environmental
effects.
It is important that reviewers provide
their comments at such times and in
such manner that they are useful to the
agency’s preparation of the

PO 00000

Frm 00005

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

environmental impact statement.
Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the
comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer’s concerns and
contentions.
Comments received in response to
this solicitation, including names and
addresses of those who comment, will
be part of the public record for this
proposed action. Comments submitted
anonymously will be accepted and
considered.
Dated: June 27, 2012.
Sylvia Clark,
District Ranger.
[FR Doc. 2012–16300 Filed 7–5–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Risk Management Agency
[Docket No. FCIC–12–0007]

Notice of Request for Approval of a
New Information Collection
Risk Management Agency,
USDA.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:

In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), this notice
announces the intention of the Risk
Management Agency (RMA) to request
approval for a new information
collection for Federal Crop Insurance
Program Delivery Cost Survey and
Interview.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be
received by September 4, 2012 to be
assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: FCIC prefers that comments
be submitted electronically through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. You may
submit comments, identified by Docket
ID No. FCIC–12–0007, by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Stan Harkey, Product
Analysis & Accounting Division, U.S.
Department of Agriculture Risk
Management Agency, Beacon FacilityMail Stop 0811, P.O. Box 419205,
Kansas City, MO 64141–6205, (816)
926–3799.
All comments received, including
those received by mail, will be posted
without change to http://www.
regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided, and can be
accessed by the public. All comments
must include the agency name and
SUMMARY:

E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM

06JYN1

TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 130 / Friday, July 6, 2012 / Notices
docket number or Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) for this rule.
For detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information,
see http://www.regulations.gov. If you
are submitting comments electronically
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
and want to attach a document, we ask
that it be in a text-based format. If you
want to attach a document that is a
scanned Adobe PDF file, it must be
scanned as text and not as an image,
thus allowing FCIC to search and copy
certain portions of your submissions.
For questions regarding attaching a
document that is a scanned Adobe PDF
file, please contact the RMA Web
Content Team at (816) 823–4694 or by
email at rmaweb.content@rma.usda.gov.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received for any dockets by the name of
the individual submitting the comment
(or signing the comment, if submitted
on behalf of an association, business,
labor union, etc.). You may review the
complete User Notice and Privacy
Notice for Regulations.gov at http://
www.regulations.gov/#!privacyNotice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stan
Harkey, Product Analysis & Accounting
Division, U.S. Department of
Agriculture Risk Management Agency,
Beacon Facility-Mail Stop 0811, P.O.
Box 419205, Kansas City, MO 64141–
6205, (816) 926–3799.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Federal Crop Insurance Program
Delivery Cost Survey and Interview.
OMB Number: 0563—NEW.
Expiration Date of Approval: Three
years from approval date.
Type of Request: New information
collection.
Abstract: The Risk Management
Agency (RMA), through the Federal
Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC),
provides crop insurance to American
agricultural producers through
cooperative financial assistance
agreements with private-sector
insurance companies (known as
Approved Insurance Providers, or AIPs)
who sell and service the policies. The
insurance companies who sell and
service FCIC policies are reimbursed for
their administrative and operating
(A&O) expenses directly by RMA on
behalf of the policyholders. The amount
of the A&O expense reimbursement paid
to these companies has been an issue of
legislative interest by Congress, an audit
target for program oversight bodies, and
a primary focus of recent negotiations
between the companies and RMA.
Congress directed the Government
Accountability Office (GAO) to conduct
a review of crop insurance delivery

VerDate Mar<15>2010

17:33 Jul 05, 2012

Jkt 226001

costs, and in April 2009, GAO released
Report GAO–09–445, ‘‘Crop Insurance:
Opportunities Exist to Reduce the Costs
of Administering the Program.’’ Among
GAO’s recommendations was that RMA
conduct a ‘‘study of the costs associated
with selling and servicing crop
insurance policies to establish a
standard method for assessing agencies’
reasonable costs in selling and servicing
policies.’’ RMA agreed with this
recommendation and is therefore
conducting a study to determine the
reasonable and necessary economic
costs of selling and servicing Federal
crop insurance policies. The
information collection efforts (i.e.,
interviews and surveys) that are being
announced herein will be an important
part of the study. Specifically, RMA
plans to conduct interviews with AIPs,
insurance agents and insured farmers,
and surveys to both insurance agents
and insured farmers.
Interviews
The purpose of the interviews with
AIPs and insurance agents is to
understand the activities performed and
types of costs incurred by the AIPs and
insurance agents to deliver Federal crop
insurance. The purpose of the
interviews with insured farmers is to
gain a good understanding of the
interactions between the insurance
agents and insured farmers and the level
of agent services required by farmers to
make an informed insurance choice.
Information obtained from the
interviews with different stakeholders
(AIPs, insurance agents and insured
farmers) will help RMA understand the
expenses AIPs incur in delivering the
Federal crop insurance and such
information will be used to help design
the survey instruments and determine
the type of data that needs to be
collected from the insurance agents and
insured farmers.
Surveys
The purpose of the survey of the
insurance agents is to collect relevant
cost data incurred by the insurance
agents in selling and servicing the
Federal crop insurance policies. In order
to determine the cost incurred by the
insurance agents, information on the
time insurance agents spend on each
task required for selling and servicing
the Federal crop insurance (including
the insurance agents’ out of pocket
expenses for support staff and travel)
will be gathered from the survey.
General background information on the
surveyed insurance agents, e.g.
geographical region, types of crop
insurance sold, and number of crop
insurance policies sold, will also be

