In accordance
with 5 CFR 1320, the information collection is approved for one
year with the following terms of clearance: 1) OMB requests the
agency to continue to work with stakeholders on the refinement of
the questionnaire for this collection and 2) OMB requests the
agency to consolidate the RTO/ISO collection with this collection
for the non-RTO/non-ISOs.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
03/31/2014
36 Months From Approved
7
0
0
1,797
0
0
0
0
0
In September 2008, the United States
Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued a report titled
Electricity Restructuring: FERC Could Take Additional Steps to
Analyze Regional Transmission Organizations Benefits and
Performance, GAO-08-987. This report recommended that the Chairman
of the Commission, among other actions, work with regional
transmission organizations (RTO), independent system operators
(ISO), stakeholders and other experts to develop standardized
measures that track the performance of ISO/RTO operations and
markets and report the results to Congress and the public annually,
including (1) an interpretation of what the measures indicate about
the benefits of ISOs and RTOs and (2) where appropriate, changes
that need to be made to address any performance concerns.
Consistent with the goals outlined in GAOs report, the Commissions
Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2009-2014 outlined a multi-year
process for developing and implementing a common set of performance
measures for markets both within and outside of ISOs and RTOs. As
recommended by GAO, Commission Staff worked with representatives
from all of the jurisdictional ISOs and RTOs to develop a set of
performance metrics. Commission Staff and ISO/RTO representatives
met with interested stakeholders to solicit their perspectives and
comments on the proposed performance metrics. Commission Staff then
released the proposed metrics for public comment in Docket No.
AD10-5-000. In October 2010, Commission Staff issued a report
addressing the comments received and recommending a final list of
metrics for ISOs and RTOs. In December 2010, the ISOs and RTOs
submitted information for the 2005-2009 period addressing the final
metrics developed by Commission Staff. This information, along with
a Commission Staff analysis, was included in a report sent to
Congress in April 2011. The ISOs and RTOs subsequently submitted a
report providing data for the 2006-2010 period. Now, Commission
Staff has developed metrics to measure performance in regions
outside of ISOs and RTOs. Consistent with the process used in
developing metrics for ISO/RTO markets, Commission Staff has worked
with the Edison Electric Institute and its members to develop a set
of performance metrics for regions outside of ISOs and RTOs.
Commission Staff, along with the Edison Electric Institute and its
members, met with interested stakeholders to solicit their
perspectives and comments on the proposed performance metrics.
These metrics are based on the metrics previously selected in
Docket No. AD10-5, but have been tailored to fit markets outside of
ISOs and RTOs. As stated in the report to Congress in April 2011,
the long-term purpose of developing and analyzing performance
metrics is to assist the utility industry, stakeholders, and the
Commission in evaluating industry trends and best practices. This
stems from GAOs recommendation to measure market performance in
ISOs and RTOs and to recommend changes to enhance performance.
Commission Staff has already worked to develop metrics to track
performance in ISO and RTO markets. Utilizing metrics for regions
outside of ISOs and RTOs will assist the Commission in evaluating
market performance both within ISOs and RTOs and outside of such
regions, identifying challenges, and developing best practices.
Commission Staff notes that the Commission is not requiring
entities to report on the metrics. On the contrary, like in the ISO
and RTO context, Commission Staff is engaged in a voluntary and
collaborative process with utilities and other stakeholders to
report on the metrics. Staff expects responses from 11 respondents
and plans to collect data bi-annually.
The estimated 1,797 burden
hours annually are due to the time it will require to compile,
review and submit the information requested. This is a new
collection of information and there is no increase or decrease from
a previously approved amount. The burden is necessary in order to
collect the information and to be able to assess the performance of
non-ISOs/RTOs. Please note that the collection is done every two
years and that the total burden and number of responses have been
averaged over the next three years to correspond to the clearance
that FERC is requesting for this collection.
$7,330
No
No
No
No
No
Uncollected
Heidi Werntz 202 502-8910
heidi.werntz@ferc.gov
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
RTO Metrics FERC Staff Report 2010.pdf
Links to Report to Congress and Appendices.docx
updatedSupporting_State12_20_12.doc
Non-RTO/ISO Reporting Requirements