PO 00000

Frm 00006

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

39989

collected. A parallel survey of the
insured farmers to whom the sampled
insurance agents sell crop insurance
will be conducted to determine the level
of service (e.g. number of insurance
agent visits, educational services, and
other services) that is necessary for the
farmers to make an informed decision.
Interviews With AIPs
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 2 hours per
response.
Type of Respondents: AIPs.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
15.
Estimated Number of Responses: 15.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 31 hours.
Interviews With Insurance Agents
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 1.5 hours per
response.
Type of Respondents: Insurance
agents.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
60.
Estimated Number of Responses: 15.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 0.25.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 26 hours.
Interviews With Insured Farmers
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 1.5 hours per
response.
Type of Respondents: Insured farmers.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
60.
Estimated Number of Responses: 15.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 0.25.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 26 hours.
Survey of Insurance Agents
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 0.5 hour per
response.
Type of Respondents: Insurance
agents.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
2,627.
Estimated Number of Responses: 788.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 0.3.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 600 hours.
Survey of Insured Farmers
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information

E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM

06JYN1

39990

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 130 / Friday, July 6, 2012 / Notices

is estimated to average 0.5 hour per
response.
Type of Respondents: Insured farmers.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
525.
Estimated Number of Responses: 158.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 0.3.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 120 hours.
Comments are invited on: (1) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments may be sent to Stan Harkey,
Product Analysis & Accounting
Division, U.S. Department of
Agriculture Risk Management Agency,
Beacon Facility-Mail Stop 0811, P.O.
Box 419205, Kansas City, MO 64141–
6205. All comments received will be
available for public inspection during
regular business hours at the same
address.
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for OMB approval. All comments will
become a matter of public record.
Signed in Washington, DC, on June 27,
2012.
William J. Murphy,
Manager, Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2012–16564 Filed 7–5–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–08–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
The Department of Commerce will
submit to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for clearance the
following proposal for collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35).
Agency: National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
Title: Survey of Hawaii Resident
Resource Users’ Knowledge, Attitudes

VerDate Mar<15>2010

17:33 Jul 05, 2012

Jkt 226001

and Perceptions of Coral Reefs in Two
Hawaii Priority Sites.
OMB Control Number: None.
Form Number(s): NA.
Type of Request: Regular submission
(request for a new information
collection).
Number of Respondents: 400.
Average Hours per Response: 20
minutes.
Burden Hours: 133.
Needs and Uses: The United States
(U.S.) Coral Reef Task Force (USCRTF)
was established in 1998 by Executive
Order 13089 to lead and coordinate U.S.
efforts to address the threats facing coral
reefs. The Hawaii Coral Reef Working
Group (CRWG), composed of key state
and federal partners involved in coral
reef management, was established
through a local charter to provide
guidance to the State of Hawaii’s coral
program and to prioritize sites to
implement specific ridge-to-reef
management activities. Priority sites are
areas where coral reef ecosystems of
high biological value are threatened but
have strong potential for improvement
with management intervention. The
current two priority sites in Hawaii are
South Kohala on the Big Island
(Pelekane Bay-Puako-Anaeho‘omalu
Bay, Hawai‘i) and West Maui
(Ka‘anapali-Kahekili, Maui). At both
sites, multiple partners are collaborating
to produce conservation action plans to
conserve resources and human uses.
The Human Dimensions Research
Program at NOAA Fisheries Pacific
Islands Fisheries Science Center is
initiating a survey to support
development of these conservation
action plans, including management
actions in watersheds and in the coral
reef ecosystems in the two priority sites.
The purpose of this survey is to identify
resident users’ knowledge, attitudes,
and perceptions regarding coral reef and
watershed conditions and alternative
management strategies to protect
resources at the two priority sites.
Information from this survey is
needed to inform the conservation
action planning process initiated by the
State of Hawaii Department of Land and
Natural Resources (DLNR), Division of
Aquatic Resources (HDAR) and The
Nature Conservancy (TNC) at the South
Kohala site and to inform conservation
and watershed planning being
implemented by HDAR, The U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, and other partners
at the West Maui site. Managers have
indicated a more immediate need for
information at the South Kohala site;
therefore, we will conduct the survey
there first and the survey at West Maui
afterwards. The information gained from
the survey will provide priority site

PO 00000

Frm 00007

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

managers with essential information
about the population of resident users
who can both threaten reef health and
play a key role in stewardship of reef
resources. Conservation planners will
gain information about the threats and
status of coral reefs from the resident
users who interact most with those
systems, and help managers identify
topics for public outreach and
education. A representative study of
resident users’ knowledge, attitudes,
and perceptions will supplement
broader public input into the
conservation planning processes at the
sites.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households.
Frequency: One time.
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
OMB Desk Officer:
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov.
Copies of the above information
collection proposal can be obtained by
calling or writing Jennifer Jessup,
Departmental Paperwork Clearance
Officer, (202) 482–0336, Department of
Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230 (or via the Internet at
JJessup@doc.gov).
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov.
Dated: July 2, 2012.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012–16530 Filed 7–5–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–905]

Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From
the People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) is conducting the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
polyester staple fiber from the People’s
Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) for the
period of review (‘‘POR’’) June 1, 2010,
through May 31, 2011. As discussed
below, the Department preliminarily
AGENCY:

E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM

06JYN1